Bug#1071082: Bug#1048703: NMU pushed to DELAYED/10

2024-05-24 Thread Martin Quinson
Hello Pierre, many many thanks for the upload. You just did what I was supposed to do, thanks for that. If you still have your PLM tree around, I'd appreciate if you could push them to the salsa git too. If you don't have that, that's not a problem. I'll try to fulfill my role at some point.

Bug#1026061: [+externe Mail+] Re: Bug#1026061: bart: FTBFS randomly in bullseye (failing test)

2024-05-07 Thread Uecker, Martin
Am Dienstag, dem 07.05.2024 um 19:23 +0200 schrieb Santiago Vila: > El 7/5/24 a las 18:50, Uecker, Martin escribió: > > Am Dienstag, dem 07.05.2024 um 17:59 +0200 schrieb Santiago Vila: > > > El 1/1/23 a las 16:55, Uecker, Martin escribió: > > > In the meantime, I beca

Bug#1026061: [+externe Mail+] Re: Bug#1026061: bart: FTBFS randomly in bullseye (failing test)

2024-05-07 Thread Uecker, Martin
Am Dienstag, dem 07.05.2024 um 17:59 +0200 schrieb Santiago Vila: > El 1/1/23 a las 16:55, Uecker, Martin escribió: > > I can apply the patch, but I do not have much time now. > > Is there some urgency? > > Hello. A lot of time passed without activity on this bug. > >

Bug#1070663: Unable to lock an existing session

2024-05-06 Thread martin f krafft
autolock suggests no packages. -- debconf-show failed -- .''`. martin f. krafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems

Bug#1070217: chromium: Symbol lookup error with libsnappy1v5>=1.2.0

2024-05-04 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Martin Steigerwald - 02.05.24, 16:43:28 CEST: > Work-around for affected users: Of course this work-around is no longer necessary. Thank you for the quick fix, Laszlo. I appreciate it. -- Martin

Bug#1070217: chromium: Symbol lookup error with libsnappy1v5>=1.2.0

2024-05-02 Thread Martin Steigerwald
error with libsnappy1v5>=1.2.0 Explanation: https://bugs.debian.org/1070217 Package: libsnappy1v5 Pin: version * Pin-Priority: -3 Please remove once bug is fixed. Thanks, -- Martin

Bug#1069692: nfs-ganesha: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: /usr/include/features-time64.h:26:5: error: #error "_TIME_BITS=64 is allowed only with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64"

2024-04-23 Thread Christoph Martin
Hi Sebastian, this is interesting. If you take a look into the commandline you see -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TIME_BITS=64 there is -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 even twice. .. But the GPFS code has: /* _FILE_OFFSET_BITS macro causes F_GETLK/SETLK/SETLKW to be defined to *

Bug#1069059: cockpit update from DSA-5655-1 without binary builds (build failures)

2024-04-16 Thread Martin Pitt
rt all the bugs I found > last week while rebuilding bullseye and bookworm). Right, that makes sense. There are no C code changes between 287 and 287.1. Thanks, and sorry for the trouble, Martin diff -Nru cockpit-287.1/debian/changelog cockpit-287.1/debian/changelog --- cockpit-287.1/debian/change

Bug#1068329: seems xz-utils 5.6.0 and 5.6.1 deb files has the backdoor, please remove both

2024-04-03 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
://salsa.debian.org/ftp-team/xz-2024-incident/-/issues/13.Thank you for your help!Martin

Bug#1066314: regina-rexx: FTBFS: ./rexxext.c:95:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘getcallstack’; did you mean ‘popcallstack’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

2024-03-26 Thread Agustin Martin
El vie, 22 mar 2024 a las 12:01, Alen Zekulic () escribió: > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 21:41:44 +0100, Agustin Martin wrote: > > > Some time ago I played a bit with upgrading regina-rexx to a recent > > upstream version. I think I can find that stuff and try again with >

Bug#1067208: umockdev: #error "_TIME_BITS=64 is allowed only with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64"

2024-03-24 Thread Martin Pitt
> therefore the wrapping will be ineffective and umockdev's mock devices > will not be seen. Correct. As it happens, the latest Ubuntu package got fixes for both of these issues recently, thanks to Steve Langasek and Zixing Liu! I'll integrate them upstream and then make a new release. Martin

Bug#1066314: regina-rexx: FTBFS: ./rexxext.c:95:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘getcallstack’; did you mean ‘popcallstack’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

2024-03-21 Thread Agustin Martin
Control: tags -1 +pending El dom, 17 mar 2024 a las 21:41, Agustin Martin () escribió: > > El vie, 15 mar 2024 a las 18:57, Agustin Martin > () escribió: > > > > Hi, Lucas and Alen. > > > > While it is easy to fix this particular error (see attached patch, >

Bug#1066314: regina-rexx: FTBFS: ./rexxext.c:95:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘getcallstack’; did you mean ‘popcallstack’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

2024-03-17 Thread Agustin Martin
El vie, 15 mar 2024 a las 18:57, Agustin Martin () escribió: > > Hi, Lucas and Alen. > > While it is easy to fix this particular error (see attached patch, > from upstream repo), other similar error happens afterwards in my > tests. The problem is that this package is way beh

Bug#1066314: regina-rexx: FTBFS: ./rexxext.c:95:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘getcallstack’; did you mean ‘popcallstack’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

2024-03-15 Thread Agustin Martin
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build > on amd64. > > This is most likely caused by a change in dpkg 1.22.6, that enabled > -Werror=implicit-function-declaration. For more information, see >

Bug#1061752: marked as pending in python-django-tagging

2024-03-15 Thread Christoph Martin
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1061752 in python-django-tagging reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1066118: telegram-desktop: does not start under Debian sid

2024-03-12 Thread Paul Martin
Package: telegram-desktop Version: 4.14.9+ds-1+b1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable It depends on a symbol not present in the current libqt5quick5 (automatically rebuilt as part of the time_t migration). $ telegram-desktop telegram-desktop: symbol lookup error:

Bug#1000061: cfengine3: depends on obsolete pcre3 library

2024-03-12 Thread Christoph Martin
version 3.24.0 is not released yet but expected for mid 2024. Am 18.12.23 um 15:14 schrieb Bastian Germann: On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 12:01:17 +0200 Bastian Germann wrote: cfengine3 is a key package and requires pcre, so this has to be fixed. Upstream claims that this is fixed with 3.24.0.

Bug#1062611: libiv-unidraw2t64 has an undeclared file conflict

2024-03-03 Thread Agustin Martin
El vie, 2 feb 2024 a las 6:57, Helmut Grohne () escribió: > > Package: libiv-unidraw2t64 > Version: 2.0.11d.a1-1.1~exp1 > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: fileconflict > Control: affects -1 + libiv2 libiv2t64 > X-Debbugs-Cc: Graham Inggs , vor...@debian.org > >

Bug#1063804: FTBFS: depmod: FATAL: could not search modules: No such file or directory

2024-02-13 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Martin Steigerwald - 13.02.24, 00:24:35 CET: > This breaks compiling my own kernel with: > > time eatmydata make -j16 bindeb-pkg LOCALVERSION=-t14 Work-around: […]etc/apt/preferences.d% cat kmod Explanation: Bug #1063804: FTBFS: depmod: FATAL: could not search modules: No

Bug#1063804: FTBFS: depmod: FATAL: could not search modules: No such file or directory

2024-02-12 Thread Martin Steigerwald
may get. But I really don't see how any possible benefit justifies that immense and error-prone effort. Anyway it is not me doing that work.) Best, -- Martin

Bug#1061519: shim: all CVEs fixed in upstream 15.8, please package

2024-02-10 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
Package: shim Followup-For: Bug #1061519 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 shim 15.8 @vathpela vathpela released this 23 Jan 19:01 What's New * Various CVE fixes: CVE-2023-40546 mok: fix LogError() invocation CVE-2023-40547 - avoid incorrectly trusting HTTP headers

Bug#1062354: libatomic1: 14-20240127-1 missing libat_test_and_set_1_i2

2024-02-01 Thread Martin Pitt
Control: severity 1061370 grave Control: forcemerge -1 1061370 Matthias Klose [2024-02-01 8:30 +0100]: > please don't file duplicate reports, see #1061370 Ah, sorry -- it wasn't clear from the title that it was about this problem, nor was it RC. Marking a duplicate, so that it's easier to find.

Bug#1062354: libatomic1: 14-20240127-1 missing libat_test_and_set_1_i2

2024-01-31 Thread Martin Pitt
d a few of the autopkgtest regressions on the PTS [3], and they all failed on the exact same issue, e.g. [4]. Thanks! Martin [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=cockpit=armel=310-1=1706722995=0 [2] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=cockpit=armel=309-1=1705590895=0 [3

Bug#1061281: #1061281: gajim: Fails to start: AttributeError: module 'eventlet.green.select' has no attribute 'epoll'

2024-01-22 Thread Martin
Dear Shawn, could you check /var/log/dpkg.log which packages have been upgraded recently? My random guess would be python3-trio from 0.22 to 0.23. Maybe you can temporarily downgrade one or the other package to find the culprit? Cheers

Bug#1014862: vdr-plugin-markad: FTBFS: Cannot find (any matches for) "command/markad"

2024-01-19 Thread Christoph Martin
notfound 1014862 3.4.5-1 thanks In the current build this bug does not exist. OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1058276: bart-view: FTBFS: (.text+0xa4e): undefined reference to `shared_obj_destroy'

2024-01-10 Thread Martin Uecker
Am Mittwoch, dem 10.01.2024 um 08:16 +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi Martin, > > I tried to open an issue upstream but it seems the repository does not > feature submitting issues. Can you have a look please? > > Kind regards > Andreas. > Hi Andreas, I ju

Bug#1058276: bart-view: FTBFS: (.text+0xa4e): undefined reference to `shared_obj_destroy'

2024-01-10 Thread Martin Uecker
Hi Andreas, thanks. I missed this. I will look at this tomorrow. Martin Am Mittwoch, dem 10.01.2024 um 08:16 +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi Martin, > > I tried to open an issue upstream but it seems the repository does not > feature submitting issues. Can you have a

Bug#1058214: sosreport: FTBFS -- NMU debdiff

2024-01-09 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello again, as promised, I uploaded the fix with the attached debdiff. Martin diff -Nru sosreport-4.0/debian/changelog sosreport-4.0/debian/changelog --- sosreport-4.0/debian/changelog 2021-01-27 15:29:24.0 +0100 +++ sosreport-4.0/debian/changelog 2024-01-10 08:16:54.0

Bug#1058214: sosreport: FTBFS: AttributeError: 'TailTest' object has no attribute 'assertEquals'. Did you mean: 'assertEqual'? -- NMU announcement

2024-01-09 Thread Martin Pitt
will attach the NMU debdiff here. Thanks, Martin

Bug#1059467: python-dbusmock: new version 0.30.1-1 causes upower's autopkgtest to fail

2023-12-28 Thread Martin Pitt
Control: reassign -1 upower 1.90.2-7 Control: tag -1 fixed-upstream pending The upower test adjustment landed upstream, I'll cherry-pick it into Debian. Martin

Bug#1059467: python-dbusmock: new version 0.30.1-1 causes upower's autopkgtest to fail

2023-12-28 Thread Martin Pitt
upower's tests IMHO. I sent a fix for upower's tests to the above MR. I'll give it three days to review (it's holiday season, after all), and will then upload the fix to Debian's upower either as a cherry-pick or a downstream patch. Martin

Bug#1056480: python-markdown2's autopkg tests fail with Python 3.12

2023-12-13 Thread Martin Manns
The issue seems to have been fixed in upstream markdown2 v2.4.11 commit commit 0fde72b: Remove deprecated imp module Updating markdown2 to 2.4.11 may fix the issue.

Bug#1057148: marked as pending in python-dbusmock

2023-11-30 Thread Martin Pitt
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1057148 in python-dbusmock reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1054730: trac: FTBFS: ValueError: ("Missing 'Version:' header and/or PKG-INFO file at path: /<>/Trac.egg-info/PKG-INFO", Trac [unknown version] (/<>))

2023-11-19 Thread Martin
Control: severity -1 normal Control: tag -1 + moreinfo Hi, I can't reproduce this FTBFS. Could you try again, please? I'll upload a new version, but it shouldn't make a difference.

Bug#1056163: libervia-backend: start fails without pre-existing configuration

2023-11-17 Thread Martin
Package: libervia-backend Severity: serious Version: 0.9.0~hg3993-4 Tags: bookworm When there is no pre-existing configuration (`~/.local/share/libervia/`), starting `libervia-backend fg` fails with an exception: ``` File "/usr/share/libervia/sat/memory/migration/env.py", line 8, in from

Bug#1054689: therion: FTBFS: utest-proj.cxx:1:10: fatal error: catch2/catch.hpp: No such file or directory

2023-11-09 Thread Martin Budaj
On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 3:14 AM Wookey wrote: > On 2023-11-08 20:10 +0100, Martin Budaj wrote: > > as we still need to maintain Catch2 v2 API compatibility to run CI tests > > and builds on older Ubuntu images, we can't simply migrate to v3. > > Who is building 'latest'

Bug#1054689: therion: FTBFS: utest-proj.cxx:1:10: fatal error: catch2/catch.hpp: No such file or directory

2023-11-08 Thread Martin Budaj
lds on older Ubuntu images, we can't simply migrate to v3. For now, I'll just enable using the bundled Catch2 instead of v3 installed in the system. Martin

Bug#1042642: ns3: FTBFS with Sphinx 7.1, docutils 0.20: make[6]: *** [Makefile:75: html] Error 2

