Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
close 399316 2.5.6-6
Bug#399316: echo -e used where -n is wanted; breaks postinst with dash
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 2.5.6-6, send any further explanations to
Santiago
Your message dated Sat, 25 Nov 2006 09:17:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#394153: fixed in twinkle 1:0.9-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
[Bruno: If you have anything to add or correct, please let us know.]
Hi Hugo,
Would be great if you could cc the bug report. Other than that, thanks a
lot for sending the additional information through! I think I know what
is going on now: The key point is that all filesystems that are not part
2006/11/25, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is also crap, and the test fails silently because you're not allowed
to
link objects into a .so on amd64 unless they're built with -fPIC, which is
enforced by the toolchain.
Guessing how to build shared objects on different platforms is a
tags 399047 - upstream
notforwarded 399047
thanks
Yes, exactly. The bug was introduced by the debian maintainer, not
upstream.
(I correct the tags of this patch, as the previous control message did
not work)
Tobi
Am Samstag, den 25.11.2006, 06:46 +0100 schrieb Ana Guerrero:
Hi Tobias,
Your message dated Sat, 25 Nov 2006 11:17:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#391642: fixed in bigloo 2.8c-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 399047 - upstream
Bug#399047: mp3check: Protection of id3-Tags does not work
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: upstream
notforwarded 399047
Bug#399047: mp3check: Protection of id3-Tags does not work
Removed annotation that Bug had been forwarded to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 398855 unreproducible help
Bug#398855: FTBFS: ClanSound: Mixing rate (22.05 kHz) not supported by
soundcard.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible, help
severity 398855 important
Bug#398855: FTBFS: ClanSound: Mixing rate (22.05 kHz)
tag 398855 unreproducible help
severity 398855 important
thanks
Hi Goswin,
Goswin von Brederlow [2006-11-16 1:27 +0100]:
rebuilding clanbomber under etch fails with this error:
Exception caught from ClanLib:
ClanSound: Mixing rate (22.05 kHz) not supported by soundcard.
make[4]: ***
Your message dated Sat, 25 Nov 2006 11:47:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#400179: fixed in gnomesword 2.1.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: wwwoffle
Version: 2.9-2
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
wwwoffle has the setting:
# lock-files = yes | no
# Enable the use of lock files to stop more than one WWWOFFLE process
# from downloading the same URL at the same time (default=no).
tags 398619 + pending
tags 395055 + pending
thanks
I think the best solution right now is depending on all cmdline clients
supported by the package, until a best solution is adopted. I will
follow the progress of bugs like #353617 and #398634.
I am waiting for my (or other) sponsor to upload the
Hi Steve,
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 09:47:18PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
So looking at libgeda for bug #400252 brings another RC bug to my attention:
you have not been changing your library package name in keeping with the
soname changes of this library, and the shlibs provided by libgeda
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 398619 + pending
Bug#398619: acidbase: postinst fails: No pgsql createuser to execute. (have you
installed postgresql-client?
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
tags 395055 + pending
Bug#395055: [intl:fr] acidbase debconf template translation
On 11/25/06, Andree Leidenfrost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Bruno: If you have anything to add or correct, please let us know.]
Hi Hugo,
Would be great if you could cc the bug report. Other than that, thanks a
lot for sending the additional information through! I think I know what
is going on
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 12:20:40 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
It would really be great if somebody could fix this, or if a new
package without powerpc support could be uploaded.
Hi Lucas,
GCI support for powerpc is dropped for now, a new package is uploaded
few minutes ago.
tags 400108 + unreproducible
severity 400108 important
stop
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006, Holger Leskien wrote:
at some point in the last weeks vino stopped working on my computer.
First I thought it might be a wrong password issue, but now I checked
more thoroughly. This is what the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 400108 + unreproducible
Bug#400108: vino: password check broken?
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
severity 400108 important
Bug#400108: vino: password check broken?
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
stop
Stopping
Your message dated Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:32:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#399841: fixed in regina 3.3-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hi Philipp,
find attached my patch for my NMU of your open-iscsi package. This patch
does NOT contain the new upstream tar-ball. As on request in #397636 i
used version 2.0.730 of upstream's tar-ball.
This upload goes to experimental, so we still have all possibilities
open for etch.
Greetings
Package: blam
Hi,
OK, I think I know what is happening. It's something that really
shouldn't happen.
The problem is simply in blam, so from now on you can just use
--trace=program instead of the one you just used.
I get timeouts whilst trying to download the file.
Just before those two
Your message dated Sat, 25 Nov 2006 14:17:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#397636: fixed in open-iscsi 2.0.730-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Mike,
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 06:28:01PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
Does your question apply to *all* of the files mentioned in the mail you
linked to? I don't understand which files you believe are non-free and why;
some of the files mentioned are things like Microsoft Office documents,
Your message dated Sat, 25 Nov 2006 14:17:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#398733: fixed in open-iscsi 2.0.730-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 25 Nov 2006 15:52:32 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line unreproducable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 03:11:16PM +0100, Frederik Wagner wrote:
Package: linux-modules-extra-2.6
Version: 2.6.17-2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
The source package depends on the 'squashfs-source' and 'unionfs-source'
package, which are not available in
retitle 393422 Contains non-free files.
tag 393422 - etch-ignore
clone 393422 -1
clone 393422 -2
clone 393422 -3
reassign -1 iceweasel
reassign -2 icedove
reassign -3 mozilla
thanks
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 07:01:28AM -0800, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Mike,
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006
Package: kvm
Version: 4-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of kvm_4-1 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by sbuild/s390 85
[...]
make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/kvm-4/qemu/s390-softmmu'
gcc-3.4 -I /build/buildd/kvm-4/qemu/../user -Wall
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 393422 Contains non-free files.
Bug#393422: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's
Changed Bug title.
tag 393422 - etch-ignore
Bug#393422: Contains non-free files.
Tags were: etch-ignore
Tags removed: etch-ignore
clone 393422 -1
Package: wormux
Version: 0.7.4-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of wormux_0.7.4-2 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by sbuild/s390 85
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: cdbs (= 0.4.23-1.1), debhelper (=
Your message dated Sat, 25 Nov 2006 15:17:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#398619: fixed in acidbase 1.2.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 386415 serious
Bug#386415: /etc/trac isn't recognised by trac
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
retitle 386415 Debian Policy Violation 10.7.2
Bug#386415: /etc/trac isn't recognised by trac
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Stopping processing
I can't find any references to the POSIX thread issue in
Oracle/Sleepycat's documentation. Could you please elaborate a bit, or
consider including db4.5 without necessarily rebuilding other
applications to link against it. As you know, bdb has a long history of
requiring a few years for
Package: rubrica
Severity: serious
Version: 1.0.15-1
Tags: sid
Hi
Your package is not installable as it depends on python2.3-libxslt1 which is
not available in unstable anymore. You might want to consider depending on
python-libxslt1 which only provides python2.4-libxslt1 instead...
Cheers
Luk
Package: migrationtools
Version: 46-2.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18
Locale:
clone 337243 386415
thanks
These bugs are related although 337243 is already closed, because you
just put a trac.ini file in /usr/share/trac/conf and it will be the
default.
but this is not the right way to do it, because /usr/share/ is not for
conffiles. representing a policy violation.
best
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 368485 serious
Bug#368485: amarok involves two circular dependencies
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
If you somehow get the package installed, you may not be able to remove it:
Removing libooc-x11-dev ...
xargs: /usr/lib/oo2c/ooconfig: No such file or directory
dpkg: error processing libooc-x11-dev (--purge):
subprocess pre-removal script returned error exit status 127
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Saturday 25 November 2006 01:17, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
On Sat, 25 Nov 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
I hope the info available now will be sufficient to track down the
problem. If not, I could repeat the procedure and also generate an
image after running the Windows 2000 chkdsk.
Please.
Package: netdiag
Version: 0.7-7.1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Several of the applications in this package now routinely segfault and leave
the port in promiscuous mode with no warning.
The problem was first reported nearly ten years ago (7794 and 12306) and
Your message dated Sat, 25 Nov 2006 16:47:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#398545: fixed in sitebar 3.3.8-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: azureus
Version: 2.5.0.0+0-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
At 1164472396 time_t, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Automatic build of azureus_2.5.0.0+0-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 98
Build started at 20061125-1730
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
# uninstallable due to unmet dep on firefox (1.6)
severity 397995 serious
Bug#397995: New version with Firefox 2.0 support
Severity set to `serious' from `wishlist'
End of message,
Enough stalling. Here's a debdiff for a sarge security update. I have
tested that the warning message is certainly triggered by the bogus
length values Adam found. I *think* the bug may only be exploitable on
64-bit systems, as read() calls seem to fail immediately where the
length would result
Your message dated Sat, 25 Nov 2006 16:47:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#400174: fixed in libextractor 0.5.16-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: mozart-gtk
Version: 20060615-2
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
Automatic build of mozart-gtk_20060615-2 on nasya by sbuild/sparc 0.50
Build started at 20061125-1533
Quoting David Gil ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
tags 398619 + pending
tags 395055 + pending
thanks
I think the best solution right now is depending on all cmdline clients
supported by the package, until a best solution is adopted. I will
follow the progress of bugs like #353617 and #398634.
I am
On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:48:15 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
Maybe the package should put something in /usr/lib/iceweasel/plugins?
AFAICS this happens in the new version 3.31-5, so I guess this bug
can be closed.
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4
El sáb, 25-11-2006 a las 17:58 +0100, Christian Perrier escribió:
I'm building the package and I'll upload
Thanks Christian, my sponsor has already done it.
Thanks again,
David.
Quoting David Gil ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
El sáb, 25-11-2006 a las 17:58 +0100, Christian Perrier escribió:
I'm building the package and I'll upload
Thanks Christian, my sponsor has already done it.
OK, thenI attempted the upload as well, which means that a REJECT
message will probably
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.24
Architecture: sparc
Severity: grave
Hello,
I have some SparcSTATION 20 with one or two SuperSPARC-II and 448 MB of
memory (thus, HIGHMEM is used). On these workstations, dpkg works fine.
If I replace SuperSPARC-II by one, two or four ROSS RT-626, I
Package: xterm
Version: 222-2
Severity: grave
Setting up xterm (222-2) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/X11/app-defaults/KOI8RXTerm ...
error in control file: `Format' value not specified at /usr/sbin/install-docs
line 699, /usr/share/doc-base/xterm-faq line 22.
dpkg: error
Package: mol-source
Version: 0.9.71.dfsg-3
Severity: serious
mol-source needs m4 to build but doesn't depend on it.
| /usr/bin/make -C /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.18-3-powerpc
M=/build/buildd/linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.18/debian/build/build_powerpc_none_powerpc_mol/kmod
-j8
| make[3]: Entering
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have build this on etch and in a clean sid chroot and it builds fine.
The problem seems to be with the swt library. The files in question are
in the libswt-gtk-3.2-java package, which azureus build-depends on.
This seems to be a non-issue, I
Looks like the NMU to 0.67-0.1 broke installation. The changelog says:
* Remove the debconf note that's displayed only in very rare
situations and rather pertains to README.Debian
and debian/config has been removed, but the postinst still contains:
. /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 399907 +patch
Bug#399907: language-env does not install
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Package: bigloo
Version: 2.8c-3
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of bigloo_2.8c-3 on bld-3 by sbuild/hppa 85
Build started at 20061125-0458
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: debhelper ( 5), dh
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
package xterm
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xterm
tags 400375 + pending
Bug#400375: fails to install
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping
Hi,
In Debian we are currently seeing some problems with drivers that are
repeatedly loaded unsuccessfully:
kernel: Intel ISA PCIC probe: not found.
FATAL: Error inserting i82365: no such device
kernel: Intel ISA PCIC probe: not found.
[...]
