Bug#871300: [Pkg-gmagick-im-team] Bug#871300: libmagick++-6.q16-7: requires rebuild against GCC 7 and symbols/shlibs bump
Hi, On 08/08/17 06:38, Bastien Roucaries wrote: > Le 7 août 2017 22:59:06 GMT+02:00, James Cowgill a > écrit : >> On 07/08/17 16:55, roucaries bastien wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 4:47 PM, wrote: Package: libmagick++-6.q16-7 Version: 8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-16 Severity: serious Tags: sid buster User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: gcc-7-op-mangling >>> >>> I need a change that break ABI, I will release a new version. Does it >>> exist in this case a short cut >> >> If you are going to rename the Debian package and trigger a package >> transition, you do not need to add any of the extra symbols/shlibs >> stuff. You should still build-depend on gcc (>= 4:7) however - I'm not >> sure if all the buildds use GCC 7 by default yet. > > Should i depends on g++7 for libmagick++-dev ? I don't think you need to do that. Consumers of your library don't need to be running gcc-7 (it should work with gcc-6 and gcc-7). Your library does need to be built using gcc-7 so that it is compatible with both compilers. Thanks, James signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#871300: [Pkg-gmagick-im-team] Bug#871300: libmagick++-6.q16-7: requires rebuild against GCC 7 and symbols/shlibs bump
Le 7 août 2017 22:59:06 GMT+02:00, James Cowgill a écrit : >Hi, > >On 07/08/17 16:55, roucaries bastien wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 4:47 PM, wrote: >>> Package: libmagick++-6.q16-7 >>> Version: 8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-16 >>> Severity: serious >>> Tags: sid buster >>> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org >>> Usertags: gcc-7-op-mangling >>> >> >> I need a change that break ABI, I will release a new version. Does it >> exist in this case a short cut > >If you are going to rename the Debian package and trigger a package >transition, you do not need to add any of the extra symbols/shlibs >stuff. You should still build-depend on gcc (>= 4:7) however - I'm not >sure if all the buildds use GCC 7 by default yet. Should i depends on g++7 for libmagick++-dev ? >Thanks, >James -- Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.
Bug#871300: [Pkg-gmagick-im-team] Bug#871300: libmagick++-6.q16-7: requires rebuild against GCC 7 and symbols/shlibs bump
Hi, On 07/08/17 16:55, roucaries bastien wrote: > On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 4:47 PM, wrote: >> Package: libmagick++-6.q16-7 >> Version: 8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-16 >> Severity: serious >> Tags: sid buster >> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org >> Usertags: gcc-7-op-mangling >> > > I need a change that break ABI, I will release a new version. Does it > exist in this case a short cut If you are going to rename the Debian package and trigger a package transition, you do not need to add any of the extra symbols/shlibs stuff. You should still build-depend on gcc (>= 4:7) however - I'm not sure if all the buildds use GCC 7 by default yet. Thanks, James signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature