Bug#381389: Reproduceable, and not smart-notifier's fault

Hi, On Thu, 05 Oct 2006, Brian Sutherland wrote: I reproduced the installation problem, but didn't try the build leading up to it with the latest debhelper. I wanted to prepare a patch for this, but I really get 2.4 and not current when building smart-notifier with python 2.4... Yeah,

Bug#391140: Uninstallable due to unavailable typo3-src-4.0

Package: typo3-dummy Severity: serious Version: 4.0.2-1 Hi Your package is not installable as it depends on typo3-src-4.0 which is not available in unstable. It might be in the NEW queue though, so you can close this bug when it would arrive in unstable... Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes -

Bug#391138: Uninstallable due to not binNMU safe

Package: sylpheed-claws-i18n Severity: serious Version: 1.0.5-4 Hi Your package is not installable as it strictly depends on sylpheed-claws (=1.0.5-4), but version 1.0.5-4+b1 is in the archive. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint:

Bug#233275: marked as done (gpsim-led: Loading libgpsim_led.so.0 causes segmentation fault)

Your message dated Thu, 5 Oct 2006 16:25:57 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line bug fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Bug#346745: marked as done (gpsim-logic: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

Your message dated Thu, 5 Oct 2006 16:27:15 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line bug fixed in last uploads has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#346742: marked as done (gpsim-led: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

Your message dated Thu, 5 Oct 2006 16:24:23 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line bug fixed in last uploads has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#391139: Uninstallable due to typo?

Package: libtulip-qt4-2.0-dev Severity: serious Version: 2.0.6-1 Hi Your package is not installable as it depends on libtulip-qt-2.0c2a which is not available in unstable. You might want to depend on libtulip-qt*4*-2.0c2a instead... Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk -

Bug#391142: Uninstallable due to unavailable typo3-src-4.0

Package: typo3-site-installer Severity: serious Version: 0.94+debian-1 Hi Your package is not installable as it depends on typo3-src-4.0 which is not available in unstable. It might be in the NEW queue though... Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D

Processed: severity of 390258 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 severity 390258 serious Bug#390258: libsvn-mirror-perl: can't install: please change depends from libsvn-core-perl to libsvn-perl Severity set to `serious' from `normal' End of

Bug#391146: Uninstallable due to unmet deps on libgnustep-base1.11-dbg and libgnustep-gui0.10-dbg

Package: gnustep-core-devel Severity: serious Version: 5 Hi Your package is not installable as it depends on libgnustep-base1.11-dbg and libgnustep-gui0.10-dbg which are not available in unstable anymore. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D

Bug#391148: Uninstallable due to not being binNMU safe

Package: sylpheed-gtk1-i18n Severity: serious Version: 1.0.6-3 Hi Your package is not installable as it strictly depends on sylpheed-gtk1 (=1.0.6-3) while version 1.0.6-3+b1 is in the archive. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint:

Bug#391071: partman-auto-crypto: No confirmation before hard-drive wiping

On Thu, October 5, 2006 2:07, Frans Pop said: I personally would prefer to consistently delay disk selection to a second level in _all_ cases and explain what the next step will be in the description; something like: example ... Automatic - use the largest continuous free space Automatic

Bug#391094: packaging errors remove old apache2 but prevent install of apache2.2

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Moshe, it's not that serious problem. You can solve by simply doing a: # dpkg --force-overwrite -i /var/cache/apt/archives/apache2.2-common_2.2.3-1_i386.deb That should work. Secondly, the package apache2.2 doesn't appear because it simply does

Processed: Fixed in NMU of bidentd 1.1.1-0.2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 389639 + fixed Bug#389639: bidentd: purging the package fails (update-inetd unavailable) There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#391167: libnss-ldap: can't boot since 251-5.2 upgrade

Package: libnss-ldap Version: 251-5.1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system 'aptitude upgrade' yesterday and this morning my debian etch is buggy. libnss/udev waiting for 2, 4, 8, 16, ... 64s and so on. I made a CTRL-C but gdm don't start ... So i downgrade from 251-5.2 to

Bug#391157: nunit2.2: FTBFS: Cannot find dh_makeclilibs

Package: nunit2.2 Version: 2.2.0-3 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... dh_fixperms -i dh_installdeb -i dh_makeclilibs -i make: dh_makeclilibs: Command not found make: *** [binary-indep] Error 127 -- Daniel Schepler

Bug#391164: xshisen: FTBFS: Build-Depends on removed package lesstif-dev

Package: xshisen Version: 1.51-2 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... Installing the build-deps - Attempting to parse the build-deps : pbuilder-satisfydepends,v 1.28 2006/05/30 23:45:45 dancer Exp $ - Considering autotools-dev - Trying autotools-dev - Considering cdbs -

Processed: reassign 391094 to apache2.2-common

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 reassign 391094 apache2.2-common Bug#391094: packaging errors remove old apache2 but prevent install of apache2.2 Warning: Unknown package 'apache2.2' Bug reassigned from package

Bug#391146: Uninstallable due to unmet deps on libgnustep-base1.11-dbg and libgnustep-gui0.10-dbg

Hello Your package is not installable as it depends on libgnustep-base1.11-dbg and libgnustep-gui0.10-dbg which are not available in unstable anymore. Yes, I know. It's waiting for other gnustep package updates stuck in Debian New Queue. Cheers Gürkan

Bug#386263: marked as done (FTBFS: aclocal: macro `AM_PROG_MKDIR_P' required but not defined)

Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 01:32:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#386072: fixed in gnome-lokkit 0.50.22-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: diff for 4.4rc.2-3.1 NMU

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 389965 + patch Bug#389965: libapache-mod-ngobjweb: purging the package fails (ucf unavailable) There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#389965: diff for 4.4rc.2-3.1 NMU

tags 389965 + patch thanks Hi, i intend to NMU this package following the 0-Day NMU Policy tomorrow. See attached Patch. bye, - michael diff -u sope-4.4rc.2/debian/changelog sope-4.4rc.2/debian/changelog --- sope-4.4rc.2/debian/changelog +++ sope-4.4rc.2/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10

Bug#386072: marked as done (FTBFS: aclocal fails)

Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 01:32:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#386072: fixed in gnome-lokkit 0.50.22-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#391181: cron.d script does not check whether the package is still installed

Package: pdbv Version: 2.0.10.1 Severity: serious Hi, I just received a mail from cron that it couldn't find /usr/bin/pdbv. Which is expected, since it's no longer installed. However, the cron.d script does not check that. I'd recommend adding at least a [ -x /usr/bin/pdbv ] in front of

Bug#391179: musixtex: purging the package fails (/usr/bin/kpsewhich unavailable)

Package: musixtex Version: 1:0.112.2-1 Severity: serious Hello Roland, There is an error when attempting to purge musixtex: Removing musixtex ... Purging configuration files for musixtex ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/musixtex.postrm: line 18: /usr/bin/kpsewhich: No such file or directory dpkg:

Bug#389965: diff for 4.4rc.2-3.1 NMU

hi again, On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 11:14:04AM +0200, Sebastian Ley wrote: i intend to NMU this package following the 0-Day NMU Policy tomorrow. See attached Patch. Please go ahead. Thanks for looking into this! the package doesnt autobuild atm. This is apache's fault (#389965 the packages

Bug#391182: debian-installer: Impossible to boot linux 2.6 i386 image on Opteron (daily build 3 oct 2006 and d-i rc3 with 2.6 kernel)

Package: debian-installer Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, Yesterday I installed an opteron at work. This opteron must run in a 32 bits environnement (binary compatibility issue). I downloaded d-i daily build (03 oct 06) and d-i rc3 with 2.6 kernel. Once the initrd

Bug#391184: dazuko-source: module failes to compile

Package: dazuko-source Version: 2.2.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Every time i want to compile the module for my 2.6.18-2 kernel, i get the following error messages: In file included from /usr/src/modules/dazuko/dazuko_linux26_lsm.c:20:

