Bug#911130: Package doesn't actually bump SOVERSION

2018-10-15 Thread Ondřej Surý
Package: libtidy5.6 Version: 1:5.6.0-0.1~exp1 Severity: serious -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, when symbols in the library change, you need to actually bump the SOVERSION/SONAME of the package. It's not enough and it's wrong to just change the package name for several

Bug#903698: sphinxbase: build appears broken for multiple python3 versions

2018-10-15 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, le ven. 12 oct. 2018 04:12:08 +0200, a ecrit: > I'm thinking... My chroots have a lib -> usr/lib symlink. Could it be > that python somehow gets lost between /lib/python* and /usr/lib/python*, > and dependending on e.g. inode number or directory order, we could have > one way or

Bug#910911: Could there be any databases built by Debian which might be affected.

2018-10-15 Thread shirish शिरीष
Dear all, While upgrading my system, I came across this bug (shared by apt-listbugs) . I wonder if there are any gdbm databases which are built and have that database. The one example that was shared by6 Niko was of libmarc-charset-perl an optional component. Maybe some core packges might be

Bug#911120: espeakup fails to install

2018-10-15 Thread Samuel Thibault
Please always keep the bug in Cc, so that I am not the only recipient of the mail. Writing to me only means risking falling in the middle of my vacations and thus not getting an answer for weeks, or that I just don't have the time to answer and thus you would at best get a terse answer, or worse,

Bug#911120: espeakup fails to install

2018-10-15 Thread Keith Barrett
On 15/10/18 22:02, Samuel Thibault wrote: Hello, Keith Barrett, le dim. 14 oct. 2018 16:50:08 +0100, a ecrit: I removed the package with a view to reinstalling but invoke-rc.d: initscript espeakup, action "start" failed. Mmm, perhaps you just need to have the speakup_soft module loaded?

Bug#911045: xenstore-utils: removal of xenstore-utils makes files disappear from xen-utils-common

2018-10-15 Thread Ian Jackson
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: xenstore-utils: removal of xenstore-utils makes files disappear from xen-utils-common"): > > The installation sequence to reproduce this problem is > > > > apt-get install xen-utils-common/stretch > > # (1) > > apt-get install xenstore-utils/sid > > apt-get

Bug#911045: xenstore-utils: removal of xenstore-utils makes files disappear from xen-utils-common

2018-10-15 Thread Ian Jackson
> The installation sequence to reproduce this problem is > > apt-get install xen-utils-common/stretch > # (1) > apt-get install xenstore-utils/sid > apt-get remove xenstore-utils > # (2) But this is not possible because xen-utils-common Depends on xenstore-utils (even in stretch). You

Processed: reassign 911056 to chromium

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 911056 chromium Bug #911056 [chromium,webext-browserpass] chromium,webext-browserpass: impossible to install chromium and webext-browserpass together Bug reassigned from package 'chromium,webext-browserpass' to 'chromium'. Ignoring

Bug#911056: chromium,webext-browserpass: impossible to install chromium and webext-browserpass together

2018-10-15 Thread Michael Meskes
Unless chromium changed the places it looks for some files, I guess this is an oversight in chromium and thus be fixed there. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org Jabber: michael at xmpp dot meskes

Processed: merging 911056 911067

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > merge 911056 911067 Bug #911056 [chromium] chromium,webext-browserpass: impossible to install chromium and webext-browserpass together Bug #911056 [chromium] chromium,webext-browserpass: impossible to install chromium and webext-browserpass

Processed: your mail

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 899240 909658 Bug #899240 [debian-installer] debian-installer: blank screen on boot (6th Gen. ThinkPad X1) Bug #909658 [debian-installer] debian-installer: blank screen on install (HP Elitebook 830 G5) Severity set to 'normal' from

Processed (with 1 error): Re: Bug#909658: debian-installer: blank screen on install (HP Elitebook 830 G5)

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > merge 899240 -1 Bug #899240 [debian-installer] debian-installer: blank screen on boot (6th Gen. ThinkPad X1) Unable to merge bugs because: severity of #909658 is 'important' not 'normal' Failed to merge 899240: Did not alter merged bugs. > severity -1 serious Bug

