Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1070421 in mac-widgets reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Thank you very much to Arnd Bergmann and Wookey for the assistance
off-list. Arnd's explanation of the root cause and the patch required
is reproduced below. I suspect others will also find it helpful.
On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 5:33 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> This is the same problem that any
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1068512 in welle.io reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 02:43:20PM +, tony mancill wrote:
> > > > Source: capnproto
> > > > Version: 1.0.1-3
> > > > Severity: serious
> > > > Tags: ftbfs
> > > >
> > > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fe
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 12:50:03AM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> Control: tags 1066649 + patch
> Control: tags 1066649 + pending
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for libtritonus-java (versioned as 20070428-14.2) and
> uploaded it to unstable.
Thank you for the NMU. The
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1067929 in java-package reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 01:49:35PM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 10:31:52PM +0000, tony mancill wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 12:13:57AM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> > > Source: capnproto
> > > Version: 1.0.1-3
> > >
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 12:13:57AM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> Source: capnproto
> Version: 1.0.1-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=capnproto=armhf=1.0.1-3%2Bb2=1711652087=0
Thank you for the bug report. I'm not able to reproduce the
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 11:37:20AM +0200, Frank B. Brokken wrote:
> Dear Peter Green, you wrote:
> > > Also, the bootstrapping procedure is only required when icmake isn't
> > > available ...
>
> Thanks for your bugreport: I'm about to update icmake so that the circular
> dependency between
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 01:50:47PM -0400, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> The 3 test cases pass for me now with the uploaded 1.50+nmu2. Maybe my
> earlier test build used the old version of xz-utils. Thank you for
> your upload!
Given what has unfolded over the past few days regarding xz-utils and
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 01:29:42PM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> Package: icmake,libbobcat6
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
>
> As src:icmake B-D:libbobcat-dev, src:bobcat B-D:icmake, there seems to be zero
> packaging-level support for bootstrapping, the packages are not
>
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1066215 in soundmodem reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1066486 in icom reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1066628 in tlf reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1065108 in java3d reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1060940 in libfreemarker-java reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1057683 in libpdfbox-java reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 05:47:46PM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> tony mancill writes:
>
> > So this is very possibly a bug in libreoffice-writer-nogui.
>
> Sure seems like it. My guess would be that what files go in what
> libreoffice binary packages got refactored so
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1057167 in libapache-poi-java reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 10:47:18PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Source: libitext-java
> Version: 2.1.7-14
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs sid
> User: a...@debian.org
> Usertags: bouncycastle-1.77
> X-Debbugs-Cc: a...@debian.org
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> libitext-java fails to build from
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1057165 in libitext-java reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 09:35:44AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: gpredict
> Version: 2.3-115-g0f3beb6-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
It feels slightly icky because it pulls in a much
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1058273 in gpredict reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 11:06:56PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Source: libitext5-java
> Version: 5.5.13.3-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs sid
> User: a...@debian.org
> Usertags: bouncycastle-1.77
There are PDF signature and encryption test cases running as part of the
build, and I did
On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 12:50:33PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I tried the latest upstream version of libitext5-java and commited the
> change to Git. Unfortunately the problem persists. Some Debian Med
> packages are depending from this package so I'd be happy if someone
> could have a look.
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1057171 in libitext5-java reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 08:18:03PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Package: src:libjose4j-java
> Version: 0.7.12-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
>
> [ERROR] Tests run: 6, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.063
> s <<< FAILURE! - in org.jose4j.jwk.EllipticCurveJsonWebKeyTest
>
On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 04:39:35PM -0500, Jérôme Charaoui wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 09:37:34 +0100 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
> > 'testing'.
