Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 768014 libvmime-dev
Bug #768014 [libgnutls-dev] libgnutls-dev: not installable in sid
Added indication that 768014 affects libvmime-dev
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
768014: http://bugs.d
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 768014 2.12.23-17+b1
Bug #768014 [libgnutls-dev] libgnutls-dev: not installable in sid
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #768014 to the same values
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 768014 2.12.23-17+b2
Bug #768014 [libgnutls-dev] libgnutls-dev: not installable in sid
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #768014 to the same values
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
Package: libgnutls-dev
Version: 2.12.23-17
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Hi,
libgnutls-dev is not installable in sid since 2014-09-29. The reason is
that it depends on libgcrypt11-dev (>= 1.4.0), and the current version
of libgcrypt11-dev in sid (1.5.4-3+
Your message dated Tue, 04 Nov 2014 07:19:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#767445: fixed in python-docker 0.5.3-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #767445,
regarding python-docker: throws ValueError exception on attempting any command
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Tue, 4 Nov 2014 08:18:26 +0100
with message-id <20141104071826.gd2...@piware.de>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-postgresql-public] Bug#768009: postgresql-9.4:
Upgrade to 9.4~beta3-3 fails
has caused the Debian Bug report #768009,
regarding postgresql-9.4: Upgrade to 9.4~beta3-3 fails
Package: blends-dev
Severity: critical
Tags: patch
Justification: breaks unrelated software
If a user who creates metapackages for a Blend by chance includes
non-free, unstable, experimental or any unrelated repository in
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/ some dependencies that are not in testing
could be
On 11/04/2014 12:43 AM, Jörg Steffens wrote:
>> How about that?
>> https://github.com/credativ/bareos/commit/a3817bfc181cbe9352e2b9c7f52e125f598bcbae
>
> looks very good.
> From my point of view, this fixes the problem.
Thanks for the review!
I have added a few postrm scripts to remove the conf
Hi Graham,
the solution you are proposing in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763909#36
is most probably sensible and I'd happily apply it future revisions.
However, as Niels wrote below the changes are conflicting with the
freeze policy. As far as I understand the clean tar
Package: postgresql-9.4
Version: 9.4~beta2-1+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
Upgrading to 9.4~beta3-3 fails with the following error:
dpkg: error processing archive
/var/cache/apt/archives/postgresql-9.4_9.4~beta3-3_i386.deb (--unpack):
subprocess ne
I've uploaded 0.9.1 to unstable.
Excerpts from Daniel Pocock's message of 2014-09-29 21:59:33 +0200:
>
> On 29/09/14 21:22, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Package: syslog-nagios-bridge
> > Version: 1.0.1-4
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> > Latest upload of syslog
BTW, the last time Palli was seen on IRC was April 17.
07:49 ... join!#debian-python -> palli(~pa...@212-30-216-15.static.simnet.is)
Excerpts from Daniel Pocock's message of 2014-11-03 23:41:48 +0100:
>
> Palli's email address is bouncing:
>
>- The following addresses had permanent fata
Apologies, I may have missed emails in the past. I will take a look at
getting the latest pynag uploaded.
Excerpts from Daniel Pocock's message of 2014-09-29 21:59:33 +0200:
>
> On 29/09/14 21:22, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Package: syslog-nagios-bridge
> > Version: 1.0.1-4
> > Severity: grave
> >
Your message dated Tue, 04 Nov 2014 04:19:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#738376: fixed in postgresql-hll 2.7-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #738376,
regarding postgresql-hll: FTBFS: dh: Unknown sequence debian/control.in (choose
from: binary binary-arch binary-indep build bui
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 766613 normal
Bug #766613 [src:cross-gcc-4.9-mipsel] cross-gcc-4.9-mipsel is functional
incomplete
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
766613: http://bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 766614 normal
Bug #766614 [src:cross-gcc-4.9-arm64] cross-gcc-4.9-arm64 is functional
incomplete
Bug #766617 [src:cross-gcc-4.9-arm64] cross-gcc-4.9-arm64 is functional
incomplete
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
Severity set to 'n
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 766616 normal
Bug #766616 [src:cross-gcc-4.9-armel] cross-gcc-4.9-armel is functional
incomplete
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
766616: http://bugs.