2023-11-06 Thread Martin Quinson
Hello, thanks for your hard work investigating on this. I confirm that this fixes the build. I am currently relaunching the build with a proper changelog entry before uploading to unstable. The patch I came up with is here: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/ns3/-/blob/master/debian/patches/sphinx-7

Bug#1054689: therion: FTBFS: utest-proj.cxx:1:10: fatal error: catch2/catch.hpp: No such file or directory

2023-10-31 Thread Martin Budaj
Thanks, I'll check it out in a week or so. Martin On Fri, Oct 27, 2023, 21:21 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: therion > Version: 6.1.8-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > Tags: trixie sid ftbfs > User: lu...@debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trix

Bug#1052937: False-positive for wofi-pass

2023-10-04 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Lucas, wofi-pass is marked for autoremoval due to this bug report but I suspect it to be a false-positive as wofi-pass does not depend on any emacs stuff and it also builds successful (see attached buildlog). Best regards, Martin Format: 1.0 Source: wofi-pass Binary: wofi-pass

Bug#1040057: #1040057: slixmpp: autopkgtest regression on arm64: Segmentation fault

2023-10-02 Thread Martin
Control: severity -1 normal Control: tag -1 + help Control: tag -1 + moreinfo Finally, I had some time to run the autopkgtest suite on my own arm64 machine (MNT reform). It did not segfault, so I assume a specific problem with the C/I system. I have no idea how to debug this, help is appreciated!

Bug#1050582: kmod update corrupts systemd uefi boot

2023-09-15 Thread Martin Nybo Andersen
easily be done by applying the following patch to your kernel git repository: https://lore.kernel.org/all/3d34a965-ab9c-d549-0c63-c717ab5d2...@tweek.dk/ Afterwards `make modules_install` will compress and install the modules correctly. Best regards, Martin Nybo Andersen

Bug#1051271: GRUB2 2.12~rc1-7 prevent machine to boot

2023-09-06 Thread Agustin Martin
El mar, 5 sept 2023 a las 20:32, Agustin Martin () escribió: > > If /boot/efi is not mounted I get for new versions > > $ LC_ALL=C sudo dpkg-reconfigure grub-efi-amd64 > Installing for x86_64-efi platform. > grub-install: error: cannot find EFI directory. > Failed: grub-instal

Bug#1051271: GRUB2 2.12~rc1-7 prevent machine to boot

2023-09-05 Thread Agustin Martin
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 07:34:13PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > I wrote > > If /boot/efi is not mounted I get for new versions > > Well that's *your problem*, sorry. Mounting /boot/efi is mandatory, > you can't just go unmount it. By the same argument unmounting /boot > (if a separate

Bug#1051271: GRUB2 2.12~rc1-7 prevent machine to boot

2023-09-05 Thread Agustin Martin
On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 07:34:13PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 12:26:56PM -0400, M. Zhou wrote: > > I am able to boot with 2.12~rc1-7 now. And my currrent status is > > > > grub-common/unstable,now 2.12~rc1-7 amd64 [installed] > > grub-efi-amd64-bin/unstable,now

Bug#1051271: GRUB2 2.12~rc1-7 prevent machine to boot

2023-09-05 Thread Agustin Martin
El mar, 5 sept 2023 a las 17:21, Agustin Martin () escribió: > > On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 04:19:01PM +0200, Miguel A. Vallejo wrote: > > Package: grub2 > > Version: 2.12~rc1-7 > > Severity: critical > > > > This morning I noticed an apt upgrade in Debian unstable

Bug#1051271: GRUB2 2.12~rc1-7 prevent machine to boot

2023-09-05 Thread Agustin Martin
On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 04:19:01PM +0200, Miguel A. Vallejo wrote: > Package: grub2 > Version: 2.12~rc1-7 > Severity: critical > > This morning I noticed an apt upgrade in Debian unstable/Sid upgraded > grub-common, grub2-common, grub-efi-amd64 and grub-efi-amd64-bin. The > upgrade went normally

Bug#1037642: encfs: ftbfs with GCC-13

2023-07-24 Thread Agustin Martin
> The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with > gcc-13/g++-13, but succeeds to build with gcc-12/g++-12. The severity of this > report will be raised before the trixie release. > The full build log can be found at: >

Bug#1041703: Broken due to missed udev dependencies

2023-07-22 Thread Martin Steigerwald
severity 1041703 important thanks Martin Steigerwald - 22.07.23, 15:41:41 CEST: > severity 1041703 grave > thanks > > Justification: Renders X unusable, renders fwupdmgr unusable On the other hand Sid should have libudev1 254~rc2-3. Even testing should have 253.5-1 already. Ah and

