Bug#651452: illuminator: FTBFS on sparc (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte')

reopen 651452 found 651452 0.11.0-12 thanks Hi! * Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org [111214 15:33]: Better to rip out the -llam and replace LLAM in the patch with -lmpi. I'll test then upload -12 with this change and let's see how it builds. That didn't work, too: It fails to build on

Processed: Re: Bug#651452: illuminator: FTBFS on sparc (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte')

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reopen 651452 Bug #651452 {Done: hazel...@debian.org (Adam C. Powell, IV)} [src:illuminator] illuminator: FTBFS on archs where petsc uses liblam (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte') 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a

Bug#651933: wicd-client can't connect to the daemon / DBus errors

tags 651933 unreproducible moreinfo thanks Hello Vincent, On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 12:30:56 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: With the latest wicd version (1.7.1~b3-2), I have the following error: xvii:~ wicd-client -n Has notifications support True Loading... Connecting to daemon... Can't

Bug#652097: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#652097: sysvinit: breaks system on reboot

[Roger Leigh] Looks like we've found the problem. It's due to the updated packaging not applying the patches in debian/startpar/patches. Looks like a simple enough fix. If we move debian/startpar into a patch, then the entire patchset can go into debian/patches so it's all automatically

Processed: Re: Bug#651933: wicd-client can't connect to the daemon / DBus errors

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 651933 unreproducible moreinfo Bug #651933 [wicd] wicd-client can't connect to the daemon / DBus errors Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 651933:

Bug#652097: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#652097: sysvinit: breaks system on reboot

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 09:59:23AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Roger Leigh] Looks like we've found the problem. It's due to the updated packaging not applying the patches in debian/startpar/patches. Looks like a simple enough fix. If we move debian/startpar into a patch, then

Bug#647030: closed by Michael Hanke m...@debian.org (Bug#647030: fixed in kbibtex 0.4-1)

Hi, I strongly disagree about closing this bug. It is a can of worms. At least you should open a bug for qt where this bug lie, and if it is a spurious bug report due to some gcc bug [1], you should open a bug on the debian pts linking to http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43976 Do you

Bug#652151: acovea: FTBFS: evocommon.h:57:27: fatal error: libbrahe/prng.h: No such file or directory

Source: acovea Version: 5.1.1-2.1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: x86_64-linux-gnu-g++ -I.

Bug#652152: gecko-mediaplayer: FTBFS: npupp.h:703:49: error: declaration of C function 'char* NP_GetMIMEDescription()' conflicts with

Source: gecko-mediaplayer Version: 1.0.4-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: make[4]: Entering

Bug#652153: gnome-chemistry-utils: FTBFS: gcc: error: unrecognized option '-V'

Source: gnome-chemistry-utils Version: 0.12.10-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: gcc version

Bug#652154: gtkhtml4.0: FTBFS: hyperlink.c:40:1: error: unknown type name 'G_CONST_RETURN'

Source: gtkhtml4.0 Version: 4.0.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: /bin/bash ../libtool

Bug#652155: gtkpod: FTBFS: plugin.c:179:5: error: implicit declaration of function 'gtk_hpaned_new' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: gtkpod Version: 2.1.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: /bin/bash ../../libtool

Bug#652157: mysql-gui-tools: FTBFS: ../gtksourceview/gtksourcemarker.h:42:1: error: unknown type name 'G_CONST_RETURN'

Source: mysql-gui-tools Version: 5.0r14+openSUSE-2.2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: gcc

Bug#652158: naspro-bridges: FTBFS: gcc: error: unrecognized option '-V'

Source: naspro-bridges Version: 0.2.91-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: gcc version 4.6.2

Bug#652159: netams: FTBFS: gtypes.h:34:24: fatal error: glibconfig.h: No such file or directory

Source: netams Version: 3.4.5-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: gcc -g -Wall -pipe -O2

