Bug#891786: [pkg-dhcp-devel] Bug#891786: isc-dhcp: diff for NMU version 4.3.5-3.1

Hi Mike, On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 04:47:10PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote: > On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > I've prepared an NMU for isc-dhcp (versioned as 4.3.5-3.1) and > > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I > > should delay it longer. >

Bug#891786: marked as done (isc-dhcp: CVE-2018-5732: A specially constructed response from a malicious server can cause a buffer overflow in dhclient)

Your message dated Mon, 05 Mar 2018 05:52:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#891786: fixed in isc-dhcp 4.3.5-3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #891786, regarding isc-dhcp: CVE-2018-5732: A specially constructed response from a malicious server

Processed: Re: wvSummary Segmentation fault (core dumped) when ran on any supported file format.

Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #891258 [wv] wvSummary Segmentation fault (core dumped) when ran on any supported file format. Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > forwarded -1 ircs://irc.gnome.org/abiword Bug #891258 [wv] wvSummary Segmentation fault (core dumped)

Bug#891258: wvSummary Segmentation fault (core dumped) when ran on any supported file format.

Control: severity -1 important Control: forwarded -1 ircs://irc.gnome.org/abiword On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 21:22:06 + Beau Moore wrote: > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable This is not the case since... > When running wvSummary on any supported file format a Segmentaiton

Bug#887306: marked as done (obs-build: CVE-2017-14804: Exploit extractbuild to write to files in the host system)

Your message dated Mon, 05 Mar 2018 01:20:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#887306: fixed in obs-build 20180302-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #887306, regarding obs-build: CVE-2017-14804: Exploit extractbuild to write to files in the host

Bug#891278: marked as done (ntpsec-ntpviz: fails to install: install: invalid user 'ntp')

Your message dated Mon, 05 Mar 2018 01:05:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#891278: fixed in ntpsec 1.0.0+dfsg1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #891278, regarding ntpsec-ntpviz: fails to install: install: invalid user 'ntp' to be marked as done.

Bug#892079: rakarrack: Cannot compile due to -Werror=format-security

control: close -1 thanks Hello, I'm sorry, apparently this is already fixed in the actual current version. It appears that the git repo is older than whatever apt-get source serves. Cheers, Ben Wiederhake

Processed: Re: Bug#892079: rakarrack: Cannot compile due to -Werror=format-security

Processing control commands: > close -1 Bug #892079 [rakarrack] rakarrack: Cannot compile due to -Werror=format-security Marked Bug as done -- 892079: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=892079 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#892079: rakarrack: Cannot compile due to -Werror=format-security

Package: rakarrack Version: 0.6.1-4+b2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Dear Maintainer, tl;dr: Remove `-Werror`! History: I'm trying to rebuild rakarrack (#892077), and write a lot about it (#892078). Steps to reproduce: Install

Bug#892078: rakarrack: Forgotten build-dep: Needs dpatch

Package: rakarrack Version: 0.6.1-4+b2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Dear Maintainer, tl;dr: Add 'dpatch' to Build-Depends or similar. History: I wanted to rebuild rakarrack from source in order to debug a problem (#892077). I

Bug#860747: marked as done (ruby-all-dev: include upper bound on generated ruby dependencies)

Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2018 23:21:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#860747: fixed in ruby-defaults 1:2.5 has caused the Debian Bug report #860747, regarding ruby-all-dev: include upper bound on generated ruby dependencies to be marked as

Bug#892074: uwsgi: FTBFS with ruby2.5 as default

Source: uwsgi Version: 2.0.15-10.2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source I am about to upload ruby-defaults to unstable, switching the default Ruby to ruby2.5. With that in place, uwsgi fails to build from source like this: [...] CFLAGS="-g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>=.

Bug#892072: weechat: build against ruby2.5

Source: weechat Version: 1.9.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: will FTBFS soon Tags: patch Hi, I am about to upload ruby-defaults to unstable, switching the default Ruby to ruby2.5, and ruby2.3 support will be removed right after that. Please consider applying the attached patch, obtained

Bug#891786: [pkg-dhcp-devel] Bug#891786: isc-dhcp: diff for NMU version 4.3.5-3.1

On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > I've prepared an NMU for isc-dhcp (versioned as 4.3.5-3.1) and > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I > should delay it longer. Hi Salvatore, Some meaningless whitespace is touched, but otherwise your patches

Bug#892049: dovecot post-install fails

Control: tags -1 unreproducible moreinfo Control: severity -1 normal Hi, On 16:46 Sun 04 Mar , dAgeCKo wrote: > Trying to install dovecot on debian 9.2 leaded to error during the > post-install process, leading to dovecot partially installed and > non-working, resulting in an unusable

Processed: Re: Bug#892049: dovecot post-install fails

Processing control commands: > tags -1 unreproducible moreinfo Bug #892049 [dovecot-core] dovecot post-install fails Added tag(s) moreinfo and unreproducible. > severity -1 normal Bug #892049 [dovecot-core] dovecot post-install fails Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave' -- 892049:

Bug#891242: marked as done (libquazip binary-any FTBFS: mv: cannot stat 'debian/*-doc/usr/share/doc/*-dev/html': No such file or directory)

Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2018 20:50:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#891242: fixed in libquazip 0.7.3-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #891242, regarding libquazip binary-any FTBFS: mv: cannot stat 'debian/*-doc/usr/share/doc/*-dev/html':

Bug#891786: isc-dhcp: diff for NMU version 4.3.5-3.1

Control: tags 887413 + patch Control: tags 887413 + pending Control: tags 891785 + patch Control: tags 891785 + pending Control: tags 891786 + patch Control: tags 891786 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for isc-dhcp (versioned as 4.3.5-3.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please

Processed: isc-dhcp: diff for NMU version 4.3.5-3.1

Processing control commands: > tags 887413 + patch Bug #887413 [src:isc-dhcp] isc-dhcp: CVE-2017-3144: dhcp: omapi code doesn't free socket descriptors when empty message is received allowing denial-of-service Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #887413 to the same tags previously set > tags

Processed: isc-dhcp: diff for NMU version 4.3.5-3.1

Processing control commands: > tags 887413 + patch Bug #887413 [src:isc-dhcp] isc-dhcp: CVE-2017-3144: dhcp: omapi code doesn't free socket descriptors when empty message is received allowing denial-of-service Added tag(s) patch. > tags 887413 + pending Bug #887413 [src:isc-dhcp] isc-dhcp:

Processed: isc-dhcp: diff for NMU version 4.3.5-3.1

Processing control commands: > tags 887413 + patch Bug #887413 [src:isc-dhcp] isc-dhcp: CVE-2017-3144: dhcp: omapi code doesn't free socket descriptors when empty message is received allowing denial-of-service Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #887413 to the same tags previously set > tags

Bug#892066: ruby-crb-blast FTBFS: test failures

Source: ruby-crb-blast Version: 0.6.9-1 Severity: serious https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ruby-crb-blast=all=0.6.9-1=1520009847=0 ... ┌──┐ │ Run tests for ruby2.3 from debian/ruby-tests.rake

Processed: severity of 892062 is important

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 892062 important Bug #892062 [libproj13] libproj13: PROJ4 version 5 ignores +vunits Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 892062:

Bug#889936: survex: FTBFS with proj 5.0.0

Control: clone -1 -2 Control: reassign -2 libproj13 Control: retitle -2 libproj13: PROJ4 version 5 ignores +vunits Control: block -1 by -2 On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 10:55:00PM +0100, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > Your package FTBFS due to missing compatibility with Proj 5.0.0: > > ./csbadsdfix.svx:2:

Processed: Re: Bug#889936: survex: FTBFS with proj 5.0.0

Processing control commands: > clone -1 -2 Bug #889936 [src:survex] survex: FTBFS with proj 5.0.0 Bug 889936 cloned as bug 892062 891966 was blocked by: 889936 889931 876934 891966 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 891966: 892062 > reassign -2 libproj13 Bug #892062 [src:survex]

Bug#892046: marked as done (puredata-gui-l10n: needs Breaks+Replaces: puredata-gui (<< 0.48.1-3))

Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2018 19:35:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#892046: fixed in puredata 0.48.1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #892046, regarding puredata-gui-l10n: needs Breaks+Replaces: puredata-gui (<< 0.48.1-3) to be marked as

Bug#891982: xchat: Intent to file removal bug

On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 05:50:15PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > >> I don't think a rant posted on reddit by the author of a fork > >> is justified enough to ask for a package to be removed from > >> the archive. > > > > The author posted his opinion to his personal blog and did not >

Bug#874364: gnome: Gnome keyboard layout setting influences system-wide keyboard layout unpredictably

Now I have investigated the problem further. My findings here: 1) The per-user layout influences the console layout when there is only one user. This in itself is somewhat reasonable, if little confusing to someone who has used to the old UNIX model that normal user cannot edit system-wide

Processed: Bug #892046 in puredata marked as pending

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #892046 [puredata-gui-l10n] puredata-gui-l10n: needs Breaks+Replaces: puredata-gui (<< 0.48.1-3) Added tag(s) pending. -- 892046: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=892046 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#892046: Bug #892046 in puredata marked as pending

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #892046 in puredata reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#891661: maven: missing Depends on libcommons-cli-java

Hi Stephen, >> Installing that library fixes it, so it’s just a missing Depends. > >Thanks for reporting this Thorsten, the dependency is present in >version 3.5.2-2 (via libmaven3-core-java). indeed it is, thanks. I guess that version had not hit my mirror yet when I reported that, and the

Processed: block 885135 with 885287

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 885135 with 885287 Bug #885135 [src:pygtk] pygtk: Unmaintained, use GObject Introspection instead Bug #885752 [src:pygtk] pygtk: Unmaintained, should not be released with Debian 885135 was blocked by: 885304 885476 885293 885300 886276

Bug#891519: marked as done (putty FTBFS: error: 'gdk_beep' is deprecated: Use 'gdk_display_beep' instead)

Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2018 18:35:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#891519: fixed in putty 0.70-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #891519, regarding putty FTBFS: error: 'gdk_beep' is deprecated: Use 'gdk_display_beep' instead to be marked

Processed: Bug #891519 in putty marked as pending

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #891519 [src:putty] putty FTBFS: error: 'gdk_beep' is deprecated: Use 'gdk_display_beep' instead Added tag(s) pending. -- 891519: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=891519 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#891519: Bug #891519 in putty marked as pending

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #891519 in putty reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#892048: marked as done (udunits-bin: missing Breaks+Replaces: libudunits2-0 (<< 2.2.26-2))

Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2018 18:20:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#892048: fixed in udunits 2.2.26-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #892048, regarding udunits-bin: missing Breaks+Replaces: libudunits2-0 (<< 2.2.26-2) to be marked as

Bug#891242: libquazip binary-any FTBFS: mv: cannot stat 'debian/*-doc/usr/share/doc/*-dev/html': No such file or directory

On Friday, February 23 2018, Adrian Bunk wrote: > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libquazip=sid > > ... > dh_installdocs > find debian -name "*.md5" -delete > # somehow the docs are installed to libquazip-dev which is not good since > there are two -dev packages > mv

Bug#891661: marked as done (maven: missing Depends on libcommons-cli-java)

Your message dated Sun, 4 Mar 2018 18:57:07 +0100 with message-id <20180304175707.xtejmg73gwwnw...@sk2.org> and subject line Re: Bug#891661: maven: missing Depends on libcommons-cli-java has caused the Debian Bug report #891661, regarding maven: missing Depends on libcommons-cli-java to be marked

Processed: Not RC

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 887873 important Bug #887873 [src:linux] linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) Severity set to 'important' from 'critical' > -- Stopping processing here. Please

Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM)

A Debian user reported the following issue on QNAP TS-119P II with 4.9.65: * Menno Finlay-Smits [2018-01-21 23:08]: > Rsyncing files between 2 HDDs on a QNAP 119p with a fresh, minimal install of > stretch NAS (armel) causes the kernel to fail after ~20mins with a kernel > memory

Bug#890774: marked as done (glade 3.20.2-1 has same filename for all images)

Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2018 17:34:24 + with message-id and subject line Bug#890774: fixed in glade 3.20.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #890774, regarding glade 3.20.2-1 has same filename for all images to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#888508: gitlab: multiple CVEs from GitLab Security Release: 10.3.4, 10.2.6, and 10.1.6 advisory

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 09:53:25PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On വ്യാഴം 15 ഫെബ്രുവരി 2018 12:07 രാവിലെ, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > What's the status? > > Cheers, > > Moritz > Some cve patches are backported, but help is welcome, >

Bug#891982: xchat: Intent to file removal bug

On 03/04/2018 05:26 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > 1. "in the maintainer's opinion, makes the package unsuitable for release" [1] Didn't you say there is no longer an upstream maintainer? Please note we have had similar cases with other packages where the maintainer of a forked project or the

Bug#891946: marked as done (datalad: tries to download msgpack-python)

Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2018 16:49:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#891946: fixed in datalad 0.9.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #891946, regarding datalad: tries to download msgpack-python to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#891956: log eclipse no starting -ClassNotFoundException:

!SESSION Fri Mar 02 18:36:55 CST 2018 -- !ENTRY org.eclipse.equinox.launcher 4 0 2018-03-02 18:36:55.263 !MESSAGE Exception launching the Eclipse Platform: !STACK java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter     at

Bug#891982: xchat: Intent to file removal bug

On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 10:14 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Could you provide any references to bug reports which indicates > that there are problems with the xchat package which make it > unfit for release or violate against any of the points mentioned > in

Bug#892051: prelude-utils: fails to upgrade from 'stable' to 'sid' - trying to overwrite /etc/prelude/default/client.conf

Package: prelude-utils Version: 4.1.0-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from 'stable'. It installed fine in 'stable', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails because it tries to overwrite other

Bug#892050: python3-panko: missing Breaks+Replaces: python-panko (<< 3.1.0-3)

Package: python3-panko Version: 3.1.0-3 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from 'testing'. It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails because it tries to overwrite

Bug#892049: dovecot post-install fails

Package: dovecot-core Version: 2.2.27-3+deb9u2 Severity: grave Debian: Stretch amd64 Regression: Unknown Trying to install dovecot on debian 9.2 leaded to error during the post-install process, leading to dovecot partially installed and non-working, resulting in an unusable program (all

Bug#859829: bump

Nobody objected, so let's hold out until libcurl breaks us for good or OpenSSL 1.1 support emerges...

Bug#892048: udunits-bin: missing Breaks+Replaces: libudunits2-0 (<< 2.2.26-2)

Package: udunits-bin Version: udunits-bin Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from 'testing'. It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails because it tries to overwrite

Bug#892047: libvlfeat-doc: fails to upgrade from 'testing' - trying to overwrite /usr/share/doc/libvlfeat-dev/examples/aib.c

Package: libvlfeat-doc Version: 0.9.21+dfsg0-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from 'testing'. It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails because it tries to

Bug#887785: marked as done (javacc-maven-plugin and build-rdeps FTBFS with jtb 1.4.12-1)

Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2018 15:49:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#887785: fixed in jtb 1.4.12-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #887785, regarding javacc-maven-plugin and build-rdeps FTBFS with jtb 1.4.12-1 to be marked as done. This

Bug#888994: marked as done (libjavacc-maven-plugin-java: plugin fails at runtime after jtb 1.4.12-1 update)

Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2018 15:49:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#887785: fixed in jtb 1.4.12-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #887785, regarding libjavacc-maven-plugin-java: plugin fails at runtime after jtb 1.4.12-1 update to be

Bug#892046: puredata-gui-l10n: needs Breaks+Replaces: puredata-gui (<< 0.48.1-3)

Package: puredata-gui-l10n Version: 0.48.1-3 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from 'testing'. It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails because it tries to overwrite

Bug#887785: javacc-maven-plugin, javacc, and the jtb update

Dear maintainer, I've uploaded an NMU versioned as 1.4.12-1.1 to address this issue. Please find attached the debdiff. Regards, Markus diff -Nru jtb-1.4.12/debian/changelog jtb-1.4.12/debian/changelog --- jtb-1.4.12/debian/changelog 2018-01-08 04:18:07.0 +0100 +++