Bug#1041703: Broken due to missed udev dependencies

2023-07-22 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Working package for AMD64: https://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/libg/libgudev/libgudev-1.0-0_237-2_amd64.deb -- Martin

Bug#858337: apt-show-versions: wrong output when version of an installed package is missing from the Packages files

2023-07-21 Thread Christoph Martin
Thanks for the patch. I'll have a try. Am 11.07.23 um 12:15 schrieb Vincent Lefevre: I note that there is a version comparison in sub parse_file: if (!defined $packages->{$package->{$PACKAGE}} or !defined

Bug#1040714: dhcpcd: Missing epoch from souce package version

2023-07-11 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 10:05 PM Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 06:30:38PM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > Reintroducing the epoch produces the following Lintian ERROR: > > > > E: dhcpcd source: > > epoch-changed-but-upstream-version-di

Bug#1040714: dhcpcd: Missing epoch from souce package version

2023-07-11 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 7:30 PM Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 7:05 PM Salvatore Bonaccorso > wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 10:39:59PM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 9, 2023 at 10:33 PM Salvatore Bonaccorso > > &

Bug#858337: apt-show-versions: wrong output when version of an installed package is missing from the Packages files

2023-07-11 Thread Christoph Martin
Hi Vincent, Am 11.07.23 um 00:46 schrieb Vincent Lefevre: cventin:~> apt-show-versions -a libreoffice-common libreoffice-common:all 4:7.5.4-4 install ok installed libreoffice-common:all 4:7.4.5-3 stable ftp.debian.org No stable-updates version libreoffice-common:all 4:7.4.5-3

Bug#1040714: dhcpcd: Missing epoch from souce package version

2023-07-10 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 7:05 PM Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 10:39:59PM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 9, 2023 at 10:33 PM Salvatore Bonaccorso > > wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 09:25:33PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccor

Bug#858337: apt-show-versions: wrong output when version of an installed package is missing from the Packages files

2023-07-10 Thread Christoph Martin
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Hi Vincent, Am 05.07.23 um 12:13 schrieb Vincent Lefevre: Control: retitle -1 apt-show-versions gives unreliable information Control: severity -1 grave I still can not reproduce your problem. Please try to find out, which value is missing in a Packages file,

Bug#1040714: dhcpcd: Missing epoch from souce package version

2023-07-09 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
nsiting the source from src:dhcpcd5 to src:dhcpcd we're missing an epoch for everything. This requires reverting the above fix and simply introducing an epoch for the whole src and binaries. Or have I misunderstood the issue? Martin-Éric

Bug#1040714: dhcpcd: Missing epoch from souce package version

2023-07-09 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
; 1:3.2.3-2 > 1:3.2.3-1.1 > 1:3.2.3-1 > 1:3.2.2-1 > 1:3.0.17-2 > 1:3.0.17-1 > 1:2.0.3-1 > 1:2.0.2-1 > 1:2.0.1-1 > 1:2.0.0-2 > 1:2.0.0-1 > 1:1.3.22pl4-22 > 1:1.3.22pl4-21sarge1 > 1:1.3.22pl4-21 > 1:1.3.22pl4-20 > 1:1.3.17pl2-8.1 > 1:1.3.17pl2-8 > 1

Bug#1037190: dhcpcd: version is lower than in wheezy

2023-06-07 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
everity:serious. This being said, this is something that is easily fixed by re-introducing the epoch. Whether this is really worth the trouble given how the discrepancy dates back to something even older than oldstable is an entirely different issue. Martin-Éric

Bug#1036263: guestfs-tools: FTBFS in testing: make[6]: *** [Makefile:1716: test-suite.log] Error 1

2023-05-27 Thread Martin Hostettler
tags -1 + unreproducible thanks On Thu, 25 May 2023 21:00:18 +0200 Bastian Germann wrote: > I cannot reproduce this. > I can't reproduce this either. I tried 2 variants and both build fine (using an up to date sid VM to run the build using bookworm docker container or pbuilder). docker run

Bug#1036021: cadabra2,python3-notebook: undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/notebook/static/components/codemirror

2023-05-26 Thread Martin Hostettler
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 09:52:55PM +0200, Gürkan Myczko wrote: > On 25.05.2023 19:47, Martin Hostettler wrote: > > On 19/05/2023 12.48, Martin Hostettler wrote: > > > It seems what is needed is this: > > > > > > mv > > > debian/cadabra2/us

Bug#1034824: tomcat9 should not be released with Bookworm

2023-05-25 Thread Martin Hostettler
verse dependencies as well. Some bugs have according to the bts been fixed and migrated meanwile: #1035995: bazel-bootstrap #1011597: tiles #1033366: resteasy3.0 What is the plan here to get this in shape for in time before last unblock requests for bookworm on the 28th? - Martin

