Bug#422909: Bourne shell assistance needed for Bug #422909

2007-05-09 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > The problem here is that if schroot-listmounts segfaults (the trigger > in this case) or returns an error, the script continues without any > indication of the fact, despite "set -e" being in effect. In this bug > this results in a failure to umount a set of mounted filesystems, and > then

Bug#381350: apt-listbugs: ..my crash looks like this:

2007-04-09 Thread Junichi Uekawa
At Mon, 9 Apr 2007 03:26:47 +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 07:08:47 +0900, Junichi wrote in message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > Fetched 98.4kB in 51s (1927B/s) > > > Reading package lists... Done > > > Reading package fields... Done > > > Reading package status... D

Bug#418286: this bug probably better stay with apt-listbugs

2007-04-08 Thread Junichi Uekawa
reassign 418286 apt-listbugs thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#418286: apt-listbugs: execution expired (Timeout::Error)

2007-04-08 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > When executing dist-upgrade, I got this message: > > Retrieving bug reports... 0%/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/timeout.rb:54:in > `rbuf_fill': execution expired (Timeout::Error) > from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/timeout.rb:56:in `timeout' > from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/timeout.rb:76:in `timeout' >

Bug#381350: apt-listbugs: ..my crash looks like this:

2007-04-08 Thread Junichi Uekawa
> > Fetched 98.4kB in 51s (1927B/s) > Reading package lists... Done > Reading package fields... Done > Reading package status... Done > Retrieving bug reports... 0%/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/timeout.rb:54:in `rbuf_fill': > execution expired (Timeout::Error) > from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/timeout.rb:56:i

Bug#418286: BTS server overloaded. Re: Bug#418286: apt-listbugs: execution expired (Timeout::Error)

2007-04-08 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > When executing dist-upgrade, I got this message: > > Retrieving bug reports... 0%/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/timeout.rb:54:in > `rbuf_fill': execution expired (Timeout::Error) > from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/timeout.rb:56:in `timeout' > from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/timeout.rb:76:in `timeout' >

Bug#416481: [Pbuilder-maint] Bug#416481: Removes backup file of /etc/pbuilderrc

2007-03-28 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > = > export LANG=C > aptitude install pbuilder > cp /etc/pbuilderrc /etc/pbuilderrc.bak > echo >> /etc/pbuilderrc.bak > > ls -l /etc/pbu* > > aptitude purge pbuilder > ls -l /etc/pbu* > = > > I wanted a backup of my pb

Bug#416481: [Pbuilder-maint] Bug#416481: Removes backup file of /etc/pbuilderrc

2007-03-28 Thread Junichi Uekawa
reassign 416481 dpkg thanks > Justification: causes non-serious data loss > > I attach a log file of a script session. The commands were > > > = > export LANG=C > aptitude install pbuilder > cp /etc/pbuilderrc /etc/pbuilderrc.bak > echo >> /etc/pbuilderrc.ba

Bug#409438: libecasound2.2-dev: missing dependency on libasound2-dev

2007-02-03 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > The ecasound2.2 package uses the following code in debian/rules to make > libecasound2.2-dev's dependency on libasound2-dev conditional on > architecture: > > ifeq (linux,$(DEB_HOST_ARCH_OS)) >dh_gencontrol -a -- -Vlibasound2-dev="libasound2-dev" > else >dh_gencontrol -a > e

Bug#408175: Needs replaces gonzui

2007-01-23 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Package: liblangscan-ruby Version: 1.2+cvs20061228-2 Severity: serious apt-get dist-upgrade stops with liblangscan-ruby overwriting files from gonzui <= 1.2. Conflicts is not enough, please add Replaces as well. regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project --

Bug#403164: apt-listbugs: some debug info

2006-12-15 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > However, I can't *always* reproduce it. Sometimes apt-listbugs > just work as expected. Fortunately I was able to dump a full > debug output from What's your proxy? regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE

Bug#403164: W: unclosed token

2006-12-15 Thread Junichi Uekawa
severity 403164 normal thanks At Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:50:04 +1100, Amos Shapira wrote: > > Package: apt-listbugs > Version: 0.0.69 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > *** Please type your report below this line *** > For a few weeks now apt-listbugs keeps giving the fo

Bug#402887: linux-uvc-source: doesn't build on 2.6.19

2006-12-14 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > I'm using vanilla 2.6.19 (2.6.19 is not in Debian yet) and linux-uvc > doesn't build. yes, already known. regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Bug#395562: apt-listbugs: Retrieving bug reports... 0% ... E: uninitialized constant Factory::BugsFactory::SOAP

2006-10-27 Thread Junichi Uekawa
tags 395562 + moreinfo thanks Hi, Thanks for your report. > apt-listbugs breaks the installation/upgrade process for every packet. > The complete message shown is: > > Recupero delle segnalazioni di bug... 0% ... E: uninitialized constant > Factory::BugsFactory::SOAP > E: Il sottoprocesso if d

Bug#389681: apt-listbugs: Bug still exists in version 0.0.57

2006-10-25 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > But apt-listbugs now reclaims about http_proxy is set and aborts, > which is not nice: > > # apt-listbugs list apt-listbugs > /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:395:in `parse_options': E: sanity check failed: > environment variable http_proxy is set and soap_use_proxy is not 'on'. > (RuntimeError) >

Bug#390126: initscripts: chrooted() is not performing a valid check for chroot

2006-10-18 Thread Junichi Uekawa
retitle 390126 initscripts: chrooted() is not performing a valid check for chroot reopen 390126 Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> thanks Hi, +chrooted() { + if [ -r /proc/1/root ]; then +return 1 + fi + return 0 +} This check, which tests if the real '/' of PID1 is re

Bug#390126: [Pbuilder-maint] Bug#392136: pbuilder: sysvinit's mounted lib/init/rw prevents cleanup

2006-10-17 Thread Junichi Uekawa
found 390126 2.86.ds1-33 block 392136 by 390126 thanks Hi, On my system, the following is true, which is scary. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/proc/1# ls root/home/dancer/Mail/inbox -d root/home/dancer/Mail/inbox [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/proc/1# ls /home/dancer/Mail/inbox -d ls: /home/dancer/Mail/inbox: No such f

Bug#392017: apt-listbugs fails upgrade and package installation

2006-10-10 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > To upgrade my system or install packages I have to remove > apt-listbugs; if installed, upgrades/installations fail: > > Retrieving bug reports... 0% ... E: no block given > E: Sub-process if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .* ok > installed'; then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || ( t

Bug#392017: downgrading this bug

2006-10-10 Thread Junichi Uekawa
severity 392017 normal tags 392017 +moreinfo thanks to avoid more people sending additional follow-up info to this bug, which is filed against an old version of apt-listbugs, I'm downgrading this bugreport. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble

Bug#392017: apt-listbugs: fails with "E: no block given", blocks upgrade

2006-10-10 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > In my case, removing the line "Acquire::http::Proxy "false";" from > /etc/apt/apt.conf solved the problem. If you want it to work, as documented in APT manpage, you probably mean Acquire::http::Proxy "DIRECT" regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian

Bug#392017: apt-listbugs: fails with "E: no block given", blocks upgrade

2006-10-10 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > Package: apt-listbugs > Version: 0.0.59 > Severity: grave > > Here is what I get when upgrading from aptitude: Please try 0.0.62 and report back with the new output. regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE

Bug#389681: apt-listbugs: Bug still exists in version 0.0.57

2006-10-06 Thread Junichi Uekawa
found 389681 0.0.59 thanks Hi, > > > Could you try to reproduce with > > > > /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs list apt-listbugs -d > > > Same here, direct connection. Thanks, there was a bug in initialization path that made SOAP processing ignore apt.conf proxy configuration. Should be fixed in

Bug#389681: apt-listbugs: Bug still exists in version 0.0.57

2006-10-06 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > > Have you read the manpage? > > No, at least not the one from the new version :). > I just have done it ... > > > If you have configured proxy in your apt.conf, you don't need to think > > about it, but If you are configuring your proxy with HTTP_PROXY > > variable set, you need to set S

Bug#389681: apt-listbugs: Bug still exists in version 0.0.57

2006-10-05 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > > .58 fixes the issue with http-proxy, please try. > > This is what I get with .58 installed: > > # apt-get upgrade > [..] > 35 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 6 not upgraded. > Need to get 0B/46.0MB of archives. > After unpacking 824kB of additional disk space will be used. >

