(dropped d-cross@)
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 10:04:42PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Dec 2023 21:59:12 +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > Filing against libmodule-build-perl for now to prevent it from entering
> > trixie before the other two are changed. Feel free to reassign or clone
> >
Your message dated Wed, 06 Dec 2023 06:34:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#101: fixed in python-ptrace 0.9.8-0.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #101,
regarding python-ptrace ftbfs with Python 3.12
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Wed, 06 Dec 2023 05:48:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1057550: fixed in cvs 2:1.12.13+real-30
has caused the Debian Bug report #1057550,
regarding cvs: FTBFS: FAIL: test-getdate.sh
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1057470 normal
Bug #1057470 [rkhunter] Outdated rkhunter since 2018-02
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1057470:
On 2023-12-05 at 20:28:44, Jörg Frings-Fürst (debian@jff.email) wrote:
> I did not search for Vulnerabilities. However, I am of the opinion that using
> rkhunter in its current form is equivalent to using a 6 year old virus scanner
> and therefore involves an increased security risk.
Ideally I
Hello Francois,
I did not search for Vulnerabilities. However, I am of the opinion that using
rkhunter in its current form is equivalent to using a 6 year old virus scanner
and therefore involves an increased security risk.
Am Dienstag, dem 05.12.2023 um 12:39 -0800 schrieb Francois Marier:
>
Had a quick look at the Debian package and it seems that all tests are
disabled.
In my opinion, this is a very good example of why tests at build (and in
autopkgtests) are important. How do you know the package you're shipping
isn't broken without tests? (you don't know, that's why there are
Your message dated Wed, 06 Dec 2023 02:34:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1057190: fixed in hackrf 2023.01.1-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #1057190,
regarding libhackrf0: udev rules file lost in upgrade
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
tags 1057550 + pending
thanks
Santiago Vila dixit:
> Hi. I think we can skip the ssh thing, as this one is easy
> to diagnose: Missing Build-Depends on tzdata.
>
> Please use debootstrap from trixie/sid to reproduce. Details here:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837060
Oh,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1057550 + pending
Bug #1057550 [src:cvs] cvs: FTBFS: FAIL: test-getdate.sh
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1057550:
Control: reassign -1 libclang1-16
Sorry, I meant to reassign to libclang1-16 of course.
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 libclang1-16
Bug #1057586 [clang-15] nvda2speechd: FTBFS: error: failed to run custom build
command for `speech-dispatcher-sys v0.7.0`
Bug reassigned from package 'clang-15' to 'libclang1-16'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1057586 to
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 clang-15
Bug #1057586 [clang-15] nvda2speechd: FTBFS: error: failed to run custom build
command for `speech-dispatcher-sys v0.7.0`
Ignoring request to reassign bug #1057586 to the same package
> affects -1 src:nvda2speechd
Bug #1057586 [clang-15]
I've uploaded an NMU fixing several cross building and reproducible
builds bugs and an RC bug to DELAYED/10. The changes should also be
available via dgit.
debdiff follows:
diff -Nru lirc-0.10.1/debian/changelog lirc-0.10.1/debian/changelog
--- lirc-0.10.1/debian/changelog2022-12-28
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 clang-15
Bug #1057586 [src:nvda2speechd] nvda2speechd: FTBFS: error: failed to run
custom build command for `speech-dispatcher-sys v0.7.0`
Bug reassigned from package 'src:nvda2speechd' to 'clang-15'.
No longer marked as found in versions
Control: reassign -1 clang-15
Control: affects -1 src:nvda2speechd
Hello,
Santiago Vila, le mar. 05 déc. 2023 23:08:27 +0100, a ecrit:
> During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
>
[...]
> Running
>
Your message dated Wed, 06 Dec 2023 00:06:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1055488: fixed in pycairo 1.25.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1055488,
regarding pycairo b-d on python3-all-dev, but only builds for the default python
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Package: valgrind
Version: 1:3.20.0-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: Adam Borowski
-dbgsym packages are not part of the normal archive,
and they can therefore not be expected to be pulled in
by normal dependencies.
For the usual case where debug symbols are only used
when debugging in a
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1055488 in pycairo reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1055488 [src:pycairo] pycairo b-d on python3-all-dev, but only builds for
the default python
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1055488: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1055488
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Your message dated Tue, 05 Dec 2023 23:35:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1055576: fixed in meson-python 0.15.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1055576,
regarding meson-python needs an update for Python 3.12
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1057586 + bookworm-ignore
Bug #1057586 [src:nvda2speechd] nvda2speechd: FTBFS: error: failed to run
custom build command for `speech-dispatcher-sys v0.7.0`
Added tag(s) bookworm-ignore.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Source: tracker-miners
Version: 3.4.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear Maintainer,
your package FTBFS in unstable, in my own test rebuild as well as on the Debian
buildds.