> > It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
> > because
0 -0700
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+python-agate (1.6.3-2.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Update TZ used in tests for tzdata 2023c-8 (Closes: #1052831)
+
+ -- tony mancill Wed, 25 Oct 2023 06:41:55 -0700
+
python-agate (1.6.3-2) unstable; urgency=medium
[ Debian
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 06:46:06PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: libjson-smart-java
> Version: 2.2-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: bullseye bookworm trixie sid
>
> Hi,
>
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package cannot be upgraded
> from buster-lts to any newer release since
On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 11:08:19AM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: severity -1 serious
> Control: tags -1 sid trixie
>
> On 2019-10-05 23:28:58 +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > Package: java-package
> > Version: 0.62
> > Severity: important
> >
> > libgl1-mesa-glx is a transitional
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1037724 in libcm256cc reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1037661 in flrig reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1041387 in libpdfbox-java reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 01:46:02PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> I intend to build and upload in the next few days, but you are welcome
> to NMU if you would prefer.
Uploaded as 11.0.11+1-3.1. (The version number was a slight mistake on
my part; I meant to remove the NMU suffix in the cha
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1021894 in openjfx reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Hi Wookey,
Thank you for the investigation and the patch!
I intend to build and upload in the next few days, but you are welcome
to NMU if you would prefer.
Cheers,
tony
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 02:28:14PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> Source: openjfx
> Followup-For: Bug #1021894
>
> I was surprised
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1037754 in limesuite reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
close 1037857 15.02.00-1
thanks
Upstream 15.02.00 addressed the FTBFS with GCC-13.
close 1037598 15.02.00-1
thanks
Upstream release 15.02.00 addressed the FTBFS with GCC-13.
On Sat, Jun 03, 2023 at 12:58:17PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Jun 2023 21:40:10 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > While this is not a build failure, it does mean building the package has a
> > dependency on software outside of main, which I believe is a serious policy
> >
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1037064 in maven-verifier reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 06:55:49AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 13:56:42 +0100 Bastian Blank wrote:
> > | dpkg: error processing package openjdk-21-jdk:arm64 (--configure):
> > | dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
>
> It also fails to install with
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 10:18:50PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: tony mancill
> > In any event, I think the change is good and am planning to upload,
> > provided there are no concerns from the Debian Hams.
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> Christoph
Thank you Christoph.
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 03:08:22AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: libsoapysdr0.8
> Version: 0.8.1-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts
>
> The soapysdr library stacks from bullseye and bookworm are not
> co-installable, but the
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1035850 in groovy reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 09:15:40AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: groovy
> Version: 2.4.21-7
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts
>
> Hi,
>
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates)
> a broken symlink.
>
> 0m28.4s
On Sat, Apr 08, 2023 at 09:13:00PM +, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Control: tag -1 pending
>
> Hello,
>
> Bug #1034059 in zstd-jni-java reported by you has been fixed in the
> Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
> message below and you can check the diff of the fix
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1033170 in libitext-java reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 07:37:48AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> However, given the low popcon count and the brokenness of the package,
> that may be the best path. If there are users of libitext-rups-java who
> think otherwise, now would be the time to speak up.
>
> ...
Hi Jorge,
On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 10:45:32PM -0400, Jorge Moraleda wrote:
> Hello Tony,
>
> I propose that we either reduce the severity, ignore the bug for the
> > bookworm release cycle, or remove only the libitext-rups-java binary
> > package from bookworm.
> >
> Thank you. I believe the
On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 05:42:12PM -0400, Jorge Moraleda wrote:
> Package: libitext-rups-java
> Version: 2.1.7-13
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> X-Debbugs-Cc: jorge.moral...@gmail.com
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> The package does not work at all. Based on the following
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 11:13:35PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 shrinksafe
> Control: severity -1 serious
>
> I uploaded a new version of rhino a while ago and it seems this bug is still
> relevant. I have rebuilt dojo with rhino 1.7.14 and all shrinksafe tests pass.
>
On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 08:14:31PM +, James Addison wrote:
> Source: openjfx
> Followup-For: Bug #1026962
>
> Could the following build-related scripting be something to do with it?
