Control: tag -1 pending
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 05:00:27PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> When I format the code correctly, the test is skipped and we can build
> diffoscope successfully:
cool!
> > >> Though I'm using pytest 3.0.3.
> > >> That test is skipped by using pytest.mark.skip(), which I d
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 08:39:00PM +, HW42 wrote:
> Leo Famulari:
> > def skip_unless_tool_is_older_than(tool, actual_ver, min_ver,
> > vcls=LooseVersion):
> > if tools_missing(tool):
> > -return pytest.mark.skip(reason="requires {}".format(tool))
> > +return pytest.mark.
Leo Famulari:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 04:23:51PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>> Though I'm using pytest 3.0.3.
>> That test is skipped by using pytest.mark.skip(), which I don't see in
>> the docs of pytest for 2.7.
>> The changelog of pytest tells me pytest.mark.skip() is recognized as a
>> ski
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 04:23:51PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Though I'm using pytest 3.0.3.
> That test is skipped by using pytest.mark.skip(), which I don't see in
> the docs of pytest for 2.7.
> The changelog of pytest tells me pytest.mark.skip() is recognized as a
> skipping marker starting
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 03:33:14PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> > > === FAILURES
> > > ===
> > > ___ test_superblock
> > >
> > >
> > > differences = []
> > >
> > > @s
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 06:02:38PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > === FAILURES
> > ===
> > ___ test_superblock
> >
> >
> > differences = []
> >
> > @skip_unless_too
control: found -1 61
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:28:33AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> ...
> tests/comparators/test_squashfs.py::test_identification PASSED
> tests/comparators/test_squashfs.py::test_no_differences PASSED
> tests/comparators/test_squashfs.py::test_no_warnings PASSED
> tests/comparato
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:05:13PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Could you re-run the testsuite with:
>
> -vv -r sxX
>
> ... or similar? :) Many thanks.
Using '-vvv -r sxX' with pytest 2.7.3, the output of the test suite is
below. Please let me know if you need any more information.
Hi,
> diffoscope: Failure of test_superblock
Could you re-run the testsuite with:
-vv -r sxX
... or similar? :) Many thanks.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
Source: diffoscope
Dear Maintainer,
While building diffoscope 61 on GNU Guix's "core-updates" branch
(roughly analogous to Debian's testing branch), the test test_superblock
fails like this:
=== FAILURES ===
10 matches
Mail list logo