Your message dated Fri, 08 May 2020 13:12:01 +0800
with message-id <0ea239623b45aed21f226ed98d544...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#959946: grace: fails to start: failed request: 12
(X_ConfigureWindow)
has caused the Debian Bug report #959946,
regarding grace: fails to start: failed
Your message dated Fri, 08 May 2020 03:34:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#959454: fixed in dvbtune 0.5.ds-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #959454,
regarding dvbtune: Build-Depends on obsolete package linux-kernel-headers
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Fri, 08 May 2020 02:45:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#959889: fixed in sphinx-gallery 0.6.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #959889,
regarding python3-sphinx-gallery: AttributeError: 'URLError' object has no
attribute 'url'
to be marked as done.
This means
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #959889 in sphinx-gallery reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #959889 [sphinx-gallery] python3-sphinx-gallery: AttributeError: 'URLError'
object has no attribute 'url'
Added tag(s) pending.
--
959889: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=959889
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Source: codeville
Severity: serious
Version: 0.8.0-2.1
Tags: sid bullseye
X-Debbugs-CC: jamu...@debian.org
Dear Debian codeville maintainer,
It seems that package codevilla has a dead upstream since at least 2014. It is
a discontinued VCS thus it doesn't make any sense to keep it in Debian
Your message dated Thu, 07 May 2020 20:35:40 -0400
with message-id <2f3cd2e49538cb07173ea26410453f0b6894be7a.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: svgtune: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
has caused the Debian Bug report #938605,
regarding svgtune: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as
> Does the crash you referenced here require connecting to file sharing
> networks to reproduce?
hard to say, as it crashed early on in the start up process (and also
because i dont really remember because several months have passed).
Clearly there's always a "risk" when using a file sharing
Hi,
I tried to build this and did not get any failure.
+--+
| Summary |
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #937762 [src:python-flexmock] python-flexmock: Python2 removal in
sid/bullseye
Added tag(s) pending.
--
937762: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=937762
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #937762 in python-flexmock reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Your message dated Thu, 07 May 2020 22:34:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#937762: fixed in python-flexmock 0.10.4-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #937762,
regarding python-flexmock: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
I think removing it from Debian is the safe way to go currently. If you
want assistance with how we build Cinc and how it could be adapted for
Debian let me know. Also if there are any changes we can make on our end to
make it easier.
Thanks-
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 2:14 PM Antonio Terceiro
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 959889 src:astropy
Bug #959889 [sphinx-gallery] python3-sphinx-gallery: AttributeError: 'URLError'
object has no attribute 'url'
Added indication that 959889 affects src:astropy
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Your message dated Thu, 07 May 2020 21:34:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953751: fixed in drf-extensions 0.6.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #953751,
regarding drf-extensions: autopkgtest failure: No module named
'djangorestframework_extensions'
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Thu, 07 May 2020 21:06:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#958313: fixed in libnitrokey 3.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #958313,
regarding libnitrokey: FTBFS: symbol changes
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Thu, 07 May 2020 21:07:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#959961: fixed in virt-p2v 1.42.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #959961,
regarding Prefix not properly set?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Thu, 07 May 2020 21:07:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#959962: fixed in virt-p2v 1.42.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #959962,
regarding Missing dependencies?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package cmake
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
> #
> user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org
Setting
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:dask
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
> #
> user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 06:52:58PM +0800, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On a clean installation, grace fails to launch:
>
> $ xmgrace
> X Error of failed request: BadValue (integer parameter out of range for
> operation)
> Major opcode of failed request: 12 (X_ConfigureWindow)
> Value in failed
Hi,
I tried to build it and did not get any failure.
Build Architecture: amd64
Build Type: full
Build-Space: 352384
Build-Time: 172
Distribution: unstable
Host Architecture: amd64
Install-Time: 37
Job: diagnostics
Machine Architecture: amd64
Package: diagnostics
Package-Time: 213
Source-Version:
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 03:32:10PM -0400, benny Vasquez wrote:
> Thanks, Lance!
>
> As he laid out, this packaged shipped as-is is a pretty serious violation
> of our trademarks, and we'd like to see it addressed as soon as humanly
> possible.
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 2:40 PM Lance Albertson
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 959684 2016.11.2+ds-1+deb9u4
Bug #959684 [src:salt] salt: CVE-2020-11651 and CVE-2020-11652
The source 'salt' and version '2016.11.2+ds-1+deb9u4' do not appear to match
any binary packages
Marked as fixed in versions
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 951888 https://github.com/enthought/enable/issues/360
Bug #951888 [src:python-enable] python-enable FTBFS with swig 4.0.1
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/enthought/enable/issues/360'.
>
End of message, stopping
close 959684 2016.11.2+ds-1+deb9u4
thanks
Package: chef
Version: 15.8.25.3.gcf41df6a2-6
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: la...@osuosl.org, maintain...@cinc.sh, be...@chef.io
- Forwarded message from Lance Albertson -
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 11:40:38 -0700
From: Lance Albertson
To:
On Thursday, May 7, 2020 2:00:58 PM EDT peter green wrote:
> I got a failure too when I cloned that branch and tried to build it, but
> once I added in the changes from the previous NMU it built fine. I would
> push that addition back to the branch but i'm not currently a member of the
> python
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 959960 cmake
Bug #959960 [src:ignition-transport] ignition-transport: FTBFS in sid
Bug reassigned from package 'src:ignition-transport' to 'cmake'.
No longer marked as found in versions ignition-transport/8.0.0+dfsg-3.
Ignoring request
On 21/04/2020 22:20, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Python 2 has never been removed from this
package. Though instead, we shall remove this source package entirely
from Debian.
# Broken Depends:
nipype: python-nipype
pytest: pypy-pytest
python-logfury: python3-logfury
python-oslo.utils:
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 09:48:34PM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> On Thursday, 7 May 2020 7:04:17 PM AEST Julien Cristau wrote:
> > This use of Provides is not acceptable. The systemctl package does not
> > in any way provide the same functionality / interfaces as the systemd
> > package, and as
Package: pgcli
Version: 2.2.0-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
```
borisov@glossy:~ $ pgcli
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 584, in
_build_master
ws.require(__requires__)
File
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #959937 [tomcat9] tomcat9: update to tomcat9:amd64 9.0.31-1~deb10u1 breaks
application
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
--
959937: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=959937
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: severity -1 normal
Am 07.05.20 um 17:58 schrieb Michael Meier:
[...]
> The application doesn't use ajp.
>
> The sense of using unattended-upgrades and debian stable (no breaking
> changes on updates) is not to read each security announcement in before.
>
> I'm not working in an area,
Hi Axel,
Quoting Axel Beckert (2020-05-07 15:45:12)
> > bisection finished successfully
> > last good timestamp: 2020-04-19 06:52:31.476563+02:00
> > first bad timestamp: 2020-04-19 10:35:09.156250+02:00
> > only one package differs: equivs is the culprit
> Yeah, but we know
On 07.05.20 06:31, Markus Koschany wrote:
Am 07.05.20 um 10:04 schrieb Michael Meier:
Package: tomcat9
Version: 9.0.16-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I've just been called out of bed.
As it seems unattended-upgrades upgraded on a debian buster server
from:9.0.16-4
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 959064 959960
Bug #959064 [cmake] cmake breaks on -isystem
Unable to merge bugs because:
package of #959960 is 'src:ignition-transport' not 'cmake'
Failed to forcibly merge 959064: Did not alter merged bugs.
> thanks
Stopping
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> merge 959064 959960
Bug #959064 [cmake] cmake breaks on -isystem
Unable to merge bugs because:
forwarded of #959960 is '' not
'https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/-/issues/20652'
affects of #959960 is '' not 'ignition-transport'
package of
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # This is an automated script, part of the effort for the removal of Python 2
> from bullseye
> # * https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal
> # * http://sandrotosi.me/debian/py2removal/index.html
> # See
I can see both php-fpm and systemctl maintainers have good reasons to
do what they did.
