Processed: bug 912297 is forwarded to https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/47436

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 912297 https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/47436 Bug #912297 {Done: Ivo De Decker } [ansible] ansible: CVE-2018-16837 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/47436'. > thanks Stopping processing

Bug#912297: ansible: CVE-2018-16837

Hi Ivo, > From the upstream changelog for 2.7.1+dfsg-1 (already in unstable): [..] > - user module - do not pass ssh_key_passphrase on cmdline > (CVE-2018-16837) Thanks for providing this and no problem that this wasn't in the changelog. Security team: This still affects stretch and jessie as

Processed: Re: pygame FTBFS on s390x, testsuite failure.

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 902036 1.9.4.post1+dfsg-1 Bug #902036 {Done: Dominik George } [pygame] pygame FTBFS on s390x, testsuite failure. There is no source info for the package 'pygame' at version '1.9.4.post1+dfsg-1' with architecture '' Unable to make a source

Bug#902036: pygame FTBFS on s390x, testsuite failure.

found 902036 1.9.4.post1+dfsg-1 tags 902036 +patch thanks On 30/10/18 02:03, peter green wrote: Unfortunately while the 1.9.4.post1+dfsg-1 upload fixed the ppc64el failure, it did not fix the s390x failure. I just took a look at this, turned out to be a typo in a #if causing a 32-bit value

Bug#902036: pygame FTBFS on s390x, testsuite failure.

found 902036 1.9.4.post1+dfsg-1 thanks Unfortunately while the 1.9.4.post1+dfsg-1 upload fixed the ppc64el failure, it did not fix the s390x failure.

Bug#912221: jabref: incompatible with openjdk 11

Le 30/10/2018 à 00:41, gregor herrmann a écrit : > I guess we need to make sure that we build with openjdk-8. > (You know this better than me but I seem to remember that the plan > was to keep openjdk-8 in buster for building packages?) No please don't built with openjdk-8 if there is a

Bug#912153: marked as done (phpunit FTBFS with PHP 7.3)

Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:05:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#912153: fixed in phpunit 7.4.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #912153, regarding phpunit FTBFS with PHP 7.3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#912052: marked as done (sslsplit: FTBFS: Failure in test -r session.pem)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Oct 2018 23:52:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#912052: fixed in sslsplit 0.5.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #912052, regarding sslsplit: FTBFS: Failure in test -r session.pem to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#911258: marked as done (libopenhmd-dev: missing dependency on libhidapi-dev, required by pkg-config metadata)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Oct 2018 23:50:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#911258: fixed in libopenhmd 0.2.0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #911258, regarding libopenhmd-dev: missing dependency on libhidapi-dev, required by pkg-config metadata to be marked as done. This means

Processed: limit source to phpunit, tagging 912153

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > limit source phpunit Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'phpunit' Limit currently set to 'source':'phpunit' > tags 912153 + pending Bug #912153 [src:phpunit] phpunit FTBFS with PHP 7.3 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks

Bug#912221: jabref: incompatible with openjdk 11

On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 16:33:54 -0700, tony mancill wrote: > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 11:44:36PM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > jabref should no longer use the java.se.ee module, it was a temporary > > module in Java 9 & 10 now removed in Java 11. jabref should add jaxb to > > its classpath

Bug#912221: jabref: incompatible with openjdk 11

On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 11:44:36PM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 29/10/2018 à 13:54, gregor herrmann a écrit : > > > Now that openjdk 11 is the default, jabref won't start without some > > help: > > > > % jabref > > Error occurred during initialization of boot layer > >

