* Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-17 16:51-0400]:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 12:41:38PM -0400, Micah Anderson wrote:
> > tag 456996 +moreinfo
> > thanks
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to track down how this happened for you, can you please
> > provide the following:
>
> If you want to re
Your message dated Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#462605: fixed in lprng 3.8.A~rc4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #462605,
regarding lprng: Fails to upgrade cause /var/spool/lpd is missing
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Your message dated Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:59:30 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: No more FTBFS
has caused the Debian Bug report #463470,
regarding xgraph: FTBFS: configure.in:3: version mismatch. This is Automake
1.10.1,
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Package: awn-manager
Version: 0.2.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
Missing dependency,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ awn-manager
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/awn-manager", line 46, in ?
from awnApplet import awnApplet
File "/usr/share/avant-window-navigator/awn
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 471458 http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69993
Bug#471458: openoffice.org: Can not save the file. Even Save As is not working.
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6
forwarded 471458 http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69993
thanks
Ďoďo wrote:
> Sometimes - still not clear when - I can not save the file. After
> pressing Ctrl+S I get:
> Error saving the document. Write Error. The file could not be written.
> It happend already in Writer and in Calc
Your message dated Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#470406: fixed in autodocksuite 4.0.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #470406,
regarding Please remove vanity suggests on popularity-contest
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Package: subtitleeditor
notfound 464704 0.11.0-1
thanks
I just installed by hand the version from stable (etch) (0.11.0-1) which works
like a charm.
--
Regards,
EddyP
=
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Confirm, downgrading the libglib to 2.14.6-1 and also 2.16.1-1 fix this
problem.
Best regards,
Neutron Soutmun
Your message dated Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:17:18 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#470338: hk-classes: FTBFS: dh_install:
libhk-classes-xbase missing files (usr/lib/libhk_xbasedriver.so*), aborting
has caused the Debian Bug report #470338,
regarding hk-classes: FTBFS:
Your message dated Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#471184: fixed in pathfinder 0.2.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #471184,
regarding pathfinder: FTBFS:
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
On jeu, 2008-03-06 at 10:42 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 08:12:55PM +, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > 'Conflicts' is not an appropriate way to resolve a conflict for a
> > program name. See policy 10.1:
> > Two different packages must not install programs with diff
Hello!
I'm able to reproduce this using pbuilder (on amd64).
If I'm not mistaken, the cause of the build failure originates from this part
in the build log:
make[2]: Entering directory `/build/user/tau-2.16.4/src/Profile'
Makefile:29: /include/Makefile: No such file or directory
make[2]: *** No r
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.12.30
You have hit the number one programmer excuse :)
The additional information you requested:
I have added "echo $PATH" in the depcomp script in vorbis-tools sources
and it outputted this:
/usr/lib/apt-build:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 470003 + patch
Bug#470003: gnome-pilot-conduits: spurious libxml build-dep
Tags were: lenny sid
Tags added: patch
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> usertag 470003 + proposed-patch
Bug#470003: gnom
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:50:36AM -0300, David Roguin wrote:
> I just download the debian source and compiled it.
> And I can't reproduce the bug.
Mark runs it on powerpc, it could be an endianness bug.
--
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sig
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1
> reassign 467575 zvbi
Bug#467575: kdetv: FTBFS: simon.cpp:97: error: 'vbi_unref_page' was not
declared in this scope
Bug reassigned from package `kdetv' to `zvbi'.
> found 467575
tag 470348 + patch
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
usertag 470348 + patch
thanks
Hello!
Simply removing the 0 in the name from the librra0-dev (>= 0.9.1)
build-dependency seems to fix the problem.
(May I also suggest to build-depend on autotools-dev, move the copying of
config.{guess,sub} to configure tim
Your message dated Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:18:36 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#456856: fixed in libvisual 0.4.0-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #456856,
regarding libvisual: FTBFS: error: 'sigill_handler_sse' undeclared (first use
in this function)
to be marked a
Package: nvidia-kernel-source
Version: 169.09-1
I think I'm experiencing the same problem. However, the system doesn't
completely freeze, just X is frozen. Surprisingly I can still move my
mouse around, but the screen doesn't react in any way, not even if I
click on something.
One thing I'm still
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 04:21:55AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> You could summarise it like:
> Either optimise for minimal downtime or maximum safety.
>
> Your preference seems to be the former, mine the latter.
no, your straw-man dichotomy is nothing like what i have been saying.
your preferen
According to upstream, this program isn't doing something valid. So I am
closing this bug and CCing the one against boson.
Brice
< bgoglin> before I report a mesa bug, could anybody tell whether it is
valid to call glGetString(GL_EXTENSIONS) "without any GL context" ?
< nh_> I'd be extremely surp
Your message dated Tue, 18 Mar 2008 05:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#469008: fixed in viewmol 2.4.1-13
has caused the Debian Bug report #469008,
regarding viewmol: may use different memory API for a given memory block
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 471317 network-manager
Bug#471317: network-manager: no networks found when libglib2 2.16.1-2 is
installed
Bug reassigned from package `libglib2.0-0' to `network-manager'.