Bug#391190: mockobjects: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'ant-optional'

Package: mockobjects Version: 0.09-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'mockobjects' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: junit: [mkdir] Created dir: /srv/dbuild/tmp/mockobjects-0.09/out/j2ee/classes BUILD FAILED /srv/dbuild/tmp/mockobjects-0.09/build.xml:176:

Processed: tagging 391146

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 tags 391146 sid Bug#391146: Uninstallable due to unmet deps on libgnustep-base1.11-dbg and libgnustep-gui0.10-dbg There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping

Bug#391201: hlatex: purging the package fails (mktexlsr unavailable)

Package: hlatex Version: 1.0.1-2 Severity: serious Hello Changwoo, There is an error when attempting to purge hlatex: Removing hlatex ... Purging configuration files for hlatex ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/hlatex.postrm: line 7: mktexlsr: command not found dpkg: error processing hlatex

Processed: Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#391062: libinline-octave-perl: Doesn't work, Inline can't find Octave

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package libinline-octave-perl Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libinline-octave-perl tags 391062 + unreproducible Bug#391062: libinline-octave-perl: Doesn't work, Inline can't find Octave There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible severity

Bug#391208: ethiop: purging the package fails (texhash unavailable)

Package: ethiop Version: 0.7-9 Severity: serious Hello Paul, There is an error when attempting to purge ethiop: Purging configuration files for ethiop ... Removing ethiop font files in /var/spool/texmf... find: /var/spool/texmf: No such file or directory

Bug#375215: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ] reopening bugs

Il giorno mer, 04/10/2006 alle 19.42 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson ha scritto: On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 06:43:38PM +0200, Christian Surchi wrote: * What does your /etc/rcS.d look like? In particular, do you have an S03udev symlink? Yes, never touched it: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14

Bug#391062: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#391062: libinline-octave-perl: Doesn't work, Inline can't find Octave

package libinline-octave-perl tags 391062 + unreproducible severity 391062 important thanks I can't reproduce this. I'm downgrading the severity for the moment. Bhaskar, can you try the examples from /usr/share/doc/libinline-octave-perl/examples/ Thanks Thomas -- To

Bug#391209: jbibtex-base: purging the package fails (mktexlsr unavailable)

Package: jbibtex-base Version: 1:2.4-1 Severity: serious Hello Masayuki, There is an error when attempting to purge jbibtex-base: Removing jbibtex-base ... Purging configuration files for jbibtex-base ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/jbibtex-base.postrm: line 22: mktexlsr: command not found dpkg:

Bug#391193: jspwiki: FTBFS: Failed to fetch http://ftp2.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/j/jspwiki/jspwiki_2.2.33.orig.tar.gz 404 Not Found

Package: jspwiki Version: 2.2.33-5 Severity: serious When building 'jspwiki' on unstable, I get the following error: # apt-get source jspwiki Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Need to get 2609kB of source archives. Get:1 http://ftp2.de.debian.org sid/main jspwiki

Bug#391205: dvipdfmx: purging the package fails (mktexlsr and update-texmf unavailable)

Package: dvipdfmx Version: 1:20050831-3 Severity: serious Hello Yu, There is an error when attempting to purge dvipdfmx: Removing dvipdfmx ... Purging configuration files for dvipdfmx ... dpkg: error processing dvipdfmx (--purge): subprocess post-removal script returned error exit

Bug#391211: unionfs-source - FTBFS: error: '__ptr_t' undeclared

** Build finished at 20061005-1237 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#391206: sgmltexi: purging the package fails (update-catalog unavailable)

Package: sgmltexi Version: 2003.00.00-2 Severity: serious Hello Gaetano, There is an error when attempting to purge sgmltexi: Removing sgmltexi ... Purging configuration files for sgmltexi ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/sgmltexi.postrm: line 11: update-catalog: command not found

Bug#391202: libdtdparser-java: FTBFS: /libdtdparser-java-1.21a/build.xml:50: Manifest file: /libdtdparser-java-1.21a/source/mainclass does not exist.

Package: libdtdparser-java Version: 1.21a-1 Severity: serious Hello, when building 'libdtdparser-java' in a clean unstable chroot, I get the following error: makejar: [jar] JARs are never empty, they contain at least a manifest file BUILD FAILED /libdtdparser-java-1.21a/build.xml:39: The

Bug#391199: opustex: purging the package fails (kpsewhich unavailable)

Package: opustex Version: 0.84-6 Severity: serious Hello Anthony, There is an error when attempting to purge opustex: Removing opustex ... Purging configuration files for opustex ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/opustex.postrm: line 14: /usr/bin/kpsewhich: No such file or directory dpkg: error

Bug#391200: ptex-base: purging the package fails (mktexlsr unavailable)

Package: ptex-base Version: 1:2.4-1 Severity: serious Hello Masayuki, There is an error when attempting to purge ptex-base: Removing ptex-base ... Purging configuration files for ptex-base ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/ptex-base.postrm: line 22: mktexlsr: command not found dpkg: error

Bug#391216: musixtex-slurps: purging the package fails (mktexlsr unavailable)

Package: musixtex-slurps Version: 92a-4 Severity: serious Hello Roland, There is an error when attempting to purge musixtex-slurps: Removing musixtex-slurps ... Purging configuration files for musixtex-slurps ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/musixtex-slurps.postrm: line 23: /usr/bin/mktexlsr: No

Bug#375215: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ] reopening bugs

On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 01:00:05PM +0200, Christian Surchi wrote: Sorry, I meant S03libnss-ldap. My guess is that -5.2 doesn't change the symlinks on upgrade. Purging and reinstalling should fix the problem, although it isn't a proper solution. No link there for libsnss-ldap, in fact. And if

Processed: tagging 391029

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 tags 391029 sid Bug#391029: libapache2-mod-php5 uninstallabe in sid due to apache2 upgrade Tags were: sid Bug#385480: libapache2-mod-php5 needs to be rebuilt for experimental Tags

Processed: severity of 391029 is grave, severity of 385480 is grave, merging 385480 391029

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 severity 391029 grave Bug#391029: libapache2-mod-php5 uninstallabe in sid due to apache2 upgrade Severity set to `grave' from `important' severity 385480 grave Bug#385480:

Bug#390531: wengophone - FTBFS: scons: *** Target `/usr/local/lib/wengophone' of Install() is a file, but should be a directory.

On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 07:22:40PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: Package: wengophone Version: 0.99+svn4511-4+b1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of wengophone_0.99+svn4511-4+b1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85 [...] phapi

Processed: tagging 391029

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 tags 391029 sid Bug#391029: libapache2-mod-php5 uninstallabe in sid due to apache2 upgrade There were no tags set. Bug#385480: libapache2-mod-php5 needs to be rebuilt for experimental

Processed: Kaffeine refuses to start completely

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 390829 important Bug#390829: kaffeine: Kaffeine refuses to start completely Severity set to `important' from `grave' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#390966: marked as done (removal horribly broken)

Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 05:17:49 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#390966: fixed in gcj-4.1 4.1.1-15j1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: merging 390774 391094

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 merge 390774 391094 Bug#390774: Conflicts with apache-common: trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man8/suexec.8.gz' Bug#391094: packaging errors remove old apache2 but prevent install

Bug#390874: marked as done (libgcj7-0 uninstallable)

Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 05:17:49 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#390874: fixed in gcj-4.1 4.1.1-15j1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#391108: marked as done (drip: FTBFS: Misusing -mcpu/-march)

Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 05:47:20 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#391108: fixed in drip 0.9.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: Re: Bug#390287: xawtv: Don't show any tv

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # not sure why this was here tag 390287 - patch Bug#390287: xawtv: Don't show any tv Tags were: patch Tags removed: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#390287: xawtv: Don't show any tv

# not sure why this was here tag 390287 - patch thanks pushling provided me with another strace, of the case where xawtv was functioning (with the symlink in place, as described above); the strace is attached. When comparing it to the strace of the failing xawtv, it turns out that in the strace

Bug#385946: fmit: crashes at startup

Hi, This problem seems to be solved now, I tested on AMD64, and x86, and there is no segfault. The program run without problems. I think it were a problem of libasound2, it is why the problem were unreproductible on x86 without alsa, like it was reported by Aurélien. I tested with jack, and the

Bug#391222: FTBS: build-depends on non-existing package linux-source-2.6.17

Package: user-mode-linux Version: 2.6.17-1um-2 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source user-mode-linux should be updated to build-depend on linux-source-2.6.18. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Processed: Re: Bug#391127: mondo: Segmentation fault after selecting CDRW size

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 391127 + confirmed, patch, pending Bug#391127: mondo: Segmentation fault after selecting CDRW size There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed, patch, pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian

Bug#390902: electricsheep dies: X Error of failed request: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes)

tags 390902 + help tags 390902 + moreinfo thanks * Tom Parker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) : [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[~] electricsheep X Error of failed request: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes) Major opcode of failed request: 141 (XVideo) Minor opcode of failed request: 19 () Serial

Bug#389681: apt-listbugs: Bug still exists in version 0.0.57

Hi On Oct 04, Junichi Uekawa wrote: .58 fixes the issue with http-proxy, please try. This is what I get with .58 installed: # apt-get upgrade [..] 35 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 6 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/46.0MB of archives. After unpacking 824kB of additional disk space

Bug#391138: marked as done (Uninstallable due to not binNMU safe)

Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 06:32:46 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#391138: fixed in sylpheed-claws 1.0.5-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#391127: mondo: Segmentation fault after selecting CDRW size

tags 391127 + confirmed, patch, pending thanks Hi Tim, Thanks a lot for your bug report! I have reproduced the issue. The problem is that a text string is too long and the code doesn't handle this properly. I have addressed this by replacing strcpy() with strncpy() and by shortening the

Bug#389994: marked as done (initramfs-tools: NFS timeout on first mount causes looping.)

Your message dated Thu, 5 Oct 2006 15:47:25 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#389994: Found the bug, patch attached has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: Re: Bug#390902: electricsheep dies: X Error of failed request: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 390902 + help Bug#390902: Fails to start when Composite is enabled Tags were: confirmed Tags added: help tags 390902 + moreinfo Bug#390902: Fails to start when Composite is enabled Tags were: help confirmed Tags added: moreinfo thanks Stopping

Bug#390287: xawtv doesn't work here

Hello, I tested Xawtv here, and I have the same experience: * Sound works fine; * Image is just noise; * BTTV is loaded fine, other tv-app works just fine. Also, in the documentation I read: Don't expect you can use xawtv without reading the documentation at least once. This is obviously not

Bug#391222: marked as done (FTBS: build-depends on non-existing package linux-source-2.6.17)

Your message dated Thu, 5 Oct 2006 16:19:51 +0200 (CEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line [Pkg-uml-pkgs] Bug#391222: FTBS: build-depends on non-existing package linux-source-2.6.17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#391216: marked as done (musixtex-slurps: purging the package fails (mktexlsr unavailable))

Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 07:17:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#391216: fixed in musixtex-slurps 92a-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#391148: marked as done (Uninstallable due to not being binNMU safe)

Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 07:02:13 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#391148: fixed in sylpheed-gtk1 1.0.6-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#391068: Fwd: Bug#391068: Can not be installed if texlive is installed

Thank you for the detailed bug report. What now? Is that bug in sisu-pdf or in some texlive-package or latex-ucs-package? At the present time I can tell you that sisu pdf generation works fine with texlive installed (without the need to install sisu-pdf with which there is indeed a conflict),

Bug#348729: zeroconf bug closure missed by Anand?

severity 348729 normal thanks Hello, I see from the related bug reports that Anand forgot to close this report but closed the others. Perhaps this was deliberate but by examining the reports and the diagnosis it doesn't seem so. So, I'm not closing this report just downgrading it. It is more