Bug#1036021: cadabra2,python3-notebook: undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/notebook/static/components/codemirror

2023-05-25 Thread Martin Hostettler
On 19/05/2023 12.48, Martin Hostettler wrote: > It seems what is needed is this: > > mv > debian/cadabra2/usr/lib/python3.*/site-packages/notebook/static/components > debian/cadabra2/usr/share/javascript > rmdir debian/cadabra2/usr/lib/python3.*/site-packages/notebook/

Bug#1036021: cadabra2,python3-notebook: undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/notebook/static/components/codemirror

2023-05-22 Thread Martin Hostettler
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 11:59:37AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On 19/05/2023 12.48, Martin Hostettler wrote: > > It seems what is needed is this: > > > > mv > > debian/cadabra2/usr/lib/python3.*/site-packages/notebook/static/components > > deb

Bug#1036272: youtube-dl - Should this be released with Bookworm?

2023-05-21 Thread Martin Hostettler
ers might benefit from automatically transitioning to youtube-dlp, on the other hand yt-dlp does not seem to provide youtube-dl as a binary, so maybe this is unexpected as well. - Martin

Bug#1036021: cadabra2,python3-notebook: undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/notebook/static/components/codemirror

2023-05-19 Thread Martin Hostettler
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 11:09:41AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 10:27:46AM +0200, Martin Hostettler wrote: > > Do I understand correctly that all we have to do here is ship the file > in its "canonical" path after resolving the symbolic link f

Bug#1036021: cadabra2,python3-notebook: undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/notebook/static/components/codemirror

2023-05-19 Thread Martin Hostettler
and someone with more solid clue about these kind of problems in packaging can resolve this. - Martin

Bug#1032553: magic-wormhole: FTBFS in testing: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test -i python{version} -p 3.11 returned exit code 13

2023-04-07 Thread Martin Hostettler
I'm not a DD, so i can't upload any fixes, but i would really appreciate if we can get this fixed before the auto removal strikes. Regards, - Martin --- magic-wormhole-0.12.0/src/wormhole/test/test_wormhole.py 2021-02-05 02:16:21.0 + +++ magic-wormhole-0.12.0.fix/src/wormhole/test/tes

Bug#1033868: linphone-desktop: cannot use any account, without agreeing to terms

2023-04-03 Thread Martin
On 2023-04-03 18:18, Dennis Filder wrote: > On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 07:29:44AM +0000, Martin wrote: >> Suggested solution: The buttons "Use SIP account" and "Fetch remote >> configuration" must not be greyed out, even if user does not agree to >>

Bug#1033868: linphone-desktop: cannot use any account, without agreeing to terms

2023-04-03 Thread Martin
Quoting Jonas Smedegaard : Software that requires signing a contract is "non-free by proxy" which in Debian means "contrib". My assumption (which might be wrong, of course, and IANAL anyway) is, that both ToU and PP are only about their linphone SIP service, *not* about using the linphone

Bug#1033868: linphone-desktop: cannot use any account, without agreeing to terms

2023-04-03 Thread Martin
On 2023-04-03 09:54, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > By abocve description, I would go further and consider this package > unfit for release in section "main" with current constraints, since it > (technically or possibly only as UX) depend on non-free Belledone code. > Until (if possible) fixed, this

Bug#1032989: marked as done (Liferea 1.14.1-1 segfaults on startup when trying to read gsettings)

2023-04-01 Thread Martin Bergström
On 2023-04-01 19:57, Paul Gevers wrote: I have uploaded a new upstream version that includes the fix for this issue, as well as fixes for some more crashes. I would appreciate it a lot if you could install the version from unstable once it's build and report back what your experience with

Bug#1032655: psi-plus segfaults

2023-03-19 Thread Martin
Control: severity -1 important Control: tag -1 moreinfo As Stefan, I get warnings, but no crash on Debian 12 bookworm.