Build log snippet, hopefully relevant:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
Package: src:python-oslo.policy
Version: 4.2.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
make:
Package: src:python-scrapy
Version: 2.11.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:python-kaptan
Version: 0.5.12-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with
Package: src:raku-meta6
Version: 0.0.29-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:shed
Version: 1.15-5
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:zsh
Version: 5.9-5
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:tpm2-pytss
Version: 2.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:python-discord
Version: 2.3.2+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:sphinx-design
Version: 0.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --with
Package: src:shim
Version: 15.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build
Package: src:python-oslo.versionedobjects
Version: 3.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
make:
Package: src:texext
Version: 0.6.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
dh clean --with python3 --buildsystem=pybuild
Package: src:scm
Version: 5f3-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
debian/rules
Package: src:python-pytest-trio
Version: 0.8.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:python-sphinxcontrib.apidoc
Version: 0.3.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
make:
Package: src:python-repoze.sphinx.autointerface
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules
Package: src:qflipper
Version: 1.3.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:python-pynndescent
Version: 0.5.8-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:xonsh
Version: 0.14.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with
Package: src:publican
Version: 4.3.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --with linktree
Package: src:tetradraw
Version: 2.0.3-10
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --with
Package: src:python-escript
Version: 5.6-5
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build -v
Package: src:pinto
Version: 0.14000-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build
Package: src:octave-netcdf
Version: 1.0.17-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:octave-vibes
Version: 0.2.0-8
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:octave-ncarray
Version: 1.0.5-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:octave-nan
Version: 3.7.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:node-strip-bom-stream
Version: 4.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:node-qs
Version: 6.11.0+ds+~6.9.7-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:nfstrace
Version: 0.4.3.2+git20200805+b220d04-2.2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
Package: src:node-gulp-changed
Version: 4.0.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:node-decompress-response
Version: 6.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh
Package: src:node-clipanion
Version: 3.2.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:mplayer
Version: 2:1.5+svn38423-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:mapsforge
Version: 0.17.0+dfsg.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build
Package: src:mako
Version: 1.2.4+ds-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:mailfromd
Version: 8.17.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:linpac
Version: 0.28-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build
Package: src:lmfit-py
Version: 1.2.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:libsoftware-copyright-perl
Version: 0.012-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh
Package: src:libical-parser-perl
Version: 1.21-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build
Package: src:libgnt
Version: 2.14.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:libconfig-model-systemd-perl
Version: 0.254.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh
Package: src:libconfig-model-lcdproc-perl
Version: 2.055-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh
Package: src:libconfig-model-openssh-perl
Version: 2.9.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh
Package: src:kalzium
Version: 4:22.12.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with kf5
Package: src:gnome-bluetooth3
Version: 42.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:libapi-gitforge-perl
Version: 0.007-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build
Package: src:gcr4
Version: 4.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:gccintro
Version: 1.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build
Package: src:gcc-11-doc
Version: 11.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build
Package: src:emacs-wgrep
Version: 3.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with elpa
Package: src:emacs-web-server
Version: 1.5.1-5
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with
Package: src:elpa
Version: 2022.11.001-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build
Package: src:emacs-helm-ag
Version: 0.59-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --with elpa
Package: src:d2x-rebirth
Version: 0.58.1-1.3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
dh_auto_clean: warning: Compatibility
Package: src:dosbox
Version: 0.74-3-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:dradio
Version: 3.8-2.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build
dh: warning:
Package: src:d1x-rebirth
Version: 0.58.1-1.2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
dh_auto_clean: warning: Compatibility
Package: src:cvs
Version: 2:1.12.13+real-29
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary -Snone
Package: src:crowdsec
Version: 1.4.6-6
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:cloud-init
Version: 23.3.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
py3versions: no
Package: src:cclib-data
Version: 1.6.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with
Package: src:calamares-extensions
Version: 1.3.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:barrier
Version: 2.4.0+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:bosh
Version: 0.6-11
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:astroquery
Version: 0.4.6+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
dh_auto_clean
I: pybuild base:310:
Package: src:ap-utils
Version: 1.5-5
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1057483 normal
Bug #1057483 [ftp.debian.org] RM: alex4-data [all] -- ROM, non free, not built
anymore
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1057483:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 1057483 src:alex4
Bug #1057483 [ftp.debian.org] RM: alex4-data [all] -- ROM, non free, not built
anymore
Added indication that 1057483 affects src:alex4
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 1057483 RM: alex4-data [all] -- ROM, non free, not built anymore
Bug #1057483 [ftp.debian.org] RM: alex-4data -- ROM, non free, not built anymore
Changed Bug title to 'RM: alex4-data [all] -- ROM, non free, not built anymore'
from 'RM:
Hi all,
On Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 03:05:09PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 01:31:19AM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > On Sun, 03 Dec 2023 10:46:50 +1100, Tony Cook wrote:
> >
> > > > https://github.com/tonycoz/imager/issues/522
> > > Fixed in 1.022, please let me know if
Your message dated Tue, 05 Dec 2023 20:49:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1057441: fixed in cryptsetup 2:2.7.0~rc0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1057441,
regarding linux-image-6.6-amd64: Crypt does not longer work
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On 2023-12-05 at 07:07:23, Jörg Frings-Fürst (debian@jff.email) wrote:
> I noticed that the program and the data available on the internet are from
> 2018-02.
> So almost 6 years old data suggests a non-existent security.
Hi Jörg, are you aware of security vulnerabilities in rkhunter or you are
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Bug #1057483 [alex4] alex4 depends on alex4-data but is NBS
Bug reassigned from package 'alex4' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1057483 to the same values
previously set
Ignoring request to alter
control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
control: retitle -1 RM: alex-4data -- ROM, non free, not built anymore
alex4-data is non free and has been removed from Debian.
alex4 has been moved to contrib
users can build their own, local,
alex4-data using game-data-packager.
Hello Maitland,
* Chris Hofstaedtler [231205 20:01]:
> * Maitland Bottoms [231203 14:57]:
> > Helmut Grohne writes:
> > > Then when you retry it, please go for experimental first. Then have
> > > Chris or me check your upload is ok and only then proceed with uploading
> > > to unstable.
> >
>
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo