Bug#1030298: pyopencl: FTBFS on i386: = 1 failed, 304 passed, 7 skipped, 1 deselected, 2 xfailed, 31 warnings in 736.25s (0:12:16) =

2023-02-01 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Source: pyopencl Version: 2022.3.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=pyopencl=i386=2022.3.1-2%2Bb1=1675322850=0

Bug#1008924: marked as done (pytorch-text FTBFS with Python 3.10 due to X-Python3-Version: 3.9)

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 02 Feb 2023 07:49:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1008924: fixed in pytorch-text 0.14.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1008924, regarding pytorch-text FTBFS with Python 3.10 due to X-Python3-Version: 3.9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#1030297: pytango: FTBFS: = 364 failed, 689 passed, 26 xfailed, 2 warnings, 40 errors in 176.40s (0:02:56) =

2023-02-01 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Source: pytango Version: 9.3.6-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=pytango=amd64=9.3.6-2%2Bb1=1675322420=0 ===

Bug#990447: Similar problems

2023-02-01 Thread Pascal Hambourg
On 02/02/2023 at 00:33, Phil Dibowitz wrote: And I've run `grub-install` with my EFI dir mounted. What's interesting is the version in EFI is different than the version staged by the package: ``` # sum /usr/lib/shim/shimx64.efi /boot/EFI/EFI/debian/shimx64.efi 47979   918

Bug#1030260: marked as done (ros-bloom's autopkg tests fail with setuptools 66)

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 02 Feb 2023 07:34:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1030260: fixed in ros-bloom 0.11.2-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1030260, regarding ros-bloom's autopkg tests fail with setuptools 66 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#1029198: marked as done (bugs.debian.org: linux-image-6.1.0-1-amd64/testing ERROR:M=/var/lib/dkms/xtrx/0.0.1+git20190320.5ae3a3e-3.1/b)

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 02 Feb 2023 06:10:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1029135: fixed in xtrx-dkms 0.0.1+git20190320.5ae3a3e-3.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1029135, regarding bugs.debian.org: linux-image-6.1.0-1-amd64/testing

Bug#1029135: marked as done (xtrx-dkms: xtrx module fails to build for kernel version 6.1)

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 02 Feb 2023 06:10:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1029135: fixed in xtrx-dkms 0.0.1+git20190320.5ae3a3e-3.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1029135, regarding xtrx-dkms: xtrx module fails to build for kernel version 6.1 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#1030284: nodejs: [arm64] RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded

2023-02-01 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Package: nodejs Version: 18.13.0+dfsg1-1 Severity: serious Tags: upstream Justification: breaks on release architecture X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de Control: affects -1 src:dygraphs During reproducible-builds testing, I found that one of my packages, the one with nodejs used during build, worked

Processed: nodejs: [arm64] RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 src:dygraphs Bug #1030284 [nodejs] nodejs: [arm64] RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded Added indication that 1030284 affects src:dygraphs -- 1030284: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1030284 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Processed: Re: Bug#1030253: gnome-control-center: Creating a user via "gnome-control-center user-accounts" results in a user with shell set to nologin

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #1030253 [accountsservice] gnome-control-center: Creating a user via "gnome-control-center user-accounts" results in a user with shell set to nologin Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > tags -1 + patch pending Bug #1030253

Processed: Re: Bug#1030262: gnome-control-center: User deleted via "gnome-control-center user-accounts" can still login

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > retitle -1 accountsservice: User that seemed to have been deleted via > gnome-control-center can still login Bug #1030262 [gnome-control-center,accountsservice] gnome-control-center: User deleted via "gnome-control-center user-accounts" can still login Changed Bug

Bug#1030262: gnome-control-center: User deleted via "gnome-control-center user-accounts" can still login

2023-02-01 Thread Simon McVittie
Control: retitle -1 accountsservice: User that seemed to have been deleted via gnome-control-center can still login Control: reassign -1 accountsservice 22.08.8-1 Control: affects -1 gnome-control-center Control: forwarded -1

Processed: found 1030190 in 2:1.4+ds1-3, tagging 1030186, reassign 1030196 to wnpp, reassign 1030197 to wnpp ...

