Bug#807969: jessie-pu: package clamav/0.99+dfsg-0+deb8u1
On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 23:59 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2016-02-10 20:08:51 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > - dansguardian [...] > > Built and accepted. > > Thank you. This was the last one. So it looks like we are done here :) Next stop wheezy? :-) Regards, Adam
Bug#807969: jessie-pu: package clamav/0.99+dfsg-0+deb8u1
On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 23:53 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2016-02-03 23:05:27 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > Okay. Uploaded the current package which hits first s-p-u. I hope to be > > > able to test the remaining two packages this weekend. > > > > Thanks. It should end up in NEW, as libclamav7 doesn't exist in stable. > > Once it does, we can ask the ftp-team to have a look. > > So it took a longer than expected to test the remaining two. So from > what I can tell here, python-pyclamav + libc-icap-mod-clamav (libclamav > inerface) seem still to work in s-p-u on i386. Thanks for the update. Regards, Adam
Bug#807969: jessie-pu: package clamav/0.99+dfsg-0+deb8u1
On Sun, 2016-02-07 at 20:54 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2016-02-06 at 16:08 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Sat, 2016-02-06 at 15:42 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > It's now built everywhere so I'll look at the binNMUs soon. [...] > > - dansguardian > > > > dansguardian | 2.10.1.1-5.1| stable | source, amd64, arm64, armel, > > armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x > > dansguardian | 2.10.1.1-5.1| testing| source > > dansguardian | 2.10.1.1-5.1| unstable | source > > dansguardian | 2.10.1.1-5.1+b1 | testing| amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, > > i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x > > dansguardian | 2.10.1.1-5.1+b1 | unstable | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, > > hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, > > powerpc, ppc64el, s390x > > > > Scheduled 2.10.1.1-5.1+b3 for unstable. Assuming there are no issue with > > those then I'll look at +b2 for stable. > > The unstable builds look okay; +b2 scheduled. Built and accepted. Regards, Adam
Bug#807969: jessie-pu: package clamav/0.99+dfsg-0+deb8u1
On 2016-02-03 23:05:27 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Okay. Uploaded the current package which hits first s-p-u. I hope to be > > able to test the remaining two packages this weekend. > > Thanks. It should end up in NEW, as libclamav7 doesn't exist in stable. > Once it does, we can ask the ftp-team to have a look. So it took a longer than expected to test the remaining two. So from what I can tell here, python-pyclamav + libc-icap-mod-clamav (libclamav inerface) seem still to work in s-p-u on i386. > Regards, > > Adam Sebastian
Bug#807969: jessie-pu: package clamav/0.99+dfsg-0+deb8u1
On 2016-02-10 20:08:51 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2016-02-07 at 20:54 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Sat, 2016-02-06 at 16:08 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > On Sat, 2016-02-06 at 15:42 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > It's now built everywhere so I'll look at the binNMUs soon. > [...] > > > - dansguardian > > > > > > dansguardian | 2.10.1.1-5.1| stable | source, amd64, arm64, > > > armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x > > > dansguardian | 2.10.1.1-5.1| testing| source > > > dansguardian | 2.10.1.1-5.1| unstable | source > > > dansguardian | 2.10.1.1-5.1+b1 | testing| amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, > > > i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x > > > dansguardian | 2.10.1.1-5.1+b1 | unstable | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, > > > hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, > > > powerpc, ppc64el, s390x > > > > > > Scheduled 2.10.1.1-5.1+b3 for unstable. Assuming there are no issue with > > > those then I'll look at +b2 for stable. > > > > The unstable builds look okay; +b2 scheduled. > > Built and accepted. Thank you. This was the last one. So it looks like we are done here :) > Regards, > > Adam Sebastian
Bug#807969: jessie-pu: package clamav/0.99+dfsg-0+deb8u1
