Package: subversion
Version: 1.2.0-1
Followup-For: Bug #316143
Unfortunately, I have exactly the same dependent package versions
(including libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22) as indicated in the original bug report,
yet I see the same problem (tested with a freshly created, local fsfs
repository).
Ken
Moritz == Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Moritz I've extracted the security relevant fix from the
Moritz 0.6.4-0.6.5 patch. If you are planning more extensive
Moritz changes for packaging 0.7 it might be a good idea to
Moritz release a fixed package for the 0.6
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 03:02:10 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#315065: fixed in heimdal 0.6.3-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 03:02:10 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#315065: fixed in heimdal 0.6.3-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 03:17:19 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#316281: fixed in pbuilder 0.128
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 01:32:22AM -0400, Adam Aube wrote:
I have strace output (over 4000 lines of it), but it's probably best to take
this to debian-user, since it appears to be unreproducible.
Check two things:
1. Do you have self-compiled modules for ethereal, not part of
the Debian
Your message dated Sun, 3 Jul 2005 10:09:39 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line allow ifrit into testing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: phpwiki
Tags: security
Severity: serious
Just got this through the PHPWiki list. I'm going to pull xmlrpc.inc as
suggested. I pulled the package from Sarge because I didn't think it was
releasable, so there's no need to go through a full DSA cycle. Just keeping
the security team in
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 05:21:49 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed innovation3d, innovation3d-plugins from unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Hello,
I think Bill has a good point here. Ressource files like compiled
terminal descriptions should not be in etc since hardly anyone edits
them. Instead, they should be moved to /usr/share and links from them to
/etc/terminfo/... should be created, so the local admin still has a
chance to
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 05:18:09 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#315012: fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Package: libmagick6-dev
Version: 6:6.2.3.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: no longer builds from source
Bug: #315503 against dvdauthor showed a problem with the newest
libmagick package.
the header file exception.h uses va_list without including stdarg.h.
Including stdarg.h
On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, Eduard Bloch wrote:
Hello,
I think Bill has a good point here. Ressource files like compiled
terminal descriptions should not be in etc since hardly anyone edits
them. Instead, they should be moved to /usr/share and links from them to
/etc/terminfo/... should be created, so
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 07:02:24 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#316714: fixed in phpwiki 1.3.7-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 316691 + pending
Bug#316691: mono-utils should define replaces for mono-mcs
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
severity 316691 serious
Bug#316691: mono-utils should define replaces for mono-mcs
Severity set to `serious'.
thanks
Package: dhcp3-server
Version: 3.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
This breaks with dash:
- if ! /usr/sbin/dhcpd3 -t /dev/null; then
+ if ! /usr/sbin/dhcpd3 -t 21 /dev/null; then
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
tags 316729 + pending
Bug#316729: bashism in the init script
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 02:00:38PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Package: dhcp3-server
Version: 3.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
This breaks with dash:
- if ! /usr/sbin/dhcpd3 -t /dev/null; then
+ if ! /usr/sbin/dhcpd3 -t 21 /dev/null; then
Nice of you to check the
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 06:33:27PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
Package: dbus
Version: 0.23.4-4
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source
The build attempt on the sparc buildd failed due to unavalable
dependancies.
Looks like that's because of the jack
On Jul 03, Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice of you to check the open bugs...
Actually I did, but only looked at serious bugs, which is the expected
severity for a bashism which breaks dash.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 08:17:27 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#316691: fixed in mono 1.1.8.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: boo
Severity: serious
The 0.5.5.1651-2 version of the boo package is missing some files which
the -1 version had, and 2 of them are important for usage and linking
against boo.
boo.pc is missing in -2, thus monodevelop for example can't be build
with boo support.
boo.lang is missing in
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 08:47:04 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#316509: fixed in calamaris 2.99.1.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 09:32:03 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#263359: fixed in wap-wml-tools 0.0.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 02:49:42PM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote:
I'm experiencing the same issue with this package. Here's an strace -f of
the sshd process, starting after I typed my password (password removed).
Could I have that strace with '-s 1024' or similar, so that I can see
what the log
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 314764 - fixed-in-experimental
Bug#314764: poldi: FTBFS in experimental: Not using -fPIC to build shared lib.
Tags were: fixed-in-experimental experimental
Tags removed: fixed-in-experimental
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 12:59:25PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include hallo.h
* Thomas Dickey [Sun, Jul 03 2005, 06:53:55AM]:
I think Bill has a good point here. Ressource files like compiled
terminal descriptions should not be in etc since hardly anyone edits
them. Instead, they should
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 11:18:23AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 12:59:25PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include hallo.h
* Thomas Dickey [Sun, Jul 03 2005, 06:53:55AM]:
I think Bill has a good point here. Ressource files like compiled
terminal descriptions
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 12:49:53 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Hello Golda,
I maintain the Debian package of glimpse, and I've patched a few minor
bugs. Another Debian developer has raised the issue though that the
glimpse license doesn't explicitly allow distributing modified
versions of the software. May Debian redistribute binaries of glimpse
built from
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 308270 +help
Bug#308270: swt-gtk: ftbfs [sparc] error: Can't find default package
`java.lang'
Tags were: sid
Tags added: help
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Hi Shaun
Yes, Debian may redistribute binaries of glimpse built from modified source
code. Let me know if you need a formal license to that effect.