According to Marco d'Itri this could be because
Package: icedove
Version: 1.5.0.7-3
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
Icedove loses some mails with broken headers. The problem is described in
detail
here:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360409
I think this should be a RC bug because Icedove is a widely
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package azureus
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: azureus
forcemerge 392114 400354
Bug#392114: azureus: FTBFS in etch: The import org.eclipse cannot be resolved
Bug#400354: azureus: FTBFS: import org.eclipse cannot be resolved
Forcibly Merged 392114
Package: dissy
Version: 3-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
This package is a frontend for objdump, readelf and nm, but it does
not depend on binutils. It's lacking dependencies at least also on
python-gtk2. Please check if anything else is missing before
uploading.
thanks,
guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Package: fmit
Version: 0.96.5-1
Followup-For: Bug #385946
Crashing here too on startup:
CaptureThread: WARNING: ALSA: cannot set channel count to one. channels
will be mixed
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread -1224427840 (LWP 25140)]
0xb721ae5c in free ()
This package should not be built on other arches, it is meaningless for
any but i386 and will be useful for amd64 in a later version. The
package has Architecture: i386, why is it being auto-built at all?
Baruch
* Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] [061125 18:04]:
Package: kvm
Version: 4-1
Your message dated Sat, 25 Nov 2006 20:32:06 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#400376: fixed in mol 0.9.71.dfsg-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 25 Nov 2006 20:32:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#392776: fixed in mbr 1.1.9-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 15:21 +0100, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
Package: blam
Hi,
OK, I think I know what is happening. It's something that really
shouldn't happen.
The problem is simply in blam, so from now on you can just use
--trace=program instead of the one you just used.
I
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 400104 pending
Bug#400104: subcommander: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-depends on libsvn-dev and
libneon25-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 09:17:54AM -0800, David Liontooth wrote:
Package: netdiag
Version: 0.7-7.1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Several of the applications in this package now routinely segfault and
leave the port in promiscuous mode with no warning.
Package: xterm
Version: 222-2
Severity: grave
Hello,
xterm 222-2 fails to install:
Setting up xterm (222-2) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/X11/app-defaults/KOI8RXTerm ...
error in control file: `Format' value not specified at /usr/sbin/install-docs
line 699,
Not the original reporter, but I see it too:
# dpkg -r solfege
(Reading database ... 216078 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing solfege ...
usage: update-python-modules [-v] [-c] package_directory [...]
update-python-modules [-v] [-c] package.dirs [...]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
# not ported, per the maintainer
severity 400334 important
Bug#400334: kvm - FTBFS: cpu.h: No such file or directory
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
End of message,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forcemerge 400375 400389
Bug#400375: fails to install
Bug#400389: xterm: installation fails
Forcibly Merged 400375 400389.
kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
forcemerge 400375 400389
kthxbye
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 22:33:55 +0100, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
xterm 222-2 fails to install:
Setting up xterm (222-2) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/X11/app-defaults/KOI8RXTerm ...
error in control file: `Format' value not specified
Your message dated Sat, 25 Nov 2006 21:32:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#397214: fixed in uswsusp 0.3~cvs20060928-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 03:01:36PM -0700, Ron Jensen wrote:
Not the original reporter, but I see it too:
First, do you still have the .deb for 3.0.6 lying around somewhere? For
example in /var/cache/apt/archives? If so, can you send it to me (no
need to cc the bts.)? I don't have the binary
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 04:40:46PM +0100, Michael Burschik wrote:
The command migrate_passwd.pl /etc/passwd marks all passwords
in /etc/shadow as {crypt} passwords, although they are clearly
{md5} passwords and are marked as such by $1$.
How does this break? The system crypt() function also
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 09:01:14PM +, Calum Mackay wrote:
Crashing here too on startup:
With a completely different error.
Please re-open this bug.
You should file a new bug report for this unrelated crash.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Your message dated Sat, 25 Nov 2006 22:47:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#399413: fixed in xlogmaster 1.6.0-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: monodoc-http
Version: 1.1.18-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Resulting web page when pointing browser to http://localhost:8081/monodoc
is a three part frame. The top frame looks ok, but only contain a link to
itself and to:
Package: dh-make-perl
Version: 0.24
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When trying to create a .deb from DateTime-Format-ISO8601-0.0403,
dh-make-perl put the following line into debian/control:
Build-Depends-Indep: 5.8.8-6.1
From looking at an older version of dh-make-perl, I guessed that
something
On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:41:40 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
remote-tty contains a new top-level directory /share:
Patch 1:
fix error in line which creates the directory
--- debian/rules.orig 2006-11-26 00:05:57.0 +0100
+++ debian/rules2006-11-26 00:07:13.0 +0100
@@
On sáb, 2006-11-25 at 20:27 +0100, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
. . . . LEAVE: Imendio.Blam.ThemeManager:LoadThemes (string)
. . . . ENTER: Imendio.Blam.Conf:Get
(string,string)([STRING:0x4bf40:ui/theme],
[STRING:0x4af00:/usr/share/blam/themesblam], )
Well, here is the problem. For some reason
Package: ca-certificates
Version: 20061027
Followup-For: Bug #387089
Greetings,
I have tested the patch for c_rehash submitted in this bug report. The patch
seems to work. Here is what I did.