Bug#389681: 389681is reproducible here

2006-10-05 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > > > > ls -1 /var/cache/apt/archives/reportbug_*.deb | /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs -d > > apt > > The output is attached. > At the end there is: > > Exception `XMLParserError' at /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/xsd/xmlparser/xmlparser.rb:31 > - > unclosed token > Exception: XMLParserError > Exception `Loca

Bug#389681: 389681is reproducible here

2006-10-04 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > Actually it's a different error: > > # LC_ALL=C aptitude install reportbug > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree... Done > Reading extended state information > Initializing package states... Done > Building tag database... Done > The following packages have been kept ba

Bug#389681: apt-listbugs: Bug still exists in version 0.0.57

2006-10-04 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > If the network connection does matter in any way: I have to use a > http-proxy here, the network has no direct routing to the internet. .58 fixes the issue with http-proxy, please try. regasrds, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, em

Bug#389681: Retrieving bug reports... 0% ... E: undefined local variable or method ...

2006-10-03 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > You asked for proxies: There is a squid in the network where I'm > located, which should handle HTTP and FTP. If you have apt proxy config in apt.conf, then it should be fixed now. If you have http_proxy env var set; then you need to also set SOAP_USE_PROXY=on also. regards, ju

Bug#323626: Fixed?

2006-10-02 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > > Version 0.57 still has the problem. > Can you give an example case (package, version, bug #)? apt-listbugs now parses the version number of the bug report and resolved versions so that it will display all bugs that is applicable. regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.

Bug#389681: apt-listbugs: Bug still exists in version 0.0.57

2006-10-02 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > Package: apt-listbugs > Version: 0.0.57 > Followup-For: Bug #389681 > > This bug still exists in version 0.0.57: > > Retrieving bug reports... 0% ... E: undefined local variable or method > `pkg' for Factory::BugsFactory:Module > E: Sub-process if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Stat

Bug#389681: Bug#389952: apt-listbugs: Fails whilke reinstalling packages

2006-09-30 Thread Junichi Uekawa
At Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:10:50 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > Hi, > > > Sorry about this, this was reported as 389681 and fixed in > > 0.0.55, please try again with new version. > > > > > Package: apt-listbugs > > > Version: 0.0.54 > > >

Bug#389681: apt-listbugs: Reports undefined variable and fails

2006-09-28 Thread Junichi Uekawa
For the record. To reproduce this problem with 0.0.54: 1. find a package with no bug registered in the BTS. 2. apt-get install /this package with no bugs/ 3. see the error happen. I added a special-casing now. Sorry for the inconvenience. After upgrading from 0.0.53 to 0.0.54 I get the follo

Bug#389681: apt-listbugs: Reports undefined variable and fails

2006-09-28 Thread Junichi Uekawa
> Lecture de l'état des paquets... Fait > Récupération des rapports de bogue... 0% ... E: undefined local > variable or meth od `pkg' for > Factory::BugsFactory:Module E: Le sous-processus if dpkg -s > apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .* ok > installed

Bug#334697: apt-listbugs needs versioned BTS handling.

2006-09-17 Thread Junichi Uekawa
reopen 334697 retitle 334697 versioned BTS handling thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#334697: QA packages with really high popcon numbers :-)

2006-09-17 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > Indeed. Please see for instance > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=334697 This bugreport sounds like a joke, really. If the goal isn't to 'not release apt-listbugs with etch', this is going to be bad. Note that the load for apt-listbugs is quite huge, and I doubt qa.deb

Bug#385801: FTBFS: Does not build on amd64

2006-09-10 Thread Junichi Uekawa
> This bug seems to be fixed in 0.2.3+0.2.4pre3-2: > >* Add 002_ftbs_64bit_fix.patch: Fix FTBFS on 64-bit platforms > (patch courtesy of Andreas Jochens) > > (which was coincidentally uploaded exactly 37 seconds(!) earlier than this > bug > was reported ;) Heh, verified. closing bug.