Bug#885051: marked as done (pdfmod: Depends on old GNOME libraries)

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Oct 2018 22:08:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#885051: fixed in pdfmod 0.9.1-8.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #885051, regarding pdfmod: Depends on old GNOME libraries to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Processed: closing 911120

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 911120 1:0.80-11 Bug #911120 [espeakup] espeakup: Does not fully install There is no source info for the package 'espeakup' at version '1:0.80-11' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version '1:0.80-11' Marked as fixed

Bug#911120: closing 911120

2018-10-15 Thread Samuel Thibault
close 911120 1:0.80-11 thanks

Bug#911120: espeakup: Does not fully install

2018-10-15 Thread Keith Barrett
Package: espeakup Version: 1:0.80-10 Severity: grave Tags: a11y Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? Frequent loss of speech in the console, particularly when

Bug#910915: marked as done (fenrir: fails to install: SyntaxError)

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Oct 2018 21:27:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#910915: fixed in fenrir 1.9.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #910915, regarding fenrir: fails to install: SyntaxError to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#885672: marked as done (cellwriter: Unnecessary Build-Depend on libgnome)

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Oct 2018 21:26:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#885672: fixed in cellwriter 1.3.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #885672, regarding cellwriter: Unnecessary Build-Depend on libgnome to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Processed: tagging 910915

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 910915 + pending Bug #910915 [fenrir] fenrir: fails to install: SyntaxError Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 910915:

Bug#868411: gniall: Port to GTK+ 3

2018-10-15 Thread Jeremy Bicha
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 3:59 PM Yavor Doganov wrote: > It would be great if you can create a repository (possibly using gbp's > --debsnap option), import it at Salsa and grant me commit access. > That way, I can make gradual commits which will be easier to review by > a potential sponsor (rather

Bug#909000: Thunderbird 60 cannot STILL be at stretch normal repository

2018-10-15 Thread Jonas Meurer
Hello, On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 19:19:53 +0200 Narcis Garcia wrote: > Stable packages aren't ready for Thunderbird 60 presence. > It's better to wait for better repository consistence before adding this > update. With keeping Thunderbird at version 52 in stretch you mean to keep the packages with

Bug#868382: gbatnav: Please drop the (build-)dependency against gnome-vfs

2018-10-15 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Ying-Chun Liu, please review the patch attached to https://bugs.debian.org/868382 to fix the RC bug keeping gbatnav out of Testing. If we don't hear from you soon, we will NMU this package. Thanks, Jeremy Bicha

Bug#868411: gniall: Port to GTK+ 3

2018-10-15 Thread Yavor Doganov
Jeremy Bicha wrote: > Yavor, I'm planning to orphan gniall now. Are you interested in being > its maintainer in Debian? It's ok if you don't want to. No, but if it gets orphaned, I can prepare a QA upload fixing other packaging issues and take care of it in the future (I'm already subscribed to

Bug#910395: mediathekview with openjfx 11

2018-10-15 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi, Am 15.10.18 um 19:45 schrieb Erich Schubert: > Hi, > > It seems the classpath is not set up correctly. > > With Java 11 as my main java, the following works: > > java -cp >

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:xiphos

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:xiphos > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org

Processed: [bts-link] source package meson

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package meson > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org Setting

Bug#868411: gniall: Port to GTK+ 3

2018-10-15 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Yavor, I'm planning to orphan gniall now. Are you interested in being its maintainer in Debian? It's ok if you don't want to. Thanks, Jeremy

Bug#911025: Transition to postgresql-11

2018-10-15 Thread Jeremy Bicha
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 4:30 AM Christoph Berg wrote: > Can I help with the transition? If you want, you can investigate why the build tests seem to hang with postgresql 11. You can check whether glom works with postgresql 11. And you can report any issues to

Bug#911025: Transition to postgresql-11

2018-10-15 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: To Jeremy Bicha 2018-10-15 <20181015083032.gb6...@msg.df7cb.de> > Re: Jeremy Bicha 2018-10-15 > > > How soon do you need this issue fixed? I'm ok with glom being removed > > from Testing if that helps. > > At the moment the biggest blocker is that llvm-toolchain-7 is not in > testing (OOM

Bug#903780: marked as done (gitlab: fails to install: Could not find gem 'fog-google (~> 0.5)')

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Oct 2018 23:54:39 +0530 with message-id and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #903780, regarding gitlab: fails to install: Could not find gem 'fog-google (~> 0.5)' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#910485: Confirm issue with libpsm2-2/11.2.68-1

2018-10-15 Thread Lippuner, Jonas
I'm having the same issue with libpsm2-2 version 11.2.68-1. Downgrading to 10.3.58-2 fixes it for me. -- Jonas Lippuner, PhD Scientist Computational Physics and Methods, CCS-2 Center for Theoretical Astrophysics Los Alamos National Laboratory jlippu...@lanl.gov 505-667-1646

Bug#911103: android-platform-dalvik: libandroid-dex-java dependency is no longer built

2018-10-15 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Source: android-platform-dalvik Version: 7.0.0+r33-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: saif...@cse.mrt.ac.lk android-platform-dalvik depends and build-dpeends on libandroid-dex-java but that package is no longer built by android-platform-libcore. This has led to android-sdk-meta being removed from

Bug#910911: libgdbm6: can't read (some?) older GDBM databases

2018-10-15 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2018-10-15 20:18] Niko Tyni > > I am sorry to say it, but probably binNMU or sourceful upload would > > be required for all packages, that bundle gdbm databases, generated > > by (gdbm << 1.9) > > This sounds really sad. So even the gdbm we have in our current stable > release is too old to

Bug#910395: mediathekview with openjfx 11

2018-10-15 Thread Erich Schubert
Hi, It seems the classpath is not set up correctly. With Java 11 as my main java, the following works: java -cp

Bug#911084: sagemath crashes as cantor backend

2018-10-15 Thread Tobias Hansen
Control: reassign -1 cantor-backend-sage Please provide more information. How can the bug be triggered? I'm not familiar with cantor. If someone can demonstrate that the segfault is really in sage, the bug can be reassigned to sagemath. Best, Tobias On 10/15/2018 03:34 PM, Kinky Nekoboi

Processed: Re: Bug#911084: sagemath crashes as cantor backend

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 cantor-backend-sage Bug #911084 [sagemath] sagemath crashes as cantor backend Bug reassigned from package 'sagemath' to 'cantor-backend-sage'. No longer marked as found in versions sagemath/8.3-3. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #911084

Bug#873156: marked as done (fofix: FoFiX.py rises a NotImplementedError on startup)

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Oct 2018 17:34:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#873156: fixed in fofix-dfsg 3.121-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #873156, regarding fofix: FoFiX.py rises a NotImplementedError on startup to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#910911: libgdbm6: can't read (some?) older GDBM databases

2018-10-15 Thread Niko Tyni
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 12:21:16AM +, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > > [2018-10-13 13:20] Niko Tyni > > The libgdbm6 transition broke autopkgtest checks of src:perl and > > libmarc-charset-perl. > > > > It looks like some GDBM databases which were working with the older > > gdbm are not readable

Bug#899060: FTBFS: even if tests pass, dh_auto_test fails

2018-10-15 Thread Sunil Mohan Adapa
Hello, FreedomBox is set to be autoremoved from testing on 2018/10/21 (in about 5 days) due to mod-gnutls which won't transition into testing which in turn due won't migrate to testing due to its dependency on moneysphere. This effects all FreedomBox users. Please consider uploading the

Bug#868411: gniall: Port to GTK+ 3

2018-10-15 Thread Jeremy Bicha
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 12:27 PM Yavor Doganov wrote: > > Jeremy Bicha wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 9:13 AM Yavor Doganov wrote: > > > Please do what you think is best. > > > > No. I'm delegating this decision to you. There is no upstream. There > > is no Debian maintainer. You're the

