Processed: severity of 407495 is normal

2007-01-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 > # issue w/ persistent device names, known issue > severity 407495 normal Bug#407495: Linux 2.6.18-686 serious boot problem in multi-user-mode, single-user boots without problems. (Ke

Bug#404555: May I upload dfsbuild to testing-proposed-updates?

2007-01-18 Thread John Goerzen
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 07:16:31PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > the normal way and disregard the version in NEW. If that's really not > possible, the next best would be to upload a .4 to unstable that fixes the > RC bugs for that branch, and then accept .3 from NEW. I have uploaded a .4 to unst

Bug#407494: caudium: failes to start

2007-01-18 Thread Henrik Andreasson
Package: caudium Version: 2:1.4.9.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When pike loads the caudium module it crashes with SIGSEGV cd /usr/lib/caudium; strace -f ./start-caudium --gdb open("/usr/lib/caudium/lib/7.6.93", O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|O_DIRECTORY) = 9 f

Bug#407495: Linux 2.6.18-686 serious boot problem in multi-user-mode, single-user boots without problems. (Kernel or scripts in initrd?)

2007-01-18 Thread Elias Schwerdtfeger
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-3-686 Version: 2.6.18-7 Severity: grave My hardware constallation: It is a little hard to describe. I had done a fresh network-installation on a rather old machine. The hardware is a little "nonstandard", so I think I have to describe it. The greatest part of the sys

Bug#401938: libapache2-mod-fcgid: Segfaults on startup with Apache 2.2

2007-01-18 Thread Michael Stucki
Why is nothing happening with this bug when it seems the problem cannot be reproduced anymore? Is there anything I can do to help about this? - michael pgppqq5XcG3eU.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#350595: marked as done (gerris_0.6.0-3(m68k/unstable/vault13): FTBFS on m68k)

2007-01-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 Jan 2007 21:32:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#350595: fixed in gerris 0.6.0-3.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#407050: let apertium enter etch

2007-01-18 Thread Steve Langasek
reopen 407050 thanks On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 02:22:20PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > New version of apertium uploaded that solves bug #407050 No, it doesn't. This bug was filed about a missing runtime dependency, and you changed the build depends. I've confirmed that 1.0.3-2 still needs lt

Processed: Re: let apertium enter etch

2007-01-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 407050 Bug#407050: apertium: Missing depends on lttoolbox 'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version; use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead. Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing her

Bug#394039: marked as done (chiark-tcl_1.0.1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: "comparison always true")

2007-01-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 Jan 2007 21:32:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#394039: fixed in chiark-tcl 1.0.1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#393970: marked as done (chiark-tcl - FTBFS: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 3 has type 'size_t')

2007-01-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 Jan 2007 21:32:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#393970: fixed in chiark-tcl 1.0.1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#407460: USB ethernet interface renamed after installation on NSLU2 which causes the system to be inaccessible

2007-01-18 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Gordon Farquharson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-18 08:57]: > I'm not sure which package to assign this bug to, but since it causes > the system to be inaccessible after an install, debian-installer seems > like a good place to start. Well, I still believe this is a problem with udev. CCing Marc

Bug#406331: After patch I can run successfully xcdroast!

2007-01-18 Thread Paul Csanyi
Package: xcdroast Followup-For: Bug #406331 -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18 Locale: LANG=hu_HU, LC_CTYPE=hu_HU (charmap=ISO-8859-2) Versions of pack

Processed: Duplicate

2007-01-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 407482 minor Bug#407482: kvm-source should depend on quilt Severity set to `minor' from `serious' > merge 407482 407447 Bug#407447: kvm-source: kvm-source needs quilt Bug#407482: kvm-source should depend on quilt Merged 407447 407482. > thank

Bug#406331: please test this patch for xcdroast - SOLVED :)

2007-01-18 Thread csanyipal
Hello! :) On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 05:44:38PM +0100, csanyipal wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 11:38:17PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > > tags 406065 + patch > > thanks > > > > xcdroast now uses readom instead of readcd. This probably means the > > version check isn't needed anymore, sinc

Bug#407482: kvm-source should depend on quilt

2007-01-18 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Package: kvm-source Version: 11-1 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source kvm-source's build is dependent on quilt (I guess this must be a recent change you've made). But the package is not dependent on quilt which it should be. Thanks, Ritesh -- System Information: Debian