So taking one step back, does it make sense to dpkg-divert /usr/bin/systemctl?
Hi Salvatore and others,
* Salvatore Bonaccorso [2020-05-06 13:09 +0200]:
> Hi Elimar,
>
> On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 10:36:42AM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > please notice the attached note from saltstack! I assume this is not
> > integrated into DSA 4676-1, isn't it?
>
Your message dated Thu, 07 May 2020 14:33:51 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#959189: fixed in bbswitch 0.8-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #959189,
regarding bbswitch-dkms: fails to build for kernel 5.6.7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Package: virt-p2v
Version: 1.42.0-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
virt-p2v has no dependencies defined, but quickly looking which external
tools it's using it should IMVHO at least requires the following
dependencies:
xz-utils for xzcat
binutils for strip
libguestfs-tools for virt-builder
It's also
Package: virt-p2v
Version: 1.42.0-1
Severity: grave
Hi,
When running virt-p2v-make-disk or virt-p2v-make-kiwi, I get the
folowing errors:
# virt-p2v-make-disk -o plop
virt-p2v-make-disk: cannot find /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/virt-p2v/virt-p2v.xz
# virt-p2v-make-kiwi
/usr/bin/virt-p2v-make-kiwi:
Hi Josch,
thanks for bringing this to my attention. It seems as if I have
overseen Otto's bug report wen it came in two weeks ago. (Sorry,
Otto.)
Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> > I am pretty sure this is related to the recent equivs 2.3.0 release,
> > but I have not figured
On Wed, 6 May 2020, Sandro Tosi wrote:
Any update on moving amule to use libwxgtk3.0-gtk3-dev? amule is one of
the last couple of packages keeping the gtk2 wx package in unstable (as
cruft). We keep getting bug reports about those cruft packages
periodically.
Sadly no: upstream hasnt ported
Your message dated Thu, 07 May 2020 13:18:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#959729: fixed in acpi-call 1.1.0-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #959729,
regarding acpi-call-dkms: fails to build on kernel 5.6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Thu, 07 May 2020 13:18:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#959729: fixed in acpi-call 1.1.0-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #959729,
regarding Build error with kernel 5.6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Thu, 07 May 2020 13:18:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#959364: fixed in acpi-call 1.1.0-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #959364,
regarding Build error with kernel 5.6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Thu, 07 May 2020 13:18:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#959364: fixed in acpi-call 1.1.0-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #959364,
regarding acpi-call-dkms: fails to build on kernel 5.6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Hi Salvatore,
On Thu, 07 May 2020 at 08:18:34 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> I would like to get some testing feedback on the stretch packages, if
> you have such instance
> https://people.debian.org/~carnil/tmp/salt/stretch/ contains testing
> packages.
Unfortunately I don't, would have
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 grave
Bug #958414 [equivs] Latest equivs version 2.3.0 breaks mk-build-deps
Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal'
--
958414: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=958414
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Hi Graham,
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 11:25:00AM +0100, Graham Clinch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I would like to get some testing feedback on the stretch packages, if
> > you have such instance
> > https://people.debian.org/~carnil/tmp/salt/stretch/ contains testing
> > packages.
>
> These packages look
Package: libsis-jhdf5-jni
Version: 19.04.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install
because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
Breaks+Replaces relation.
See
make[1]: *** [debian/rules:11: override_dh_auto_build] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>'
make: *** [debian/rules:7: binary] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary subprocess returned exit status 2
---
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #956324 [clustalo] "clustalo: Bus error on mipsel"
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
956324: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=956324
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #956828 {Done: Paul Gevers } [src:bedtools]
src:bedtools: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on several archs
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
956828: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=956828
Control: severity -1 important
The builds for the failed architectures are requested for removal. So
the bug is set to severity important to move on with architectures that
are used in practical applications without creating noise in form of
lots of testing removal warnings of rdepends.
Kind
On Thursday, 7 May 2020 7:04:17 PM AEST Julien Cristau wrote:
> This use of Provides is not acceptable. The systemctl package does not
> in any way provide the same functionality / interfaces as the systemd
> package, and as such it does not get to pretend that it does and cause
> problems to
Followup-For: Bug #959942
Control: retitle -1 src:caffe: missing (unversioned) Breaks+Replaces:
libcaffe-cpu1/libcaffe-cpu-dev/caffe-tools-cpu/python3-caffe-cpu
I overlooked another occurrence in python3-caffe:
Preparing to unpack .../libcaffe1_1.0.0+git20180821.99bd997-6_amd64.deb ...
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 src:caffe: missing (unversioned) Breaks+Replaces:
> libcaffe-cpu1/libcaffe-cpu-dev/caffe-tools-cpu/python3-caffe-cpu
Bug #959942 [src:caffe] src:caffe: missing (unversioned) Breaks+Replaces:
libcaffe-cpu1/libcaffe-cpu-dev/caffe-tools-cpu
Changed Bug
Hi,
I would like to get some testing feedback on the stretch packages, if
you have such instance
https://people.debian.org/~carnil/tmp/salt/stretch/ contains testing
packages.
These packages look good to me.
I updated two stretch instances from 2016.11.2+ds-1+deb9u3 to
Am 07.05.20 um 10:04 schrieb Michael Meier:
> Package: tomcat9
> Version: 9.0.16-4
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> I've just been called out of bed.
> As it seems unattended-upgrades upgraded on a debian buster server
> from:9.0.16-4 to 9.0.31-1~deb10u1
> One of
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 upstream
Bug #959940 [src:hdmf] hdmf FTBFS with h5py 2.10.0
Added tag(s) upstream.
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/hdmf-dev/hdmf/issues/343
Bug #959940 [src:hdmf] hdmf FTBFS with h5py 2.10.0
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
Control: tags -1 upstream
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/hdmf-dev/hdmf/issues/343
Package: python-m2crypto-doc
Version: 0.35.2-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to
Package: grace
Version: 1:5.1.25-8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
On a clean installation, grace fails to launch:
$ xmgrace
X Error of failed request: BadValue (integer parameter out of range for
operation)
Major opcode of failed request: 12 (X_ConfigureWindow)
Your message dated Thu, 07 May 2020 10:34:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#959861: fixed in virt-p2v 1.42.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #959861,
regarding virt-p2v: missing epoch in Conflicts
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 10:28:33AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>...
> On 07-05-2020 10:07, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > This is a toolchain problem affecting many packages:
> > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25051
>
> Do you have any rough estimate how many?
>...
Other bugs I can
control: tags -1 patch
Changing stdc++11 to stdc++14 fixed the build failure
--- gtkmm3.0-3.24.2/debian/patches/series 1970-01-01 00:00:00.0
+
+++ gtkmm3.0-3.24.2/debian/patches/series 2020-05-07 10:03:05.0
+
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+stdc++14.patch
diff -Nru
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #959602 [src:gtkmm3.0] gtkmm3.0: FTBFS: gtk-demo/demowindow.cc:54:1: error:
‘demo_columns’ function uses ‘auto’ type specifier without trailing return type
Added tag(s) patch.
--
959602: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=959602
On Thursday, 7 May 2020 7:04:17 PM AEST Julien Cristau wrote:
> This use of Provides is not acceptable. The systemctl package does not
> in any way provide the same functionality / interfaces as the systemd
> package, and as such it does not get to pretend that it does and cause
> problems to
Source: caffe
Version: 1.0.0+git20180821.99bd997-6
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # reporter says stable version is fine
> found 959937 9.0.31-1~deb10u1
Bug #959937 [tomcat9] tomcat9: update to tomcat9:amd64 9.0.31-1~deb10u1 breaks
application
Marked as found in versions tomcat9/9.0.31-1~deb10u1.
> notfound 959937 9.0.16-4
The real culprit here, is that pkg:systemd provides many many distinct
interfaces, without letting any consumers say _which_ interfaces they want.
Thus, all of this would be solved if systemd declared Provides:systemctl
and relevant consumers depended on that.
Same with systemd-revolvd,
On Thursday, 7 May 2020 6:58:49 PM AEST Ansgar wrote:
> So all packages that want systemd-tmpfiles need "Depends: systemd" and
> "Conflicts: systemctl" now? (Same for anything else provided by systemd,
> but not systemctl.)
You are over-reacting. "systemctl" is a niche package that is used only
Your message dated Thu, 07 May 2020 09:35:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#959758: fixed in theano 1.0.4+dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #959758,
regarding theano: FTBFS with pegjs 0.10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Thu, 07 May 2020 09:33:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#958531: fixed in pandas 0.25.3+dfsg2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #958531,
regarding pandas: broken by NaT/isnan changes in numpy 1.18
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 src:pynwb
Bug #959940 [src:hdmf] hdmf FTBFS with h5py 2.10.0
Added indication that 959940 affects src:pynwb
--
959940: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=959940
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Source: hdmf
Version: 1.5.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: affects -1 src:pynwb
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/hdmf.html
...
==
ERROR:
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #959828 [systemctl] systemctl: `Provides: systemd`, but doesn't provide
what systemd does
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
--
959828: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=959828
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Dear Adrian,
On 07-05-2020 10:07, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This is a toolchain problem affecting many packages:
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25051
Do you have any rough estimate how many? Is there any way to predict
which packages are effected, or to detect which packages are
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 10:57:20AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
>...
> However, it fails on arm64. I copied some of the output at the bottom of
> this report.
>
> Currently this regression is blocking the migration to testing [1]. Can
> you please investigate the situation and fix it?
>...
>
Package: tomcat9
Version: 9.0.16-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I've just been called out of bed.
As it seems unattended-upgrades upgraded on a debian buster server
from:9.0.16-4 to 9.0.31-1~deb10u1
One of the installed webapps throws following error when trying to use
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 937769 by 959934
Bug #937769 [src:python-funcsigs] python-funcsigs: Python2 removal in
sid/bullseye
937769 was blocked by: 937926 937144 937558 943135
937769 was blocking: 937695 938168 938756
Added blocking bug(s) of 937769: 959934
>
End
Hi Michael,
this bug continuously creates noise on the testing removal front. I'd
really love to ask for removal the failing arches for the moment.
What do you think?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
That's fine by me
--
Michael R. Crusoe
On Thu, May 7, 2020, 09:53 Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> this bug continuously creates noise on the testing removal front. I'd
> really love to ask for removal the failing arches for the moment.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Kind regards
>
>
Your message dated Thu, 07 May 2020 07:48:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#950066: fixed in python-asyncssh 1.12.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #950066,
regarding python-asyncssh: missing build dependency on dh-python
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 959556 libyaml-cpp0.6
Bug #959556 [src:olive-editor] olive-editor: FTBFS: ld:
/usr/lib/libOpenColorIO.so: undefined reference to
`YAML::detail::node_data::empty_scalar[abi:cxx11]'
Bug reassigned from package 'src:olive-editor' to
I just uploaded python-logfury dropping the funcsigs dependency, so
that's one step closer.
Package: wrk
Version: 4.0.2-2
Followup-For: Bug #874176
I can confirm that this occurs for me as well; any attempt to run wrk
produces:
PANIC: unprotected error in call to Lua API (attempt to index a nil value)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
Hi Guilhem,
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 01:09:52AM +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> Control: notfixed -1 2016.11.2+ds-1+deb9u3
>
> On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 10:36:42 +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > please notice the attached note from saltstack! I assume this is not
> > integrated into DSA 4676-1,
92 matches
Mail list logo