This is indeed an accurate summary.
One more data point - I rebooted without that change, and the problem
indeed persists. I will try with it, but it will take a bit of work to
make it ready. Give me a day or two.
John
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 766618 normal
Bug #766618 [src:cross-gcc-4.9-powerpc] cross-gcc-4.9-powerpc is functional
incomplete
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
766618: http://b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 766615 normal
Bug #766615 [src:cross-gcc-4.9-ppc64el] cross-gcc-4.9-ppc64el is functional
incomplete
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
766615: http://b
Am 18.10.2014 um 21:49 schrieb John Goerzen:
> Package: systemd
> Version: 215-5+b1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> On investigating why my 8GB system, which was suddenly running extremely
> slow and maxed out on swap, I discovered numerous systemd-logind
> processe
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #767589 [systemd] systemd: cryptdisks other than root/swap fail cryptsetup
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
767589: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767589
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Am 01.11.2014 um 11:50 schrieb Arnaud Installe:
> Package: systemd
> Version: 215-5+b1
> Severity: critical
> Tags: d-i
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
> After successfully unlocking and mounting root and swap devices, the system
> hangs a while, then drops to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 767445 https://github.com/docker/docker-py/issues/377
Bug #767445 [python-docker] python-docker: throws ValueError exception on
attempting any command
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/docker/docker-py/issues/377'.
>
On 02/11/14 21:33, Ximin Luo wrote:
> On 01/11/14 18:41, Holger Levsen wrote:
>>
>> well, you are the maintainer you can make it output the test.log if there
>> are
>> failures...
>>
>
> It's pretty tricky to do this and I don't want to commit a hack that bypasses
> automake. I've filed a fea
Package: base-files
Version: 7.10
Severity: grave
W: Failure trying to run: chroot /tmp/unstable/. dpkg --force-depends
--install /var/cache/apt/archives/base-files_7.10_i386.deb
/var/cache/apt/archives/base-passwd_3.5.36_i386.deb
While #766459 fixed debootstrapping with jessie's debootstrap, I'm
Am 03.11.2014 18:29, schrieb Evgeni Golov:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 12:16:24PM +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote:
>
>> I have a half-working patch on my disk for that. You might want to try
>> that as a base, I'll push it to git soon and let you know.
>
> How about that?
> https://github.com/cr
Your message dated Mon, 03 Nov 2014 23:49:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#758229: fixed in nfacct 1.0.1-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #758229,
regarding nfacct: is priority important, depends on packages with priority extra
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
On Mon, 03 Nov 2014, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> And yes, the Version: 4.2.0-1 was a mistake. I will try to clean it up, but
> since it is missing the getmail4/* prefix, the BTS might not cooperate.
There, fixed. The bug is present in getmail4/4.2.0-1 (first version in the
Debian change
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 766670 getmail4/4.2.0-1
Bug #766670 [getmail4] getmail4: unpatched security issues (MITM) in stable
The source getmail4 and version 4.2.0-1 do not appear to match any binary
packages
Marked as found in versions getmail4/4.2.0-1.
> thanks
St
Your message dated Tue, 04 Nov 2014 00:28:23 +0100
with message-id <54580f97.80...@physik.fu-berlin.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#767996: fs-uae-launcher fails to launch fsuae
has caused the Debian Bug report #767996,
regarding fs-uae-launcher fails to launch fsuae
to be marked as done.