On Sat, 2016-02-06 at 16:08 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2016-02-06 at 15:42 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > It's now built everywhere so I'll look at the binNMUs soon. > > - python-clamav [...] > Scheduled as 0.4.1-7+b2, on the assumption that -8 will migrate before > the point release > > - havp [...] > Scheduled as 0.92a-3+b2 Done and accepted. > - dansguardian > > dansguardian | 2.10.1.1-5.1| stable | source, amd64, arm64, armel, > armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x > dansguardian | 2.10.1.1-5.1| testing| source > dansguardian | 2.10.1.1-5.1| unstable | source > dansguardian | 2.10.1.1-5.1+b1 | testing| amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, > i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x > dansguardian | 2.10.1.1-5.1+b1 | unstable | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, > hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, > powerpc, ppc64el, s390x > > Scheduled 2.10.1.1-5.1+b3 for unstable. Assuming there are no issue with > those then I'll look at +b2 for stable. The unstable builds look okay; +b2 scheduled. > - c-icap-modules [...] > Scheduled as 1:0.3.2-2+b1 Done and accepted. Regards, Adam
Bug#807969: jessie-pu: package clamav/0.99+dfsg-0+deb8u1
On Sat, 2016-02-06 at 15:42 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > It's now built everywhere so I'll look at the binNMUs soon. - python-clamav python-pyclamav | 0.4.1-7 | stable | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x python-pyclamav | 0.4.1-7+b1| testing| amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x python-pyclamav | 0.4.1-7+b1| unstable | mips64el python-pyclamav | 0.4.1-8 | unstable | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x Scheduled as 0.4.1-7+b2, on the assumption that -8 will migrate before the point release - havp havp | 0.92a-3 | stable | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el havp | 0.92a-3+b1| stable | s390x havp | 0.92a-4 | testing| source havp | 0.92a-4 | unstable | source havp | 0.92a-4+b1| testing| amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x havp | 0.92a-4+b1| unstable | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x Scheduled as 0.92a-3+b2 - dansguardian dansguardian | 2.10.1.1-5.1| stable | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x dansguardian | 2.10.1.1-5.1| testing| source dansguardian | 2.10.1.1-5.1| unstable | source dansguardian | 2.10.1.1-5.1+b1 | testing| amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x dansguardian | 2.10.1.1-5.1+b1 | unstable | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x Scheduled 2.10.1.1-5.1+b3 for unstable. Assuming there are no issue with those then I'll look at +b2 for stable. - c-icap-modules libc-icap-mod-virus-scan | 1:0.3.2-2 | stable | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x libc-icap-mod-virus-scan | 1:0.4.2-1 | testing| arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x libc-icap-mod-virus-scan | 1:0.4.2-1 | unstable | arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x libc-icap-mod-virus-scan | 1:0.4.2-1+b1 | testing| amd64 libc-icap-mod-virus-scan | 1:0.4.2-1+b1 | unstable | amd64 Scheduled as 1:0.3.2-2+b1 Regards, Adam
Bug#807969: jessie-pu: package clamav/0.99+dfsg-0+deb8u1
Control: tags -1 + pending On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 23:05 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 23:55 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > On 2016-02-02 20:31:23 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote: > [...] > > > > havp seems to work (installed old, dpkg -i new package, loaded a page > > > > and the eicar test signature which got blocked as expected). > > > > dansguardian > > > > (just installed the new package, used behind havp) seems to serve > > > > content, > > > > too. > > > > I did no test the other packages (but this can change on your request). > > > > > > Any testing we could get before looking at releasing the packages to the > > > masses via -updates would be appreciated. > > > > Okay. Uploaded the current package which hits first s-p-u. I hope to be > > able to test the remaining two packages this weekend. > > Thanks. It should end up in NEW, as libclamav7 doesn't exist in stable. > Once it does, we can ask the ftp-team to have a look. It did, and it was accepted into p-u by the ftp-team yesterday. It's now built everywhere so I'll look at the binNMUs soon. Regards, Adam
Bug#807969: jessie-pu: package clamav/0.99+dfsg-0+deb8u1
On 2016-02-02 20:31:23 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Okay, thanks. Let's get this rolling; apologies for the delay in getting > back to you. No problem. It is better that way than just rubber-stamp it. > > havp seems to work (installed old, dpkg -i new package, loaded a page > > and the eicar test signature which got blocked as expected). dansguardian > > (just installed the new package, used behind havp) seems to serve content, > > too. > > I did no test the other packages (but this can change on your request). > > Any testing we could get before looking at releasing the packages to the > masses via -updates would be appreciated. Okay. Uploaded the current package which hits first s-p-u. I hope to be able to test the remaining two packages this weekend. Regading the binNMU: please note that (almost) all packages have the same source version in stable as in unstable/testing and their binary version (in testing) is +b1. So maybe +0+b1 would be better to ensure an update path from s -> s-u and then s -> testing. > Regards, > > Adam Sebastian
Bug#807969: jessie-pu: package clamav/0.99+dfsg-0+deb8u1
On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 23:55 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2016-02-02 20:31:23 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote: [...] > > > havp seems to work (installed old, dpkg -i new package, loaded a page > > > and the eicar test signature which got blocked as expected). dansguardian > > > (just installed the new package, used behind havp) seems to serve content, > > > too. > > > I did no test the other packages (but this can change on your request). > > > > Any testing we could get before looking at releasing the packages to the > > masses via -updates would be appreciated. > > Okay. Uploaded the current package which hits first s-p-u. I hope to be > able to test the remaining two packages this weekend. Thanks. It should end up in NEW, as libclamav7 doesn't exist in stable. Once it does, we can ask the ftp-team to have a look. > Regading the binNMU: please note that (almost) all packages have the > same source version in stable as in unstable/testing and their binary > version (in testing) is +b1. So maybe +0+b1 would be better to ensure an > update path from s -> s-u and then s -> testing. We can only schedule binNMUs as +bX, so in those cases we'll likely have to do something like schedule +b(>=3) for unstable and, assuming those succeed, then schedule +b2s for p-u. Regards, Adam
Bug#807969: jessie-pu: package clamav/0.99+dfsg-0+deb8u1
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed On Mon, 2015-12-28 at 23:12 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2015-12-28 16:57:27 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > I have bad memories of the last time we had a libclamav SONAME change in > > stable - more precisely, in volatile. When you say you've rebuilt the > > packages, I assume that this means that no source changes were needed? Have > > correct, no source changes except for libclamunrar. Okay, thanks. Let's get this rolling; apologies for the delay in getting back to you. > > you performed any testing (either installation/upgrade or functional) > > testing on the resulting packages? > > havp seems to work (installed old, dpkg -i new package, loaded a page > and the eicar test signature which got blocked as expected). dansguardian > (just installed the new package, used behind havp) seems to serve content, > too. > I did no test the other packages (but this can change on your request). Any testing we could get before looking at releasing the packages to the masses via -updates would be appreciated. Regards, Adam
Bug#807969: jessie-pu: package clamav/0.99+dfsg-0+deb8u1
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On 2015-12-14 22:05, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: We would like to update clamav in Jessie to the current (upstream) [...] Please note that this will trigger a transition in stable due to libclamav6 -> libclamav7. The following packages needs to be rebuilt: - python-pyclamav - havp - dansguardian - libc-icap-mod-virus-scan - libclamunrar The transition for unstable was tracked in #806999. I rebuilt all packages in Jessie on i386. I have bad memories of the last time we had a libclamav SONAME change in stable - more precisely, in volatile. When you say you've rebuilt the packages, I assume that this means that no source changes were needed? Have you performed any testing (either installation/upgrade or functional) testing on the resulting packages? libclamunrar needs a source upload to change the manual dependency (and upload library version). Do I need a separate pu-bug for it? Yes, one bug per source package please. Regards, Adam
Bug#807969: jessie-pu: package clamav/0.99+dfsg-0+deb8u1
On 2015-12-28 16:57:27 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote: > I have bad memories of the last time we had a libclamav SONAME change in > stable - more precisely, in volatile. When you say you've rebuilt the > packages, I assume that this means that no source changes were needed? Have correct, no source changes except for libclamunrar. > you performed any testing (either installation/upgrade or functional) > testing on the resulting packages? havp seems to work (installed old, dpkg -i new package, loaded a page and the eicar test signature which got blocked as expected). dansguardian (just installed the new package, used behind havp) seems to serve content, too. I did no test the other packages (but this can change on your request). > Regards, > > Adam Sebastian