Thanks for bringing this up, and for maintaining a non-free archive! I have
considered asking the University of Arizona (which holds the
tag 308270 +help
thanks
swt-gtk 3.0+3.1M4-3 builds successfully on ia64, hppa, alpha, s390 and
powerpc, but it failed to build on arm, sparc, and m68k. The package
is being built using gcj-3.3. The error message is...
org/eclipse/swt/internal/Platform.java:0: error: Can't find default
package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 309140 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#309140: kionjb: FTBFS: Build depends on libnjb-dev ( 1.2) which is not
available.
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Is there any progress on this? Is there a reason you didn't
switch to the new ghc6 6.4 yet?
Yes, the problem is that ghc 6.4 comes with Cabal, but it needs to be
removed for me to upload a new version of haskell-cabal, or
libghc6-cabal-dev will
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 315561 serious
Bug#315561: libsdl1.2: please apply this patch for libslang2
Severity set to `serious'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Package: wmfire
Version: 1.2.1-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
As above. Unstable now has libgtop2-5, which is part of the Gnome 2.10
transition, isn't it?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
tags 316764 sid
Bug#316764: wmfire depends on unavailable package libgtop2-2
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
I will setup a pbuilder sid environment this afternoon and rebuild sdl against
slang2.
Lawrence
On July 3, 2005 03:59 pm, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
I am marking this bug serious as it is release-critical (FTBFS).
It is also holding up the transition of several other packages to
libslang2;
On Sunday 03 July 2005 04:38 am, W. Borgert wrote:
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 01:32:22AM -0400, Adam Aube wrote:
I have strace output (over 4000 lines of it), but it's probably best to
take this to debian-user, since it appears to be unreproducible.
Check two things:
1. Do you have
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 16:02:26 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#313445: fixed in gok 1.0.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 16:47:11 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#306078: fixed in icheck 0.9.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 316573 normal
Bug#316573: move of files in /var/lib/misc to /var/lib/db silently breaks
scripts depending on libnss-db
Severity set to `normal'.
tags 316573 moreinfo
Bug#316573: move of files in /var/lib/misc to /var/lib/db silently breaks
severity 316573 normal
tags 316573 moreinfo
thanks
On Sat, 2 Jul 2005, Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: libnss-db
Version: 2.2-6.3
Severity: grave
The last NMU moved /var/lib/misc/Makefile to /var/lib/db/Makefile.
It's not mentioned in the changelog, it breaks existing scripts.
sorry, that's
On July 3, 2005 09:27, Adeodato Simó wrote:
The real question is why the kde packages don't conflict with earlier
kdm versions if they don't work with them... (not that kde had too few
conflicts, how about a little backwards compatibility anyway?)
This situation is mostly fixed in our
Package: request-tracker3.4
Version: 3.4.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
dselect says:
request-tracker3.4 depends on rt3.4-clients (= 3.4.1-2)
for both request-tracker3.4 and rt3.4-clients, and will not allow me
to select them together.
If I force it, it says:
The
Package: request-tracker3
Version: 3.0.12-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
dselect says:
request-tracker3 depends on rt3-clients (= 3.0.12-7)
for both request-tracker3 and rt3-clients, and will not allow me
to select them together.
If I force it, it says:
The
Package: gnome-control-center
Version: 1:2.10.1-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After upgrade, GNOME session startups are blocked by
/usr/lib/control-center/gnome-settings-daemon sitting in a read()
syscall and not advancing. Reproduced on two different hardware.
--
Thanks. I'll get to this ASAP. The dependency on a specific library version
is neccesary. Currently libjack is not guaranteing backwards binary
compatibility.
Enrique
On 7/2/05, Itai Seggev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: rosegarden4
Version: 1.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 316792 important
Bug#316792: request-tracker3.4: rt3 and rt3.4 dependencies broken
Severity set to `important'.
severity 316796 important
Bug#316796: request-tracker3: rt3 and rt3.4 dependencies broken
Severity set to `important'.
thanks
severity 316792 important
severity 316796 important
thanks
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 04:31:07PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
dselect says:
request-tracker3.4 depends on rt3.4-clients (= 3.4.1-2)
for both request-tracker3.4 and rt3.4-clients, and will not allow me
to select them together.
51 matches
Mail list logo