This means
Package: fs-uae-launcher
Version: 2.4.1+ds-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
A upgrade of the system. Sadly can't say when it happened
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
Your message dated Mon, 03 Nov 2014 23:19:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#767974: fixed in lucene4 1:4.6.1+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #767974,
regarding lucene4: Package is incompatible with lucene 4.6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
On Mon, 03 Nov 2014, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> I think that the use of backported current testing package is the
> reasonable option. The updates listed in the upstream changelog (see
Yeah, I am running a 4.46.0-1 backport in stable, it works perfectly in my
usercase (which is rather simple, but still.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 766670 4.2.0-1
Bug #766670 [getmail4] getmail4: unpatched security issues (MITM) in stable
There is no source info for the package 'getmail4' at version '4.2.0-1' with
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '4.2.0-1'
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # regression
> severity 767960 important
Bug #767960 [gitweb] gitweb: no longer works: Undefined subroutine
CGI::startform
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> reassign 765525 gitweb 1:2.1.1-1
Bug #765525 [git] git: gitweb broken by libcgi-
# regression
severity 767960 important
reassign 765525 gitweb 1:2.1.1-1
severity 765525 grave
tags 765525 + fixed-upstream
block 767960 by 765525
reassign 767960 libcgi-pm-perl 4.06-1
tags 767960 + patch
quit
Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> gitweb no longer works. When I call /usr/share/gitweb/index.cgi
Package: elasticsearch
Version: 1.0.3+dfsg-4
Severity: grave
$ /usr/share/elasticsearch/bin/plugin
Error: Could not find or load main class org.elasticsearch.plugins.PluginManager
This happens because we forgot to adjust the classpath in the script.
-Hilko
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
Hi Andreas
I attach a debdiff switching viewmol to source format 3.0 (quilt) and
debhelper 9.
This does the right thing on the Ubuntu PPA builders, at least for the
i386 and amd64 builds I tested.
I also attach my debian.tar.xz, as it may be easier to extract the
original source tarball followed b
Palli's email address is bouncing:
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
(reason: 550 5.1.1 : Recipient address rejected:
zimbra.okhysing.is)
- Transcript of session follows -
... while talking to zimbra.okhysing.is.:
>>> DATA
<<< 550 5.1.1 : Recipi
Hi Clint, Palli,
Can you please let me know about the pynag 0.9.1 release? I notice you
still haven't uploaded it to Debian and this makes syslog-nagios-bridge
unusable, it is an RC bug.
Regards,
Daniel
On 29/09/14 12:59, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> On 29/09/14 21:22, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> Pa
Your message dated Mon, 03 Nov 2014 22:19:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#767230: fixed in libotr 4.1.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #767230,
regarding libotr5: Debian/testing libotr5 incompatible with pidgin-otr plugin
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 03 Nov 2014 22:19:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#767230: fixed in libotr 4.1.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #767230,
regarding bitlbee-plugin-otr: bitlbee no longer starts: libotr API version
4.1.0 incompatible with actual version 4.0.0
to be marked as
Your message dated Mon, 03 Nov 2014 22:05:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#762656: fixed in tbb 4.2~20140122-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #762656,
regarding tbb fails to build on powerpc
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 12:10:44AM +0200, Maciej Kotliński wrote:
> # > I tried to use openvpn openvpn_2.2.1-8+deb7u2_amd64.deb without succes.
> found 761234 2.2.1-8
Bug #761234 [openvpn] openvpn: Openvpn connects to server but no data pass the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 767583 freebsd-driv...@lists.freebsd.org
Bug #767583 [src:kfreebsd-10] kfreebsd-10: ar9300_devid.h license restricts
modification
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'freebsd-driv...@lists.freebsd.org'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
P
forwarded 767583 freebsd-driv...@lists.freebsd.org
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Christoph Egger wrote:
> Riley writes:
> > After reading a discussion on the gnu-linux-libre mailing list [1],
> > I found that the two files named ar9300_devid.h have a license that
> > restricts modification:
> What does linux do (doesn't seem obvious from the link you
> quoted but codesea
Hi,
> Do we think this is copyrightable material (adding FTP Master for
> input)? What does linux do (doesn't seem obvious from the link you
> quoted but codesearch seems to indicate debian linunx doesn't have
> it)? Has FreeBSD upstream been contacted?
Honestly, I doubt that it is copyrightabl
Hi!
The license of two files in the ath_hal driver appears to restrict
modification. The two files are:
/sys/dev/ath/ath_hal/ar9003/ar9300_devid.h
/sys/contrib/dev/ath/ath_hal/ar9300/ar9300_devid.h
The license of these files is:
* Copyright (c) 2002-2004 Sam Leffler, Errno Consulting, Atheros
Your message dated Mon, 03 Nov 2014 21:21:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765132: fixed in user-mode-linux 3.16-1um-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #765132,
regarding user-mode-linux: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable:
linux-source-3.13
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Mon, 03 Nov 2014 21:21:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#741075: fixed in user-mode-linux 3.16-1um-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #741075,
regarding user-mode-linux: Occasional memory corruption on startup under high
load
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Mon, 03 Nov 2014 21:19:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#767968: fixed in dictionaries-common 1.23.16
has caused the Debian Bug report #767968,
regarding dictionaries-common::aspell-autobuildhash: Installation fails because
of bad return code on error.
to be marked
Your message dated Mon, 03 Nov 2014 21:20:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#767859: fixed in ifetch-tools 0.15.24d-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #767859,
regarding ifetch-tools: postinst uses /usr/share/doc content (Policy 12.3)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 767690 serious
Bug #767690 [trousers] trousers: fails to install: subprocess installed
post-installation script returned error exit status 2
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> tags 767690 - moreinfo unreproducible
Bug #767690 [tro
Package: aircrack-ng
Version: 1:1.2-0~beta3-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
Hi,
the following vulnerabilities were published for aircrack-ng.
CVE-2014-8321[0]:
GPS stack overflow
CVE-2014-8322[1]:
tcp_test stack overflow
CVE-2014-8323[2]:
buddy-ng missing checkin data format
CVE-201
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 767690 normal
Bug #767690 [trousers] trousers: fails to install: subprocess installed
post-installation script returned error exit status 2
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> tags 767690 + unreproducible moreinfo
Bug #767690 [trou
severity 767690 normal
tags 767690 + unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
I tried for a few days to reproduce the bug on different hosts, without
any luck. I'm therefore lowering the severity to normal, until having
more information.
Preparing to unpack .../trousers_0.3.13-2_amd64.deb ...
Unpackin
On 2014-11-03 21:40, Pierre Chifflier wrote:
> I tried for a few days to reproduce the bug on different hosts, without
did you try chroots, not real machines?
> The attached log is also useless, it does not provide any info on the
> failure. Maybe adding set -x to the postinst script could help
>
Hi!
Riley writes:
> After reading a discussion on the gnu-linux-libre mailing list [1],
> I found that the two files named ar9300_devid.h have a license that
> restricts modification:
Quoting that file:
> #ifndef __AR9300_DEVID_H__
> #define __AR9300_DEVID_H__
>
> /*
> * AR9380 HA
On 2014-11-03 20:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 20:13 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> Unstable/jessie would not really need that fix (it's a squeeze->wheezy
>> upgrade issue), but it won't harm :-)
>
> Well, I could be persuaded that it doesn't need fixing in sid in that
alr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unarchive 720375
> found 720375 1.4.5-1
Bug #720375 {Done: Emmanuel Bourg } [libxml-security-java]
libxml-security-java: CVE-2013-2172
Marked as found in versions libxml-security-java/1.4.5-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Den 03. nov. 2014 20:13, skrev Andreas Beckmann:
> On 2014-11-03 20:04, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> That might be true if the fix could wait until the next stable
>> point release (unplanned yet, but at the earliest in
>> mid-December). Aside from anyt
Package: src:lucene4
Version: 4.10.1+dfsg-1
Severity: grave
While working on fixing some issues in elasticsearch 1.0.3, I noticed
that it can no longer be built using Lucene 4.10.1 -- because of API/ABI
incompatibilities. lucene4-4.6.1+dfsg-1 which is currently in jessie
should *not* be replaced.
On 2014-11-03 20:28, Andreas Noteng wrote:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bashburn/bashburn_3.0.1-2.dsc
Uploaded.
You'll need to get this unblocked first before considering doing
something about 3.1.0.
> Not sure if the (Closes: #) should still be in the changelog though.
> If th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Den 03. nov. 2014 20:13, skrev Andreas Beckmann:
> On 2014-11-03 20:04, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> That might be true if the fix could wait until the next stable
>> point release (unplanned yet, but at the earliest in
>> mid-December). Aside from anyt
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 767968 dictionaries-common/1.23.0
Bug #767968 [dictionaries-common] dictionaries-common::aspell-autobuildhash:
Installation fails because of bad return code on error.
Marked as found in versions dictionaries-common/1.23.0.
> found 767940 di
Your message dated Mon, 03 Nov 2014 19:48:51 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#767567: fixed in bashburn 3.0.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #767567,
regarding bashburn: fails to upgrade from squeeze - trying to overwrite
/usr/share/man/man1/bashburn.1.gz
to be marked as done.
This
Hi Graham,
it would be great if you could revise the patch. I admit that the
package is in a quite outdated packaging state. :-(
Just ping me if you found a better solution and I'll do my best
to upload quickly.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 09:30:59PM +0200, Graham Ingg
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 767968
Bug #767968 {Done: Agustin Martin } [dictionaries-common]
dictionaries-common::aspell-autobuildhash: Installation fails because of bad
return code on error.
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 767940 -1
Bug #767940 {Done: Agustin Martin } [dictionaries-common]
dictionaries-common: upgrade failure: Undefined subroutine &main::subst called
at /usr/sbin/aspell-autobuildhash line 54.
Bug 767940 cloned as bug 767968
> retitle -1 dict
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 763909
Bug #763909 {Done: Andreas Tille } [src:viewmol] viewmol:
/usr/bin/viewmol missing for most archs
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-ad
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 767940
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> retitle -1 dictionaries-common::aspell-autobuildhash: Installation fails
> because of bad return code on error.
Failed to set the title of -1: The 'bug' parameter ("-1") to
Debbug
reopen 763909
thanks
Hi Andreas
Thanks for the upload. Unfortunately it didn't seem to work. :(
>From the i386 buildlog, it appears that getmachine runs before
dh_quilt_patch, so the patch hasn't been applied yet.
I'll see if I can convert the package to source format 3.0 (dquilt)
and I should
clone 767940
retitle -1 dictionaries-common::aspell-autobuildhash: Installation fails
because of bad return code on error.
submitter -1 !
close 767940
fixed 767940 dictionaries-common/1.23.15
thanks
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 08:05:03PM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote:
> > The reason is that I missed t
On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 20:13 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2014-11-03 20:04, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > That might be true if the fix could wait until the next stable point
> > release (unplanned yet, but at the earliest in mid-December). Aside from
> > anything else, at least this SRM will be
This has been fixed upstream in version 2.90.
http://www.infradead.org/get_iplayer/html/get_iplayer.html
I have grabbed the new script from here until it can be properly
packaged.
Extracting and copying this version over the apt installed version
in /usr/bin has allowed a functioning get_iplayer
Your message dated Mon, 03 Nov 2014 19:18:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#767394: fixed in django-assets 0.10-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #767394,
regarding python-django-assets: dist-packages/tests/__init__.py conflict
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On 2014-11-03 20:04, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> That might be true if the fix could wait until the next stable point
> release (unplanned yet, but at the earliest in mid-December). Aside from
> anything else, at least this SRM will be following standard procedure
> and not acking the wheezy fix until
Your message dated Mon, 03 Nov 2014 19:58:24 +0100
with message-id <5457d050.6020...@vr-web.de>
and subject line Re: synaptic: libc upgrade always failed in synaptic
has caused the Debian Bug report #760402,
regarding synaptic: libc upgrade always failing in synaptic
to be marked as done.
This mea
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 767940
Bug #767940 {Done: Agustin Martin Domingo }
[dictionaries-common] dictionaries-common: upgrade failure: Undefined
subroutine &main::subst called at /usr/sbin/aspell-autobuildhash line 54.
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug ha
reopen 767940
thanks
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 06:54:11PM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 10:53:17PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > Package: dictionaries-common
> > Version: 1.23.14
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > When upgrading from 1.23.12 to 1.23.14 I get this error message:
>
On Sun, 2014-11-02 at 13:08 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > Please prepare an update for wheezy and follow the
> > stable-proposed-updates procedure (file a PU request against
> > release.debian.org including a source debdiff).
> > Wait,
reassign #767559 geoip-database-contrib
thanks
Hi,
this has to be fixed in the -contrib packaging.
Am 01.11.2014 um 04:05 schrieb Andreas Beckmann:
> Package: geoip-database-extra,geoip-database-contrib
> Version: 1.17
> Severity: serious
> User: trei...@debian.org
> Usertags: edos-file-overwrit
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign #767559 geoip-database-contrib
Bug #767559 [geoip-database-extra,geoip-database-contrib] geoip-database-extra,
geoip-database-contrib: error when trying to install together
Bug reassigned from package 'geoip-database-extra,geoip-database
Updated diff looks better :-)
send this to the PU bug, too. And let me know once you hear something
from the release team.
Thanks
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Den 03. nov. 2014 18:55, skrev Andreas Beckmann:
> On 2014-11-03 18:09, Andreas Noteng wrote:
>> Den 02. nov. 2014 18:53, skrev Andreas Beckmann:
>>> I'll sponsor your uploads. If you want a review, send me (and
>>> this bug) source debdiffs.
>>
>>
...
diff -Nru bashburn-3.0.1/debian/changelog bashburn-3.0.1/debian/changelog
--- bashburn-3.0.1/debian/changelog 2011-06-25 23:17:11.0 +0200
+++ bashburn-3.0.1/debian/changelog 2014-11-03 19:13:52.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+bashburn (3.0.1-1+deb7u1) wheezy; urgency=medium
+
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 754791 fusionforge-plugin-sysauthldap: fails to install: mv: cannot
> stat '/etc/gforge/httpd.conf.d/plugin-sysauthldap-secrets.inc.generated': No
> such file or directory
Bug #754791 [fusionforge-plugin-sysauthldap] fusionforge-plugin-s
Your message dated Mon, 03 Nov 2014 18:18:51 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#767940: fixed in dictionaries-common 1.23.15
has caused the Debian Bug report #767940,
regarding dictionaries-common: upgrade failure: Undefined subroutine
&main::subst called at /usr/sbin/aspell-autobuildhash
Package: gitweb
Version: 1:2.1.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
gitweb no longer works. When I call /usr/share/gitweb/index.cgi
manually from the shell, I get:
[Mon Nov 3 18:58:27 2014] index.cgi: CGI::param called in list context from
package main line 874, this can
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 10:53:17PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Package: dictionaries-common
> Version: 1.23.14
> Severity: serious
>
> When upgrading from 1.23.12 to 1.23.14 I get this error message:
>
> Setting up dictionaries-common (1.23.14) ...
> Processing triggers for dictionaries-common (1.2
On 2014-11-03 18:09, Andreas Noteng wrote:
> Den 02. nov. 2014 18:53, skrev Andreas Beckmann:
>> I'll sponsor your uploads.
>> If you want a review, send me (and this bug) source debdiffs.
>
> Looks like stable upload was approved. Attached is the debdiff.
where did you get the idea of approval?
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 12:16:24PM +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> I have a half-working patch on my disk for that. You might want to try
> that as a base, I'll push it to git soon and let you know.
How about that?
https://github.com/credativ/bareos/commit/a3817bfc181cbe9352e2b9c7f52e125f598bcb
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 767165 normal
Bug #767165 [ktp-call-ui] [ktp-call-ui] Doesn't work
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
767165: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.
I'm also able to reliably reproduce this. I always see avahi-autoipd
processes like these pop up when the problem occurs:
$ ps aux | grep avahi-autoipd
USER PID %CPU %MEMVSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND
avahi-a+ 31710 0.0 0.0 2440 816 ?S10:15 0:00
avah
Your message dated Mon, 03 Nov 2014 16:33:58 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#764386: fixed in efivar 0.15-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #764386,
regarding libefivar0: Segmentation fault in vars_get_variable() (vars.c:165)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Actually, never mind. Peter broke out your patch and applied it
upstream. I've just uploaded efivar 0.15-2. Please verify that it works
correctly on your system.
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 09:58:20AM -0600, Dominguez, Jared wrote:
Jan,
I passed your patch upstream. Peter Jones is looking at it.
Although libtuxcap can be compiled again, I doubt that the package is in
a releasable state. I don't see any upstream activity, the version of
libtuxcap is already five years old and there are more packaging
problems such as
https://bugs.debian.org/767948
https://bugs.debian.org/623300
In additio
Jan,
I passed your patch upstream. Peter Jones is looking at it. It'd
probably help him to know more details about what system you're on,
though, like what make/model this is and probably an strace if you can.
--Jared
--
Jared Domínguez
Server OS Engineering
Dell | Enterprise Solutions Grou
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