Bug#911067: chromium: Conflict with chrome-gnome-shell /etc/chromium

2018-10-15 Thread Modestas Vainius
Hello, 2018 m. spalio 15 d., pirmadienis 16:11:38 EEST Patrick Franz rašė: > > > > dpkg: erreur de traitement de l'archive /var/cache/apt/archives/ > > chromium_70.0.3538.54-2_amd64.deb (--unpack) : > > tentative de remplacement du répertoire « /etc/chromium » dans le > > paquet

Bug#868411: gniall: Port to GTK+ 3

2018-10-15 Thread Yavor Doganov
Jeremy Bicha wrote: > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 9:13 AM Yavor Doganov wrote: > > Please do what you think is best. > > No. I'm delegating this decision to you. There is no upstream. There > is no Debian maintainer. You're the closest we have to either one of > those for this package. If your

Bug#899594: marked as done (lirc-compat-remotes: Invalid maintainer address pkg-lirc-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org)

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Oct 2018 16:21:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#899594: fixed in lirc-compat-remotes 0.9.0-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #899594, regarding lirc-compat-remotes: Invalid maintainer address pkg-lirc-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org to be marked as done.

Bug#899578: marked as done (libirman: Invalid maintainer address pkg-lirc-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org)

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Oct 2018 16:21:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#899578: fixed in libirman 0.5.2-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #899578, regarding libirman: Invalid maintainer address pkg-lirc-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#899663: marked as done (pylirc: Invalid maintainer address pkg-lirc-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org)

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Oct 2018 16:22:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#899663: fixed in pylirc 0.0.5-3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #899663, regarding pylirc: Invalid maintainer address pkg-lirc-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#899981: marked as done (lirc: Invalid maintainer address pkg-lirc-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org)

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Oct 2018 16:21:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#899981: fixed in lirc 0.10.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #899981, regarding lirc: Invalid maintainer address pkg-lirc-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#911090: libapt-pkg5.0: incompatible with apt/stretch

2018-10-15 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 05:12:10PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: libapt-pkg5.0 > Version: 1.7.0 > Severity: serious > > Hi, > > I just did a partial upgrade on a stretch+buster+sid development > system resulting in apt-get erroring out with > > apt-get: relocation error:

Processed: pylirc: nmu ongoing

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch pending Bug #899663 [src:pylirc] pylirc: Invalid maintainer address pkg-lirc-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org Added tag(s) pending and patch. -- 899663: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=899663 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#899663: pylirc: nmu ongoing

2018-10-15 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: tags -1 patch pending uploaded in unstable the following debdiff --- pylirc-0.0.5/debian/changelog 2011-06-14 22:24:16.0 +0200 +++ pylirc-0.0.5/debian/changelog 2018-10-15 18:10:22.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +pylirc (0.0.5-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + *

Bug#899578: libirman: nmu uploaded

2018-10-15 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Control: tags 899578 + patch Control: tags 899578 + pending diff -Nru libirman-0.5.2/debian/changelog libirman-0.5.2/debian/changelog --- libirman-0.5.2/debian/changelog 2016-10-29 05:19:40.0 +0200 +++ libirman-0.5.2/debian/changelog 2018-10-15 18:06:39.0 +0200 @@ -1,3

Processed: libirman: nmu uploaded

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 899578 + patch Bug #899578 [src:libirman] libirman: Invalid maintainer address pkg-lirc-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org Added tag(s) patch. > tags 899578 + pending Bug #899578 [src:libirman] libirman: Invalid maintainer address

Bug#908681: libsane1: pointless package rename

2018-10-15 Thread Philip Rinn
Hi Jörg, it seems there is an accepted solution for this bug since almost two weeks: - rename libsane1 back to libsane - add a "Provides: libsane1" to libsane see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=908681#51 Why isn't that route followed? Thanks, Philip signature.asc

Bug#908681: libsane1: pointless package rename

2018-10-15 Thread Philip Rinn
On 14.10.18 at 14:35 Jeremy Bicha wrote: > Control: severity -1 serious > > On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 at 19:59:38 Philip Rinn wrote: >> Control: -1 severity normal >> >> Hi, >> >> I lower the severity of this bug as I couldn't find a severe violation of the >> Debian policy - please point me to it if

Bug#911093: libjetbrains-annotations-java: missing Breaks+Replaces: libintellij-annotations-java (<< 16.0.2-4)

2018-10-15 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: libjetbrains-annotations-java Version: 16.0.2-4 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts replaces-without-breaks Hi, during a test with piuparts and DOSE tools I noticed your package causes removal of files that also belong to another package. This is caused

Bug#909099: gimagereader: crashes at startup

2018-10-15 Thread Philip Rinn
Control: block -1 by 908681 Hi, I'm really sorry that gImageReader in testing is still not fixed. Unfortunately it's still blocked by the back and forth due to the libsane -> libsane1 transition - although it's technically totally unrelated, it just happened during the same time. Best, Philip

Processed: Re: Bug#909099: gimagereader: crashes at startup

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block -1 by 908681 Bug #909099 {Done: Philip Rinn } [gimagereader] gimagereader: crashes at startup 909099 was not blocked by any bugs. 909099 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 909099: 908681 -- 909099:

Bug#906602: marked as done (haskell-hashable: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A)

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Oct 2018 15:35:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#906602: fixed in haskell-hashable 1.2.7.0-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #906602, regarding haskell-hashable: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#908702: linux-image-4.18.0-1-amd64 prevents use of internet (more or les

2018-10-15 Thread ghpy
Dear maintainer, after updating from 4.18.0-1-amd64 to 4.18.0-2-amd64 the behaviour of my system seems to be back to normal. As far as I can see this bug is fixed for me. Best regards and thank you for your time G. Heine

Bug#911091: python3.5-minimal: incompatible with python3-minimal 3.5.3-1 from stretch

2018-10-15 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: python3.5-minimal Version: 3.5.6-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Control: affects -1 + python3-pymca5-dbg Control: found -1 python3-pymca5-dbg/5.4.0+dfsg-1 Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from 'stable'. It

Processed: python3.5-minimal: incompatible with python3-minimal 3.5.3-1 from stretch

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + python3-pymca5-dbg Bug #911091 [python3.5-minimal] python3.5-minimal: incompatible with python3-minimal 3.5.3-1 from stretch Added indication that 911091 affects python3-pymca5-dbg > found -1 python3-pymca5-dbg/5.4.0+dfsg-1 Bug #911091

Bug#910861: Update

2018-10-15 Thread Bruninksbeek
Dear maintainer I wrote that I use Debian Jessie with the MATE desktop environment. However, I should have written that I use Stretch with the MATE desktop environment. I upgraded from Jessie to Stretch only two months ago. Furthermore, the Bug Tracking System has indicated that

Bug#911090: libapt-pkg5.0: incompatible with apt/stretch

2018-10-15 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: libapt-pkg5.0 Version: 1.7.0 Severity: serious Hi, I just did a partial upgrade on a stretch+buster+sid development system resulting in apt-get erroring out with apt-get: relocation error: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libapt-private.so.0.0: symbol

Processed: Re: Bug#886394: pdfsam still shows the same error although it does give the banner as gimp does while starting up.

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 grave Bug #886394 [pdfsam] java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: javafx.scene.layout.HBox Severity set to 'grave' from 'important' > block -1 by 910764 Bug #886394 [pdfsam] java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: javafx.scene.layout.HBox 886394 was not blocked by

Bug#911073: gtimelog fails to start with ValueError (`Namespace Soup not available`)

2018-10-15 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 12:55:54PM +0200, Michael Schubert wrote: > ./gtimelog currently fails with the following traceback: > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/gtimelog", line 11, in ... > File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/gtimelog/main.py", line 55, in >

Bug#868411: gniall: Port to GTK+ 3

2018-10-15 Thread Jeremy Bicha
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 9:13 AM Yavor Doganov wrote: > Jeremy Bicha wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 5:00 PM Yavor Doganov wrote: > > > I am not in a position to decide the faith of a package that I do not > > > maintain. > > > > With its very low popcon and the fact that it has no maintainer

Bug#911084: sagemath crashes as cantor backend

2018-10-15 Thread Kinky Nekoboi
Package: sagemath Version: 8.3-3 Severity: serious Justification: unkown as above cantor-sage-backend crashes with Segmentation fault. -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux

Bug#909837: bug 909837 is forwarded to https://github.com/libreswan/libreswan/issues/206, closing 909837

2018-10-15 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
forwarded 909837 https://github.com/libreswan/libreswan/issues/206 close 909837 3.27-1 thanks

Processed: bug 909837 is forwarded to https://github.com/libreswan/libreswan/issues/206, closing 909837

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 909837 https://github.com/libreswan/libreswan/issues/206 Bug #909837 [src:libreswan] libreswan: FTBFS on armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel Bug #909839 [src:libreswan] libreswan FTBFS on 32bit Set Bug forwarded-to-address to

Bug#910964: libprotobuf17 might need Breaks: libprotobuf10

2018-10-15 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 06:33:50PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 23:42:59 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Package: libprotobuf17 > > Version: 3.6.1-2 > > Severity: serious > > Control: affects -1 src:cura-engine > > I think this was caused by another dependency still built

Bug#910974: Bug #910974 in utidylib marked as pending

2018-10-15 Thread Michal Čihař
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #910974 in utidylib reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug #910974 in utidylib marked as pending

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #910974 [src:utidylib] utidylib: FTBFS with new tidy-html5 5.7.16: Build-dep list needs updating, test fails (upstream behaviour change) Added tag(s) pending. -- 910974: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=910974 Debian Bug

Bug#911067: chromium: Conflict with chrome-gnome-shell /etc/chromium

2018-10-15 Thread Patrick Franz
Hi On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:28:05 +0200 wrote: > Package: chromium > Version: 70.0.3538.54-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: Policy 10.7.4 > > dpkg: erreur de traitement de l'archive /var/cache/apt/archives/ chromium_70.0.3538.54-2_amd64.deb (--unpack) : > tentative de remplacement du

Bug#868411: gniall: Port to GTK+ 3

2018-10-15 Thread Yavor Doganov
Jeremy Bicha wrote: > On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 5:00 PM Yavor Doganov wrote: > > I am not in a position to decide the faith of a package that I do not > > maintain. > > With its very low popcon and the fact that it has no maintainer in > Debian (or anywhere), I think your opinion is the most

Bug#840377: marked as done (pyepl: Please remove build dependency on jade)

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Oct 2018 13:06:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#840377: fixed in pyepl 1.1.0+git12-g365f8e3-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #840377, regarding pyepl: Please remove build dependency on jade to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#911068: marked as done (ranger: broken symlinks: /etc/ranger/*/*.* -> /usr/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/ranger/*/*.*)

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Oct 2018 13:07:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#911068: fixed in ranger 1.9.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #911068, regarding ranger: broken symlinks: /etc/ranger/*/*.* -> /usr/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/ranger/*/*.* to be marked as done. This

Bug#866459: marked as done (pyepl: depends on obsolete python-imaging (replace with python3-pil or python-pil))

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Oct 2018 13:06:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#866459: fixed in pyepl 1.1.0+git12-g365f8e3-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #866459, regarding pyepl: depends on obsolete python-imaging (replace with python3-pil or python-pil) to be marked as done. This

Processed: notfound 910806 in 4.9.0.2652-3

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 910806 4.9.0.2652-3 Bug #910806 {Done: Alexandre Rossi } [davmail] Latest testing update (4.9.0.2652-2) fails to execute in daemon mode Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #910806 to the same values previously set > thanks

Processed: Re: Bug#911079: [pdfsam] Window blank

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 unreproducible Bug #911079 [pdfsam] [pdfsam] Window blank Added tag(s) unreproducible. > severity -1 important Bug #911079 [pdfsam] [pdfsam] Window blank Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' -- 911079:

Bug#911079: [pdfsam] Window blank

2018-10-15 Thread Markus Koschany
Control: tags -1 unreproducible Control: severity -1 important Am 15.10.18 um 14:11 schrieb Marco Righi: > Package: pdfsam > Version: 1.1.4-4 > Severity: grave > > --- Please enter the report below this line. --- > Hi, > After pdfsam execution appears only a little box (see image_1). > After

Bug#900998: marked as done (gambas3: FTBFS w/SDL2 2.0.7+: MIX_INIT_FLUIDSYNTH undeclared)

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Oct 2018 13:59:24 +0200 with message-id <027cd8ae-21bd-fb02-db36-7e7730a9e...@fishpost.de> and subject line gambas3: FTBFS w/SDL2 2.0.7+: MIX_INIT_FLUIDSYNTH undeclared has caused the Debian Bug report #900998, regarding gambas3: FTBFS w/SDL2 2.0.7+: MIX_INIT_FLUIDSYNTH

Bug#911078: triplea: Fails to start with NullPointerException

2018-10-15 Thread Markus Koschany
Package: triplea Version: 1.9.0.0.7062-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After the switch to OpenJFX 11, triplea fails to start with a NullPointerException. triplea.engine.version.bin:1.9 java.lang.NullPointerException at

Processed: user debian...@lists.debian.org, usertagging 910836, severity of 911049 is serious, affects 910150

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > user debian...@lists.debian.org Setting user to debian...@lists.debian.org (was a...@debian.org). > usertags 910836 piuparts There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: piuparts. > severity 911049 serious Bug #911049

Bug#911073: gtimelog fails to start with ValueError (`Namespace Soup not available`)

2018-10-15 Thread Michael Schubert
Package: gtimelog Version: 0.11.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, ./gtimelog currently fails with the following traceback: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/gtimelog", line 11, in load_entry_point('gtimelog==0.11.1',

Bug#908947: youtube-dl: backport youtube-dl to recent version for stretch

2018-10-15 Thread Holger Levsen
On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 04:02:06PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote: > Second, I would like to more formally update youtube-dl for stable releases > in conjunction with Holger. yay! > So, what is the way to proceed with updates to stable releases? I've never > done that before. you file a bug

Bug#911068: ranger: broken symlinks: /etc/ranger/*/*.* -> /usr/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/ranger/*/*.*

2018-10-15 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: ranger Version: 1.9.2-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates) a broken symlink. >From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): /etc/ranger/data/scope.sh ->

Bug#897806: lmms: ftbfs with GCC-8

2018-10-15 Thread Holger Levsen
On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 03:08:34AM +0200, Javier Serrano Polo wrote: > El ds 13 de 10 de 2018 a les 11:14 +, Holger Levsen va escriure: > > why don't you attach your fix to this bug? > Because I am the lazy maintainer. shrugs then. -- cheers, Holger

Bug#911067: chromium: Conflict with chrome-gnome-shell /etc/chromium

2018-10-15 Thread Jérémy Lal
Package: chromium Version: 70.0.3538.54-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.7.4 dpkg: erreur de traitement de l'archive /var/cache/apt/archives/chromium_70.0.3538.54-2_amd64.deb (--unpack) : tentative de remplacement du répertoire « /etc/chromium » dans le paquet chrome-gnome-shell

Bug#894359: Now we have antlr 4.6 - any chance to get 4.7 soon (Was: beast-mcmc2: Cannot find symbol CharStreams.fromString(newick))

2018-10-15 Thread Andrius Merkys
Hi Andreas, On 10/15/2018 12:54 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > when I tried last time we had antlr 4.5. I now tried with 4.6 but it > seems 4.7 is really needed. Any chance to get this soon? I am interested in packaging antlr 4.7 (with Cpp support, needed for #902798), I am working on it right

Bug#910446: NMU diff (substantive patches in git-format-patch form)

2018-10-15 Thread Ian Jackson
Guido Günther writes ("Re: Bug#910446: NMU diff (substantive patches in git-format-patch form)"): > It's not that much trouble for me but rather sad that people spent time > on (in this case) just tedious work while they could fix other stuff > in the same time since the maintainer is already on