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 1030190 2:1.4+ds1-3 Bug #1030190 [src:mplayer] mplayer uninstallable Marked as found in versions mplayer/2:1.4+ds1-3. > tags 1030186 + sid bookworm Bug #1030186 [src:enigmail] enigmail: FTBFS (Error: Cannot find module 'chalk') Added tag(s)

Bug#990447: Similar problems

2023-02-01 Thread Phil Dibowitz
I'm also unable to update to the latest uefi-dbx: ``` $ fwupdmgr update ... Blocked executable in the ESP, ensure grub and shim are up to date: /boot/EFI/EFI/debian/shimx64.efi Authenticode checksum [af79b14064601bc0987d4747af1e914a228c05d622ceda03b7a4f67014fee767] is present in dbx ``` I

Bug#973990: marked as done (shorewall: Fails to start with "Couldn't load match `iface':No such file or directory")

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 1 Feb 2023 23:02:58 + with message-id and subject line Bug#973990: fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #973990, regarding shorewall: Fails to start with "Couldn't load match `iface':No such file or directory" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1029403: marked as done (shorewall: fails to start with "Couldn't load match `iface':No such file or directory")

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 1 Feb 2023 23:02:58 + with message-id and subject line Bug#973990: fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #973990, regarding shorewall: fails to start with "Couldn't load match `iface':No such file or directory" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1029594: Fails to authenticate mit o365

2023-02-01 Thread Carsten Schoenert
Am Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 03:24:14PM + schrieb Nicola Chiapolini: > Control: severity -1 serious > > Hi Carsten > > I am increasing the severity again. This bit me today. > I rely on apt-listbugs to protect me from such problems and with the default > settings "normal" is not sufficient to

Processed: found 1030262 in gnome-control-center/1:43.2-2, found 1030262 in accountsservice/22.08.8-1

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 1030262 gnome-control-center/1:43.2-2 Bug #1030262 [gnome-control-center,accountsservice] gnome-control-center: User deleted via "gnome-control-center user-accounts" can still login Marked as found in versions

Bug#1030262: gnome-control-center: User deleted via "gnome-control-center user-accounts" can still login

2023-02-01 Thread Simon McVittie
On Wed, 01 Feb 2023 at 21:07:09 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > Looking briefly at the gnome-control-center code, I think this indicates > that act_user_is_local_account() is returning false, so instead of deleting > a local user, gnome-control-center is telling accountsservice to > "uncache" a

Processed: reassign 1030274 to src:h5py

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1030274 src:h5py 3.7.0-3 Bug #1030274 [src:python-h5py] Provide PyDist overrides for h5py? Warning: Unknown package 'src:python-h5py' Bug reassigned from package 'src:python-h5py' to 'src:h5py'. No longer marked as found in versions

Processed: Re: Bug#1030220: xrayutilities: missing dependency on python3-h5py breaks armel tests

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > clone -1 -2 Bug #1030220 [src:xrayutilities] xrayutilities: missing dependency on python3-h5py breaks armel tests Bug 1030220 cloned as bug 1030274 > reassign -2 src:python-h5py 3.7.0-3 Bug #1030274 [src:xrayutilities] xrayutilities: missing dependency on

Bug#1030220: xrayutilities: missing dependency on python3-h5py breaks armel tests

2023-02-01 Thread Stefano Rivera
Control: clone -1 -2 Control: reassign -2 src:python-h5py 3.7.0-3 Control: retitle -2 Provide PyDist overrides for h5py? Hi Drew (2023.01.31_18:48:32_-0400) > xrayutilities does have Build-Depends: python3-h5py. Evidentally > dh-python3 isn't able to determine the correct dependency for h5py >

Bug#1027217: marked as done (python-pymbar: autopkgtest fail with numpy/1.24.1)

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 01 Feb 2023 21:23:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1027217: fixed in python-pymbar 3.1.0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1027217, regarding python-pymbar: autopkgtest fail with numpy/1.24.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#1030233: marked as done (python-hypothesis: autopkgtest regression in testing)