Processed: zeroconf bug closure missed by Anand?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 348729 normal Bug#348729: strange interaction with my network settings at work Severity set to `normal' from `grave' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#390133: Openoffice.org crashes when opening some documents

I am seeing this same problem, but I do not have any localization packages installed. It is also only certain files that cause this crash on me. Unfortunately I have not had it crash on a file I can share yet. Most of my openoffice.org packages are still rc2-2, except for openoffice.org-common

Bug#390384: diff for 0.12-5.1 NMU

Hi, i intend to NMU this Package following the 0-Day NMU policy in the next days, see attached patch. Please drop me a note if you prefer to fix this issue on yourself. bye, - michael diff -u libxmms-perl-0.12/debian/changelog libxmms-perl-0.12/debian/changelog ---

Bug#389681: 389681is reproducible here

Hi, ls -1 /var/cache/apt/archives/reportbug_*.deb | /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs -d apt The output is attached. At the end there is: Exception `XMLParserError' at /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/xsd/xmlparser/xmlparser.rb:31 - unclosed token Exception: XMLParserError Exception `LocalJumpError' at

Bug#390129: Rebuilding only provided formats - will that work?

Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Ralf, hi Norbert, Still no answer... Should we just go on and let tetex-base's and tetex-extra's postinst call create_tetex_formats --all --cnffile /etc/texmf/fmt.d/01tetex.cnf I think that would help, too, at least with jadetex and friends.

Bug#391068: Can not be installed if texlive is installed

Thank you for the detailed bug report. What now? Is that bug in sisu-pdf or in some texlive-package or latex-ucs-package? At the present time I can tell you that sisu pdf generation works fine with texlive installed (without the need to install sisu-pdf with which there is indeed a conflict),

Bug#391222: [Pkg-uml-pkgs] Bug#391222: FTBS: build-depends on non-existing package linux-source-2.6.17

On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 02:57:02PM +0200, Julien Valroff wrote: Dear Julien, Package: user-mode-linux Version: 2.6.17-1um-2 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source user-mode-linux should be updated to build-depend on linux-source-2.6.18. there was just the upload of

Bug#391179: marked as done (musixtex: purging the package fails (/usr/bin/kpsewhich unavailable))

Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 07:47:05 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#391179: fixed in musixtex 1:0.112.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#390260: Should be fixed

Should be fixed by newly released xpad 2.12. Sorry for the trouble! -mt signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#390654: marked as done (gcj-4.1_4.1.1-15(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: missing argument?)

Your message dated Thu, 5 Oct 2006 16:48:38 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line #390654: gcj-4.1_4.1.1-15(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: missing argument? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#390928: marked as done (gij-4.1 uninstallable)

Your message dated Thu, 5 Oct 2006 16:47:45 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line 390928: gij-4.1 uninstallable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#390385: diff for 1:1.05-1.1 NMU

Hi, i intend to NMU this Package following the 0-Day NMU Policy in one of the next days. Please drop me a note if you prefer to fix the issue on yourself. bye, - michael diff -u libio-pty-perl-1.05/debian/rules libio-pty-perl-1.05/debian/rules --- libio-pty-perl-1.05/debian/rules +++

Processed: The bug is still there, real bug fix in preparation

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 388231 Bug#388231: config/postrm depends on non-essential packages (dbconfig-common, probably ucf) 'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version; use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead. Bug reopened, originator not

Bug#391231: ntp: file conflict with ntp-simple

Package: ntp Version: 1:4.2.2+dfsg.2-2 Severity: serious Hello Debian NTP Team, There is an error when upgrading the package from sarge to etch, it should Replaces ntp-simple: Preparing to replace ntp 1:4.2.0a+stable-2sarge1 (using .../ntp_1%3a4.2.2+dfsg.2-2_i386.deb) ... Unpacking