Bug#912232: marked as done (carrotsearch-hppc FTBFS with OpenJDK 11)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Oct 2018 23:13:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#912232: fixed in carrotsearch-hppc 0.6.1-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #912232, regarding carrotsearch-hppc FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#912234: marked as done (commons-httpclient FTBFS with OpenJDK 11)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Oct 2018 23:14:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#912234: fixed in commons-httpclient 3.1-15 has caused the Debian Bug report #912234, regarding commons-httpclient FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#908680: marked as done (erlang-erlware-commons: FTBFS in every architecture)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Oct 2018 23:14:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#908680: fixed in erlang-erlware-commons 1.2.0+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #908680, regarding erlang-erlware-commons: FTBFS in every architecture to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#912221: jabref: incompatible with openjdk 11

Le 29/10/2018 à 13:54, gregor herrmann a écrit : > Now that openjdk 11 is the default, jabref won't start without some > help: > > % jabref > Error occurred during initialization of boot layer > java.lang.module.FindException: Module java.se.ee not found jabref should no longer use the

Bug#912221: jabref: incompatible with openjdk 11

Control: tag -1 + ftbfs On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 13:54:26 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > Package: jabref > Version: 3.8.2+ds-7 > Severity: important > > Now that openjdk 11 is the default, jabref won't start without some > help: > > % jabref > Error occurred during initialization of boot layer >

Processed: Re: Bug#912221: jabref: incompatible with openjdk 11

Processing control commands: > tag -1 + ftbfs Bug #912221 [jabref] jabref: incompatible with openjdk 11 Added tag(s) ftbfs. -- 912221: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=912221 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#912231: bnd FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

The OpenJDK 11 issue is rather simple to fix, however the build fails later on with this error message, a Gradle issue? Patch is attached. Cannot find pom file /build/bnd-3.5.0/debian/.m2/repository/biz/aQute/bnd/aQute.libg/3.5.0/aQute.libg-3.5.0.pom Oct 29, 2018 7:44:01 PM

Bug#912232: Bug #912232 in carrotsearch-hppc marked as pending

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #912232 in carrotsearch-hppc reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug #912232 in carrotsearch-hppc marked as pending

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #912232 [src:carrotsearch-hppc] carrotsearch-hppc FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Added tag(s) pending. -- 912232: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=912232 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#912297: marked as done (ansible: CVE-2018-16837)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Oct 2018 23:08:59 +0100 with message-id <20181029220857.s2c3qbod6imko...@debian.org> and subject line Re: ansible: CVE-2018-16837 has caused the Debian Bug report #912297, regarding ansible: CVE-2018-16837 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Processed: Re: Bug#912266: tomcat7 FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + wontfix Bug #912266 [src:tomcat7] tomcat7 FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Added tag(s) wontfix. -- 912266: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=912266 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#912266: tomcat7 FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

Control: tags -1 + wontfix src:tomcat7 builds one package, libservlet3.0-java, which is only used by eclipse. Once eclipse is removed tomcat7 will follow.

Bug#883731: marked as done (audacious: Debian packaging has incorrect license)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Oct 2018 22:05:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#883731: fixed in audacious 3.10-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #883731, regarding audacious: Debian packaging has incorrect license to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#912234: Bug #912234 in commons-httpclient marked as pending

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #912234 in commons-httpclient reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug #912234 in commons-httpclient marked as pending

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #912234 [src:commons-httpclient] commons-httpclient FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Added tag(s) pending. -- 912234: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=912234 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#912297: ansible: CVE-2018-16837

Package: ansible Version: 1.7.2+dfsg-2 X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org Severity: grave Tags: security Hi, The following vulnerability was published for ansible. CVE-2018-16837[0]: | Ansible "User" module leaks any data which is passed on as a parameter | to ssh-keygen. This could lean in

Bug#912295: jboss-jdeparser2 FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

Source: jboss-jdeparser2 Version: 2.0.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs buster sid https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/jboss-jdeparser2.html ... [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE [INFO]

Bug#912296: jboss-modules FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

Source: jboss-modules Version: 1.8.6-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/jboss-modules.html ... [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE [INFO]