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 01 Feb 2023 21:23:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1030233: fixed in python-hypothesis 6.65.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1030233, regarding python-hypothesis: autopkgtest regression in testing to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: Bug#1030233 marked as pending in python-hypothesis

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1030233 [src:python-hypothesis] python-hypothesis: autopkgtest regression in testing Added tag(s) pending. -- 1030233: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1030233 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#1030233: marked as pending in python-hypothesis

2023-02-01 Thread Timo Röhling
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1030233 in python-hypothesis reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed (with 2 errors): Re: Bug#1030262: gnome-control-center: User deleted via "gnome-control-center user-accounts" can still login

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 gnome-control-center,accountsservice Bug #1030262 [gnome-control-center] gnome-control-center: User deleted via "gnome-control-center user-accounts" can still login Bug reassigned from package 'gnome-control-center' to

Bug#1030262: gnome-control-center: User deleted via "gnome-control-center user-accounts" can still login

2023-02-01 Thread Simon McVittie
Control: reassign -1 gnome-control-center,accountsservice Control: found -1 gnome-control-center 1:43.2-2 Control: found -1 accountsservice 22.08.8-1 (Quoting full bug report for accountsservice maintainers) On Wed, 01 Feb 2023 at 20:56:08 +0200, Timo Lindfors wrote: > Steps to reproduce: > 1)

Processed (with 1 error): Re: Bug#1030190: mplayer uninstallable

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:mplayer Bug #1030190 [mplayer] mplayer uninstallable Bug reassigned from package 'mplayer' to 'src:mplayer'. No longer marked as found in versions mplayer/2:1.4+ds1-3. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1030190 to the same values

Bug#1030190: mplayer uninstallable

2023-02-01 Thread Sven Joachim
Control: reassign -1 src:mplayer Control: forcemerge 1004579 -1 On 2023-02-01 09:13 +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote: > Package: mplayer > Version: 2:1.4+ds1-3+b2 > Severity: critical > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > mplayer : Depends: libavcodec58 (>= 7:4.4) which is a virtual

Bug#1030222: [DSE-Dev] Bug#1030222: selint: please restrict check only where valgrind is available

2023-02-01 Thread Amin Bandali
Amin Bandali writes: > Hello there, > > You might find it more convenient to depend on 'valgrind-if-available' > rather than 'valgrind' itself, per the attached patch. It also skips > tests that need valgrind, for problematic arches. What do you think? To be fully clear, by "it" in "it also

Bug#1029929: marked as done (msmtp-mta fails to purge when adduser is not installed)

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 01 Feb 2023 20:42:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1029929: fixed in msmtp 1.8.22-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1029929, regarding msmtp-mta fails to purge when adduser is not installed to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#1030222: [DSE-Dev] Bug#1030222: selint: please restrict check only where valgrind is available

2023-02-01 Thread Amin Bandali
Hello there, You might find it more convenient to depend on 'valgrind-if-available' rather than 'valgrind' itself, per the attached patch. It also skips tests that need valgrind, for problematic arches. What do you think? diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index 44fca69..a130223

Bug#1029845: harfbuzz: non-distributable font included in source

2023-02-01 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Andres, On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 03:47:03AM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > Hi Security Team & Jeremy, > > I had originally planned to ask the release team about fixing #1029845 (the > bug below) in bullseye via t-p-u. However, it would appear that there's also > an outstanding security bug in

Processed (with 1 error): Re: Bug#1030208: Acknowledgement (statsmodels: FTBFS with scipy 1.10 on 32-bit: int64 -> int32 cast)

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > merge -1 1030210 1030221 Bug #1030208 [python3-statsmodels] statsmodels: FTBFS with scipy 1.10 on 32-bit: int64 -> int32 cast Unable to merge bugs because: package of #1030210 is 'src:statsmodels' not 'python3-statsmodels' package of #1030221 is 'src:statsmodels'

Bug#1030208: Acknowledgement (statsmodels: FTBFS with scipy 1.10 on 32-bit: int64 -> int32 cast)

2023-02-01 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: merge -1 1030210 1030221 Not obviously known upstream. It's due to the test passing an int64 array to np.bincount (which casts to native-size int). Hence, we can probably get it to pass by explicitly casting to int32 in the test code, but I haven't tried that yet. I don't know

Bug#1004729: bind9-dyndb-ldap: fails to load dyndb-ldap backend

2023-02-01 Thread Matej Zagiba
Dear Maintainers, this bug is NOT FIXED, which manifests right now. packake bind9-dyndb-ldap is now broken both in stable and unstable. In stable: bind9-dyndb-ldap is in version 11.6-3 and this package depends on bind9-libs >= 1:9.16.15. Reality is, that bind9-dyndb-ldap actually depends

Bug#1030269: freezer: python3 dependency issues

2023-02-01 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Source: freezer Version: 13.0.0-1.1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org python3-freezer is an arch: all package that should work with all versions of the python3 interpreter. Nevertheless, it currently has a dependency on python3.10 (and rebuilding it produces one on python3.11).

Bug#1030268: fparser: python3 dependency issues

2023-02-01 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Source: fparser Version: 0.0.16-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org python3-fparser is an arch: all package that should work with all versions of the python3 interpreter. Nevertheless, it currently has a dependency on python3.10 (and rebuilding it produces one on python3.11).

Bug#1030262: gnome-control-center: User deleted via "gnome-control-center user-accounts" can still login

2023-02-01 Thread Simon McVittie
On Wed, 01 Feb 2023 at 20:56:08 +0200, Timo Lindfors wrote: > 6) Click "Remove User..." > 7) Click "Delete" when prompted. Do you happen to know what this actually does, behind the scenes? > This issue is particularly scary It's too late now, but in future, if you're reporting an otherwise

Processed: tagging 1030012, severity of 1030012 is serious

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=astropy=i386=5.2.1-1%2Bb1=1675266640=0 > tags 1030012 + ftbfs Bug #1030012 [src:astropy] astropy: i386 LevMarLSQFitter fails test Added tag(s) ftbfs. > severity 1030012 serious Bug #1030012

Bug#1029594: Fails to authenticate mit o365

2023-02-01 Thread Enrico Tröger
Hi, > (Since the only reason I use Thunderbird in the first place is to > access o365, this bug might even be considered grave ;-) upstream is handling this bug in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1810760 and it seems a working fix is available and so we will hopefully see a new

Bug#1030262: gnome-control-center: User deleted via "gnome-control-center user-accounts" can still login

2023-02-01 Thread Timo Lindfors
Package: gnome-control-center Version: 1:43.2-2 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole X-Debbugs-Cc: timo.lindf...@iki.fi, timo.lindf...@iki.fi, Debian Security Team Steps to reproduce: 1) Run "gnome-control-center user-accounts" 2) Click "Unlock..." 3) Enter root

Bug#1030256: [Pkg-puppet-devel] Bug#1030256: FTBFS: test failures ArgumentError: can't find user for puppet

2023-02-01 Thread Jérôme Charaoui
I think this is occurring because the test is being run as "root". I don't know how common that is in build environments, but it's not something that I have or think I should have in my build (sbuild) or test (autopkgtest) environments. Is there some flag we could use to tell

Bug#973990: recap

2023-02-01 Thread Jeremy Sowden
On 2023-02-01, at 20:04:22 +0200, Vincas Dargis wrote: > On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 23:41:54 + Jeremy Sowden wrote: > > However, Vincas Dargis, the reporter, observed that shorewall worked > > with Linux 5.8 and did not with 5.9 and proposed #972454 as the culprit: > > I completely forgot that I

Bug#1017990: marked as done (src:pytango: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x)

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 1 Feb 2023 20:26:12 +0200 with message-id and subject line src:pytango: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x has caused the Debian Bug report #1017990, regarding src:pytango: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x to be marked as

Bug#1030261: jenkins-job-builder autopkg tests fail with setuptools 66

2023-02-01 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: src:jenkins-job-builder Version: 3.11.0-4 Severity: serious Tags: sid bookworm jenkins-job-builder autopkg tests fail with setuptools 66: [...] == Failed 1 tests - output below: ==

Bug#1029044: marked as done (gcc-12-cross-mipsen: source and binary version go out of sync)

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 01 Feb 2023 18:19:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1029044: fixed in gcc-12-cross-mipsen 3+c3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1029044, regarding gcc-12-cross-mipsen: source and binary version go out of sync to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#1030260: ros-bloom's autopkg tests fail with setuptools 66

2023-02-01 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: src:ros-bloom Version: 0.11.2-3 Severity: serious Tags: sid bokworm ros-bloom's autopkg tests fail with setuptools 66: [...] ERRORS ERROR collecting test/system_tests/test_bloom_setup.py

Bug#1028375: Accepted xz-utils 5.4.1-0.1 (source) into unstable

2023-02-01 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Debian FTP Masters dixit: >Changed-By: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior >Changes: > xz-utils (5.4.1-0.1) unstable; urgency=medium > . > * Non-maintainer upload. > * Update pt_BR translations. > * Add lintian overrides and an override for blhc. This is missing the updated Breaks+Replaces for

Bug#973990: #973990: recap

2023-02-01 Thread Vincas Dargis
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 23:41:54 + Jeremy Sowden wrote: However, Vincas Dargis, the reporter, observed that shorewall worked with Linux 5.8 and did not with 5.9 and proposed #972454 as the culprit: I completely forgot that I wrote that bug in 2020... Anyway, shorewall works now: ``` $

Bug#1030256: FTBFS: test failures ArgumentError: can't find user for puppet

2023-02-01 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
Source: ruby-puppetserver-ca-cli Version: 2.4.0-1 Severity: serious Tag: ftbfs Dear Maintainer, ruby-puppetserver-ca-cli currently fails to build from source with test failures. Example: 1) Puppetserver::Ca::Action::Enable infracrl does not print the help output if called correctly

Processed: tagging 1030251, found 1030251 in 3:3.2.16-2

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1030251 + upstream Bug #1030251 {Done: Chris Lamb } [python-django] python-django: CVE-2023-23969 Potential denial-of-service via Accept-Language headers Added tag(s) upstream. > found 1030251 3:3.2.16-2 Bug #1030251 {Done: Chris Lamb }

Bug#1028375: still conflicting with manpages-fr 4.16.0-3~bpo11+1

2023-02-01 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Thorsten, On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 04:03:12PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Helge Kreutzmann dixit: > > >> >odler than stable. It also shipped them in every backport until > >> >4.16.0-3~bpo11+1. It is also in the upcoming 4.17.0-2~bpo11+1. > >> > > >> >But I wonder if I should remove them

Bug#1029601: marked as done (redmine: upgrade fails because of missing dependency on mocha)

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 01 Feb 2023 16:53:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1029601: fixed in redmine 5.0.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1029601, regarding redmine: upgrade fails because of missing dependency on mocha to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1030240: wayfire: FTBFS with wlroots 0.16.1

2023-02-01 Thread Guido Günther
Hi, On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 04:46:14PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote: > Hi, > On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 04:37:37PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 04:23:00PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 04:03:47PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote: > > > > Hi, >

Bug#1030240: wayfire: FTBFS with wlroots 0.16.1

2023-02-01 Thread Guido Günther
Hi, On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 05:34:16PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 04:46:14PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 04:37:37PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > [...] > > > FWIW here are some examples of autopkgtest for checking if

Bug#1030240: wayfire: FTBFS with wlroots 0.16.1

2023-02-01 Thread Andreas Henriksson
On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 04:46:14PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote: > Hi, > On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 04:37:37PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: [...] > > FWIW here are some examples of autopkgtest for checking if pkg-config > > works for your own -dev packages: > >

Bug#1030251: marked as done (python-django: CVE-2023-23969 Potential denial-of-service via Accept-Language headers)

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 01 Feb 2023 16:21:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1030251: fixed in python-django 3:3.2.17-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1030251, regarding python-django: CVE-2023-23969 Potential denial-of-service via Accept-Language headers to be marked as done.

Bug#1030240: marked as done (libwlroots-dev (exp): missing dependency on libvulkan-dev (breaks pkg-config))

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 01 Feb 2023 16:22:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1030240: fixed in wlroots 0.16.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1030240, regarding libwlroots-dev (exp): missing dependency on libvulkan-dev (breaks pkg-config) to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1029961: marked as done (python-catalogue: autopkgtest failure: No module named 'numpy')

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 01 Feb 2023 16:20:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1029961: fixed in python-catalogue 2.1.0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1029961, regarding python-catalogue: autopkgtest failure: No module named 'numpy' to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Processed: Bug#1030251 marked as pending in python-django

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1030251 [python-django] python-django: CVE-2023-23969 Potential denial-of-service via Accept-Language headers Added tag(s) pending. -- 1030251: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1030251 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1028375: still conflicting with manpages-fr 4.16.0-3~bpo11+1

2023-02-01 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Helge Kreutzmann dixit: >> >odler than stable. It also shipped them in every backport until >> >4.16.0-3~bpo11+1. It is also in the upcoming 4.17.0-2~bpo11+1. >> > >> >But I wonder if I should remove them there. >> >> Yes, please. Otherwise it’s impossible to do the package >Done in the upcoming

Bug#1030251: marked as pending in python-django

2023-02-01 Thread Chris Lamb
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1030251 in python-django reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1030251: python-django: CVE-2023-23969 Potential denial-of-service via Accept-Language headers

2023-02-01 Thread Chris Lamb
Package: python-django Version: 1:1.11.29-1+deb10u5 X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org Severity: grave Tags: security Hi, The following vulnerability was published for python-django. CVE-2023-23969: Potential denial-of-service via Accept-Language headers The parsed values of

Bug#1030115: marked as done (opensnitch-ui: AttributeError: module 'PyQt5.Qt' has no attribute 'QItemDelegate')

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 01 Feb 2023 15:50:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1030115: fixed in opensnitch 1.5.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1030115, regarding opensnitch-ui: AttributeError: module 'PyQt5.Qt' has no attribute 'QItemDelegate' to be marked as done. This means

Processed: Re: wayfire: FTBFS with wlroots 0.16.1

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 = src:wayfire Bug #1030240 [wlroots] libwlroots-dev (exp): missing dependency on libvulkan-dev (breaks pkg-config) Removed indication that 1030240 affects wayfire Added indication that 1030240 affects src:wayfire -- 1030240:

Bug#1028375: still conflicting with manpages-fr 4.16.0-3~bpo11+1

2023-02-01 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Thorsten, On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 03:11:19PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Helge Kreutzmann dixit: > > >odler than stable. It also shipped them in every backport until > >4.16.0-3~bpo11+1. It is also in the upcoming 4.17.0-2~bpo11+1. > > > >But I wonder if I should remove them there. > >

Bug#1030240: wayfire: FTBFS with wlroots 0.16.1

2023-02-01 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Control: affects -1 = src:wayfire On 01/02/2023 15.46, Andreas Henriksson wrote: Control: affects -1 wayfire Use an affects on the source package s.t. the bug shows up on the affected source package. Source package based queries are used by default, e.g. tracker.d.o links to

Bug#1030240: wayfire: FTBFS with wlroots 0.16.1

2023-02-01 Thread Guido Günther
Hi, On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 04:37:37PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 04:23:00PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 04:03:47PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote: > > > Hi, > > > [..snip..] > > > > This seems to be caused by wlroots/experimental

Bug#1030240: wayfire: FTBFS with wlroots 0.16.1

2023-02-01 Thread Andreas Henriksson
On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 04:23:00PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 04:03:47PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote: > > Hi, > > [..snip..] > > > This seems to be caused by wlroots/experimental missing a > > > build-dependency on libvulkan-dev and indeed after installing > > > that

Bug#1030250: elan: Build-depends on cruft package, whill FTBFS when decrufted

2023-02-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
Source: elan Version: 1.4.2-4 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) source package rust-zip version 0.6.3-3 no longer builds ust-zip+flate2-dev librust-zip+time-dev. This is a build-dep for elan, so once it's decrufted, elan

Bug#1029916: marked as done (q2-phylogeny/i386: Depends: python3-skbio but it is not installable)

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 01 Feb 2023 15:25:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1029916: fixed in q2-phylogeny 2022.11.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1029916, regarding q2-phylogeny/i386: Depends: python3-skbio but it is not installable to be marked as done. This means that you

Processed: Re: Bug#1029594: Fails to authenticate mit o365

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #1029594 [thunderbird] Fails to authenticate mit o365 Bug #1029606 [thunderbird] thunderbird: After updating the package I cannot access the Exchange account Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' --

Bug#1030240: wayfire: FTBFS with wlroots 0.16.1

2023-02-01 Thread Andreas Henriksson
On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 04:03:47PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote: > Hi, > [..snip..] > > This seems to be caused by wlroots/experimental missing a > > build-dependency on libvulkan-dev and indeed after installing > > that package the build works again. > > There is a build-dependency on

Bug#1013153: camitk: vtk[6,7] removal

2023-02-01 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 02:02:30PM +0100 schrieb Emmanuel Promayon: > > > > Salsa CI? > > > I just pushed both (VTK9 compatibility and dicom component disability) to > > > salsa (in the main branch, hopefully that's ok) > > Unfortunately Salsa CI failed for whatever reason in the first stage. > >

Bug#1028375: still conflicting with manpages-fr 4.16.0-3~bpo11+1

2023-02-01 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Helge Kreutzmann dixit: >odler than stable. It also shipped them in every backport until >4.16.0-3~bpo11+1. It is also in the upcoming 4.17.0-2~bpo11+1. > >But I wonder if I should remove them there. Yes, please. Otherwise it’s impossible to do the package relationships right. This will leave

Bug#1030030: marked as done (gosa-plugins-systems,gosa-plugins-goto: both ship /usr/share/gosa/plugins/admin/systems/services/*)

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 01 Feb 2023 15:19:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1030239: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1030030, regarding gosa-plugins-systems,gosa-plugins-goto: both ship /usr/share/gosa/plugins/admin/systems/services/* to be marked

Bug#1030240: wayfire: FTBFS with wlroots 0.16.1

2023-02-01 Thread Guido Günther
Hi, [..snip..] > This seems to be caused by wlroots/experimental missing a > build-dependency on libvulkan-dev and indeed after installing > that package the build works again. There is a build-dependency on libvulkan-dev. I think what you mean is the lack of a dependency in the libwlroots-dev

Processed: libwlroots-dev: missing dependency on libvulkan-dev (breaks pkg-config)

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 1030240 libwlroots-dev (exp): missing dependency on libvulkan-dev > (breaks pkg-config) Bug #1030240 [wlroots] wlroots/exp: missing build-dep on libvulkan-dev (breaks pkg-config) Changed Bug title to 'libwlroots-dev (exp): missing

Processed: Re: wayfire: FTBFS with wlroots 0.16.1

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 wlroots 0.16.1-1 Bug #1030240 [src:wayfire] wayfire: FTBFS with wlroots 0.16.1 Bug reassigned from package 'src:wayfire' to 'wlroots'. No longer marked as found in versions wayfire/0.7.5-1~exp1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1030240 to

Bug#1030240: wayfire: FTBFS with wlroots 0.16.1

2023-02-01 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Control: reassign -1 wlroots 0.16.1-1 Control: retitle -1 wlroots/exp: missing build-dep on libvulkan-dev (breaks pkg-config) Control: affects -1 wayfire On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 02:15:37PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Source: wayfire > Version: 0.7.5-1~exp1 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs

Bug#1029327: marked as done (python3-pytest-aiohttp fails to import)

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 01 Feb 2023 14:36:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1029327: fixed in pytest-aiohttp 1.0.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1029327, regarding python3-pytest-aiohttp fails to import to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#998043: marked as done (armnn: Tests fail with 'illegal instruction' on NEON-less hardware)

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 01 Feb 2023 14:34:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#998043: fixed in armnn 20.08-11 has caused the Debian Bug report #998043, regarding armnn: Tests fail with 'illegal instruction' on NEON-less hardware to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1030216: marked as done (armnn: FTBFS with GCC12)

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 01 Feb 2023 14:34:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1030216: fixed in armnn 20.08-11 has caused the Debian Bug report #1030216, regarding armnn: FTBFS with GCC12 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#1030209: marked as done (pytorch-vision FTBFS with Python 3.11 only)

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 1 Feb 2023 21:43:54 +0800 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1030209: pytorch-vision FTBFS with Python 3.11 only has caused the Debian Bug report #1030209, regarding pytorch-vision FTBFS with Python 3.11 only to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1030240: wayfire: FTBFS with wlroots 0.16.1

2023-02-01 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Source: wayfire Version: 0.7.5-1~exp1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi, wayfire/experimental recently started to FTBFS: dh_auto_configure cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 meson setup ..

Bug#1030182: marked as done (unifrac FTBFS with scipy 1.10)

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 01 Feb 2023 13:08:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1030182: fixed in unifrac 1.2-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1030182, regarding unifrac FTBFS with scipy 1.10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#1030181: marked as done (python-iow FTBFS with scipy 1.10)

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 01 Feb 2023 13:08:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1030181: fixed in python-iow 1.0.6-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1030181, regarding python-iow FTBFS with scipy 1.10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#1013153: camitk: vtk[6,7] removal

2023-02-01 Thread Emmanuel Promayon
Dear Andreas, On 01/02/2023 13:35, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi Emmanuel, Am Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 01:53:15PM +0100 schrieb Emmanuel Promayon: could you simply push your patch and we can see the build log in Salsa CI? I just pushed both (VTK9 compatibility and dicom component disability) to

Bug#1013153: camitk: vtk[6,7] removal

2023-02-01 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Emmanuel, Am Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 01:53:15PM +0100 schrieb Emmanuel Promayon: > > could you simply push your patch and we can see the build log in > > Salsa CI? > > I just pushed both (VTK9 compatibility and dicom component disability) to > salsa (in the main branch, hopefully that's ok)

Bug#1030233: python-hypothesis: autopkgtest regression in testing

2023-02-01 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: python-hypothesis Version: 6.64.0-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Hi Maintainer Recently, the autopkgtests of python-hypothesis regressed in testing [1]. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#1030143: marked as done (buildstream is not compatible with python 3.11)

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 01 Feb 2023 12:04:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1030143: fixed in buildstream 1.6.8-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1030143, regarding buildstream is not compatible with python 3.11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#1028638: libproxy1v5: Gajim 1.6.0-1 crashes in libproxy call

2023-02-01 Thread Martin
Dear Laurent, dear Jeremy, der Iain, because I'm not sure, if you saw it: I uploaded libproxy 0.4.18-1.2 with Sebastians patch to DELAYED/5. You might like to do something different, therefore my headsup. Cheers

Bug#1028375: still conflicting with manpages-fr 4.16.0-3~bpo11+1

2023-02-01 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Sebastian, lets clarify the facts: Xz-utils ships the localized manpages since 5.2.7. I do not see any backport yet, I assume it will be 5.4.1-0.0~bpo11+1 manpages-l10n shipped the localized manpages before 4.1.0-1. This is odler than stable. It also shipped them in every backport until

Processed: Bug#1030143 marked as pending in buildstream

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1030143 [buildstream] buildstream is not compatible with python 3.11 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1030143: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1030143 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1030143: marked as pending in buildstream

2023-02-01 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1030143 in buildstream reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1030227: rtpengine: please use dkms packaging helpers

2023-02-01 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: rtpengine Version: 10.5.3.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch Hi, src:rtpengine is the only package in the archive the builds a -dkms package without using the dkms packaging helpers. Please switch to dh-sequence-dkms instead of using handcrafted code, a patch doing this is attached. This

Bug#1022496: pulsemixer: diff for NMU version 1.5.1-1.1

2023-02-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for pulsemixer (versioned as 1.5.1-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/7. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it. cu Adrian diff -Nru pulsemixer-1.5.1/debian/changelog pulsemixer-1.5.1/debian/changelog --- pulsemixer-1.5.1/debian/changelog 2020-06-28

Bug#1028863: marked as done (python-aioice: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.11 returned exit code 13)

2023-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 01 Feb 2023 11:59:13 +0100 with message-id <167524915342.1735478.16881388239677862...@auryn.jones.dk> and subject line Re: Bug#1028863: python-aioice: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.11 returned exit code 13 has caused the

  1   2   >