Bug#389681: 389681is reproducible here

Hi! On 10/5/06, Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is your machine 1. on a very slow link? I think that not. It's an ADSL 600K downstream and 120K upstream. 2. served by a very broken web proxy server ? Only of there is a proxy between my network and the server where reportbug is

Bug#391071: partman-auto-crypto: No confirmation before hard-drive wiping

On Thursday 05 October 2006 09:48, David Härdeman wrote: Strange, it sounds familiar...oh yes...it's what I've been suggesting all along [1]. So I think its safe to say that we fully agree. :-) I can whip up a patch or two once I have confirmation that this is the final decision on this

Bug#391236: Uninstallable due to unavailable libsvn0-dev

Package: libsvncpp-dev Severity: serious Version: 0.9.3-1 Hi Your package is not installable as it depends on libsvn0-dev which is not available in unstable (anymore). You might want to update the dependency to libsvn-dev. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key

Bug#391234: python2.3: FTBFS : mv: cannot overwrite directory `debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man1'

Package: python2.3 Version: 2.3.5-15 Severity: serious Hi, python2.3 fails to build from sources on pbuilder [...] mkdir debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/test cp -p Lib/test/{{regrtest,test_support,__init__,pystone}.py,README} \ debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/test/. : # move manpages to new

Bug#390364: marked as done (chinput: FTBFS: error: X11/IntrinsicP.h: No such file or directory)

Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 09:17:12 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#390364: fixed in chinput 3.0.2-19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#388231: marked as done (config/postrm depends on non-essential packages (dbconfig-common, probably ucf))

Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 09:02:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#388231: fixed in otrs2 2.0.4p01-15 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#391237: liquidwar-server: file conflict with liquidwar

Package: liquidwar-server Version: 5.6.3-2 Severity: serious Hello Alexandre, There is an error when upgrading the package from sarge to etch, it should Replaces liquidwar: Selecting previously deselected package liquidwar-server. Unpacking liquidwar-server (from

Bug#391235: Uninstallable due to unavailable mjpegtools

Package: vdr-plugin-mp3 Severity: serious Version: 0.9.15-1 Hi Your package is not installable as it depends on mjpegtools which is not available in unstable. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544

Bug#391242: Uninstallable due to unavailable gaim (1:2.0)

Package: gaim-librvp Severity: serious Version: 0;9-1 Hi Your package is not installable as it depends on gaim (1:2.0) while gaim 1:2.0.0+beta3.1-4 is in unstable. As the API of gaim has changed your package probably needs some changes to support this new version. The changes in the API of gaim

Processed: Re: Bug#391231: Acknowledgement (ntp: file conflict with ntp-simple)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: notfound 391231 1:4.2.2+dfsg.2-3 Bug#391231: ntp: file conflict with ntp-simple Bug marked as not found in version 1:4.2.2+dfsg.2-3. merge 391231 389113 Bug#389113: package ntp tries to overwrite /usr/sbin/ntpd which is in package ntp-simple

Processed: libuim3: sarge to etch upgrade fail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 387661 serious Bug#387661: libuim3: should conflict with libuim0 Severity set to `serious' from `normal' quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Processed: retitle 385480 to uninstallable in sid due to apache2 conflict

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 385480 uninstallable in sid due to apache2 conflict Bug#385480: libapache2-mod-php5 needs to be rebuilt for experimental Changed Bug title. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#391205: Acknowledgement (dvipdfmx: purging the package fails (mktexlsr and update-texmf unavailable))

notfound 391205 1:20050831-3 merge 391205 388662 quit Really sorry, I managed to report the same bug twice. Cheers, -- Bill. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#391231: Acknowledgement (ntp: file conflict with ntp-simple)

notfound 391231 1:4.2.2+dfsg.2-3 merge 391231 389113 quit I did not see the bug was already repoted twice... Sorry about that, -- Bill. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Bug#391239: libglib1.2-dev: makes some packages uninstallable

Package: libglib1.2-dev Version: 1.2.10-12 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, upgrading libglib1.2-dev would remove some packages of my system: # apt-get install libglib1.2-dev Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done The following extra packages

  1   2   >