Bug#891982: xchat: Intent to file removal bug

Package: src:xchat Followup-For: Bug #891982 Hi Jeremy! Could you provide any references to bug reports which indicates that there are problems with the xchat package which make it unfit for release or violate against any of the points mentioned in the Debian Policy? Please note that we have

Processed: Found in 1.4.12

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 887785 1.4.12-1 Bug #887785 [src:jtb] javacc-maven-plugin and build-rdeps FTBFS with jtb 1.4.12-1 Bug #888994 [src:jtb] libjavacc-maven-plugin-java: plugin fails at runtime after jtb 1.4.12-1 update Marked as found in versions

Bug#892045: usbguard-applet-qt: upgrading libqt5 to experimental's 5.10 breaks the applet

Package: usbguard-applet-qt Version: 0.7.0+ds1-2+b1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Nothing prevents the user from installing an incompatible Qt 5.10 libraries: --8<---cut here---start->8--- $ usbguard-applet-qt Cannot mix incompatible

Processed: Reassign 887785

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 887785 src:jtb Bug #887785 [src:javacc-maven-plugin] javacc-maven-plugin and build-rdeps FTBFS with jtb 1.4.12-1 Bug #888994 [src:javacc-maven-plugin] libjavacc-maven-plugin-java: plugin fails at runtime after jtb 1.4.12-1 update Bug

Bug#887785: javacc-maven-plugin, javacc, and the jtb update

reassign -1 src:jtb On Fri, 2 Mar 2018 12:54:36 +0100 Markus Koschany wrote: > Hi, > > Am 02.03.2018 um 06:33 schrieb Tiago Daitx: > > Hi, > > > > A simple relocation in jtb fixed the FTBFS - tested for surefire, > > javacc-maven-plugin, hawtbuf, avro-java, and

Processed: block 885135 with 885488 885471 885278 885477 885365 885289 885300 885303 885297 885258 885287 885509 885268 885140 885498 885298 885372 885510 885379 885280 885493 885476 885292 885279 885

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 885135 with 885488 885471 885278 885477 885365 885289 885300 885303 > 885297 885258 885287 885509 885268 885140 885498 885298 885372 885510 885379 > 885280 885493 885476 885292 885279 885355 885511 885275 885495 885361 885377 > 885351

Processed (with 1 error): block 885135 with 885488 885471 885278 885477 885365 885289 885300 885303 885297 885258 885287 885509 885268 885140 885498 885298 885372 885510 885379 885280 885493 885476 88

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 885135 with 885488 885471 885278 885477 885365 885289 885300 885303 > 885297 885258 885287 885509 885268 885140 885498 885298 885372 885510 885379 > 885280 885493 885476 885292 885279 885355 885511 885275 885495 885361 885377 > 885351

Processed: block 885135 with 885368 885513 885470 885356 885496 885282 885517 885483 885374 885467 885519 885523 885482 885515 885271 885474 885266

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 885135 with 885368 885513 885470 885356 885496 885282 885517 885483 > 885374 885467 885519 885523 885482 885515 885271 885474 885266 Bug #885135 [src:pygtk] pygtk: Unmaintained, use GObject Introspection instead Bug #885752 [src:pygtk]

Processed (with 1 error): block 885135 with 885529 885491 885469 885485 885468 885479 885528 885267 885301 885880

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 885135 with 885529 885491 885469 885485 885468 885479 885528 885267 > 885301 885880 Bug #885135 [src:pygtk] pygtk: Unmaintained, use GObject Introspection instead Bug #885752 [src:pygtk] pygtk: Unmaintained, should not be released with

Processed: block 885135 with 885508 885274 885505 885371 885530 885304 885256 885490 885270 885380

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 885135 with 885508 885274 885505 885371 885530 885304 885256 885490 > 885270 885380 Bug #885135 [src:pygtk] pygtk: Unmaintained, use GObject Introspection instead Bug #885752 [src:pygtk] pygtk: Unmaintained, should not be released with

Processed (with 1 error): block 885135 with 885488 885471 885278 885477 885365 885289 885300 885303 885297 885258 885287 885509 885268 885140 885498 885298 885372 885510 885379 885280 885493 885476 88

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 885135 with 885488 885471 885278 885477 885365 885289 885300 885303 > 885297 885258 885287 885509 885268 885140 885498 885298 885372 885510 885379 > 885280 885493 885476 885292 885279 885355 885511 885275 885495 885361 885377 > 885351

Processed: block 885135 with 885357 885263 885527 886198 885478 885494 885360 886276 885362 885299

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 885135 with 885357 885263 885527 886198 885478 885494 885360 886276 > 885362 885299 Bug #885135 [src:pygtk] pygtk: Unmaintained, use GObject Introspection instead Bug #885752 [src:pygtk] pygtk: Unmaintained, should not be released with

Processed (with 1 error): block 885135 with 885368 885513 885480 885470 885356 885496 885282 885517

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 885135 with 885368 885513 885480 885470 885356 885496 885282 885517 Bug #885135 [src:pygtk] pygtk: Unmaintained, use GObject Introspection instead Bug #885752 [src:pygtk] pygtk: Unmaintained, should not be released with Debian 885135 was

Processed (with 1 error): block 885135 with 885483 885374 885467 885519 885523 885482 885515 885271 885474 885266

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 885135 with 885483 885374 885467 885519 885523 885482 885515 885271 > 885474 885266 Bug #885135 [src:pygtk] pygtk: Unmaintained, use GObject Introspection instead Bug #885752 [src:pygtk] pygtk: Unmaintained, should not be released with

Bug#890774: Bug #890774 in glade marked as pending

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #890774 in glade reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug #890774 in glade marked as pending

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #890774 [glade] glade 3.20.2-1 has same filename for all images Added tag(s) pending. -- 890774: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=890774 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#887525: marked as done (poppler FTBFS with gtk-doc-tools 1.27-1)

Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2018 11:50:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#887525: fixed in poppler 0.62.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #887525, regarding poppler FTBFS with gtk-doc-tools 1.27-1 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#876934: proj transition started, increasing severity to serious

On 03/04/2018 11:55 AM, Kai Pastor, DG0YT wrote: > Am 04.03.2018 um 10:03 schrieb Sebastiaan Couwenberg: >> severity 876934 serious >> thanks >> >> The proj transition (#891966) has started, these build failures are >> now RC. > > Again, 876934 was reported for FTBFS in reproducible builds. This

Bug#876934: proj transition started, increasing severity to serious

Am 04.03.2018 um 10:03 schrieb Sebastiaan Couwenberg: severity 889931 serious severity 876934 serious severity 889936 serious thanks The proj transition (#891966) has started, these build failures are now RC. Kind Regards, Bas Again, 876934 was reported for FTBFS in reproducible builds.

Bug#870308: marked as done (ruby-ridley FTBFS: test failures)

Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2018 10:50:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#870308: fixed in ruby-ridley 5.1.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #870308, regarding ruby-ridley FTBFS: test failures to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#890957: marked as done (live-tasks missing live-task-base binary.)

Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2018 09:50:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#890957: fixed in live-tasks 0.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #890957, regarding live-tasks missing live-task-base binary. to be marked as done. This means that you

Processed: pending

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 890957 + pending Bug #890957 [live-tasks] live-tasks missing live-task-base binary. Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #890957 to the same tags previously set > kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Processed: proj transition started, increasing severity to serious

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 889931 serious Bug #889931 [src:python-cartopy] python-cartopy FTBFS with proj 5.0.0 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 876934 serious Bug #876934 [src:openorienteering-mapper] openorienteering-mapper FTBFS: test

Bug#892019: python-meshio: Installs test files to /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages

Source: python-meshio Version: 1.11.7-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: randomness X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi, Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], we noticed that python-meshio installs

Bug#892018: Won't work without grunt!

Package: node-grunt-cli Version: 1.2.0-3 Severity: grave It is really depending on grunt -- but doesn't, so it's possible to install the package in a broken state. Snark on #debian-js