Bug#652161: open-vm-tools: FTBFS: conftest.c:60: undefined reference to `dlopen'

Source: open-vm-tools Version: 2:8.8.0+2011.10.26-514583-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part:

Bug#652162: pidgin-facebookchat: FTBFS: gtypes.h:34:24: fatal error: glibconfig.h: No such file or directory

Source: pidgin-facebookchat Version: 1.69-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: gcc

Bug#646598: [calendarserver] Didn't work after upgrade too

Package: calendarserver Version: 2.4.dfsg-6 --- Please enter the report below this line. --- The calendar server didn't work after upgrade, i see in ubuntu forums that is a phyton 2.7 related bug. It affect old installs too --- System information. --- Architecture: amd64 Kernel: Linux

Bug#652163: pxlib: FTBFS: gtypes.h:34:24: fatal error: glibconfig.h: No such file or directory

Source: pxlib Version: 0.6.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: if /bin/bash ../libtool

Bug#652164: rakarrack: FTBFS: ../../src/rakarrack.cxx:22892:37: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security]

Source: rakarrack Version: 0.6.1-3 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: if x86_64-linux-gnu-g++

Bug#652165: scli: FTBFS: gcc: error: unrecognized option '-V'

Source: scli Version: 0.4.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: gcc version 4.6.2 (Debian

Bug#515284: marked as done (RM: geg -- RoM, depends on removed GTK 1.2)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:23:48 + with message-id e1rb8tc-0006lc...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#515284: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #515284, regarding RM: geg -- RoM, depends on removed GTK 1.2 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#521918: marked as done (eprover: FTBFS with binary-arch build)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:24:23 + with message-id e1rb8ub-0006mm...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#651971: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #521918, regarding eprover: FTBFS with binary-arch build to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#641690: marked as done (elfsign: FTBFS in sid with multiarch ssl)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:25:37 + with message-id e1rb8vn-0006rt...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#651972: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #641690, regarding elfsign: FTBFS in sid with multiarch ssl to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#652166: sagan: FTBFS: lognorm.h:31:19: fatal error: annot.h: No such file or directory

Source: sagan Version: 0.1.9-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..

Bug#652167: gpointing-device-settings: FTBFS: ld: final link failed: Bad value

Source: gpointing-device-settings Version: 1.5.1-5 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part:

Bug#649712: wordnet: diff for NMU version 1:3.0-26.1

Hi Jakub, thanks for the NMU and sorry for not caring for this issue earlier. Would you mind commiting your changes to Debian Science SVN which is writable for all DDs? Kind regards Andreas. On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:51:47PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: tags 649712 + patch tags 649712 +

Bug#652161: open-vm-tools: FTBFS: conftest.c:60: undefined reference to `dlopen'

tag 652161 - wheezy tag 652161 pending thanks On 12/15/2011 11:12 AM, Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote: During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. known, this is due to procps-ng (and therefore not affecting wheezy, as procps 3.3.x is sid only atm). Relevant

Processed: Re: Bug#652161: open-vm-tools: FTBFS: conftest.c:60: undefined reference to `dlopen'

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 652161 - wheezy Bug #652161 [src:open-vm-tools] open-vm-tools: FTBFS: conftest.c:60: undefined reference to `dlopen' Removed tag(s) wheezy. tag 652161 pending Bug #652161 [src:open-vm-tools] open-vm-tools: FTBFS: conftest.c:60: undefined

Bug#652169: vdkxdb2: FTBFS: gtypes.h:34:24: fatal error: glibconfig.h: No such file or directory

Source: vdkxdb2 Version: 2.4.0-3.3 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: /bin/bash ../libtool

Bug#652170: guymager: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lproc

Source: guymager Version: 0.5.9-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: g++ -m64 -ggdb -rdynamic

Bug#652171: xmem: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lproc

Source: xmem Version: 1.20-27.1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: gcc -Wall -g -O2 -o xmem