Bug#386403: linux-uvc-source: Unable to complete device test with ekiga

2006-09-07 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > I have a Logitech QuickCam Pro 5000. When I attempt to test the device > with ekiga 2.0.2-1, I receive the following: > > "Failed to open the device. Error with the frame size." The version of linux-uvc in Debian is known not to work with Logitech QuickCam Pro 5000, and known to work wit

Bug#385801: FTBFS: Does not build on amd64

2006-09-03 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Package: libodbc++ Version: 0.2.3+0.2.4pre3 Severity: serious I'm not sure if there's some inconsistencies between MS ODBC standard and iODBC (iODBC and unixodbc seems to define SQLLEN and SQLULEN, which is nowhere to be found on Microsoft specs), but it doesn't seem to build. [17:57:11]dancer64

Bug#382756: ecawave - FTBFS: aclocal: command not found

2006-08-13 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > > There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > > > Automatic build of ecawave_1:0.6.1-8 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85 > [...] > > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > > Build-Depends: libecasound2.2-dev (>= 2.4.1-2), libqt3-mt-dev (>= > > 3:3.3.4-4), libkvut

Bug#382756: ecawave - FTBFS: aclocal: command not found

2006-08-13 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > > There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > > > Automatic build of ecawave_1:0.6.1-8 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85 > [...] > > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > > Build-Depends: libecasound2.2-dev (>= 2.4.1-2), libqt3-mt-dev (>= > > 3:3.3.4-4), libkvut

Bug#380571: linux-uvc - FTBFS: Nothing to be done for `binary-arch'.

2006-07-31 Thread Junichi Uekawa
> Package: linux-uvc > Version: 0.1.0-4 > Severity: serious > > There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Please fix P-a-s. There is nothing to build for arch non-i386. > > > Automatic build of linux-uvc_0.1.0-4 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by sbuild/s390 85 > [...] > > /usr/bin/faker

Bug#375931: closed by "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Contents file is empty, where is it gone ?)

2006-07-07 Thread Junichi Uekawa
reopen 375931 retitle 375931 warning message on tail +8, use tail -n +8 thanks At Fri, 7 Jul 2006 09:04:19 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 08:42:30AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=376777 is the root > > cause o

Bug#375931: Contents file is empty, where is it gone ?

2006-07-06 Thread Junichi Uekawa
> > auto-apt update > > Downloading http://ftp.jp.debian.org/debian//dists/unstable > > Contents-amd64.gz ... > > Warning: "+number" syntax is deprecated, please use "-n +number" > > > > put: 0 files, 0 entries done (0 sec) > > FWIW, this works for me, even though I get the same warnings (which

Bug#375931: auto-apt uses obsolete command-line?

2006-06-28 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Package: auto-apt Version: 0.3.20 Severity: serious auto-apt update now fails with: auto-apt update Downloading http://ftp.jp.debian.org/debian//dists/unstable Contents-amd64.gz ... Warning: "+number" syntax is deprecated, please use "-n +number" put: 0 files, 0 entries done (0 sec) regard

Bug#375585: rosegarden-data: missing replaces on rosegarden4

2006-06-26 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Package: rosegarden-data Version: 1:1.2.3-1 Severity: grave Some files overlap, but it's not declaring replaces on rosegarden4. regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl

Bug#372560: cdbs bug, I think

2006-06-11 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, gandalf is failing to build with missing Makefile, but it's most probably because ./configure isn't invoked. Why is cdbs not calling ./configure anymore? regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Bug#361376: verified that the problem still persists

2006-06-10 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, Version: 1.0.12-1 Using gtkhtml, liferea still segfaults intermittently. regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#370210: dpkg: install-info requires English.pm, which is not in perl-base

2006-06-03 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Package: dpkg Version: 1.13.20 Severity: serious dpkg install-info requires English.pm, but that's not included in perl-base, and thus new installations fail. O: Setting up sed (4.1.5-1) ... P: Configuring package sed O: Can't locate English.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/p

Bug#363030: [Pbuilder-maint] Bug#363030: aegis: FTBFS with pbuilder on i386

2006-05-16 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > maybe this is of interest of you. Feel free to close it if you don't > think it's worth working on this issue. Is this ran under fakeroot mode or is it ran under root mode? regards, junichi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble

Bug#358306: FTBFS in unstable: There is no package matching [libgd2-dev]

2006-05-09 Thread Junichi Uekawa
reassign 350704 libgd2-xpm-dev thanks Hi, > > > > d-devlibdeps debian/libgdchart-gd2-noxpm-dev.substvars > > > > libgdchart-gd2-noxpm/libgdc.so.0.11.5 > > > > --> libc6-dev package exists. > > > > --> libfreetype6-dev package exists. > > > > devlibs error: There is no package matching [libgd2-

Bug#358306: FTBFS in unstable: There is no package matching [libgd2-dev]

2006-05-06 Thread Junichi Uekawa
> > > d-devlibdeps debian/libgdchart-gd2-noxpm-dev.substvars > > libgdchart-gd2-noxpm/libgdc.so.0.11.5 > > --> libc6-dev package exists. > > --> libfreetype6-dev package exists. > > devlibs error: There is no package matching [libgd2-dev] and noone provides > > it, please report bug to d-shlib

Bug#360417: bootsplash

2006-04-20 Thread Junichi Uekawa
> but the package still needs to be polished. Right now I'm building the > latest 2.6.16-7 source with the bootsplash patch applied, and in the > next days I'm going to carefully test the package. > > All keep you all informed.. Thanks, looking forward to your progress. regards, juni

Bug#360417: bootsplash

2006-04-09 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, Anyway, we need to find some solution over how to package bootsplash package; we are in a difficult situation where there is no bootsplash package while there is kernel-patch-bootsplash in Debian. At Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:25:24 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > Hi, > > >

Bug#354898: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates?

2006-03-01 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > > I've opened bugs now, I don't know if it hasn't happened before. > > Please Cc' the respective bugs so that we know it's fixed either way. > > > > The possible options that I see are: > > > > 1. audacity/portaudio are removed from Debian > > > > 2. license text is modified so that it cl

Bug#354898: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates?

2006-03-01 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > > Can you please identify yourself as someone who has final authority for > > giving this advice. > > I will be very surprised if Don satisfies that request. No > debian decision is final: we reserve the right to find or admit > bugs in the future, whether coding, usage or licensing. The m

Bug#354899: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates?

2006-03-01 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Package: portaudio Severity: serious I'm filing a bug so that we can remember there is an issue here. regards, junichi At Sun, 19 Feb 2006 20:19:18 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: > > [1 ] > On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Ross Bencina wrote: > > [someone said] > > >Or, if the "request" clause is not

Bug#354898: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates?

2006-03-01 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Package: audacity Severity: serious Hi, I'm filing a bugreport against audacity in case we forget at all. It kind of sneaked in; without a resolution this package should be removed from Debian. regards, junichi > [1 ] > On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Ross Bencina wrote: > > [someone said] > >

Bug#351480: exim4-base fails to install with debootstrap

2006-02-05 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > Looks like adduser 3.81 does falsely assume that uid and gid can be > equal. > > Can you try the following patch? > > --- adduser (revision 458) > +++ adduser (working copy) > @@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ > printf STDERR gtx("No UID/GID pair is available in the range > %d-%d (F

Bug#351331: dvipdfmx NMU broke fontmapsx

2006-02-05 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > > > > It's not a L10n patch. It's a configuration patch for extensible > > framework. Currently your NMU'd dvipdfmx does not provide a extention > > framework without touching dvipdfmx conffile. Which means, if I modify > > its configuration, dpkg will warn you. > > The old version of dv

Bug#351333: cid-x.map is almost empty

2006-02-05 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > > > I've checked, tetex-base, and it provides map files in > > > /usr/share/texmf-tetex/fonts/map/ > > > and has files under > > > /etc/texmf/updmap.d/ > > > > > > Probably ptex-base should provide map files somewhere, > > > so that it can be used by dvipdfmx. > > The way how fonts ar

Bug#351331: NMU: 1:20050831-0.2

2006-02-05 Thread Junichi Uekawa
271468 behavior. +It is required for a non-dpkg controlled configuration file. +(Closes: #351331) + + -- Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 5 Feb 2006 22:48:02 +0900 + dvipdfmx (1:20050831-0.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload dvipdfmx-20050831/debianだけに発

Bug#351331: dvipdfmx NMU broke fontmapsx

2006-02-05 Thread Junichi Uekawa
> > > > To properly fix the problem at hand, dvipdfmx should probably have a > > directory where it reads all configuration sequentially from. > > I think update-dvipdfmx can do that. Where is it? > > > The Debian maintainer of dvipdfmx decided to patch dvipdfmx to support > > it. See Bug#2714

Bug#351480: exim4-base fails to install with debootstrap

2006-02-04 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Package: adduser Version: 3.81 Severity: serious I guess it's a adduser bug; adduser --system --group --home /var/spool/exim4 --no-create-home \ --disabled-login --force-badname Debian-exim > /dev/null is failing due to new adduser. O: Adding system-user for exim (v4)

Bug#314671: comment on your patch re zynaddsubfx

2006-02-04 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, I've stumbled around to this bugreport. > > I think this will fix the bug. However I haven't tested it because I > looked at the surrounding code and decided never to let it run on my > system. > > --- src/main.C~ 2005-12-15 05:23:14.0 + > +++ src/main.C 2005-12-15 05:23

Bug#351333: cid-x.map is almost empty

2006-02-04 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, I've sent to the wrong mail address, resending. > > > You've broken some default font-maps which were provided by dvipdfmx. Put > > > them back. > > > > dvipdfmx package does not contain any font file. Configurations for other > > package must be contained to that package. Otherwise, dvipd

Bug#351333: cid-x.map is almost empty

2006-02-04 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 12:23:02AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > You've broken some default font-maps which were provided by dvipdfmx. Put > > them back. > > dvipdfmx package does not contain any font file. Configurations for other > package must be contain

Bug#351331: dvipdfmx NMU broke fontmapsx

2006-02-04 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > > > Why it needs another config file? > > > Is there any reason that ptex-jisfonts package can't use dvipdfmx.cfg > > > file? > > > > It's a known interface provided by dvipdfmx Debian package. If you're > > breaking it, take both parts. > > Is there any other package that uses the config

Bug#351333: cid-x.map is almost empty

2006-02-04 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > > The current version of dvipdfmx supports separate map files. > If you need to add some font to dvipdfmx, make the separate map file and > then put the name of the fontmap file to /etc/texmf/dvipdfmx.cfg file. > You've broken some default font-maps which were provided by dvipdfmx. Put th

Bug#351331: dvipdfmx NMU broke fontmapsx

2006-02-04 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > Why it needs another config file? > Is there any reason that ptex-jisfonts package can't use dvipdfmx.cfg file? It's a known interface provided by dvipdfmx Debian package. If you're breaking it, take both parts. Keep the feature or fix both parts, please. Do NMUs sensibly. regards,

Bug#351333: cid-x.map is almost empty

2006-02-03 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Package: dvipdfmx Version: 1:20050831-0.1 Severity: grave justification: renders package unusable Hi, what's happened to cid-x map contents? Compared to the version in sarge, it's mostly too empty to find any font. Is there a new mechanism to find the fonts? I noticed while debugging a problem

Bug#351331: dvipdfmx NMU broke fontmapsx

2006-02-03 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Package: dvipdfmx Version: 1:20050831-0.1 Severity: grave Justification, breaks other packages /etc/texmf/dvipdfm/fontmapsx isn't being read by dvipdfmx anymore, which breaks Japanese fonts, ptex-jisfonts package This is a regression of 271468 which is probably: debian/patch/fontmappsx.diff

Bug#346613: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

2006-01-15 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, Will be rejected unless it's properly tested. regards, junichi > diff -u canna-3.7p3/debian/control canna-3.7p3/debian/control > --- canna-3.7p3/debian/control > +++ canna-3.7p3/debian/control > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ > Section: utils > Priority: optional >

Bug#346613: patches for some xlibs-dev bugs

2006-01-13 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > canna 346613 (no replacement needed) That sounds a bit fishy, but reviewing the code, it might actually not be needed. Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.59), xlibs-dev, xutils, dpatch, po-debconf, autoconf2.13, ptex-bin My comment wrt this mass patch post is that I w

Bug#346613: canna: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev

2006-01-08 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, Mitsuka-san, could you prepare a fixed package? I'll sponsor you. > Package: canna > Version: 3.7p3-2 > Severity: serious > > Hello, > > This is a serious bug filed against your package because it > build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is > no longer ava

Bug#262627: [Pbuilder-maint] Bug#344089: testsuite failure with experimental upgrade

2005-12-19 Thread Junichi Uekawa
another failure happens with 262627 where inetd is started within chroot. It should be fixed on inetd side. regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P

Bug#342749: Bugs are mixed up

2005-12-10 Thread Junichi Uekawa
forwarded 342794 [EMAIL PROTECTED] notforwarded 342749 thanks Hi, 342749 is marked as forwarded, but I think you want 342794 (mutt bug) thanks, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe

Bug#325449: Checked emacs-wiki, and it was innocent.

2005-12-10 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, I've noticed after cloning that cgi.el is fixed. It was just elserv that was broken. Sorry for the noise. regards, junichi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325449: update info

2005-12-09 Thread Junichi Uekawa
clone 325449 -1 clone 325449 -2 reassign -1 emacs-wiki reassign -2 muse-el retitle -1 emacs-wiki: cgi.el contains construct that does not work with emacs22 retitle -2 muse-el: cgi.el contains construct that does not work with emacs22 thanks I'm cloning the bugreport to the respective packages, sin

Bug#325449: #325449: emacs-snapshot parses '?\ ' differently from emacs21?

2005-12-09 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > > elserv.el > > elserv-url-decode-string() > > (push ?\ decoded) > > > > is breaking in emacs-snapshot. > > > > emacs-snapshot probably wants > > (push ?\\ decoded) > > In emacs21, the following S expressions return the value of `(32)'. > But in emacs-snapshot (of

Bug#325449: update info

2005-12-09 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, elserv.el elserv-url-decode-string() (push ?\ decoded) is breaking in emacs-snapshot. emacs-snapshot probably wants (push ?\\ decoded) regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] w

Bug#339136: stat behavior change

2005-11-25 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, For the record, in the case of cowdancer; the solution was system("find . -xdev -print0 -type f | xargs -0 stat --format '%d %i ' > .ilist"); to add a space after '%i' in '%d %i', so that there is a whitespace for later consumption. regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],net

Bug#339136: stat behavior change

2005-11-25 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > >However, from an upstream software POV, this is > >a nightmare. > >I'll need to check for stat version before giving it > >a format string, possibly by checking it in configure.ac > > Yeah, the problem is that if upstream doesn't acknowledge this as an > issue you'll either be compabtibl

Bug#339136: stat behavior change

2005-11-22 Thread Junichi Uekawa
reopen 339136 retitle 339136 stat --format behavior change with default newline thanks Hi, I've noticed that it's also affecting cowdancer. I'm planning on getting a workaround and fixing it in 0.7. However, from an upstream software POV, this is a nightmare. I'll need to check for stat version

Bug#338993: ia32-libs conflict with libg2c0-dev

2005-11-21 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, I've experienced the same error with libg2c0-dev 1:3.4.4-9 ia32-libs 1.5 I could remove libg2c0-dev to install ia32-libs, and reinstall libg2c0-dev afterwards. Trying to re-install ia32-libs again fails. I tried to reproduce it within fresh pbuilder, with apt-get install g77 apt-get i

Bug#338046: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Removal of initex?]

2005-11-14 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, Initex command symlink is removed from tetex-3.0, since it was apparently a cause of lot of confusion. Especially since tetex-3.0 switched (again) to pdfetex for generating latex formats. Thanks Julian for the info regards, junichi At Mon, 14 Nov 2005 19:11:14 +, Julian Gil

Bug#338046: Debian Bug#338046: whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions.

2005-11-13 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > > anyway, the following changes will be applied to Debian whizzytex default > > configuration to work around the problem. > > ... and cause a new one sooner or later. > > > -FMT=efmt > > +FMT=fmt > > As I said previously, and as it is documented in the Debian TeX Policy > Draft, the forma

Bug#338046: Bug#338608: Debian Bug#338046: whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions.

2005-11-12 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > > 1. I don't understand why it has to be removed; it's an > > interface that has been used, and not documented as > > deprecated anywhere. > > I'm not usre that one can say initex _has to_ be removed > but at least it is reasonable to remove it in teTeX3.0 > as I already explained. Fur

Bug#338046: Debian Bug#338046: whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions.

2005-11-11 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, anyway, the following changes will be applied to Debian whizzytex default configuration to work around the problem. --- whizzytexrc 24 Mar 2005 23:19:26 - 1.4 +++ whizzytexrc 12 Nov 2005 03:42:20 - @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ # This pair specifies advi. Specify a lower level value for any o

Bug#338046: Debian Bug#338046: whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions.

2005-11-11 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > >> But your postinst scripts will fail anyway > > > > It's not only postinst scripts that will use initex. > > initex is a well-known interface for generating > > dumps with tex. > > Many obsolete things are well-known. It's a good idea to provide an > initex script that will echo "pl

Bug#338046: Debian Bug#338046: whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions.

2005-11-11 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > > For example, releasing etch with a 'initex' that gives out > > a warning that 'initex is deprecated, use tex -ini instead' > > won't hurt. > But your postinst scripts will fail anyway It's not only postinst scripts that will use initex. initex is a well-known interface for generating

Bug#338046: Debian Bug#338046: whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions.

2005-11-11 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > About manual, initex feature is there forever so manual doesn't > stop to mention initex feature. So this doesn't mean removal > of initex is premature. (even right now, if you call tex with > the name initex, it behaves as such.) I'd think documenting that in texk/web2c/man/tex.man et al

Bug#338046: Debian Bug#338046: whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions.

2005-11-10 Thread Junichi Uekawa
retitle 338046 whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions. thanks Hi, There is a change in tetex-3.0 Debian package which removes 'initex' 'einitex' commands, and requires 'tex -ini' instead. According to the maintainers, this is an upstream change, and other distribu

Bug#338046: whizzytex: FTBFS: einitex not provided anymore by tetex-bin (or elsewhere in sid)

2005-11-10 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > > whizzytex users reported that tetex no longer etex. > > I've not quite investigated the problem; but I would like > > to check the intention. > > > > Is the intention to remove 'etex' 'einitex' commands? > > > > From the 'NEWS' file, it looks like 'pdfetex' is the default now, > > so invo

Bug#338046: whizzytex: FTBFS: einitex not provided anymore by tetex-bin (or elsewhere in sid)

2005-11-09 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > > Running INITEX=einitex ... ./checkconfig: line 115: einitex: command not > > found > > > > *** Error: > > > > Command failed: > > > > einitex '&latex' dummy > initex.log && [ -f dummy.$FMT ] > > > > einitex seems to have problems building format latex for latex > > It cou

Bug#338046: whizzytex: FTBFS: einitex not provided anymore by tetex-bin (or elsewhere in sid)

2005-11-09 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Quoting someone who doesn't want to be mentioned: I've noticed this bug in the BTS. It also bit me during the last tex update, as whizzytex is completely broken by it, not just FTBFS. Upstream's suggestion for this was to replace einitex by "etex -ini". This can for example be done in /etc/whizzy

Bug#338046: whizzytex: FTBFS: einitex not provided anymore by tetex-bin (or elsewhere in sid)

2005-11-07 Thread Junichi Uekawa
> Checking DATADIR nonempty ... ok > Checking BINDIR nonempty ... ok > Checking LATEXDIR nonempty ... ok > Checking DOCDIR nonempty ... ok > Checking INITEX nonempty ... ok > Checking LATEX nonempty ... ok > Checking FORMAT nonempty ... ok > Running INITEX=einitex ... ./checkconfig: line 115: eini

Bug#321301: package maintained?

2005-10-12 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, This RC bug has been open for 2 months now, and no action has been taken; I don't see much progress either. Is the maintainer MIA? regards, junichi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#329468: Bug#322309: Debian woody dpkg no longer works with recent linux kernel.

2005-10-09 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > > dpkg in Debian woody (3.0) is broken by recent linux kernels; > > due to the following command changing behavior (mmap of > > zero-byte length): > > > > addr=mmap(NULL, 0, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0); > > > > These bugs are caused by mmap changing behavior; > > it used to return NU

Bug#329468: Debian woody dpkg no longer works with recent linux kernel.

2005-10-09 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, dpkg in Debian woody (3.0) is broken by recent linux kernels; due to the following command changing behavior (mmap of zero-byte length): addr=mmap(NULL, 0, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0); These bugs are caused by mmap changing behavior; it used to return NULL when given a length of 0. Ho

Bug#330291: Authentication problem with pbuilder

2005-09-28 Thread Junichi Uekawa
retitle 330291 missing /etc/pam.d/su from login package thanks Let us retitle this bugreport, so that is looks more correct. amicablement, junichi -- Junichi Uekawa, Debian Developer http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/ 183A 70FC 4732 1B87 57A5 CE82 D837 7D4E E81E 55C1 -- To

<    1   2   3   >