Hello,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:54:04AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
However, I have not re-uploaded jlgui just yet. We ran into a problem
with the audio part.
When starting jlgui with openjdk it defaulted to use pulseaudio (which
was not even installed) and failed to play any sound.
Version: 1.6.4-4
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 03:34:31PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: groovy
Version: 1.6.4-4
Severity: serious
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu karmic
There are a lot of files licensed under the Apache-2.0 license; the
debian/copyright file
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 08:12:50PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 25/10/09 at 19:39 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 08:54:45PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: libgnucrypto-java
Version: 2.1.0-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:17:41PM +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
But, first, I would like to understand the reasoning behind this change in
version mapping. Michael could you please describe your process ?
The process was very simple. I tried to update doxia and related packages.
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 08:54:45PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: libgnucrypto-java
Version: 2.1.0-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package
tags 549838 - unreproducible
thanks
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 04:24:45PM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
tags 549838 + unreproducible
thanks
excalibur-logkit has alternate build dependency on libjboss-j2ee-java.
So it should not fail to build.
This bug is not reproducible in pbuilder chroot for
Version: 1.6.4.dfsg1-1
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 08:23:37PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
Package: libceguiogre-dev,libogre-dev
Version: libceguiogre-dev/1.6.3.dfsg1-1
Version: libogre-dev/1.6.3.dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Date: 2009-10-01
Hello,
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 05:04:58PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
--
3208. ERROR in ../java/lang/Float.java (at line 76)
public static final float MIN_VALUE = 1.4e-45f;
The literal 1.4e-45f of type float is out of range
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 10:26:07AM +0200, Jakub Skoczen wrote:
On my machine all jars under /usr/share/maven-repo/javax are real
files and not symlinks. That includes Servlet, JSP and Expression
Language APIs so stuff definitely loaded by tomcat:
|-- javax
| |-- el
| | `-- el-api
|
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 04:57:37PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
Package: pdfsam
Version: 1.1.3-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
when invoking pdfsam-console regularly, I just get no error but unreadable
files.
When following the instructions from pdfsam-console -h, I get the following:
$
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 11:35:17AM +0200, Jakub Skoczen wrote:
Hi Ludovic,
I don't see the new packages being available in testing yet, at least
not on danish mirrors. I'll upgrade and test them as soon as they are.
It will not be in testing for at least the next 10 days as we just uploaded
reassign 547735 bootchart
thanks
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 02:01:17AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Package: libcommons-compress-java
Version: 1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: breaks unrelated packages
Well the package is not unrelated, bootchart depends on
libcommons-compress-java.
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:29:11PM +0100, Ludovic Claude wrote:
This was a temporary issue with the way I installed jars both to
/usr/share/java and /usr/share/maven-repo. In an old version of
maven-repo-helper, the script mh_installjar was copying the jars to
/usr/share/maven-repo
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 09:15:47PM +0100, Ludovic Claude wrote:
Yes, this version should fix this bug. It works for me, Jakub, can you
confirm that the fix works for you as well?
I have made some small changes and uploaded to the archive.
Thanks for your work.
Cheers,
Michael
--
To
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:59:53PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:12:22PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
Do you have any specific showstopper for filing a removal request RoM
right ahead?
The only showstopper I can think is that the built kaffe VM might
Hello zack,
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 09:25:00PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I've prepared an NMU for kaffe (versioned as 2:1.1.8-5.3) and uploaded
it to DELAYED/2, as allowed by devref §5.11.1. The patch generalize the
build-dep which was on gcj-4.2 to plain gcj.
The current plan is to
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:47:08PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:28:43PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Many thanks in advance,
BTW, I forgot to mention, it is of course totally up to you to decide
whether let my delayed NMU flow in or not. I doubt it will do
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:01:04PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote:
Shouldn't the libjgrapht0.6 then have the Replaces entry in the
control file?
No, the old package should get removed. Steffen filed the removal
request
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:43:57PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Michael Koch konque...@gmx.de wrote:
And what about people who have the old package already installed?
A Replaces helps them and is needed in this case afaik.