Bug#652173: vdkbuilder2: FTBFS: gtypes.h:34:24: fatal error: glibconfig.h: No such file or directory

Source: vdkbuilder2 Version: 2.4.0-4.3 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: if /bin/bash

Bug#652175: tuxpaint-config: FTBFS: src/tuxpaint-config2.cxx:1385:54: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security]

Source: tuxpaint-config Version: 0.0.12-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: g++ -Wall -g -O2

Bug#652176: cqrlog: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: lazarus-0.9.30, lcl-0.9.30

Source: cqrlog Version: 1.2.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part:

Bug#652177: midish: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lncurses

Source: midish Version: 1.0.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: cc \

Bug#652178: bzr-git: FTBFS: dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2

Source: bzr-git Version: 0.6.5+bzr1465-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: Text

Bug#652179: hardinfo: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lffi

Source: hardinfo Version: 0.5.1-1.1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: gcc -g -fPIC -pipe

Bug#652180: golly: FTBFS: wxperl.cpp:3057: undefined reference to `PL_thr_key'

Source: golly Version: 2.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: g++ -O2 -Wall

Bug#619050: marked as done (autoclass: non-free academic papers in package)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:42:28 +0100 with message-id 20111215114228.ga26...@melusine.alphascorpii.net and subject line Re: Bug#619050: non-free academic papers in package has caused the Debian Bug report #619050, regarding autoclass: non-free academic papers in package to be marked

Bug#652182: cardstories: FTBFS: TypeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute '__getitem__'

Source: cardstories Version: 1.0.6-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: fakeroot debian/rules

Bug#652183: python-shapely: FTBFS: FAIL: /build/python-shapely-6luht3/python-shapely-1.2.10/shapely/tests/Point.txt

Source: python-shapely Version: 1.2.10-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: make[1]: Entering

Bug#652184: libbtm-java: FTBFS: [javac] 552 problems (513 errors, 39 warnings)

Source: libbtm-java Version: 1.3.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: [javac] 30. ERROR

Bug#652185: libcommons-lang3-java: FTBFS: Tests run: 2039, Failures: 197, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

Source: libcommons-lang3-java Version: 3.0.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: debian/rules

Bug#652186: hyphen-kn: FTBFS: make[1]: /usr/sbin/update-openoffice-dicts: Command not found

Source: hyphen-kn Version: 0.6.0-3 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: make[1]: Entering

Bug#652187: libpixie-java: FTBFS: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused

Source: libpixie-java Version: 1:1.1.6-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: make[1]: Entering

Bug#652188: httpcomponents-core: FTBFS: Cannot find the jar to install: httpcore/target/httpcore*.jar

Source: httpcomponents-core Version: 4.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: fakeroot

Bug#652189: libwebservice-cia-perl: FTBFS: Failed 2/8 test programs. 2/55 subtests failed.

Source: libwebservice-cia-perl Version: 1.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: debian/rules

Bug#652011: Repeated pattern of FHS violation: Dependencies of /sbin and /bin, belong in /lib

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 03:31:41PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Two clarifications: Jonathan Nieder wrote: Roger Leigh wrote: The question that needs answering is this: what are the reasons, today, for a separate /usr? No, I don't think an answer to that precise question today

Bug#652191: r-noncran-lindsey: FTBFS: ERROR: lazy loading failed for package 'event'

Source: r-noncran-lindsey Version: 1.0.20071024-1.1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: make[1]:

Bug#652011: general: Repeated pattern of FHS violation: Dependencies of /sbin and /bin, belong in /lib

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:43:38PM +0100, J.A. Bezemer wrote: On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Roger Leigh wrote: [..] The same argument applies to encryption. / and /usr both contain a selection of programs, libraries etc. If you're encrypting one, why would you not encrypt all of it? Speed.

