Hello Barry, Ian,
Ian Jackson [2016-10-23 17:21 +0100]:
> I see in fact that is is still not compatible. How about:
>
> Test-Command: tox -e qa
> Depends: @builddeps@, git
> Features: test-name=qa
That seems okay to me. It would be our first-ever supported
"Features:" item, too :-)
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Bug#839253: autopkgtest: --testname incompatible with
Test-Command:"):
> Barry's suggestion of a Test-Name field is better. This is because if
> a package provides
> Test-Command-foobar:
> it won't be compatibile with software compatible with the
Martin Pitt writes ("Bug#839253: autopkgtest: --testname incompatible with
Test-Command:"):
> Hey Barry,
> > * Add a Test-Name: field solely for the purpose of matching
> > --testname. Of course if Test-Name doesn't exist, it would fall
> > back to matching on
On Oct 01, 2016, at 12:16 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
>You can actually -- they get named "command1", "command2", etc, same
>names that appear in the logs and in summary.
I must have missed that, but it's really nice.
pgpIUkqcn_THD.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Oct 01, 2016, at 12:16 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
>I'd slightly change that idea to be Test-Command-foobar:, to provide
>an optional name? Test-Command: would then continue to get
>autogenerated commandN names.
I rather like that. One of my other minor problems is that in the summary, if
you
Hey Barry,
Barry Warsaw [2016-09-30 14:17 -0400]:
> AFAICT, if you specify a test with Test-Command: there's no way to
> select it with `autopkgtest --testname`. A couple of thoughts:
You can actually -- they get named "command1", "command2", etc, same
names that appear in the logs and in
Package: autopkgtest
Version: 4.0.5
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear Maintainer,
AFAICT, if you specify a test with Test-Command: there's no way to
select it with `autopkgtest --testname`. A couple of thoughts:
* Allow Tests: and Test-Command: to
7 matches
Mail list logo