A Replaces won't hurt but I am
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:26:12PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Chris Lamb la...@debian.org wrote:
Package: pj
Severity: serious
Version: 0.0~20080628-1
no reverse (build) deps, low popcon, outdated upstream version, last
upload 14 months, nobody cared
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 02:19:01PM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Package: libnoise
Version: 1.0.0
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
libtool --mode=link g++ -shared -Wl,-soname=libnoise.so.0 -o libnoise.so.0.3
../src/latlon.lo ../src/noisegen.lo ../src/model/cylinder.lo
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 09:44:25PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
tag 540737 + confirmed
thanks
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 09:14:49PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
| Setting up libantlr2.7-cil (2.7.7-11) ...
| * Installing 2 assemblies from libantlr2.7-cil into Mono
| E: installing Assembly /usr
Version: 0.9.1.2-3
Hello,
the package builds fine now. I'm unsure if this was a temporary
breakage in another package or what.
Cheers,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tag 540737 + confirmed
thanks
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 09:14:49PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
| Setting up libantlr2.7-cil (2.7.7-11) ...
| * Installing 2 assemblies from libantlr2.7-cil into Mono
| E: installing Assembly /usr/lib/cli/antlr-2.7/antlr.astframe.dll failed
| E: Installation of
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:47:38AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Source: classpath
Version: 2:0.98-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Start Time: 20090729-0552
[...]
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), ecj [!alpha !arm !hppa !hurd-i386],
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 07:29:24PM +0100, Al Riddoch wrote:
Subject: cyphesis-cpp packages since at least version 0.5.15 are missing key
files
Package: cyphesis-cpp
Version: 0.5.15-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hello,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 07:47:11PM -0400, Matthias Klose wrote:
reassign 537290 classpath-common
thanks
No, there's nothing wrong with gcj-jdk. It defines a conflict with
the current classpath-common. What needs to be done: update
classpath to 0.98, build cacao using the new
Hello Steve,
sorry for the long delay.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 04:03:15PM +0100, Steve Cotton wrote:
There's a year-old ITP for Ember: #437516
Sear is currently the only user of four libary packages:
liberis-1.3-14 libmd3-1 libsage2 libwfut-0.2-1
Erick (Ember's ITP'r) requests that
tag 487036 pending
thanks
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 12:04:22PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: dom4j
Version: 1.6.1+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080619 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 02:49:31PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 09:32:42AM +0200, Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.29
#
# eclipse (3.2.2-7) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Build-Depends
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 02:09:10AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Package: cacao
Version: 0.99~rc5-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package failed to build from source.
The reason seems to be that configure tries to compile an executable
with -m64 which fails since gcc-multilib isn't
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 09:07:12PM +0200, Philippe Coval wrote:
Tags: patch
It seems that the jar file is badly linked :
I think this can be easly fixed using wildcards in debian/rules
check this patch attached or online at :
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 09:38:34PM +0300, Ionut Ciocirlan wrote:
Package: eclipse
Version: 3.2.2-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Eclipse invariably starts up properly, displays the UI for a short
moment, then closes
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 09:27:12AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 09:38:34PM +0300, Ionut Ciocirlan wrote:
Package: eclipse
Version: 3.2.2-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Eclipse
tag 479226 unreproducible help
thanks
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 01:17:22PM +0300, Ionut Ciocirlan wrote:
No, it doesn't.
What does indeed work is starting with a fresh workbench -- i.e. rm
workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.ui.workbench/workbench.xml
I tried isolating the offending
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 07:10:00PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Package: eclipse-cdt
Version: 3.1.2-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of eclipse-cdt_3.1.2-2 on lebrun by sbuild/sparc 98
Build started at 20080501-1740
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 10:36:43PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Package: libjdic-java
Version: 0.0.20060613-8
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of libjdic-java_0.0.20060613-8 on lebrun by sbuild/sparc 98
Build started at
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 12:45:57PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Package: cacao
Version: 0.99~rc3-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package failed to build from source.
| Automatic build of cacao_0.99~rc3-1 on signy by sbuild/mips 98-farm
| Build started at 20080505-0116
|
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.26
#
# eclipse (3.2.2-6) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Build-Depends on default-jdk-builddep. Closes: #477858
package eclipse-efj eclipse-jdt eclipse-platform libswt3.2-gtk-jni eclipse-sdk
eclipse-rcp eclipse-source
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.26
#
# classpath (2:0.97.1-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Build-Depends on ecj and gcj not on alpha, arm, hppa and hurd-i386.
#Closes: #477852
#
package classpath-common-unzipped classpath-qtpeer classpath-doc gcjwebplugin
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 12:20:25AM +0100, peter green wrote:
tags 478503 +patch
thanks
to fix this bug add
chmod 755 src/native/unix/configure
to the beggining of the configure-stamp target in debian/rules.
No, thats the wrong solution. Problem is that configure script was not
deleted
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 10:02:03AM +0200, Thomas Girard wrote:
Hello Matthias,
Le vendredi 25 avril 2008 à 18:36 +0200, Matthias Klose a écrit :
gij/gcj and java-gcj-compat are not available (anymore) on the following
architectures: alpha, arm, hppa and hurd-i386.
This package has
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:06:20AM +0200, Andreas Kirschbaum wrote:
gcc-4.2 and gcc-4.3 differ in the representation of char values: gcc-4.2
represents a char as a 32 bit value (bits 0..7 is the char value; bits
8..31 are always set to zero); gcc-4.3 uses only the lower 8 bits,
ignoring bits
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 10:24:37PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: java-access-bridge
Version: 1.22.0-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.21
#
# sear (0.6.3+cvs20080127-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Added patch to be able to build with GCC 4.3. Closes: #474866
#
package sear
tags 474866 + pending
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 10:33:32PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: cdk
Version: 1:1.0.2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
...
[javac] Compiling 125 source files to /build/user/cdk-1.0.2/build
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.21
#
# kaffe (2:1.1.8-4) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Make Build-Depends on libasound2-dev only used on linux archs.
#Closes: #397782, #462329
# * Added patch to build against alsa 1.0.16 and up. Closes: #470341
#
package
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 03:13:15PM +0200, Andreas Kirschbaum wrote:
I cannot reproduce this issue: all of jdk1.5.0_02, cacao, kaffe, and gij
produce charts on both AMD x32 and x64 machines.
The only remaining issues are:
- The charts produced by caco/kaffe/gij are about twice as large as
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 11:29:15AM +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
reopen 459281
thanks
Sorry, this problem still occur as of now, on AMD64 machines at
least. With the following commands on one of my boxes (amd64, gij
version 4.3.0-2):
I tested on amd64 with gij-4.3 4.3.0-2.
Cheers,
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.21
#
# tomcat5.5 (5.5.26-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * New upstream release.
#- CVE-2007-5333: unauthorized disclosure of information. Closes: #465645
#- CVS-2007-6286: handling of empty requests.
#
package
forwarded 451494 https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44738
thanks
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 10:51:03AM +0900, SASAJIMA,Toshihiro wrote:
This is a bug of JkOptions handling.
I made a patch for this:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44738
Thanks for the
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 09:22:55PM +0100, Jörg Sommer wrote:
Hello Petter, Hi Java Team,
Petter Reinholdtsen schrieb am Sat 29. Mar, 19:02 (+0100):
[Trent W. Buck]
I don't really know about Java, but I suspect this is failing
because bootchart-view doesn't work with sablevm (which I
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 06:06:25PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: kaffe
Version: 2:1.1.8-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080308 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 05:56:48PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: libtritonus-java
Version: 20070428-5
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080308 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:35:28AM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
And what was the reason? I need to know.
!ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 4 0 2008-03-02 12:38:50.196
!MESSAGE Application error
!STACK 1
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.eclipse.core.runtime.Plugin
at
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 12:01:03PM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
Michael Koch wrote:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:35:28AM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
And what was the reason? I need to know.
!ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 4 0 2008-03-02 12:38:50.196
!MESSAGE Application error
!STACK 1
-* are at version 4.2.1-3
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 05:12:44PM +0100, Michael Koch replied:
I have just tried this with SUN JDK 6, Icedtea, gcj 4.3, jamvm and cacao
with the following result:
* SUN JDK 6: Just works.
* gcj-4.3: No output at all. Returns with exit code 13.
* icedtea: No output
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:39:02PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: jfreereport
Version: 0.9.0-05-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080225 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 09:33:30PM -0500, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Package: libxpp2-java
Version: 2.1.10-4
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
Nice pbuilder output.
To be serious. I can't reproduce this her in a clean pbuilder. Do you
did something special to your pbuilder?
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 09:23:42PM -0500, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Package: libcommons-codec-java
Version: 1.3-4
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
cd . /usr/lib/kaffe/bin/java -classpath
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 09:35:36PM -0500, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Package: libxpp3-java
Version: 1.1.3.4.O-3
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
cd . /usr/lib/kaffe/bin/java -classpath
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:54:16AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
This happens because the existing version is bigger than the new one.
