Bug#998105: Fix published (see pull request)

Hi Christian, On Sun, 2023-03-05 at 19:18 +, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote: > Dear Sven, > > this is one of the upstream maintainers (@buhtz). > > Thanks a lot for your contribution. Keep in mind the the upstream PR > isn't merged yet. > > And wouldn't it be better to use the next upstream

Bug#998105: Fix published (see pull request)

On 2023-03-05 19:52 Sven Geuer wrote: > On Fri, 2023-03-03 at 01:46 +0100, BiT dev wrote: > > [...] > > https://github.com/bit-team/backintime/pull/1413 > > [...] > > I created a patch to backintime 1.3.3-4 and tested it successfully. > > Here is the merge request for a backintime 1.3.3-5: >

Bug#998105: Fix published (see pull request)

On Fri, 2023-03-03 at 01:46 +0100, BiT dev wrote: > [...] > https://github.com/bit-team/backintime/pull/1413 > [...] I created a patch to backintime 1.3.3-4 and tested it successfully. Here is the merge request for a backintime 1.3.3-5:

Bug#998105: Fix published (see pull request)

I have implemented the support for the ChainerBackend class of the python keyring package and it is currently on its way into the dev branch of BiT via this pull request: https://github.com/bit-team/backintime/pull/1413 Any feed-back (esp. testing it on your computer) is welcome. THX a lot!