Bug#909218: Xmas Gift

Donation to you, contact jleac...@outlook.com

Bug#912247: marked as done (starman FTBFS: ssl tests fail)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Oct 2018 21:39:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#912247: fixed in starman 0.4014-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #912247, regarding starman FTBFS: ssl tests fail to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#912274: marked as done (ruby-clockwork FTBFS: Mocha::NotInitializedError: Mocha methods cannot be used outside the context of a test)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Oct 2018 23:09:16 +0200 with message-id <20181029210916.GB24921@localhost> and subject line This seems to be already fixed in experimental has caused the Debian Bug report #912274, regarding ruby-clockwork FTBFS: Mocha::NotInitializedError: Mocha methods cannot be used

Processed: Bug #912247 in starman marked as pending

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #912247 [src:starman] starman FTBFS: ssl tests fail Added tag(s) pending. -- 912247: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=912247 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: bug 912247 is forwarded to https://github.com/miyagawa/Starman/pull/130

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 912247 https://github.com/miyagawa/Starman/pull/130 Bug #912247 [src:starman] starman FTBFS: ssl tests fail Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/miyagawa/Starman/pull/130'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Bug#912247: Bug #912247 in starman marked as pending

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #912247 in starman reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#912288: zeroc-ice FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

Source: zeroc-ice Version: 3.7.1-3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/zeroc-ice.html ... FAILURE: Build failed with an exception. * What went wrong: Execution failed for task ':test:compileJava'. > error: invalid source release: 1.11

Bug#912286: libgzstream FTBFS on 32bit: symbol differences

Source: libgzstream Version: 1.5+dfsg-3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libgzstream=sid ... dh_makeshlibs -a -O--no-parallel dpkg-gensymbols: warning: some new symbols appeared in the symbols file: see diff output below dpkg-gensymbols: error:

Bug#912272: staden-io-lib FTBFS: dh_installdocs: Cannot find (any matches for) "README" (tried in .)

Helmut Grohne: > Source: staden-io-lib > Version: 1.14.9-4 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > > staden-io-lib fails to build from source in unstable. This smells a bit > like a debhelper regression, but I'm not sure actually. In any case, it > fails to build reliably. > > |dh_installdocs

Bug#897846: HELP needed for uploading a new debianisation of the Rheolef package

Hi Andreas, I just commit with git a new release 7.0-2 of the debianisation of the rheolef package: it fixes a FTBS bug #897846 (see d/changelog). The upstream version is unchanged (7.0). Could you please upload it in debian ? Many thanks for your help. Best regards, Pierre --

Processed: tagging 912274

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 912274 + buster sid experimental Bug #912274 [src:ruby-clockwork] ruby-clockwork FTBFS: Mocha::NotInitializedError: Mocha methods cannot be used outside the context of a test Added tag(s) experimental, buster, and sid. > thanks Stopping

Bug#912272: staden-io-lib FTBFS: dh_installdocs: Cannot find (any matches for) "README" (tried in .)

Control: tags -1 pending Hi Helmut, On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 08:09:25PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote: > staden-io-lib fails to build from source in unstable. This smells a bit > like a debhelper regression, but I'm not sure actually. In any case, it > fails to build reliably. > > |

Processed: Re: Bug#912272: staden-io-lib FTBFS: dh_installdocs: Cannot find (any matches for) "README" (tried in .)

Processing control commands: > tags -1 pending Bug #912272 [src:staden-io-lib] staden-io-lib FTBFS: dh_installdocs: Cannot find (any matches for) "README" (tried in .) Added tag(s) pending. -- 912272: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=912272 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#912255: marked as done (python-asdf FTBFS if some webserver is listening to localhost:80)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Oct 2018 19:49:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#912255: fixed in python-asdf 2.1.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #912255, regarding python-asdf FTBFS if some webserver is listening to localhost:80 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#912265: marked as done (trove3 FTBFS with OpenJDK 11)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Oct 2018 19:34:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#912265: fixed in trove3 3.0.3-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #912265, regarding trove3 FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#912278: wala FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

Source: wala Version: 1.3.9-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/wala.html ... FAILURE: Build failed with an exception. * What went wrong: Execution failed for task ':util:compileJava'. > error: invalid source release: 1.11

Bug#912275: uncommons-watchmaker FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

Source: uncommons-watchmaker Version: 0.7.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs buster sid https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/uncommons-watchmaker.html ... FAILURE: Build failed with an exception. * What went wrong: Execution failed for task ':framework:compileJava'.

Processed: tagging 890075

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 890075 + ftbfs Bug #890075 [src:ruby-http] ruby-http ftbfs (test failures with 2.5) Added tag(s) ftbfs. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 890075:

Bug#912274: ruby-clockwork FTBFS: Mocha::NotInitializedError: Mocha methods cannot be used outside the context of a test

Source: ruby-clockwork Version: 1.2.0-3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs ruby-clockwork fails to build from source in unstable. | 1) Error: | Clockwork::Event::#thread?::manager config thread option set to true#test_0001_is true: | Mocha::NotInitializedError: Mocha methods cannot be used outside

Bug#912235: Bug#912235: figtree FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

Hi Fabian, On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 04:41:56PM +0100, Fabian Klötzl wrote: > Thank you for reporting. I added a fix to the repo. Will get resolved with > the next upload. I've seen your patch to enforce Java 8. I'm not sure whether this is a sustainable solution. Did you pointed upstream to the

Bug#912273: unsafe-mock FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

Source: unsafe-mock Version: 8.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/unsafe-mock.html ... [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE [INFO]

Bug#912272: staden-io-lib FTBFS: dh_installdocs: Cannot find (any matches for) "README" (tried in .)

Source: staden-io-lib Version: 1.14.9-4 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs staden-io-lib fails to build from source in unstable. This smells a bit like a debhelper regression, but I'm not sure actually. In any case, it fails to build reliably. |dh_installdocs -O--no-parallel | dh_installdocs:

Bug#910485: Confirm issue with libpsm2-2/11.2.68-1

Sure, but it is still an improvement over the current situation and is simple enough to minimize its impact. Of course, it should be considered as a wrkaround, until upstream releases a fixed version. Le 29 octobre 2018 19:41:06 GMT+01:00, Brian Smith a écrit : >Hi Mehdi, > > >On Mon, Oct

Bug#910485: Confirm issue with libpsm2-2/11.2.68-1

Hi Mehdi, On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 4:48 AM Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > > Sorry for not replying sooner. > > On 2018-10-20 17:54, Brian Smith wrote: > > The change is in psm2_hal.c. It is a brand new file. Reference the > > initialization loop at line 246. > > > > Indeed. The solution described in the

Bug#912270: writer2latex FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

Source: writer2latex Version: 1.4-5 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/writer2latex.html ... compile: [mkdir] Created dir: /build/1st/writer2latex-1.4/target/classes [javac] Compiling 203 source files to

Bug#897496: marked as done (python-pathlib: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: pybuild --test -i python{version} -p 2.7 returned exit code 13)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Oct 2018 18:37:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#897496: fixed in python-pathlib 1.0.1-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #897496, regarding python-pathlib: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: pybuild --test -i python{version} -p 2.7 returned exit code 13 to be marked

Bug#899804: marked as done (fcitx-hangul: Invalid maintainer address pkg-ime-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Oct 2018 18:34:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#899804: fixed in fcitx-hangul 0.3.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #899804, regarding fcitx-hangul: Invalid maintainer address pkg-ime-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#912268: uimaj FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

Source: uimaj Version: 2.10.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/uimaj.html ... [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE [INFO]

Bug#912266: tomcat7 FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

Source: tomcat7 Version: 7.0.78-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/tomcat7.html ... compile-java6: [javac] Compiling 1307 source files to /build/1st/tomcat7-7.0.78/output/classes [javac] warning: [options] bootstrap class

Bug#912267: uddi4j FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

Source: uddi4j Version: 2.0.5-4 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/uddi4j.html ... compile: [mkdir] Created dir: /build/1st/uddi4j-2.0.5/build/classes [javac] /build/1st/uddi4j-2.0.5/build.xml:158: warning: 'includeantruntime'

Bug#912265: trove3 FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

Source: trove3 Version: 3.0.3-4 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/trove3.html ... -build_tests: [javac] /build/1st/trove3-3.0.3/build.xml:350: warning: 'includeantruntime' was not set, defaulting to build.sysclasspath=last; set

Processed: tagging 912249

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 912249 + buster sid Bug #912249 [src:ruby-file-tail] ruby-file-tail FTBFS: test_tail_change2(FileTailTest) fails Added tag(s) buster and sid. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 912249:

Processed: tagging 912253

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 912253 + buster sid Bug #912253 [src:ruby-protected-attributes] ruby-protected-attributes: FTBFS reliably (failing tests) Added tag(s) sid and buster. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 912253:

Bug#912263: android-sdk-helper FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

Source: android-sdk-helper Version: 0.1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/android-sdk-helper.html ... FAILURE: Build failed with an exception. * What went wrong: Execution failed for task ':gradle-debian-android-plugin:compileJava'.

Bug#912262: android-platform-frameworks-data-binding FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

Source: android-platform-frameworks-data-binding Version: 2.2.2-3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/android-platform-frameworks-data-binding.html ... FAILURE: Build failed with an exception. * What went wrong: Execution failed for

Bug#912261: clojure FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

Source: clojure Version: 1.9.0-5 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/clojure.html ... compile-clojure: [java] Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError [java] at

Bug#912260: android-platform-tools-analytics-library FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

Source: android-platform-tools-analytics-library Version: 2.2.2-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs buster sid https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/android-platform-tools-analytics-library.html ... FAILURE: Build failed with an exception. * What went wrong: Execution

Bug#911403: Please always include a copyright notice in 'LicenseWithSummary::summary_or_text'

Hi Dominique, I am fine with your suggestion. We will wait for your implementation. Thank you for providing this package! Kind regards, Felix On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 9:44 AM Dominique Dumont wrote: > > On Monday, 29 October 2018 16:51:45 CET you wrote: > > I am happy to provide patches and

Bug#905614: Patch invalid

Control: tags 905614 - patch The owner of libsoftware-licensemoreutils would like to resolve the issue differently. (For details, please see #911403.) The patch I submitted earlier is outdated. Thank you! Kind regards, Felix

Processed: Patch invalid

Processing control commands: > tags 905614 - patch Bug #905614 [src:license-reconcile] FTBFS: Failed test 'no warnings' with libsoftware-license-perl 0.103013-2 Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #905614 to the same tags previously set -- 905614:

Bug#910888: marked as done (imagemagick: CVE-2018-16644)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Oct 2018 16:50:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#910888: fixed in imagemagick 8:6.9.10.14+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #910888, regarding imagemagick: CVE-2018-16644 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#910889: marked as done (imagemagick: CVE-2018-16645)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Oct 2018 16:50:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#910889: fixed in imagemagick 8:6.9.10.14+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #910889, regarding imagemagick: CVE-2018-16645 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#910887: marked as done (imagemagick: CVE-2018-16412 CVE-2018-16413)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Oct 2018 16:50:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#910887: fixed in imagemagick 8:6.9.10.14+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #910887, regarding imagemagick: CVE-2018-16412 CVE-2018-16413 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#911403: Please always include a copyright notice in 'LicenseWithSummary::summary_or_text'

On Monday, 29 October 2018 16:51:45 CET you wrote: > I am happy to provide patches and merge requests that implement your > idea, Thanks. But the change is trivial. I can do it on my side. We just need to find a common ground that allow fixing #905614 > but are you sure there are other

Bug#911403: Please always include a copyright notice in 'LicenseWithSummary::summary_or_text'

On Monday, 29 October 2018 15:21:25 CET you wrote: > I'm not thrilled at the idea of changing the behavior of summary_or_text > method because the implementation would no longer match its behavior. Oops, this sentence does not make sense. I meant that "the function name would no longer match its

Processed: tagging 912245

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 912245 + buster sid experimental Bug #912245 [src:ruby-nio4r] ruby-nio4r FTBFS: SSL_CTX_use_certificate: ee key too small Added tag(s) sid, experimental, and buster. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#912255: python-asdf FTBFS if some webserver is listening to localhost:80

Source: python-asdf Version: 2.1.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs python-asdf fails to build from source if some webserver is listening to localhost:80. The Debian policy prohibits doing so in section 4.9. The access is only legitimate if python-asdf starts the web server. |

Bug#912252: android-platform-dalvik FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

Source: android-platform-dalvik Version: 8.1.0+r23-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/android-platform-dalvik.html ... FAILURE: Build failed with an exception. * What went wrong: Execution failed for task ':compileJava'. > error:

Bug#912253: ruby-protected-attributes: FTBFS reliably (failing tests)

Source: ruby-protected-attributes Version: 1.1.3-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs ruby-protected-attributes fails to build from source reliably now. On my system as well as on reproducible builds, I consistently see the very same three failures: | Finished in 0.447334s, 453.7994 runs/s, 1629.6540

Bug#912250: gkl FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

Source: gkl Version: 0.8.5+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/gkl.html ... FAILURE: Build failed with an exception. * What went wrong: Execution failed for task ':compileJava'. > error: invalid source release: 1.11

Bug#912249: ruby-file-tail FTBFS: test_tail_change2(FileTailTest) fails

Source: ruby-file-tail Version: 1.1.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs ruby-file-tail fails to build from source in unstable. | Failure: test_tail_change2(FileTailTest) | /<>/tests/file_tail_test.rb:353:in `test_tail_change2' | 350: end | 351: appender.join | 352:

Bug#912248: gatk-native-bindings FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

Source: gatk-native-bindings Version: 1.0.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/gatk-native-bindings.html ... All input files are considered out-of-date for incremental task ':compileJava'. Compiling with JDK Java compiler API.

Bug#912247: starman FTBFS: ssl tests fail

Source: starman Version: 0.4014-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs starman fails to build from source in unstable. Presumably openssl broke it: | t/ssl.t .. | Dubious, test returned 111 (wstat 28416, 0x6f00) | No subtests run | 2018/10/29-15:24:42 Starman::Server (type

Bug#912246: ruby-cheffish FTBFS: uses unavailable default cipher DES-EDE3-CBC

Source: ruby-cheffish Version: 13.1.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs ruby-cheffish fails to build from source in unstable: | An error occurred while loading ./spec/unit/recipe_run_wrapper_spec.rb. | Failure/Error: property :cipher, OpenSSL::Cipher.ciphers, default: "DES-EDE3-CBC" | |

Bug#912235: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#912235: figtree FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

Thank you for reporting. I added a fix to the repo. Will get resolved with the next upload. Best Fabian

Bug#911403: Please always include a copyright notice in 'LicenseWithSummary::summary_or_text'

Hi Dominique, I am happy to provide patches and merge requests that implement your idea, but are you sure there are other meaningful consumers of the summary_or_text method? Your posting [1] restricts uses to Debian, and a search on codesearch.debian.net shows no other packages that rely on the

Bug#912245: ruby-nio4r FTBFS: SSL_CTX_use_certificate: ee key too small

Source: ruby-nio4r Version: 1.2.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs ruby-nio4r fails to build in unstable with the current openssl: | Failures: | | 1) OpenSSL::SSL::SSLSocket behaves like an NIO selectable selects readable objects | Failure/Error: ssl_peer =

Bug#912243: libsmali-1-java FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

Source: libsmali-1-java Version: 1.4.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/libsmali-1-java.html ... All input files are considered out-of-date for incremental task ':dexlib:compileJava'. Compiling with JDK Java compiler API.