0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ dpkg --compare-versions 1.2.5-2etch1 gt 1.2.5-2+b1
echo bigger || echo smaller
smaller
BTW: I sent an update to the security team
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:56:18AM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
Has anyone actually attempted to debug this? Which code actually calls
Runtime.exit()?
I tried to debug this but I dont found out from where exit is called
with code 13.
I'm betting it's a bogus version check.
What kind of
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 10:33:21AM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
Michael Koch wrote:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:56:18AM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
Has anyone actually attempted to debug this? Which code actually calls
Runtime.exit()?
I tried to debug this but I dont found out from where
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 06:21:54PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
Package: tomcat5.5
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was
published for tomcat5.5.
CVE-2007-5333[0]:
| Apache Tomcat 6.0.0 through 6.0.14, 5.5.0 through 5.5.25, and
severity 459281 important
forwarded 459281 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35168
thanks
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 09:18:06PM +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 07:42:41PM +0100, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
Hello,
Michael Koch wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 10
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 10:19:26AM +0100, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
For information, libjfreechart-java still does not work with gcj
4.3-20080202-1.
I have tested 4.3-20080116-1 and 4.3-20080202-1 locally and both worked.
The generated image is slightly different to the one generated by SUN
but
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 07:42:41PM +0100, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
Hello,
Michael Koch wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 10:19:26AM +0100, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
For information, libjfreechart-java still does not work with gcj
4.3-20080202-1.
I have tested 4.3-20080116-1 and 4.3
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 10:17:47PM +0200, Thomas Girard wrote:
reassign 432541 gcj-4.2
retitle 432541 gcj-4.2 can no longer compile Eclipse plugins
merge 432539 432541
thanks
Hi,
after having slowly updated an etch chroot to a sid one using
snaphsot.debian.net, I have found that the
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 09:49:39AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
antlr/WildcardElement.java:30: error: String cannot be resolved to a type
public void setLabel(String label_) {
^^
antlr/WildcardElement.java:34: error: String cannot be resolved to
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 09:56:07AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
unknown:0: error: verification failed at PC=0: invalid signature
unknown:0: error: verification failed at PC=0: invalid signature
unknown:0: error: verification failed at PC=0: invalid signature
unknown:0: error:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 04:22:52AM +0100, Rene Wunderlich wrote:
1. ubuntu users have the same problem
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eclipse/+bug/109583
2. i found this bug fix from Arnold Daniels and it work for me
http://blog.adaniels.nl/?p=14
$sudo apt-get --purge
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 11:21:55PM +0200, Arie Skliarouk wrote:
I have the same problem.
If I launch the command line manually (not using eclipse shell script), then
eclipse starts properly:
/usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/java -Djava.library.path=/usr/lib/jni -
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 11:21:55PM +0200, Arie Skliarouk wrote:
I have the same problem.
If I launch the command line manually (not using eclipse shell script), then
eclipse starts properly:
/usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/java -Djava.library.path=/usr/lib/jni -
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 11:43:50AM +0200, Arie Skliarouk wrote:
Have you tried executing /usr/lib/eclipse/eclipse?
When I start /usr/lib/eclipse/eclipse, it complains on out-of-memory
# /usr/lib/eclipse/eclipse
GC Warning: Out of Memory! Returning NIL!
In separate window top
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:01:36PM +0200, Arie Skliarouk wrote:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+
COMMAND
4588 arie 23 0 930m 754m 60m D 81 64.7 0:28.48 java
Hmm, no I have a much leaner memory usage here. Is the package
eclipse-gcj installed?
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 01:07:30PM +0200, Arie Skliarouk wrote:
sudo apt-get install java-gcj-compat-dev java-gcj-compat
$ eclipse
searching for compatible vm...
testing /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj...found
$
Apparently works. How can I see for sure, whether it uses gcj?
It did already. It
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:24:20PM +0200, Arie Skliarouk wrote:
On Jan 15, 2008 12:16 PM, Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:01:36PM +0200, Arie Skliarouk wrote:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+
COMMAND
4588 arie 23
tag 460364 pending
thanks
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 10:49:27AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
[javac] 2. ERROR in
/build/user/eclipse-3.2.2/source-tree/plugins/org.eclipse.team.cvs.ssh2/src/org/eclipse/team/internal/ccvs/ssh2/CVSSSH2PreferencePage.java
(at line 877)
[javac]
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 03:48:31PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
It blocked during the testcases. I have no idea why. The last testcases
to be executed were:
[junit] Testcase: setOpenCallCountTwice took 0.045 sec
[junit]
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 12:28:48PM +0100, Deller, Helge wrote:
This is probably the same problem as in ecj Bug#459563
I think both are issues in GCJ. Ant itself is only bytecode. So no
native calls (except when ant-gcj and ant-optional-gcj are installed but
I think these are empty on hppa
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 01:14:07PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: jaxme
version: 0.5.2+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080103 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 10:29:47AM +0100, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
Package: libjfreechart-java
Version: 1.0.9-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
Unfortunately, unlike what is said in the changelog,
libjfreechart-java does not work with free JVM available. As I proof,
I joined a test case,
severity 458606 normal
thanks
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 11:03:49AM +0800, Jivan Amara wrote:
Package: eclipse
Version: 3.2.1-6
Severity: grave
File: /usr/bin/eclipse
Justification: renders package unusable
This bug started for me after installing and removing two UML editors
that interface
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 12:07:44AM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 at 00:53:28 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 08:40:43PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
Michael: how would you recommend proceeding with this? Should I bother
asking for a sponsored-NMU
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 02:48:00PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 12:55:26AM +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 02:40:20AM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
http://people.alioth.debian.org/~smcv-guest/gnash-0.81~rc070818-2.1-rfs1/
Wow, that really
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 02:40:20AM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
(I'm a new maintainer doing RC bug squashing; Michael Koch, Cc'd, is my AM.)
I attach a proposed NMU interdiff for this bug, and for a FTBFS with recent
dpkg-shlibdeps which I discovered while fixing it. I haven't built
Hello Simon,
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 08:40:43PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
Michael: how would you recommend proceeding with this? Should I bother
asking for a sponsored-NMU of a known-broken package in the hope that it's
xmms2's fault, should I add the Recommends, should I file a separate
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 10:15:55PM +0800, darren wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -l |grep libc6
ii libc62.7-3GNU C
Library: Shared libraries
ii libc6-dev2.7-3GNU C
Library:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 11:49:09PM +0100, NoX wrote:
Package: eclipse
Version: 3.2.2-4
Severity: grave
Hi,
I had problems launching eclipse. Every time I tried, the java process
was using up to 80% of the memory.
Please update to glibc 2.7-3 and retry and report back if its better.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:23:50AM +0800, darren wrote:
Package: eclipse
Version: 3.2.2-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Can please retry with libc6 2.7-3?
With which options if your /home parition mounted?
Cheers,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Hello Nicolas,
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 11:38:27PM +0100, Nicolas Maitre wrote:
Package: eclipse
Version: 3.2.2-4
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Hi,
I had problems launching eclipse. Every time I tried, the java process
was using up to 80% of the memory.
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 05:58:02PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Package: flutejava
Version: 1.3-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package failed to build from source. The failure seems to appear on
every architecture.
| Automatic build of flutejava_1.3-2 on odin by sbuild/sparc 98-farm
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 07:13:55AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
Please retry with current java-gcj-compat installed. This should use
much less memory.
Bastian requeued bouncycastle and it build this time (with newer
java-gcj-compat).
Cheers,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 07:55:28AM +0530, Varun Hiremath wrote:
Hi Michael,
On Tue, 23 Oct, 2007 at 11:38:29AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
This is cause by a bug in dak (e.g. #232730). A possible workaround is
to do a complete update with a new orig tarball. This means a new
version
Hello,
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 12:21:56PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
/build/user/javahelp2-2.0.05/build-tree/javahelp2-2.0.05/javahelp_nbproject/build.xml:119:
The following error occurred while executing this line:
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 10:45:34PM +0200, Rene Wunderlich wrote:
Hi,
i tink it is an amd64 bug
i have a 32bit and a 64bit system and the bug is only on the 64bit system
(sid)
the init on a clean homedir fail and eclipse crashes ;/
Hmm, I develop the package on x86_64 and it works fine
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 12:20:22PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: entagged
version: 0.31-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071021 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 12:19:19PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
Package: bouncycastle
Version: 1.37-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of bouncycastle_1.37-2 on debian-31.osdl.marist.edu by
sbuild/s390 98
[...]
install -m
Hello,
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 04:13:09PM +0800, Hongzheng Wang wrote:
Hi,
The error log is quite long. So I attach it at the end. One
important thing is: the crashing is not reproduceable all the time
although the success rate is so low :(
Huh? It tries to load
1 - 100 of 231 matches
Mail list logo
