On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 09:44PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> It helps if you can check if all the packages that you expect migrate.
Yep, everything (except for taffybar) has migrated.
Thanks,
--
Ilias
Hey Paul,
It looks like everything has been rebuilt without errors. Moreover,
git-annex now works, so I assume that the problem has been resolved.
Could you please unblock ghc/8.4.4+dfsg1-3 as well as every Haskell
package that was rebuilt on armel? One exception to the above is the
taffybar
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 09:24AM, Emanuele Olivetti wrote:
> I am very happy to announce that git-annex v.7.20190129-3+b1 for armel
> works perfectly on my QNAP TS-219P (armv5tel)!
Great news! Thank you for helping us out with this.
Best,
--
Ilias
Dear Ilias,
I am very happy to announce that git-annex v.7.20190129-3+b1 for armel
works perfectly on my QNAP TS-219P (armv5tel)!
I ran the extensive test suite within git-annex, with "git-annex test" and
all the 227 tests passed without error - here is the last line of that
execution:
All
Hi Emanuele,
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 12:05AM, Emanuele Olivetti wrote:
> Indeed, I'll be very happy to test git-annex!
Could you please test git-annex version 7.20190129-3+b1 from unstable?
Thanks,
--
Ilias
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 09:10PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Scheduling as we speak. Can you please keep an eye on it and ping this
> bug if you spot something not going well or when everything is finished?
Thank you Paul. Looking at armel's buildd status page [1], it looks like
we are half way there,
Control: retitle -1 unblock: ghc/8.4.4+dfsg1-3
Hi Ilias,
On 20-06-2019 04:20, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote:
> Attached is the updated file.
Scheduling as we speak. Can you please keep an eye on it and ping this
bug if you spot something not going well or when everything is finished?
It's unclear to
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 11:33 PM Ilias Tsitsimpis
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 12:00AM, Emanuele Olivetti wrote:
> > Let me know if I can help more.
>
> Dear Emanuele,
>
> Thank you for taking the time to test and verify my packages. Can I ping
> you one last time to test that git-annex
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Dear Ilias,
Please go ahead with uploading the reviewed ghc to unstable and remove
the moreinfo tag when it is available so we can schedule the binNMU's.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Dear Paul,
Indeed I confirm that "happy" provided by Debian buster/sid does not work
on my hardware (armv5tel Kirkwood Feroceon). Just tested now after removing
Ilias' deb package and reinstalling the previous one:
drakestail:/opt/bug_ghc_armel# apt remove happy
Reading package lists...
Hi Emanuele,
On 16-06-2019 20:25, Emanuele Olivetti wrote:
> I've just followed your instructions, downloaded and installed the
> current happy (and also ghc and the other packages) in the usual way:
>
> dpkg -i
> apt install -f
>
> then tested the example files as indicated:
>
>
Dear Ililas and Paul,
Thank you for your great work.
I've just followed your instructions, downloaded and installed the current
happy (and also ghc and the other packages) in the usual way:
dpkg -i
apt install -f
then tested the example files as indicated:
Hi Emanuel,
On 14-06-2019 18:07, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote:
> I have uploaded both ghc and happy here, in case you need Emanuele to
> verify that the current version of happy fails, whereas the new one
> works:
>
> https://www.iliastsi.net/ghc/ghc_8.4.4+dfsg1-2+armel0_armel.deb
> sha256:
Hi again,
Sorry for the late reply. Hopefully we can still fix this.
On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 10:35PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> I *think* we could also binNMU in experimental. And we could just try a
> couple of packages that you know that won't work right now.
I tried to find a package which has as
Hi,
On 08-06-2019 22:11, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote:
> It is a bit big, but if everything goes well, it should be painless
> (i.e., just schedule the binNMUs).
And unblock all of them, yes. And hope that with the rebuild we're not
introducing bugs in one of these packages that weren't there before.
Hi Paul,
On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 05:06PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Am I correct when I say this is no regression? I.e. it has always been
> like that?
I am not sure about this. The current mechanism of using the
llvm-targets file was introduced in version 8.4.1 [1] replacing the
previously
Hi,
On 06-06-2019 23:14, Emanuele Olivetti wrote:
> Indeed it would be too difficult for me to directly apply the proposed
> patch and recompile all the needed packages - my armv5tel machine (QNAP
> TS-219P) is too underpowered for that. For example, I tried to recompile
> git-annex from sources
Dear Paul,
Thank you for your reply,
On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 5:06 PM Paul Gevers wrote:
> [...]
> @Emanuele, did you now very that it worked? Or is your message more of
> the type: I can verify it when I have the packages? In that later case,
> is there a chance we can get a verification done
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Ilias,
On Sun, 12 May 2019 14:40:09 +0300 Ilias Tsitsimpis > Due to a
misconfiguration of ghc, where it uses the 'arm1136jf-s' ARM11
> core family on armel, all Haskell packages are currently miscompiled and
> will only work on a subset of armel machines (the ones
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Due to a misconfiguration of ghc, where it uses the 'arm1136jf-s' ARM11
core family on armel, all Haskell packages are currently miscompiled and
will only work on a subset of armel machines
20 matches
Mail list logo