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 03:12:59AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
Unkno
Daniel, please look again: this bug has not been fixed. Version
0.2+20080219-1 is the package with the bug. The reason the bug is filed
against 0.2+20080118-1 is that 0.2+20080219-1 WILL NOT INSTALL,
and 'reportbug' files the bug for the currently installed version.
Please read the bu
tags 470328 + patch
thanks
Attached patch should solve this FTBFS.
Thank you.
--
Luca Falavigna
Ubuntu MOTU Developer
GPG Key: 0x86BC2A50
#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
## glib-sharp-2.0-support.dpatch by Luca Falavigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
## DP: Add /glib-sharp-2.0 support, fix FTBFS.
Your message dated Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:02:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#471372: fixed in avant-window-navigator 0.2.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #471372,
regarding awn-manager: missing dependecy from python-xdg
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 471458 + moreinfo
Bug#471458: openoffice.org: Can not save the file. Even Save As is not working.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> tag 471458 + unreproducible
Bug#471458: openoffice.org: Can not save the file. Even Save As is not work
Package: dansguardian
Version: 2.8.0.6-antivirus-6.4.4.1-2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
1.)"etch, apt-get install dansguardian, reboot"
2.)Starting DansGuardian: dansguardianLibClamAV Warning: *
LibClamAV Warning: *** This version of the ClamAV is outdated. ***
Li
Shawn Willden wrote:
> On Monday 17 March 2008 08:25:23 am Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > tags 452128 etch moreinfo
> > Hi Shawn,
> >
> > > After upgrading this morning (to obtain the security fixes), my
> > > gallery installation cannot perform the web-based portion of the
> > > upgrade process. When
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Eddy Petrișor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
>
>
> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 09:48:40PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> Lars Lindner wrote:
> >>> Nonetheless I identified the problem. You do massively mark posts
> >>> as importa
As copyright holder, if I say it doesn't conflict with the GPL, then
it doesn't conflict with the GPL.
However, there's no point in causing people's brains to overheat, so
yes, I grant permission for the code to be relicensed under the
GPLv2. Please make sure that this change in licensing makes i
Lars Lindner wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 7:53 PM, Eddy Petrișor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lars Lindner wrote:
> To be honest your error report is pretty vague and one cannot really
> determine what you problem is. You really need to provide more details!
> For example I'm not sure you tol
Package: wengophone
Version: 2.1.2.dfsg0-2
Severity: grave
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
After starting Wengophone, just try to initiate a call (123 for example). Then
you will not be able to hear the message and when you will hangup it will crash
immediately.
Here are last l
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 470719 + pending
Bug#470719: Data corruption (null bytes) using multiple NFS clients to same file
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processi
tag 471458 + moreinfo
tag 471458 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
Ďoďo wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org
> Version: 1:2.3.1-5
please try with something supported (means: 2.4 from sid). 2.3.1 is not
suppoted/supportable anymore. It should vanish from testing better
earlier than later but
Regards,
On 17/03/2008, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 02:21:14PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> > Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 02:33:54AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>
> On to more promising lands:
>
> Coul
[Bill Allombert]
> I asked for feedback from Holger about the DOS issue and got nothing.
I assume you are talking about the "Is it possible to get more data on
this issue, like the relevant apache logs ?" question in bug #459910.
As far as I know, Holger is not a Debian sysadmin, so I doubt he got
Package: bin86
Version: 0.16.17-2
Severity: grave
The 64-bit versions of this package don't produce useful code; they're full of
sizeof(long) == 4 assumptions, causing as86 to mess up alignment, etc.
Attached patch fixes some of the problems, although I didn't get it to produce
equivalent images
andrew_j_chapman schrieb am Monday, den 17. March 2008:
> Package: dansguardian
> Version: 2.8.0.6-antivirus-6.4.4.1-2
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
>
> 1.)"etch, apt-get install dansguardian, reboot"
> 2.)Starting DansGuardian: dansguardianLibClamAV Warning: **
Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 03:14:58AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>> Second, if you replace files while the daemon is still running,
>> this can lead to all sorts of subtle failures, e.g. daemons that
>> dynamically load functionality via shared modules (as rsyslog does)
>>
Am Dienstag, den 18.03.2008, 09:34 + schrieb Adrian Davey:
> On 18/3/2008, "Michael Biebl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Hristo Vladimirov Hristov wrote:
> >>
> >>The winner is 80_static-mutex-aliasing-warnings.patch , in case you
> >> haven't found yet (in which I doubt). Didn't che
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 05:37:39PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> I can confirm this (on amd64 too), and the provided packages fix the problem.
I confirm all the same.
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael Biebl wrote:
> The difference is, that a crashing daemon might lead to data corruption,
> which is much worse than a slightly longer downtime.
>
> FWIW, if it is correct, that postfix behaves the way you describe, than
> this is broken.
> postfix can be combined with several other daemons
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1
> close 467575
Bug#467575: kdetv: FTBFS: simon.cpp:97: error: 'vbi_unref_page' was not
declared in this scope
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing
I can confirm this (on amd64 too), and the provided packages fix the problem.
Cheers
--
Yves-Alexis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gnuift
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source on the mipsel buildd
Version: 0.1.14-6.3
The build of gnuift/mipsel failed because g++ tried to access an include
directory in the user's home directory, which did not exist.
make[4]: Entering directory
`/build/buildd/gn
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 02:21:14PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> > Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 02:33:54AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>
> On to more promising lands:
>
Your message dated Mon, 17 Mar 2008 22:02:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#456996: fixed in util-vserver 0.30.215-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #456996,
regarding util-vserver: Should not stop vservers without some kind of warning.
to be marked as done.
This
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > What software does this?
> >
> > As Thomas pointed out, dpkg-source is fine. Is that sbuild?
>
> Yes. sbuild seems to have problems parsing dsc files with stuff like:
>
> Files:
> 10aa32e58969c4efeb00ef42ba192b17 1746455 python-django_0.96.1.orig
Lars Lindner wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Eddy Petrișor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> If this works for you, please let me know. I'll then downgrade this
> report's severity but leave it open as a hint for others.
Yes, it does, but why hide/bury it
also sprach Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.03.17.1748 +0100]:
> Since logcheck ships lots and lots of files, it may be best for lpr to
> either rename the file to something like, like lpr.package, or just drop
> the file altogether. I'll take a look at the rules today and get this done..
The
Frédéric Brière wrote:
> severity 418393 serious
> thanks
>
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 01:49:01PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
>> Yes, definitely. The fix is just to remove the conffile from lpr. No
>
> Seems to me like these two files should at least be merged, as they have
> different rules.
Since
Your message dated Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:17:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#430558: fixed in cdrkit 9:1.1.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #430558,
regarding genisoimage: Unexpected joliet directory length
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:54:43 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #276948,
regarding vncserver: Segmentation fault on amd64
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 02:21:14PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 02:33:54AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
On to more promising lands:
Could you try running with --debug-update, please?
>>> I moved away the ~/.liferea_1.4 dire
Your message dated Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:17:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429244: fixed in cdrkit 9:1.1.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #429244,
regarding genisoimage: Unexpected joliet directory length
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
martin f krafft wrote:
> logcheck-database exists as a bag for rules that are not in the
> packages. If a package provides its own rule files, the
> logcheck-database must not.
Yes, that makes very good sense. I've just added the missing rule from
1.2.63 logcheck-database to lpr package.
Does thi
2008/3/17, Ben Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The conversion process does *not* remove ID3v1 tags, so you may be able
> to recover by deleting the ID3v2 tags (id3v2 -d).
No, somehow this does not recover the information. See a test below.
> What encoding was used in the ID3v1 tags? ID3v1 doe
Your message dated Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420046: fixed in libgcr410 2.4.0-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #420046,
regarding libgcr410: FTBFS: ./ifdhandler.h:115: error: expected '=', ',', ';',
'asm' or '__attribute__' before '
Your message dated Tue, 18 Mar 2008 01:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298496: fixed in ipsec-tools 1:0.6.7-1.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #298496,
regarding racoon: Remove/purge package doesn't remove all files
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 12:33:48PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
> Does this mean the bug should be reassigned to logcheck-database?
The appropriate action, IMO, would be to Replace: logcheck-database; we
can then remove that file at our leisure. (I for one am using l-d from
backports.org on my server
Sorry, sent the reply to the wrong email address.
On Tuesday 18 March 2008, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Chris Knadle wrote:
> >Daniel, please look again: this bug has not been fixed. Version
> > 0.2+20080219-1 is the package with the bug. The reason the bug is filed
> > against 0.2+20080118-1 i
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: python-scipy
> Severity: serious
> Version: 0.6.0-8
> Tags: sid
> Justification: fails to build from source
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package with
> pbuilder:
>
> [...]
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my libebml 0.7.7-3.1 NMU.
diff -u libebml-0.7.7/debian/copyright libebml-0.7.7/debian/copyright
--- libebml-0.7.7/debian/copyright
+++ libebml-0.7.7/debian/copyright
@@ -7,21 +7,79 @@
-Copyright (C) 2002-2005 Steve Lhomme. All rights reserved.
-
-This file may be di
package wengophone
tags 471385 + confirmed
thanks
Mazen NEIFER wrote:
> After starting Wengophone, just try to initiate a call (123 for example).
> Then you will not be able to hear the message and when you will hangup it
> will crash immediately.
It started to happen to me too, after some libr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package wengophone
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: wengophone
> tags 471385 + confirmed
Bug#471385: Wengophone crashes whenever initiating a call
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Your message dated Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#470328: fixed in beagle 0.3.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #470328,
regarding beagle: FTBFS: GConfThreadHelper.cs(30,7): error CS0246: The type or
namespace name `GLib' could not be f
101 - 168 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
