Bug#870987: Bug#814176: Bug#793492: Bug#814176: azureus: (Build-)Depends on OpenJDK 7

2018-02-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 22:20:22 + Scott Kitterman wrote: > > > On August 31, 2017 1:28:40 PM EDT, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > >Le 27/08/2017 à 00:07, Scott Kitterman a écrit : > > > >> I would like to give Emmanuel time to respond to this. I've tagged >

Bug#870987: Bug#814176: Bug#793492: Bug#814176: azureus: (Build-)Depends on OpenJDK 7

2017-08-31 Thread Scott Kitterman
On August 31, 2017 1:28:40 PM EDT, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >Le 27/08/2017 à 00:07, Scott Kitterman a écrit : > >> I would like to give Emmanuel time to respond to this. I've tagged >the bug >> moreinfo to hold on on processing it for the moment. If Emmanuel >agrees to >>

Bug#870987: Bug#814176: Bug#793492: Bug#814176: azureus: (Build-)Depends on OpenJDK 7

2017-08-31 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 27/08/2017 à 00:07, Scott Kitterman a écrit : > I would like to give Emmanuel time to respond to this. I've tagged the bug > moreinfo to hold on on processing it for the moment. If Emmanuel agrees to > the removal or we don't hear back in two weeks, then go ahead and remove the > moreinfo

Bug#870987: Bug#814176: Bug#793492: Bug#814176: azureus: (Build-)Depends on OpenJDK 7

2017-08-26 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Sun, 20 Aug 2017 22:12:29 +0200 Markus Koschany wrote: > reassign 870987 ftp.debian.org > retitle 870987 RM: azureus -- RoQA; missed both jessie and stretch > thanks > > Am 08.08.2017 um 20:08 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > > On 08/08/2017 06:44 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > >

Bug#793492: Bug#814176: Bug#793492: Bug#814176: azureus: (Build-)Depends on OpenJDK 7

2017-08-20 Thread Markus Koschany
reassign 870987 ftp.debian.org retitle 870987 RM: azureus -- RoQA; missed both jessie and stretch thanks Am 08.08.2017 um 20:08 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > On 08/08/2017 06:44 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > >> 1.5 years later this hasn't changed, shall we now drop it? > > Actually there has been

Bug#814176: Bug#793492: Bug#814176: azureus: (Build-)Depends on OpenJDK 7

2017-08-08 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
On 08/08/2017 06:44 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > 1.5 years later this hasn't changed, shall we now drop it? Actually there has been a change since upstream has cleared the license issues we raised. I still intend to update the package, but I don't mind if it has to go through the NEW queue.