Bug#894359: Now we have antlr 4.6 - any chance to get 4.7 soon (Was: beast-mcmc2: Cannot find symbol CharStreams.fromString(newick))

2018-10-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, when I tried last time we had antlr 4.5. I now tried with 4.6 but it seems 4.7 is really needed. Any chance to get this soon? Kind regards Andreas. On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 11:23:42AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 09:44:30AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > >

Bug#907952: marked as done (openvswitch-common: Fails to install due to file conflict)

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Oct 2018 08:38:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#907952: fixed in openvswitch 2.10.0+2018.08.28+git.8ca7c82b7d+ds1-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #907952, regarding openvswitch-common: Fails to install due to file conflict to be marked as done. This

Bug#911061: ukui-control-center depends on nonexisting package gnome-control-center-faces

2018-10-15 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: ukui-control-center Version: 1.1.6-1 Severity: serious The following packages have unmet dependencies: ukui-control-center : Depends: gnome-control-center-faces but it is not installable

Bug#911056: chromium,webext-browserpass: impossible to install chromium and webext-browserpass together

2018-10-15 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2018-10-15 10:12 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Package: chromium,webext-browserpass > Severity: serious > Justification: 7 > > With chromium 70.0.3538.54-1 and webext-browserpass 2.0.11+dfsg-2 installed, > attempting to upgrade to chromium 70.0.3538.54-2 fails: > > Gør klar til at udpakke

Bug#909035: marked as done (dependency missing to libx11-protocol-perl)

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Oct 2018 10:28:55 +0200 with message-id <20181015082855.qr3ufszgbqhmx...@sk2.org> and subject line Re: Bug#909035: dependency missing to libx11-protocol-perl has caused the Debian Bug report #909035, regarding dependency missing to libx11-protocol-perl to be marked as

Bug#911025: Transition to postgresql-11

2018-10-15 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Jeremy Bicha 2018-10-15 > How soon do you need this issue fixed? I'm ok with glom being removed > from Testing if that helps. At the moment the biggest blocker is that llvm-toolchain-7 is not in testing (OOM when stripping on mips(el)), so it's not urgent anyway. But that could change

Bug#911056: chromium,webext-browserpass: impossible to install chromium and webext-browserpass together

2018-10-15 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Package: chromium,webext-browserpass Severity: serious Justification: 7 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 With chromium 70.0.3538.54-1 and webext-browserpass 2.0.11+dfsg-2 installed, attempting to upgrade to chromium 70.0.3538.54-2 fails: Gør klar til at udpakke

Bug#910446: NMU diff (substantive patches in git-format-patch form)

2018-10-15 Thread Guido Günther
Hi, On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 10:55:10PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Guido Günther writes ("Re: Bug#910446: NMU diff (substantive patches in > git-format-patch form)"): > > On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 03:36:49PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > Hi. I fixed this bug, and some other FTBFS, and am about

Bug#891096: planet-venus: python-beautifulsoup is replaced with python-bs4

2018-10-15 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Paul Wise (2018-10-15 05:49:46) > On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 00:57:59 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > planet-venus only reference BeautifulSoup in a vendor dir which is fully > > patched out and therefore irrelevant. > > In that case the Recommends should be removed, reopening. Oh,

Processed: Re: Bug#909110: serious

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > notfixed -1 7.3.0~rc2-2 Bug #909110 {Done: Ondřej Surý } [php7.3-dev] Extraneous 'L' in /usr/bin/phpize7.3 No longer marked as fixed in versions 7.3.0~rc2-2. > fixed -1 7.3.0~rc3-1 Bug #909110 {Done: Ondřej Surý } [php7.3-dev] Extraneous 'L' in

Bug#909110: serious

2018-10-15 Thread Ondřej Surý
Control: notfixed -1 7.3.0~rc2-2 Control: fixed -1 7.3.0~rc3-1 No, I am sorry, you are right, it was correctly fixed in 7.3.0~rc2-3, and it’s also included in 7.3.0~rc3-1 that I just uploaded. Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org > On 15 Oct 2018, at 08:55, Kunal Mehta wrote: > > Hi, > >

  1   2   >