Bug#912116: nuitka FTBFS: test failures

Hello Adrian, > +simpleFunction21: FAILED 125836 125872 leaked 36 The reference counting in 3.7.0 was broken, as reported in https://bugs.python.org/issue34042 which is reported fixed. For current releases, I have had disabled it for 3.7.0 therefore, and couldn't see what 3.7.1 will be. These

Processed: severity of 912221 is serious

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 912221 serious Bug #912221 [jabref] jabref: incompatible with openjdk 11 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 912221:

Bug#912241: uuagc FTBFS: error: Repeated declaration of synthesized attribute copy of nonterminal Pattern.

Source: uuagc Version: 0.9.52.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs uuagc fails to build from source in unstable on the official buildds for any arch tried thus far: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=uuagc=amd64=0.9.52.1-2=1538622922=0 | src-ag/Patterns.ag:22:23: error: Repeated

Bug#912239: ruby-httparty FTBFS: SSL_CTX_use_certificate: ee key too small

Source: ruby-httparty Version: 0.16.2+dfsg1-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs ruby-httparty fails to build from source in unstable: |

Bug#912240: gentlyweb-utils FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

Source: gentlyweb-utils Version: 1.5-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs buster sid https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/gentlyweb-utils.html ... jh_linkjars jh_build find src -name *.java -and -type f -print0 | xargs -s 512000 -0

Bug#912238: android-platform-libnativehelper FTBFS: ScopedPthreadMutexLock.h: No such file or directory

Source: android-platform-libnativehelper Version: 7.0.0+r33-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs buster sid https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/android-platform-libnativehelper.html ... g++ JNIHelp.cpp JniConstants.cpp toStringArray.cpp JniInvocation.cpp

Bug#912075: [Pkg-ayatana-devel] Bug#912075: ayatana-indicator-power FTBFS with googletest 1.8.1-1

On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 02:09:15PM +, Mike Gabriel wrote: >... > Hi Adrian, Hi Mike, >... > Can you retry with -4. Please reopen this bug, if you see the issue re-occur. confirmed that it is fixed now. > Mike cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly

Bug#912236: ruby-ffi-rzmq FTBFS: SSL_CTX_use_certificate: ee key too small

Source: ruby-ffi-rzmq Version: 2.0.6-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs ruby-ffi-rzmq fails to build from source in unstable (but not in testing): | Failures: | | 1) ZMQ::Poller poll works with SSLSocket | Failure/Error: server = OpenSSL::SSL::SSLSocket.new(s, ctx) | |

Bug#912206: freerdp2-x11: ERRCONNECT_TLS_CONNECT_FAILED with libssl1.1 1.1.1-1

On Mon, 2018-10-29 at 14:13 +, Mike Gabriel wrote: > Bernhard from FreeRDP upstream has started working on this and we will > likely provide patches next week. > > So, please stay tuned + thanks for reporting this. The problem is caused by > system-wide openssl default settings that have

Bug#912234: commons-httpclient FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

Source: commons-httpclient Version: 3.1-14 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/commons-httpclient.html ... [ERROR] Tests run: 591, Failures: 0, Errors: 29, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 24.172 s <<< FAILURE! - in

Bug#912235: figtree FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

Source: figtree Version: 1.4.3+dfsg-6 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/figtree.html ... compile: [javac] /build/1st/figtree-1.4.3+dfsg/build.xml:40: warning: 'includeantruntime' was not set, defaulting to

Bug#912233: checkstyle FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

Source: checkstyle Version: 8.8-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/checkstyle.html ... [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE [INFO]

  1   2   >