Bug#652192: wsjt: FTBFS: gfortran: error: portaudio-v19/lib/.libs/libportaudio.a: No such file or directory

Source: wsjt Version: 5.9.7.r383-1.5 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: gfortran: error:

Bug#652011: general: Repeated pattern of FHS violation: Dependencies of /sbin and /bin, belong in /lib

On Dec 15, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote: That is to say, /usr is a split of /convenience/. The real solution would be to have /etc as a separately-mounted encrypted filesystem. So really, keeping /usr separate is a different issue, IMHO. This isn't a reason to keep the /usr split,

Bug#647030: closed by Michael Hanke m...@debian.org (Bug#647030: fixed in kbibtex 0.4-1)

Hi, On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:33:30AM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: Hi, I strongly disagree about closing this bug. It is a can of worms. It _could_ indeed be one. At least you should open a bug for qt where this bug lie, and if it is a spurious bug report due to some gcc bug [1], you

Bug#652186: Bug is in the upstream makefile

tags 652186 + upstream tags 652186 + confirmed thanks Hi Monica, Thanks for the report this bug is because of removal of update-openoffice-dictionaries[1] which is used in the upstream Makefile I've notified upstream and once the fix is provided we will upload new package. [1]

Bug#652186: Tagging

tag 652186 + upstream tag 652186 + confirmed thanks -- Vasudev Kamath signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#652199: obconf: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (obrender-3.0 = 3.4.2 obparser-3.0 = 3.4.2) were not met:

Source: obconf Version: 2.0.3-3 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: debian/rules build

Bug#652200: php-imagick: FTBFS: 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file ltmain.sh.rej

Source: php-imagick Version: 3.0.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: fakeroot debian/rules

Bug#652061: elmerfem: FTBFS missing build-dependencvy?

clone 652061 -1 reassign -1 libarpack2-dev retitle -1 Removed symbols needed by other packages found -1 3.0.1-1 block 652061 by -1 thanks On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 14:31 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: Hi Sylvestre, On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 18:50 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: Le mercredi 14

Bug#652201: diagnostics: FTBFS: configure: error: invalid ltdl library directory: `/usr/lib'

Source: diagnostics Version: 0.3.3-1.1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: debian/rules build

Bug#652189: libwebservice-cia-perl: FTBFS: Failed 2/8 test programs. 2/55 subtests failed.

Hi Mònica Thanks for your report! On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 01:37:48PM +0100, Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote: Source: libwebservice-cia-perl Version: 1.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Bug#652011: general: Repeated pattern of FHS violation: Dependencies of /sbin and /bin, belong in /lib

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 01:57:20PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: On Dec 15, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote: That is to say, /usr is a split of /convenience/. The real solution would be to have /etc as a separately-mounted encrypted filesystem. So really, keeping /usr separate is a

Bug#650359: segmentation fault gmpc

* Dmitry E. Oboukhov un...@debian.org [29 10:25]: Hi! I've just upgraded gmpc upto 11.8.16-1. It always crashes. The bug is reproducible in a few hosts (desktop, notebook, the other desktop). Hello ! Thanks a lot for the backtrace, that helps. I have a few questions to

Bug#652202: hyphen-hi: FTBFS: make[1]: /usr/sbin/update-openoffice-dicts: Command not found

Source: hyphen-hi Version: 0.6.0-3 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: make[1]: Entering

Bug#652011: general: Repeated pattern of FHS violation: Dependencies of /sbin and /bin, belong in /lib

Ok, ok, ok, I think I may have got it. Some of your comments helped get me on the proper track of distro-oriented thinking where different systems are picking and choosing a different subset of available packages, but those packages have predefined locations where they have to put things. It has

Processed: Bug#652186: Tagging

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 652186 + upstream Bug #652186 [src:hyphen-kn] hyphen-kn: FTBFS: make[1]: /usr/sbin/update-openoffice-dicts: Command not found Added tag(s) upstream. tag 652186 + confirmed Bug #652186 [src:hyphen-kn] hyphen-kn: FTBFS: make[1]:

Bug#652208: zpspell: FTBFS: CMake Error: The following variables are used in this project, but they are set to NOTFOUND.

Source: zpspell Version: 0.4.3-4 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: make[1]: Entering directory

Bug#652215: libqt4pas: FTBFS: /build/libqt4pas-APLA1O/libqt4pas-2.4/debian/libqt4pas5.install: 1: /build/libqt4pas-APLA1O/libqt4pas-2.4/debian/libqt4pas5.install: usr/lib/*/libQt4Pas.so.*: not found

Source: libqt4pas Version: 2.4-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: make[2]: Entering directory

Bug#652214: optgeo: FTBFS: Fatal: Can't find unit Forms used by OptGeo

Source: optgeo Version: 2.10-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: make[1]: Entering directory

Bug#652216: libgssapi-perl: FTBFS: Failed 1/9 test programs. 1/152 subtests failed.

Source: libgssapi-perl Version: 0.28-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: make[1]: Entering

Bug#652171: xmem: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lproc

Hello Mònica, I know, but have some problems with my Devel-Workstation and since Debian has changed the spamfilter rules,I can not more send ANY messages to the BTS. I send mail through my PUBLIC mailserver and is blocked by the Debian. It is not funny anymore to maintain packages. I

Bug#652183: python-shapely: FTBFS: FAIL: /build/python-shapely-6luht3/python-shapely-1.2.10/shapely/tests/Point.txt

* Mònica Ramírez Arceda mon...@probeta.net, 2011-12-15, 12:54: == FAIL: /build/python-shapely-6luht3/python-shapely-1.2.10/shapely/tests/MultiPolygon.txt Doctest: MultiPolygon.txt

Bug#652222: sensors-applet: FTBFS: Could not parse DTD http://scrollkeeper.sourceforge.net/dtds/scrollkeeper-omf-1.0/scrollkeeper-omf.dtd

Source: sensors-applet Version: 3.0.0-0.1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: make[2]: Entering

Bug#652223: udunits: FTBFS: 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file ltmain.sh.rej

Source: udunits Version: 2.1.23-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: make[1]: Entering

Bug#652224: silo-llnl: FTBFS: 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file ltmain.sh.rej

Source: silo-llnl Version: 4.8-10 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: make[1]: Entering

Bug#652226: sciscipy: FTBFS: ERROR: ld.so: object 'libfakeroot-sysv.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded: ignored.

Source: sciscipy Version: 0.3.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: fakeroot debian/rules

Bug#652227: node-cssom: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_build] Error 1

Source: node-cssom Version: 0.2.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: make[1]: Entering

Bug#652229: libhttp-lrdd-perl: FTBFS: Failed 1/2 test programs. 1/2 subtests failed.

Source: libhttp-lrdd-perl Version: 0.103-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: make[1]: Entering

Bug#652231: brickos: FTBFS: semop(2): encountered an error: Invalid argument

Source: brickos Version: 0.9.0.dfsg-6 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: make[2]: Entering

Bug#652232: checkstyle: FTBFS: Tests run: 676, Failures: 372, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

Source: checkstyle Version: 5.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: Results : Failed

Bug#652235: Multiple new security issues

Package: moodle Severity: grave Tags: security Hi, the following new Moodle issues affect sid/stable: MSA-11-0045: Potential to masquerade through MNet Affects: 2.1.x, 2.0.x, 1.9.x Fix: http://git.moodle.org/gw?p=moodle.git;a=commitdiff;h=10df8657c1c138c0d0ab1d4796c552fcec0c299b

Bug#652202: Tagging

tag 652202 + upstream tag 652202 + confirmed thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#625319: marked as done (chiark-tcl: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Dec 2011 16:32:12 + with message-id e1rbee8-0003m8...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#625319: fixed in chiark-tcl 1.1.0+nmu3 has caused the Debian Bug report #625319, regarding chiark-tcl: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#622041: marked as done (pound: FTBFS: pound.h:340:5: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'LHASH')