Bug#1030658: More info needed on the RC bug you opened

2023-02-22 Thread Martin Quinson
tag 1030658 +moreinfo thanks Hello Damyan, sorry for not noticing this bug before, I thought I was subscribed to the package. It looks like a missing dependency to me. Could you please give me the output of `ldd /usr/bin/zeal` ? I tried to dig a bit to understand what's going wrong, but the

Bug#981484: webext-exteditor: not compatible with current thunderbird

2023-02-19 Thread Martin
On 2022-11-24 15:37, Paride Legovini wrote: > Upstream isn't active anymore. I suggest switching to: > > https://github.com/Frederick888/external-editor-revived Thanks! Filed "RFP: external-editor-revived -- Thunderbird MailExtension which allows using external editors"

Bug#1027050: growing image fails to boot: /scripts/local-bottom/growroot: line 97: wait-for-root: not found

2023-02-17 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Santiago, Santiago Vila [2023-02-18 0:26 +0100]: > Martin Pitt wrote: > > The "flock: not found" is #1014662, but that is already present in our > > current > > image with cloud-initramfs-tools 0.18.debian8, and does not seem fatal. So > > far >

Bug#988462: trac: not ready for Debian 12

2023-02-16 Thread Martin
On 2023-02-16 17:44, Santiago Vila wrote: > AFAIK, the main reason trac was not ready for Debian 12 was the > problems with python3, but those in theory have been fixed 1.5.x is the development branch of Trac and I would like to wait for the official 1.6 release. It probably comes to late for

Bug#1026992: Preparing fix for CVE-2022-4728, CVE-2022-4729 & CVE-2022-4730

2023-02-07 Thread Christoph Martin
Hi all, I am preparing a fix for this bug based on the upstream pull request https://github.com/graphite-project/graphite-web/pull/2785 which is also in oldstable security with version 1.1.4-3+deb10u2. Regards Christoph OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1030738: linux-image-6.1.0-3-amd64: rtw88_8723de, machine hard reset when mac address changes

2023-02-06 Thread Martin Kraus
testing this on a Bullseye live image. It might be specific to HP laptops, can't really say. But it's a nasty surprise to whoever gets hit by this and not really obvious how to get around it. with regards Martin Kraus -- Package-specific info: ** Version: Linux version 6.1.0-3-amd64 (debian-ker

Bug#1030429: libervia-backend: FTBFS: InvalidVersion: Invalid version: '0.9.0-hg3993'

2023-02-04 Thread Martin
Control: retitle -1 libervia-backend: FTBFS: InvalidVersion: Invalid version: '0.9.0-hg3993' Control: user debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Control: usertags -1 python3.11 The cause of the error is not the failing unit test (which is ignored as "known broken"), but that Python 3.11 is more strict

Bug#1028638: libproxy1v5: Gajim 1.6.0-1 crashes in libproxy call

2023-02-01 Thread Martin
Dear Laurent, dear Jeremy, der Iain, because I'm not sure, if you saw it: I uploaded libproxy 0.4.18-1.2 with Sebastians patch to DELAYED/5. You might like to do something different, therefore my headsup. Cheers

Bug#1028638: libproxy1v5: Gajim 1.6.0-1 crashes in libproxy call

2023-01-27 Thread Martin
Control: tags -1 + patch So far only good reports about the patch by Sebastian , applied in experimental.

Bug#1028638: Bug#1028413: gajim 1.6.1-2 crash

2023-01-26 Thread Martin
Hi Markus, could you please try out, if the problem is fixed with a patched libproxy? $ echo deb https://deb.debian.org/debian/ experimental main \ | sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/experimental.list $ sudo apt update $ sudo apt install -t experimental libproxy1v5 (IIRC) It would be very

Bug#1028638: libproxy1v5: Gajim 1.6.0-1 crashes in libproxy call

2023-01-25 Thread Martin
Sorry, that went to the wrong bug report :-( Laurent, Jeremy, Iain, I hope you are OK with the upload to experimental! On 2023-01-25 15:11, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] > Hi Martin, > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:50:52PM +, Martin wrote: >> Hi S

Bug#1028192: libproxy1v5: Gajim 1.6.0-1 crashes in libproxy call

2023-01-24 Thread Martin
Hi Sebastian, I wonder, if I should upload libproxy with your github patch¹ to experimental. Then people affected (or not affected) by the bug can test easily. Or you may upload, of course! :-) Cheers ¹ https://github.com/libproxy/libproxy/issues/199#issuecomment-1401124997

Bug#1026602: marked as pending in python-unicodecsv

2023-01-21 Thread Martin
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1026602 in python-unicodecsv reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1029174: Bug#1029176: please check dhcpcd 9.4.1-14 in unstable

2023-01-20 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 10:25 PM Beat Bolli wrote: > On 19.01.23 16:35, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > We've just pushed dhcpcd 9.4.1-14 into unstable. Can you please check > > whether that fixes it? > > Indeed, this new version works. Marking FIXED as of 9.4.1-14 . I

Bug#1029174: please check dhcpcd 9.4.1-14 in unstable

2023-01-19 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
Greetings, Something tells me that both of you have encountered the same bug. We've just pushed dhcpcd 9.4.1-14 into unstable. Can you please check whether that fixes it? Martin-Éric

Bug#1028638: libproxy1v5: Gajim 1.6.0-1 crashes in libproxy call

2023-01-14 Thread Martin
Control: severity -1 normal The problem disappeared magically for all users who reported it before. I assume, that there is a hidden bug in libproxy, that only appears in certain circumstances. Downgrading for now.

