this particular issue out of the too-hard-basket and put it back
in
several times already... thanks for taking a crack at it.
No problem. Feel free to revert the change if it's causing problems.
--
John Wright j...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
for testing this stuff). It's possible
there was a short-lived bug in the kernel itself, causing some corrupt
representation of its log buffer.
On 2013-10-20 10:29 PM, John Wright wrote:
Hi Alex,
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:12:39PM -0400, Alex Vanderpol wrote:
Package: makedumpfile
Version
also help to know the exact kernel version, and access to a dbg package
if it's not a stock kernel.
Sorry for the issue and thanks for the report!
--
John Wright j...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
?
Interesting. That's a possibility, but tracking down the specific
difference in Ubuntu's and Debian's toolchains is going to be tricky.
Does it work in Ubuntu with Debian's kernel, or vice versa?
--
John Wright j...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
-2.6.38.3 root=/dev/mapper/rootvg-root ro
Thanks for the bug report. You're right, the package should not fail to
configure. I'll modify the init script so that it prints a warning and
exits with status 0 in this case.
--
John Wright j
--
Ran 6 tests in 0.011s
FAILED (errors=1)
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
Crap. Sorry. Will fix this tonight.
--
John Wright j...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
to
fight with git to make sure it pushed the right thing, and I can't
upload anyway.
If someone wants to upload with the patch that would be great.
I just committed and pushed it. I'm planning on working on #586021 in
the next few days, so I'll hold off actually uploading for now.
John
--
John
reassign 562398 libdebian-installer4-udeb
found 562398 0.69
retitle 562398 libdebian-installer: strange behavior with more than one version
of a package in a Packages file
affects 562398 + anna
tags 562398 + patch
thanks
On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 03:08:08PM -0600, John Wright wrote:
Specifically
/net-retriever/+bug/234486
--
John Wright j...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
for now just in case. :)
Thanks,
John Wright
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell
of this I'll adopt this package and
(probably) to collab-maint.
Great! I'm glad it will be getting the attention it deserves. :)
--
John Wright j...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
tags 526346 + patch
thanks
Hello,
The build system in this version of apr doesn't work with libtool 2.x.
It's fixed in the upstream Subversion repository. The attached patch is
a port of the relevant commits in upstream svn.
Thanks,
--
John Wright j...@debian.org
#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch
details.
To get pkg-config, see http://pkg-config.freedesktop.org/.
See `config.log' for more details.
make[1]: *** [binary-modules] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/xtables-addons'
make: *** [kdist_build] Error 2
BUILD FAILED!
I have attached a patch.
Thanks,
--
John Wright j
My patch won't apply, since I ran into this while attempting a backport.
Sorry about that. Still, the solution is simple enough: add pkg-config
to the dependency list of xtables-addons-source.
--
John Wright j...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
package up the latest upstream version this weekend.
--
John Wright j...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 08:42:26AM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
John, hi,
John Wright wrote:
The above problem is actually the same as bug 501207. However, with
that patch applied, I get the following problem starting destar:
snip
The attached patch fixes the SyntaxError.
Thanks
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 09:07:10AM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
John Wright wrote:
Yes, lenny will have both python2.4 and python2.5. One workaround, at
least for the compiler.ast.From problem, would be to run destar with
#!/usr/bin/python2.4 instead of #!/usr/bin/python. But I think
fixes the SyntaxError.
--
John Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- destar-0.2.2.orig/page_owner_cdr.ptl
+++ destar-0.2.2/page_owner_cdr.ptl
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@
return render()
-def cdrShowResults [html] (where=[], limit, offset, total = 0, field=_(Time_of_start), order=DESC):
+def cdrShowResults
.
--
John Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
variable 'deps_info' referenced before assignment
Agh! This is my fault. I tested with and without --warn-on-others, but
apparently I didn't test without --apt. I'm about to commit the fix.
Sorry about that.
--
John Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 441189 +patch
thanks
Hello,
Looks like you need to add libnm-util-dev to the list of
Build-Depends. The attached patch fixes the build for me.
--
John Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -r e7f4f0eef040 -r 00874119ee55 debian/control
--- a/debian/control Mon Sep 10 00:53:39 2007 -0600
+++ b
tags 441188 +patch
thanks
Hello,
Adding libnm-util-dev to the Build-Depends fixes the build for me.
--
John Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -r eeb406871960 -r d938290990ac debian/control
--- a/debian/control Mon Sep 10 01:25:52 2007 -0600
+++ b/debian/control Mon Sep 10 01:32:07 2007 -0600
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 12:49:11AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
tag 359095 patch
thanks
John Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] (15/02/2007):
tags + patch
thanks
You were missing the bug number, your patch didn't appear (e.g. on the
list of RC bugs).
Whoops! Thanks for correcting
tags 431248 +pending
thanks
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 06:09:43PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 04:45:44PM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
I'm getting the following messages after upgrading piuparts today:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 07:18:03PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 11:15:12AM -0600, John Wright wrote:
tags 431248 +pending
thanks
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 06:09:43PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 04:45:44PM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote
Package: pciutils
Version: 1:2.2.4~pre4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.5
pciutils depends on libpci2, but libpci2 is of lower priority.
According to Policy 2.5, Packages must not depend on packages with
lower priority values (excluding build-time dependencies). You
mentioned in
tags + patch
thanks
Package: dh-kpatches
Version: 0.100.1
Severity: grave
Tags: experimental
Justification: renders package unusable
I built a kernel-patch package for the hard disk queue freezing patch
that is used with the IBM ThinkPad HDAPS support code. It was built with
dh-kpatches
This seems to be caused by the fix for #410067. After looking at that
bug, it seems to me that these files really should be in python-numpy
and not in python-numpy-dev. Or maybe f2py ought to go into
python-numpy-dev?
John
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Whoops, I forgot to include a regex fix in lib/TWiki.cfg in the last
patch. Here's an updated patch.
This time, I've attached the file that goes into debian/patches rather
than a patch that adds a patch to debian/patches. Sorry if the last one
caused any confusion...
Thanks,
John Wright
will
be applied.
Thanks,
John Wright
=== added file
'debian/patches/upstream-Codev.SecurityAlertSecureFileUploads.patch'
--- debian/patches/upstream-Codev.SecurityAlertSecureFileUploads.patch
1970-01-01 00:00:00 +
+++ debian/patches/upstream-Codev.SecurityAlertSecureFileUploads.patch
2006-08
tags 384112 +patch
thanks
I have attached a patch that updates freeloader to the new Python
policy, which ought to fix this bug.
Thanks,
John Wright
=== added file 'debian/pycompat'
--- debian/pycompat 1970-01-01 00:00:00 +
+++ debian/pycompat 2006-08-24 00:16:43 +
@@ -0,0 +1,1
tags 383823 +patch
thanks
This seems to be fixed in version 2.2.1 upstream. I've attached a patch
that patches the affected file up to the version in 2.2.1. It works for
me.
Thanks,
John Wright
=== added file 'debian/patches/gap_thumbnail-free.diff'
--- debian/patches/gap_thumbnail-free.diff
Daniel Schepler wrote:
Package: joy2key
Version: 1.6.1-2
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
checking for X... libraries , headers in standard search path
...
i486-linux-gnu-gcc -Wall -g -O2 -o joy2key joy2key.o -L -lX11
joy2key.o: In function `argtokey':
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
severity 349611 grave
thanks
Hi!
This even breaks when dhelp isn't installed, making the package
uninstallable at all. The complete postinst script isn't needed, the
complete doc-base file for joy2key is wrong, none of the mentioned
targets within there does
Package: xine-lib
Followup-For: Bug #337997
I have attached a patch which removes the xlibs-dev build-dependency and adds
the specific packages actually needed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386
Package: floatbg
Followup-For: Bug #346396
I have attached a patch which removes the xlibs-dev build dependency and adds
the specific packages actually needed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Package: xjig
Followup-For: Bug #346404
I have attached a patch to replace the xlibs-dev Build-Depends with the correct
packages.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to
Strange, it builds fine for me on both ia64 and x86 with this patch.
This looks suspiciously like bug #292953. I've been working on version
0.60.3-7.1, which includes (most of) a patch submitted to that bug. For
some reason, although that patch includes the change that I submitted
above, it was
38 matches
Mail list logo