Your message dated Thu, 15 Dec 2011 16:33:01 + with message-id e1rbeev-00040t...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#622041: fixed in pound 2.5-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #622041, regarding pound: FTBFS: pound.h:340:5: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'LHASH' to be

Bug#622041: NMU diff

attached Cheers, -- Steve McIntyresteve.mcint...@linaro.org http://www.linaro.org/ Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs diff -Nru pound-2.5/debian/changelog pound-2.5/debian/changelog --- pound-2.5/debian/changelog 2010-03-10 21:55:56.0 +

Processed: [bts-link] source package gnash

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gnash # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org

Processed: [bts-link] source package libreoffice

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # # bts-link upstream status pull for source package libreoffice # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to

Bug#650600: NMU diff

attached Cheers, -- Steve McIntyresteve.mcint...@linaro.org http://www.linaro.org/ Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs diff -Nru ytree-1.94/debian/changelog ytree-1.94/debian/changelog --- ytree-1.94/debian/changelog 2010-06-20 18:02:01.0 +

Bug#652202: Tagging

tags 652202 + upstream tags 652202 + confirmed thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#652236: [pcscd] unusable due to typo in init.d-script

Package: pcscd Version: 1.8.1-4 Severity: serious --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Hi everyone, please apply the attached patch to /etc/init.d/pcscd in order to avoid this issue: user-in-pcscd-group@host $ chipcard-tool -v --loglevel=info --logtype=console atr

Bug#641621: xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-legacy-173xx: Dependency

As the Xorg packages from testing is now 1.11, there is no possibility to install the package with testing nor with unstable. Please, make a working 3D driver available ! Thanks Colliar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe.

Bug#652238: wicd: Network settings lost after upgrade

Package: wicd Version: 1.7.1~b3-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, After the upgrade to the version 1:7:1~b*, all my configured network get lost, with their keys and every other settings. For each new location I go, I need to reconfigure wireless

Bug#652035: wicd-curses: Crashs when running (Python UnicodeDecodeError)

On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:43:29 +0100, Florian Birée wrote: Hello, Hello Florian, please remember to keep the bug CCed when replying :) Le Wed, 14 Dec 2011 20:55:39 +0100, David Paleino da...@debian.org a écrit : Do you have any unicode ESSID in /etc/wicd/wireless-settings.conf? Is it the

Bug#642163: libebook-tools-perl: FTBFS: test failures

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 08:10:01PM -0400, Zed Pobre wrote: On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:11:48PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: This package FTBFS for me on a clean sid chroot: # Failed test 'MMDD-unparseable' # at t/10-fix_datestring.t line 23. # got: '2012-08-20' #

Bug#650600: marked as done (FTBFS: curses.h: No such file or directory)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:05:22 + with message-id e1rbeke-mw...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#650600: fixed in ytree 1.94-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #650600, regarding FTBFS: curses.h: No such file or directory to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#652240: ghc-mod: FTBFS: Cabal.hs:57:5: Not in scope: `many'

Source: ghc-mod Version: 1.0.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: debian/rules build test

Bug#652241: felix-utils: FTBFS: [ERROR] BUILD FAILURE

Source: felix-utils Version: 1.1.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: debian/rules build

Bug#652242: jenkins-memory-monitor: FTBFS: test2(org.jvnet.hudson.MemoryMonitorTest): 'top' unavailable

Source: jenkins-memory-monitor Version: 1.5-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: debian/rules

Bug#652243: hyphen-gu: FTBFS: make[1]: /usr/sbin/update-openoffice-dicts: Command not found

Source: hyphen-gu Version: 0.6.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: make[1]: Entering

Bug#652245: tomoe: FTBFS: dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source --after-build tomoe-0.6.0 gave error exit status 1

Source: tomoe Version: 0.6.0-1.2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: make[3]: Entering directory

  1   2   >