(note: I am not a member of the release team, just a dd who spots a load of
build-depency issues in testing as part of running a derivative)
I thought testing with dose-builddebcheck already happened routinely but
can't find it. Any historical perspective on that?
There is
https://qa.debian.
> I wish I could say unconditionally yes, but I am not sure we are ready
> for it yet. If your testing can trivially say which relation in
> Build-Depends/Build-Depends-Arch is broken, you could cross reference it
> with the [excuses] and see if they are permanently rejected due (and why).
>
> I
On Sat, 7 Jul 2018 19:17:11 +0200 (CEST) Santiago Vila
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear Release Managers:
>
Hi Santiago,
Thanks for working on QA in testing.
> I'm looking for guidance and advice here.
>
> I'm reporting FTBFS bugs in testing, but I'm skippin
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Dear Release Managers:
I'm looking for guidance and advice here.
I'm reporting FTBFS bugs in testing, but I'm skipping bugs of type
"unmet build-depends" because I've heard somewhere that Britney takes
care of that.
However, I don't see the procedu
4 matches
Mail list logo