Bug#1028638: libproxy1v5: Gajim 1.6.0-1 crashes in libproxy call

2023-01-14 Thread Martin
Control: found -1 0.4.16-1 Control: notfound -1 0.4.15-15 I tried various versions of libproxy from snapshot.debian.org and could find the crash to be introduced by version 0.4.16-1 exactly.

Bug#1028192: libproxy1v5: Gajim 1.6.0-1 crashes in libproxy call

2023-01-13 Thread Martin
Control: clone -1 -2 Control: reassign -2 libproxy1v5 0.4.18-1 Control: retitle -2 libproxy1v5: Gajim 1.6.0-1 crashes in libproxy call This is the backtrace with a debian.org account: (gdb) bt #0 read_encoded_value_with_base(unsigned char, _Unwind_Ptr, unsigned char const*, _Unwind_Ptr*)

Bug#1026622: [Pkg-xmpp-devel] Bug#1026622: python-omemo-backend-signal: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'omemo.backends'

2023-01-10 Thread Martin
On 2023-01-10 19:49, Stefano Rivera wrote: > So, probably time to remove this from the archive, clearly they don't > intend to support the new API. Yes, I'll file a removal request!

Bug#1028192: [Pkg-xmpp-devel] Bug#1028192: Needs to block python3-nbxmpp

2023-01-10 Thread Martin
Control: clone -1 -2 Control: reassign -2 python3-nbxmpp 4.0.0-1 Control: retitle -2 python3-nbxmpp: Gajim 1.6.0-1 crashes on connect On 2023-01-10 18:29, Fiona Klute wrote: > In that case python3-nbxmpp 4.x must not migrate either, because it > breaks Gajim 1.5.x. I'm not sure what's the proper

Bug#1027572: nfs-ganesha: FTBFS: dh_install: error: missing files, aborting

2023-01-10 Thread Christoph Martin
Hi Lucas, is it possible that this is a transistion issue? The logs talk about python3.10 and sid has python3.11. Christoph Am 01.01.23 um 15:35 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: . warnings.warn( TEST FAILED: /<>/debian/tmp/usr/local/lib/python3.10/dist-packages/ does NOT support .pth files bad

Bug#1026061: bart: FTBFS randomly in bullseye (failing test)

2023-01-01 Thread Uecker, Martin
> > > Am 01.01.23 um 15:55 schrieb Uecker, Martin: > > > > One could just relax (or simply remove) the test from bullseye > > or packport the version bookworm. > > I guess that would be applying 0003-relax-failing-unit-test.patch > to the Bu

Bug#1026061: bart: FTBFS randomly in bullseye (failing test)

2023-01-01 Thread Uecker, Martin
One could just relax (or simply remove) the test from bullseye or packport the version bookworm. The wine code is broken (it violates the effective types rules of ISO C). Martin Am Sonntag, dem 01.01.2023 um 15:39 +0100 schrieb Bernhard Übelacker: > Dear Maintainer, > I could rep

Bug#1026072: firefox: fails to start (cannot load libnssutil3.so)

2022-12-14 Thread Martin Dickopp
Package: firefox Version: 108.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When starting firefox, it displays the following message and exits immediately with exit code 255: XPCOMGlueLoad error for file /usr/lib/firefox/libnssutil3.so: /usr/lib/firefox/libnssutil3.so: cannot open

Bug#1026069: Cannot find symbols during build

2022-12-14 Thread martin f krafft
scrcpy-server 1.24-1 Versions of packages scrcpy recommends: ii adb 1:29.0.6-21 scrcpy suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- .''`. martin f. krafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck `- Debian - when you have better things to do

Bug#1025659:

2022-12-07 Thread Martin
I am also affected by this bug on a 2020 Lenovo laptop, same as OP reported. After an upgrade on my unstable debian system it booted only to a blinking cursor. Going into a terminal and checking logs I also saw the segmentation fault. It made my laptop unusable as of now. :( Hope that the driver

Bug#1000596: php-db Update

2022-12-06 Thread Christoph Martin
reopen -1 thanks The new version seams to not fix the test on all architectures. Christoph Am 30.11.22 um 17:09 schrieb Christoph Martin: I have uploaded a fixed package as NMU to to the deferred queue. Am 17.11.22 um 14:13 schrieb Christoph Martin: I just tried to build php-db

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >