Bug#1067088: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#1067088: zfs-linux: missing B-D: libtirpc-dev

Control: tags -1 + pending On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 5:31 PM Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > > This could be fixed by adding an explicit Build-Depends on libtirpc-dev. > The glibc change will likely be reverted in the short term, but given > its a change we want to do for Trixie, this will only lower

Bug#1066279: [Debian-zh-dev] Bug#1066279: Bug#1066279: unicon: FTBFS: cin2tab.c:238:13: error: implicit declaration of function ‘tolower’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 10:34 AM xiao sheng wen wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks for your report. > > I'd uploaded the new version in mentors to fix this bug. > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/unicon/ > > Welcome to review and upload. > This has been sponsored to Sid, thanks for your contribution!

Bug#1059040: libxml2: ABI change? (undefined references)

me/rene/LibreOffice/git/libreoffice-24-2/workdir/LinkTarget/Executable/pdfverify] > > Error 1 > > > > Do we have removed symbols/removed versions here? (libxmlsec.so.1 was > > not rebuilt) > > After a rebuild of libxmlsec1 this link succeeds... > I see that you've commit

Bug#1036062: frr: CVE-2023-31490

Hi, On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 13:47:46 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 03:17:52PM +0200, David Lamparter wrote: > > Fixed upstream in 9f1ba873637fd6ce4a2d366eafcf41402775852b on stable/8.4 > > branch. > > > > Debian fix incoming with bump to 8.4.4 if that's OK? That wouldn't be a >

Bug#1039487: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#1039487: zfs-dkms: autopkgtest fails on Linux 6.3 (arm64 only)

Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/14555 The issue first appeared in Linux 6.2, caused by commit aaeca98456431a8d9382ecf48ac4843e252c07b3[1]. Let's wait a bit to see what upstream would respond. We could patch to disable simd on arm64 (as well as the runtime benchmarks

Bug#1027851: pytorch FTBFS with Python 3.11 as default version

On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 9:42 PM Andreas Tille wrote: > > Am Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 08:21:46PM +0800 schrieb Aron Xu: > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 7:12 PM Andreas Tille wrote: > > > make: *** [debian/rules:83: binary] Terminated > > > ninja: build stopped: interrup

Bug#1027851: pytorch FTBFS with Python 3.11 as default version

On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 9:42 PM Andreas Tille wrote: > > So what help could I (as someone who does not know pytorch at all, just > maintains some packages that are depending from it) can I provide? > Here is the fail log just in case you can have a look... /build/pytorch/build$ ninja [1/5]

Bug#1027851: pytorch FTBFS with Python 3.11 as default version

On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 7:12 PM Andreas Tille wrote: > > BTW, I tried to switch on Salsa-CI which failed[2] and I suspect this > might be due to insufficient memory. At least I've found references in > Web that > > make: *** [debian/rules:83: binary] Terminated > ninja: build stopped:

Bug#1027851: pytorch FTBFS with Python 3.11 as default version

On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 3:48 PM Andreas Tille wrote: > > Hi Aron, > > Am Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 02:09:05AM +0800 schrieb Aron Xu: > > > > The packaging work of 1.13.1[1] has started on salsa. We still have a > > failure related to fmtlib before making the package

Bug#1027851: pytorch FTBFS with Python 3.11 as default version

Hi On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 1:27 AM Andreas Tille wrote: > > Hi, > > I was checking this bug log and realised, that the "Forwarded" field > links to an old PR[1] that was merged long before this bug was filed. > Checking upstream I realised that the Debian package is lagging behind > upstream

Bug#1029063: anbox-binder issues reported to src:linux/src:dkms

Control: severity -1 normal dkms never risks creating an unbootable environment by exiting with an error during the configuration of the corresponding linux-image-* package when a module fails to build. Even though it looks annoying when the failing dkms packages are not-so-critical to booting

Bug#995014: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#995014: linux/linux-signe-* break zfs-linux autopkgtest: None of the expected "capability" interfaces were detected

Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/12590 I've reported this problem upstream, let's wait for their response. Regards, Aron

Bug#989373:

Control: severity -1 important I'm downgrading this bug to important temporarily to avoid this package to be removed from bullseye. Since we are late in the release freeze, we cannot guarantee the fix to land in time for bullseye, but if that fails let's push a fix in -updates as soon as the

Bug#946497: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#946497: zfs-dkms: module wants to build with gcc instead of kernel's compiler

Control: severity -1 important On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 6:51 PM Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > Followup-For: Bug #946497 > Control: severity -1 serious > > Please depend on gcc if you cannot find a way to use the kernel > compiler. You cannot expect build-essential to be available. > Depending

Bug#955535: Bug #955535: httping: flaky autopkgtest: PING google.com:80

Hi, The two different results are caused by different CI workers - some of our workers at ci.d.n does not have reliable network to public services, in this case to google.com:80, which makes the test result flaky. Would you mind to consider setting up something locally (a small web server) in

Bug#937321: presage: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

Hi, I have uploaded the NMU for removing python sub-packages, and we can wait Matteo to see how to deal with the Python porting. Also I've updated the dh compat to 10 so that the build process can proceed with more parallelism. Regards, Aron On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 10:33 AM Scott Talbert

Bug#920927: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#920927: Bug#920927: zfs-dkms: module FTBFS for i386 kernel

Control: retitile -1 dkms module FTBFS for amd64 kernel + i386 user land Control: severity -1 important On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 5:09 AM Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > On 2019-01-30 20:12, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > > > [Andreas Beckmann] > >> zfs-dkms does not build a kernel module for e.g. the

Bug#915831: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#915831: zfs init file upgrade

On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 1:15 AM Chris Zubrzycki wrote: > > I would like to amend my reply. The files are no longer in the deb, however > they are still listed by dpkg -L zfsutils-linux. I do not understand how the > solution to an ordering issue is to remove needed init files that have been >

Bug#915689: prevent from migrating to testing

Package: rng-tools Version: 5-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid We need to prevent this version of rng-tools from migrating to testing before finding a solution of coordinating with the rng-tools5 package. Aron

Bug#887743:

I've uploaded an NMU to DELAYED/5 queue, with upstream fix https://github.com/att/ast/pull/63/ included. If there it is desired I can reschedule it to sooner. Cheers, Aron

Bug#826994: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#826994: Missing init-script(s)?

Control: severity -1 wishlist Please don't ping-pong here by changing the severity again, wishlist is the final priority set for this bug. I'm not against LSB support, please make it upstream. I think this statement is clear enough. Regards, Aron

Bug#899513: Debian中文团队邮件地址即将失效，可能需要一位DD在5月末前采取行动

我给 alioth-lists 写邮件申请迁移了，先看回复如何。 2018-05-26 14:06 GMT+08:00 Lumin : > (In order to draw attention from admins of debian-chinese team, this > mail is written in Simplified Chinese deliberately.) > > // Encoding: UTF-8, Simplified Chinese > > 致 Debian 中文团队： > > 随着 Alioth

Bug#852552: ocserv: Build fail on arm patch inc

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Phillip Camp wrote: > Package: ocserv > Version: 0.11.6-1~bpo8+1 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) > > Dear Maintainer, > > build is failing for arm have

Bug#811872: [Debian-zh-dev] Bug#811872: Bug#811872: #811872 fqterm: FTBFS with GCC 6: no matching function for call to

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 1:28 AM, Boyuan Yang <073p...@gmail.com> wrote: > > * Did not touch debhelper compat version and cdbs buildsystem. Those > changes would be too large and can be postponed. > I've changed the compat to 9 and uploaded to unstable, such change looks harmless to the package

Bug#811872: [Debian-zh-dev] Bug#811872: #811872 fqterm: FTBFS with GCC 6: no matching function for call to

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:34 PM, Boyuan Yang <073p...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Aron, > > 2016-10-25 21:23 GMT+08:00 Aron Xu <a...@debian.org>: >> If you are willing to maintain this package under the team, I can >> sponsor the upload. > > There are many wor

Bug#811872: [Debian-zh-dev] Bug#811872: #811872 fqterm: FTBFS with GCC 6: no matching function for call to

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Boyuan Yang <073p...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear debian-chinese folks, > > I intend to prepare a minimal NMU for package `fqterm' in recent days > to fix RC bugs and allow fqterm to enter Stretch. > > The package `fqterm' is team-maintained by Debian Chinese Team. The

Bug#835992: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#835992: 835992

We met some problem when testing zfs-linux at the time, it's fixed and uploaded now. Cheers, Aron

Bug#834331: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#834331: ibus: FTBFS in testing (tests last forever)

Hi, I'm not able to reproduce the problem in a pbuilder environment, build log attached. Cheers, Aron On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 10:15 PM, Santiago Vila wrote: > Package: ibus > Version: 1.5.11-1 > Severity: serious > > Dear maintainer: > > I tried to build this package with

Bug#809284: ocserv: FTBFS: ocpasswd-args.h:1:1: error: unterminated comment

Hi Chris, I'm not able to reproduce this problem in an up-to-date clean sid chroot, so what's wrong? Thanks, Aron

Bug#804473: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#804473: Bug#804473: libzhuyin: FTBFS: stderr.. recompile with -fPIC

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 7:01 PM, ChangZhuo Chen wrote: > Control: tags -1 pending > > On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 07:23:29PM +, Chris West (Faux) wrote: >> Source: libzhuyin >> Version: 1.0.2-1 >> Severity: serious >> Justification: fails to build from source >> Tags: sid stretch

Bug#796731: freecontact: FTBFS on mips (test suite failure)

On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi mips porters, > > could anybody please find a more powerful machine to build the rdepends > libfreecontact-perl and python-freecontact. > > Alternatively I would decide to exclude mips architecture for > libfreecontact

Bug#781232: Bug#766884: libxml2 broken in sid for months already

On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > On Sat, 5 Sep 2015, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > >> I'm not the maintainer, but I think that it is probably cleaner to >> have testing version = stable version until this bug is fixed (it > > No, absolutely not. We’re in the

Bug#798279: mpc: FTBFS undefined reference to `subunit_test_start'

Package: src:mpc Severity: serious Version: 0.27-1 mpc fails to build with current Sid, with following message: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/libcheck.a(check_log.o): In function `subunit_lfun': (.text+0x584): undefined reference to `subunit_test_start'

Bug#766884: Bug#781232: Bug#766884: libxml2 broken in sid for months already

On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Sat, 05 Sep 2015, Vincent Lefevre wrote: >> My argument is that: >> >> 1. stable must not have security issues, i.e. all security issues >>should be fixed ASAP. AFAIK, security issues in stable are >>generally

Bug#781232: Bug#766884: libxml2 broken in sid for months already

ribed to > debian-xml-sgml-p...@lists.alioth.debian.org... I just discovered your > reply by chance. > > On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, Aron Xu wrote: >> Let's reopen #766884 for tracking, it's not really fixed, but just >> avoided. Unfortunately #781232 is opened. I would lik

Bug#766884: Bug#781232: Bug#766884: libxml2 broken in sid for months already

On Saturday, September 5, 2015, Raphael Hertzog <hert...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 04 Sep 2015, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > On 2015-09-04 13:59:02 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > > On Fri, 04 Sep 2015, Aron Xu wrote: > > > > I don't want

Bug#766884: libxml2 broken in sid for months already

Control: reopen 766884 Let's reopen #766884 for tracking, it's not really fixed, but just avoided. Unfortunately #781232 is opened. I would like to block this version to testing as it's not the proper way of fixing the problem (but it is indeed the most straightforward way of avoiding it).

Bug#787312: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#787312: pycangjie is FTBFS

. (and then we can try and figure out whether it is reproducible or not) Would be nicer if you can release a minor update with this patch included, ;-) Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas

Bug#782452: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#782452: Help to sponsor libcangjie to fix 782452 in Jessie

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 8:25 AM, ChangZhuo Chen czc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Please help to sponsor libcangjie [0] to fix issue 782352 [1], thanks. The unblock request for this version is in 782506 [2], and it needs to be in unstable before before the 9:52 UTC dinstall on Wednesday to

Bug#775888: virtualbox: CVE-2014-6588 CVE-2014-6589 CVE-2014-6590 CVE-2014-6595 CVE-2015-0418 CVE-2015-0427

I'll check, if that's not too complicated I'll do it. Cheers, Aron -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#775888: virtualbox: CVE-2014-6588 CVE-2014-6589 CVE-2014-6590 CVE-2014-6595 CVE-2015-0418 CVE-2015-0427

to security-master, I'll take care of the update. Cheers, Moritz -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#750593: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#750593: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#769242: Bug#769242: Bug#769242: samba: FTBFS in jessie/i386

On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Ivo De Decker iv...@debian.org wrote: Control: tags -1 patch Hi Jelmer, On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 02:29:29PM +0100, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: The release team decided to mark 750593 as jessie-ignore, because it doesn't seem likely that this can be fixed

Bug#768149: [Pkg-ime-devel] ibus-table-extraphrase: RC, remove this? (Chinese related data)

Please go ahead with the rebuild or just request a binNMU. Thanks! Aron -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#759832:

Control: tags 759832 - pending Haven't seen the package in sponsor queue, remove the pending tag. Cheers, Aron -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#765722: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#765722: CVE-2014-3660 libxml2 billion laugh variant

Hi, I'm preparing 2.9.2 for jessie, and for stable/oldstable I'll work on them after the upload of 2.9.2. Thanks, Aron -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#754199: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#754199: librime: FTBFS on armel: std::future is broken

=librimearch=armelver=1.1%2Bdfsg-2stamp=1404754412 This is blocking the librime transition. Emilio In such case, do you mind us uploading new upstream releases of fcitx-rime/ibus-rime into unstable right now? -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ

Bug#750623: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#750623: Bug#750623: What is the hold-up of uploadin new package

On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 1:33 AM, GUO Yixuan culu@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 03:39:39PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: Hi, Why are not we uploading the new librime? Osamu I'm just waiting for a confirmation on the librime-dev = librime1-dev renaming, from Aron, as we

Bug#747309: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#747309: CVE-2014-0191

/usn/usn-2214-2/ I tried to update the package when the first USN comes out and noticed there's action from Ubuntu Security team for regression, so the update was held back. Now I'll try to deal with the update as soon as possible. Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc

Bug#732407: libvigraimpex: FTBFS on mipsel (timeout)

On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:50 AM, Andreas Metzler ametz...@bebt.de wrote: On 2013-12-17 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: Source: libvigraimpex Version: 1.9.0+dfsg-7 [...] libvigraimpex FTBFS on a mipsel buildd:

Bug#715568: Please do not use --disable-ibus

for super-space usage. Let me figure out it as a separate bug. Guess this means missing ibus-gjs on Debian? -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#715568: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#720071: Bug#715568: Please do not use --disable-ibus

On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org wrote: Hi, On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 02:18:50PM +0800, Aron Xu wrote: On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org wrote: Hi #715568, Changed path of dbus is related following commit: https://github.com/ibus

Bug#715568: [Pkg-ime-devel] Follow-up: gnome-shell: Please do not use --disable-ibus

-- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#715568: [Pkg-ime-devel] Follow-up: gnome-shell: Please do not use --disable-ibus

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Aron Xu happyaron...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Please don't rush to removing that option, though I agree we need to remove that soon. I think before doing that we need at least test them locally without using --disable-ibus? Also we need to check if removing

Bug#715568: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#715568: Gnome 3.8 packages have disbale_ibus

http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ime-devel -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#713617: Bug #713617 presage: FTBFS: ld: ./.libs/libscintilla.a(libscintilla_la-PlatGTK.o): undefined reference to symbol 'lroundf@@GLIBC_2.2.5'

I think appending `-lm -lgmodule-2.0' to gprompter_LDADD would work this out. -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#717509: sheepdog: FTBFS on !x86 architectures

code 2 make: *** [build-arch] Error 2 Full logs: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=sheepdog -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#713783: Bug #713783 ns3: FTBFS: build hangs

be the problem of failing the build. -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#715531: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#715531: libxml2: CVE-2013-2877

fixed 715531 libxml2/2.9.1+dfsg1-2 thanks This problem does not exist in 2.9.1, it's some of the last commits that makes up the release of 2.9.1. I'll have a look at wheezy then. -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Bug#715568: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#715568: Regarding Mozc Icon on the system tray with IBus 1.5.x/gnome-shell 3.8.x

? ibus-mozc is maintained in mozc source code and the package isn't maintained by pkg-ime, so the patch needs go there. -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#713146: downgrade severity for the moment

Control: severity -1 important I'm downgrading the severity to important for the moment to allow testing migration as I see the impact of this issue is quite limited. Thanks, Aron -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Bug#709921: im-config: cannot detect IM module files correctly

On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org wrote: Hi, Here, I installed fcitx to wheezy while installing 0.22-2 of im-config. I do not see the problem. $ set|grep GTK GTK_IM_MODULE=fcitx $ set|grep fcitx GTK_IM_MODULE=fcitx QT4_IM_MODULE=fcitx XMODIFIERS=@im=fcitx $

Bug#709921: im-config: cannot detect IM module files correctly

Am I correct? $ im-config -d + shift + '[' -n '' ']' + '[' X = X ']' + '[' '!' -x /usr/bin/zenity ']' + '[' x:0 = x ']' ++ active_im ++ '[' '!' -r /home/aron/.xinputrc ']' ++ check_md5sum /home/aron/.xinputrc ++ '[' -r /home/aron/.xinputrc ']' +++ head -n -1 /home/aron/.xinputrc +++ md5sum +++

Bug#701381: busybox: diff for NMU version 1:1.20.0-8.1

) + + -- Aron Xu a...@debian.org Sun, 02 Jun 2013 17:59:36 +0800 + busybox (1:1.20.0-8) unstable; urgency=low * grep-fix-grep--Fw-not-respecting-the--w-option.patch - implement diff -Nru busybox-1.20.0/debian/patches/eglibc-2.17.patch busybox-1.20.0/debian/patches/eglibc-2.17.patch --- busybox-1.20.0

Bug#701381: busybox: diff for NMU version 1:1.20.0-8.1

On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote: 02.06.2013 14:25, Aron Xu wrote: Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for busybox (versioned as 1:1.20.0-8.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/3. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. I'm still waiting

Bug#709921: im-config: cannot detect IM module files correctly

On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org wrote: HI, II think I figured out. [...] So I should change these new dorectories for new multiarch packages to: /usr/lib/*/gtk-2.0/*/immodules/im-fcitx.so /usr/lib/*/gtk-3.0/*/immodules/im-fcitx.so Was this directory change

Bug#709921: im-config: cannot detect IM module files correctly

On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org wrote: Hi, On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 09:57:46PM +0800, Aron Xu wrote: On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org wrote: HI, II think I figured out. [...] So I should change these new dorectories for new

Bug#709921: im-config: cannot detect IM module files correctly

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org wrote: I uploaded one for unstable. Please check what I am doing is right. If it is good, I will backport this. Osamu Seems GTK_IM_MODULE still show up as xim, and QT4_IM_MODULE is correct. But I don't know what's wrong with GTK.

Bug#709921: im-config: cannot detect IM module files correctly

Package: im-config Version: 0.21 Severity: serious The problem is that im-config quits when trying to detect IM module files that is written in data/??_*.rc, so no IM module is set correctly and all are falling back to XIM. For example in data/22_fcitx.rc at line 16 and 17, there are two lines

Bug#709934: libchewing: FTBFS on sparc

/test' -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#709352: FTBFS on all non-x86 architectures

, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#701413:

This patch should be fixing the problem: https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/saucy/proxychains/saucy/download/head:/600ftbfsgetnameinfo.-20121202114114-afglc47iyr43rsxi-4/600-ftbfs-getnameinfo.patch -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ

Bug#705722: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#705722: libxml2: CVE-2013-1969

___ debian-xml-sgml-pkgs mailing list debian-xml-sgml-p...@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-xml-sgml-pkgs -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Bug#703933: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#703933: libxslt: CVE-2012-6139

Hi, Please go ahead with NMU, and thank you very much!

Bug#700988: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#700988: librime: FTBFS on 32-bit architectures: .symbols discrepancies

Thanks for spotting the FTBFS! I've CC'ed Yunqiang, who uploaded this version. The symbols file really needs to use (c++) tags, but not plain symbols. -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#700815: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#700815: fcitx: doesn't start due to library problem

Hi, I wonder what's the version of your fcitx-libs package? This looks like you haven't upgrade that package properly. $ grep FcitxXDGMakeDirUser debian/*.symbols debian/fcitx-libs.symbols: FcitxXDGMakeDirUser@Base 4.2.7 -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ

Bug#700076: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#700076: ibus: non-functional, setup breaks

On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote: Hi, On Mi, 13 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote: Here is a relevant commit, though I'm not sure this is the whole story: https://github.com/ibus/ibus/commit/53d33ec4e6ad41a116f25cfa7ce12e04f6f93752 Seen that, it is huge

Bug#700076: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#700076: ibus: non-functional, setup breaks

On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:32 PM, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote: On Mi, 13 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote: Do you think uploading as something like 1.5.1a.is.1.4.2 will work? Should work I guess, if you really want to avoid epochs. Just try with dpkg --compare-version 1.5.1-2 lt

Bug#700076: [Pkg-ime-devel] ibus: non-functional, setup breaks

On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote: Hi Aron, On Di, 12 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote: It seems to be quite difficult to deal with current situation after my checking into details of the whole stack because, ibus 1.5 series depends extensively on gobject

Bug#700076: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#700076: Bug#700076: ibus: non-functional, setup breaks

On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Toni Mueller supp...@oeko.net wrote: On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 02:46:07PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: On Mi, 13 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote: - separate IME for different windows is working? AFAIK this feature is removed, but not simply caused by bug. Ok

Bug#700076: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#700076: Bug#700076: Bug#700076: Bug#700076: ibus: non-functional, setup breaks

that this ibus 1.5 was not tested *at*all*??? Frankly, I haven't tested it in very detail since Fedora 18 has been released with this version. But it turns out that 1.5.1 (already an update to 1.5) is still not quite working, let's try to figure issues out and work with upstream for fixes. -- Regards, Aron

Bug#700076: [Pkg-ime-devel] ibus: non-functional, setup breaks

? -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#700076: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#700076: ibus: non-functional, setup breaks

? AFAIK this feature is removed, but not simply caused by bug. -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#700076: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#700076: ibus: non-functional, setup breaks

. The option has been hidden in ibus-setup, but I'm worry that whether ibus 1.5 itself has removed the capability. Here is a relevant commit, though I'm not sure this is the whole story: https://github.com/ibus/ibus/commit/53d33ec4e6ad41a116f25cfa7ce12e04f6f93752 -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Bug#700076: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#700076: Bug#700076: ibus: non-functional, setup breaks

On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 2:21 AM, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote: On Sa, 09 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote: But there are still three problems I see: - when *left*clicking on the icon in the gnome top bar, a window pops up which has two part: upper part: configuration

Bug#700076: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#700076: Bug#700076: Bug#700076: Bug#700076: ibus: non-functional, setup breaks

. A direct result is that if you have installed ibus using apt-get, then you must log out and re-login to the desktop environment, so that during the initialization process of DE dconf-service is very likely to exist, and ibus can suceed in reading from it. -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#700076: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#700076: ibus: non-functional, setup breaks

On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote: Hi Aron, On Sa, 09 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote: The problem seems to be a easy one, just install gir1.2-ibus-1.0 and ibus-setup/ibus-daemon will work without problem. I'll upload new version very soon. I just saw

Bug#700076: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#700076: Bug#700076: ibus: non-functional, setup breaks

Hi Norbert, Can you please try to run dconf update as root? As to see whether a file named /etc/dconf/db/ibus get created. Thank you. On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Aron Xu happyaron...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote: Hi Aron

Bug#700076: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#700076: Bug#700076: ibus: non-functional, setup breaks

On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote: Hi Aron, On Sa, 09 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote: Can you please try to run dconf update as root? As to see whether a file named /etc/dconf/db/ibus get created. Yes, I have now /etc/dconf/db/ibus /etc

Bug#700076: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#700076: Bug#700076: ibus: non-functional, setup breaks

On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote: Hi Aron, On Sa, 09 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote: Yes, I pushed another patch to git, can you try it? I see no problem so far. getting better. I have now: - ibus* 1.5.1-2~1 (your version -2 from git) - mozc

Bug#700076: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#700076: Bug#700076: Bug#700076: ibus: non-functional, setup breaks

On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Praveen A prav...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/2/9 Aron Xu happyaron...@gmail.com: Yes, I pushed another patch to git, can you try it? I see no problem so far. http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-ime/ibus.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/correct-type-of-shortcuts.patch

Bug#700076: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#700076: Bug#700076: Bug#700076: ibus: non-functional, setup breaks

On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Praveen A prav...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/2/9 Aron Xu happyaron...@gmail.com: You forgot to tell me what's your locale - the one that doesn't work, ;-) My locale is ml_IN (it was in the log - ValueError: unknown locale: ml_IN). Now it is failing even with en_IN

Bug#700076: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#700076: ibus: non-functional, setup breaks

already done for 1.4.99*) because when it breaks people think that's normal. This is a shame, I'd like to change it. -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#700076: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#700076: ibus: non-functional, setup breaks

-ime-devel -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#700076: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#700076: Bug#700076: ibus: non-functional, setup breaks

have 1.2.x something. Sure, it wasn't uploaded because I have to go and travel by train as mentioned in my previous mail... -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#700076: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#700076: ibus: non-functional, setup breaks

...@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ime-devel -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#700076: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#700076: Bug#700076: ibus: non-functional, setup breaks

not possible. -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#700076: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#700076: Bug#700076: ibus: non-functional, setup breaks

postinst? And, what is it? I would like to get my Japanese input running again ;-) Thanks Norbert Be a bit more patient, :-) I've started working on ibus-anthy already. -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe

Bug#697270: PC 32-bit programs fails to work on amd64

://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-trunk/ or latest Firefox, try http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/latest/ All of them are available under both 32bit and 64bit x86 architectures. -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ

Bug#697270: PC 32-bit programs fails to work on amd64

not exist. I agree it is not a user-friendly error message which can cause misunderstanding, but that message should not be fixed by Debian as Russ has given the details. -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble

Bug#694301: tag as pending

tags 694301 + pending tags 691656 + pending thanks I have committed necessary changes to Debian's gnome-settings-daemon and gnome-control-center repository to disable IBus integration for experimental. -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org

  1   2   3   >