Bug#407458: A bug in debhelper #406921

2007-01-18 Thread Baruch Even
This is in fact a bug in debhelper and it was already filed as #406921. We'll see how that bug progresses, if it won't we'll look into putting a patch in for now. Cheers, Baruch -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: updates

2007-01-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 393380 1.4.4-6 Bug#393380: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's Bug marked as found in version 1.4.4-6. > found 393394 1:0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2 Bug#393394: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's Bug marked as found in version 1

Bug#406331: please test this patch for xcdroast

2007-01-18 Thread csanyipal
Hello! :) On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 11:38:17PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > tags 406065 + patch > thanks > > xcdroast now uses readom instead of readcd. This probably means the > version check isn't needed anymore, since any version of readom in > existance should be new enough. > > The atta

Processed: Re: bash-doc: Package description is wrong and misleading

2007-01-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 394275 serious Bug#394275: bash-doc: Package description is wrong and misleading Bug#402544: bash-doc: Description out of date Severity set to `serious' from `normal' > tags 394275 + patch Bug#394275: bash-doc: Package description is wrong and

Bug#405926: disabling altivec in ffmpeg avoids the segfault.

2007-01-18 Thread Andreas Henriksson
tags 405926 + patch thanks If ffmpeg is configured with --disable-altivec then there's no segfault. This is what the attached patch does. There seems to be several altivec-related problems in different packages currently. People might want to keep an eye on bugs like #404876 Patch attached.

Processed: disabling altivec in ffmpeg avoids the segfault.

2007-01-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 405926 + patch Bug#405926: ffmpeg doesnt work on powerpc There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#407460: USB ethernet interface renamed after installation on NSLU2 which causes the system to be inaccessible

2007-01-18 Thread Gordon Farquharson
Package: debian-installer Version: 20061102 Severity: serious I'm not sure which package to assign this bug to, but since it causes the system to be inaccessible after an install, debian-installer seems like a good place to start. Summary of the problem: After an installation of Debian on the L

Bug#400192: Patch for the 251-7.1 NMU

2007-01-18 Thread Christian Perrier
Olivier Berger a écrit : Hi. I noticed the package hasn't yet entered testing though it seems to me that it wouldn't have changed anything preventing it to... but unfortunately it doesn't seem to enter testing because of compilation on alpha, according to http://packages.qa.debian.org/libn/libns

Bug#407458: package does not purge properly

2007-01-18 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
Package: kvm Version: 11-1 Severity: serious kvm does not purge properly (apologies for the Norwegian in the dpkg line, but I guess it should be quite obvious what happens nevertheless): fugl:~> sudo dpkg --purge kvm (Leser database ... 102778 filer og kataloger er inst

Bug#407459: refuses to launch, tap support is broken

2007-01-18 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
Package: kvm Version: 11-1 Severity: grave This command line used to work with kvm 7: fugl:~> sudo kvm -hda /dev/evms/winxp -net nic -net tap Incorrect number of arguments for command Usage: brctl addifadd interface to bridge /etc/kvm/kvm-ifup: could not launch network script Could

Processed: Re: Fails to configure

2007-01-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 405996 + unreproducible Bug#405996: Fails to configure There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible > tags 405996 + wontfix Bug#405996: Fails to configure Tags were: unreproducible Tags added: wontfix > severity 405996 important Bug#405996:

Bug#400192: Patch for the 251-7.1 NMU

2007-01-18 Thread Olivier Berger
Hi. I noticed the package hasn't yet entered testing though it seems to me that it wouldn't have changed anything preventing it to... but unfortunately it doesn't seem to enter testing because of compilation on alpha, according to http://packages.qa.debian.org/libn/libnss-ldap.html Is there some

Bug#407105: marked as done (tenshi: Package is non functional when rebuilt from sources)

2007-01-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#407105: fixed in tenshi 0.4-1.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#405873: #405873: trivial patch to fix FTBFS

2007-01-18 Thread Mohammed Sameer
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 02:13:08AM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote: > The following NMU patch obviously fixes the FTBFS by casting the pointer > into a intptr_t instead of a int. Builds fine, not tested. > > Brice > Fixing the bug is not a big issue. My sponsor is not free to sponsor the upload (http:

Bug#407406: mysql-server: DELETE FROM table causes "Incorrect key file for table"

2007-01-18 Thread Alexis Sukrieh
Hi again, I also have another bug (certainly related) with the same dump: mysql> SHOW FIELDS FROM users; ERROR 1030 (HY000): Got error 28 from storage engine mysql> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#407406: mysql-server: DELETE FROM table causes "Incorrect key file for table"

2007-01-18 Thread Alexis Sukrieh
Christian Hammers wrote: That bug is supposed to be fixed since 5.0.26 if I read it correctly. Yep, but I'm facing a symptom very near to the upstream bug reported. That's why I thought in the first place it was the same bug. Could you mail me a copy of the mysqldump output you tried to insert

Processed: severity of 407435 is important

2007-01-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 > severity 407435 important Bug#407435: laptop-net: does not set the appropriate scheme according to the neighbouring IPs Severity set to `important' from `grave' > End of message, st

Bug#407050: marked as done (apertium: Missing depends on lttoolbox)

2007-01-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#407050: fixed in apertium 1.0.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#406139: Viewing key properties locks up seahorse

2007-01-18 Thread Sebastian Dröge
On Do, 2007-01-18 at 11:55 +, Sam Morris wrote: > On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 12:41 +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > > Upstream said, that there is an attempt to download unknown keys if you > > uncheck the button that says show only trusted signatures. > > > > Does this fix it for you in some way? >

Bug#406139: Viewing key properties locks up seahorse

2007-01-18 Thread Sam Morris
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 12:58 +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > On Do, 2007-01-18 at 11:55 +, Sam Morris wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 12:41 +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > > > Upstream said, that there is an attempt to download unknown keys if you > > > uncheck the button that says show only tr

Bug#407435: laptop-net: does not set the appropriate scheme according to the neighbouring IPs

2007-01-18 Thread Eddy Petrișor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: laptop-net Version: 2.26-7 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, I am using laptop-net to connect to the network at home(ritter) and the one at work(bd). Both places use DHCP. At work I need to do some stuff after co

Bug#407407: it is a duplicate of #398091

2007-01-18 Thread Jeremy Lal
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=398091 sorry i checked after ! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#406139: Viewing key properties locks up seahorse

2007-01-18 Thread Sam Morris
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 12:41 +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > Upstream said, that there is an attempt to download unknown keys if you > uncheck the button that says show only trusted signatures. > > Does this fix it for you in some way? Could you tell me where the options is? I don't see it... --

Bug#406139: Viewing key properties locks up seahorse

2007-01-18 Thread Sam Morris
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 12:32 +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > On Do, 2007-01-18 at 11:25 +, Sam Morris wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 11:59 +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > > > I can't reproduce your lockup here. I sometimes get bug #401474 though > > > when viewing key properties but the CPU us

Bug#406139: Viewing key properties locks up seahorse

2007-01-18 Thread Sebastian Dröge
On Do, 2007-01-18 at 12:32 +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > On Do, 2007-01-18 at 11:25 +, Sam Morris wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 11:59 +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > > > I can't reproduce your lockup here. I sometimes get bug #401474 though > > > when viewing key properties but the CPU usa

Bug#406139: Viewing key properties locks up seahorse

2007-01-18 Thread Sebastian Dröge
On Do, 2007-01-18 at 11:25 +, Sam Morris wrote: > On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 11:59 +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > > I can't reproduce your lockup here. I sometimes get bug #401474 though > > when viewing key properties but the CPU usage goes down again after some > > seconds. > > > > Could it be t

Bug#406139: Viewing key properties locks up seahorse

2007-01-18 Thread Sam Morris
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 11:59 +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > I can't reproduce your lockup here. I sometimes get bug #401474 though > when viewing key properties but the CPU usage goes down again after some > seconds. > > Could it be that your lockup is just bug #401474? The UI isn't really > respo

Processed: severity of 407230 is important

2007-01-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 > severity 407230 important Bug#407230: gnome-chess crashes Severity set to `important' from `grave' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistan

Bug#406646: rafkill segfaults already on startup (amd64).

2007-01-18 Thread Andreas Henriksson
For the record... For me rafkill segfaults already on startup. Running on Debian GNU/Linux Unstable AMD64. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ rafkill rafkill -h for help screen Running game at 40 Using window mode 0 *FATAL* Setting null bitmap OS Linux Loaded data Loaded /usr/share/games/rafkill/data/intro

Processed: thttpd bugs: merge 216554 396277 (take two)

2007-01-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > #close 216554 -- already done by Steve > merge 216554 396277 Bug#216554: thttpd: malicious user may start stopped daemon exploiting logrotate Bug#396277: allows creating any file as root Merged 216554 396277. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Processed: tagging 405873

2007-01-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > tags 405873 + patch Bug#405873: katoob: FTBFS: cast from 'protoent*' to 'int' loses precision There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. P

Bug#406139: Viewing key properties locks up seahorse

2007-01-18 Thread Sebastian Dröge
Hi, I can't reproduce your lockup here. I sometimes get bug #401474 though when viewing key properties but the CPU usage goes down again after some seconds. Could it be that your lockup is just bug #401474? The UI isn't really responsive while taking 100% CPU and I could imagine that under some ci

Bug#404876: Jonathans 2.6.19.2 config doesn't solve the problem on my PPC.

2007-01-18 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hello! Just reporting that running 2.6.19.2 with the .config that Jonathan supplied does _not_ solve the problem on my PowerPC. -- Regards, Andreas Henriksson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#407230: gnome-chess works without problems on amd64 and ppc ... please provide more info.

2007-01-18 Thread Andreas Henriksson
tags 407230 + moreinfo unreproducible thanks I've tested gnome-chess on my Debian GNU/Linux Unstable AMD64 machine and my Debian GNU/Linux Etch PowerPC and I couldn't find any problem on eigther of those. Can you please provide more info on what you're doing to make gnome-chess segfault. If you c

Processed: gnome-chess works without problems on amd64 and ppc ... please provide more info.

2007-01-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 407230 + moreinfo unreproducible Bug#407230: gnome-chess crashes There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (

Processed: tagging 407405

2007-01-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 > # ncc is only in unstable, not RC for etch > tags 407405 sid Bug#407405: file conflicts between ncc and nemerle There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping pro

Bug#407406: mysql-server: DELETE FROM table causes "Incorrect key file for table"

2007-01-18 Thread Christian Hammers
tags 407406 moreinfo stop Hello On 2007-01-18 Alexis Sukrieh wrote: > Package: mysql-server > Version: 5.0.30-3 > Severity: grave > Justification: causes serious data loss > > > Hello, > > I use a Debian "etch" server for development purposes, and I use there a > mysql database. > > Now that

Bug#403703: quick look

2007-01-18 Thread Alex Owen
I still have my test setup from December where I ran test.sh (BTS Dec 21). in test.sh when I run $HOME/cups/cupsys-1.2.7/filter/pstops I am running pstops from 1.2.7-1 patched ONLY with str2111.patch I have upgraded my system so that 1.2.7-2 is now installed. rerunning the tests I should expect

Processed: Re: Bug#407406: mysql-server: DELETE FROM table causes "Incorrect key file for table"

2007-01-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 407406 moreinfo Bug#407406: mysql-server: DELETE FROM table causes "Incorrect key file for table" There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Processed: severity of 407403 is minor

2007-01-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > severity 407403 minor Bug#407403: duplicity cannot "canonicalise" Severity set to `minor' from `grave' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assi

Processed: tagging 407403

2007-01-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 407403 + unreproducible Bug#407403: duplicity cannot "canonicalise" There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contac

Bug#407403: duplicity cannot "canonicalise"

2007-01-18 Thread Martin Wuertele
Hi David! * David Andel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-18 07:36]: > Package: duplicity > Version: 0.4.2-10.1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Whatever I enter, if I use it through backupninja or directly on the > commandline, it always returns the same error: > > ap

Bug#407406:

2007-01-18 Thread Alexis Sukrieh
After looking at the patch submitted upstream, it looks like I'm not facing the exactly same bug, as the sources of mysql-server in etch include the correct version: MySQL patch: http://lists.mysql.com/commits/12694 etch mysql-server sources: if (!_mi_get_last_key(info,keyinfo,anc_buff

Bug#407329: emacs-snapshot: emacs should make a backup for every file by default

2007-01-18 Thread Romain Francoise
Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > One shouldn't lose a backup until the buffer is modified and > saved. Of course the file must be saved again after being reopened for the backup to be overwritten -- Emacs doesn't throw the backup away if you just open the file... Anyway, I think you