I patched c_rehash in the openssl source with the patch provided in the bug
report. I then rebuilt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
tags 400183 + patch
Bug#400183: tesseract-ocr: tessdata directory with content missing
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Package: xterm
Version: 222-2
Severity: serious
The upgrade of xterm fails with the following error message:
Setting up xterm (222-2) ...
error in control file: `Format' value not specified at /usr/sbin/install-docs
line 699, /usr/share/doc-base/xterm-faq line 22.
dpkg: error processing xterm
While trying to autobuild lucene, I ran into several different failures.
Over 16 builds, it failed 3 times and timeouted once.
And succeeded 12 times? Sounds good enough to me. Let's leave
this alone until etch is released, then can look into switching to a Sun
JDK build (once the Sun JDK gets
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forcemerge 400375 400401
Bug#400375: fails to install
Bug#400401: xterm upgrade: error in control file: `Format' value not specified
at /usr/sbin/install-docs line 699, /usr/share/doc-bae/xterm-faq line 22.
Bug#400389: xterm: installation fails
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
forcemerge 400375 400403
Bug#400375: fails to install
Bug#400403: invalid doc-base file
Bug#400389: xterm: installation fails
Forcibly Merged 400375 400389 400403.
End of message,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 368485 + pending
Bug#368485: amarok involves two circular dependencies
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 368485 + pending
Bug#368485: amarok involves two circular dependencies
Tags were: pending
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Ari Pollak wrote:
On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 01:15 -0800, Alvaro Martinez Echevarria wrote:
The bug specifies that firefox does not work either.
Should that be confirmed before closing the bug?
Please accept my deepest apologies for missing a small parenthetical
remark in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
forcemerge 400375 400403
Bug#400375: fails to install
Bug#400403: invalid doc-base file
Bug#400389: xterm: installation fails
Bug#400401: xterm upgrade: error in control file: `Format'
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 03:19:28PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: cdbs (= 0.4.23-1.1), debhelper (= 4.2.0),
libsdl1.2-dev, libsdl-image1.2-dev, libsdl-mixer1.2-dev,
libsdl-net1.2-dev, libsdl-ttf1.2-dev | libsdl-ttf2.0-dev,
as
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
forcemerge 400375 400414
Bug#400375: fails to install
Bug#400414: xterm not installing (error in control file)
Bug#400389: xterm: installation fails
Bug#400401: xterm upgrade: error in
On Sat, 25 Nov 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
I've stopped after the Win2k chkdsk as that turned out to be sufficient to
make Vista boot again, so running the Vista repair is unnecessary!
The md5sum check after running chkdsk showed only /pagefile.sys deleted.
Yes, there isn't really anything
Hi,
On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 19:19:58 +0100, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.24
Architecture: sparc
Severity: grave
I have some SparcSTATION 20 with one or two SuperSPARC-II and 448 MB
of memory (thus, HIGHMEM is used). On these workstations, dpkg works fine.
If I replace
severity 400052 grave
reassign 400052 gaim-autoprofile
merge 400052 394773
thanks
Debian Bug report logs source autoprofile.URL
Description: Binary data
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 400052 grave
Bug#400052: autoprofile_2.14-2+b1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: compiler errors
Severity set to `grave' from `serious'
reassign 400052 gaim-autoprofile
Bug#400052: autoprofile_2.14-2+b1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: compiler errors
Bug
Robert Woodcock wrote:
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 09:17:54AM -0800, David Liontooth wrote:
Package: netdiag
Version: 0.7-7.1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Several of the applications in this package now routinely segfault and
leave the port in
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