>
> -
>
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1028720 in wss4j reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1026494 in eclipse-wtp reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1030414 in jalview reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1028772 in apache-directory-jdbm reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1028752 in openid4java reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 11:12:15PM +0100, Alexandre Rossi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > The update looks good to me and a rebuild of rdeps with ratt was
> > successful. Or more precisely, was successful for the packages that
> > also build against 5.12.1. So I have just uploaded to the archive.
>
>
On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 11:35:30PM +0100, David Prévot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 09:17:02PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff a écrit :
> > Source: nekohtml
> […]
> > The following vulnerability was published for nekohtml.
> >
> > CVE-2022-24839[0]:
>
> I prepared an upload (new upstream
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1029622 in tuxguitar reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 10:55:09PM +0100, Alexandre Rossi wrote:
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/libjna-java/
>
> My commits are available at: https://salsa.debian.org/niol/libjna-java/
Hi Alex,
The update looks good to me and a rebuild of rdeps with ratt was
successful. Or more
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1028374 in libjna-java reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 08:45:55PM +0100, Helmar Gerloni wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> sorry for causing so much work with tuxguitar, and thanks for your efforts!
>
> Do you think it would make sense to merge all the tuxguitar* packages into
> one package tuxguitar with arch-any? Maybe this would solve
Hi Alex,
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 10:55:09PM +0100, Alexandre Rossi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I prepared an updated package with the new upstream version.
>
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/libjna-java/
>
> My commits are available at: https://salsa.debian.org/niol/libjna-java/
I will take a look.
Hi Helmar,
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 08:45:55PM +0100, Helmar Gerloni wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> sorry for causing so much work with tuxguitar, and thanks for your efforts!
No worries at all! You've done a lot of work on the package, so we will
get it ironed out in time for the release.
> Do you
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1028170 in maven-doxia-tools reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 05:24:30PM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> $ reverse-depends -b -l libcommons-vfs-java
> commons-configuration
> commons-configuration2
> ivy
> mondrian
> sbt-ivy
Bah, this should have been:
$ reverse-depends -l -b libcommons-vfs-java-doc
commons-con
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1028168 in commons-configuration2 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Hi Scott,
On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 07:08:10PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Source: commons-configuration
> Version: 1.10-5
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
> Justification: fails to build from source
>
>
> * source package commons-vfs version 2.1-4 no longer builds
> binary package(s):
On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 05:25:40PM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 08:22:43PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Source: openjfx
> > Version: 11.0.11+0-1.1
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: ftbfs
> > Justification: fails to build fr
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1027484 in commons-vfs reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 08:22:43PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Source: openjfx
> Version: 11.0.11+0-1.1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
>
> openjfx tries to build with -j64 on zani.debian.org, which only has 2
>
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 06:32:07PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: apache-directory-api
> Version: 1.0.0-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
The FTBFS is due to the recent upload of mina2
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1026510 in openjfx reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1026685 in streamex reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Hi Gregor,
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 07:31:55PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Control: tag -1 + confirmed upstream
>
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 18:28:10 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > Source: clusterssh
> > Version: 4.16-3
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: FTBFS
> > Tags: bookworm sid
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #102 in apache-log4j2 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Hi Pierre,
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 07:31:30AM +0100, Pierre Gruet wrote:
> Hi tony,
>
> Le 21/12/2022 à 22:58, tony mancill a écrit :
> > On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 11:45:54PM +0100, Pierre Gruet wrote:
> > > Control: retitle -1 Please make liblog4j2-java depend on j
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1026710 in libspin-java reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 11:45:54PM +0100, Pierre Gruet wrote:
> Control: retitle -1 Please make liblog4j2-java depend on junit5
>
> Hello,
>
> In version 2.19.0-1 of liblog4j2-java, the file
>
> /usr/share/maven-repo/org/apache/logging/log4j/log4j/debian/log4j-debian.pom
> declares the
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1026617 in libjt400-java reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 12:07:24PM +0100, Hans Joachim Desserud wrote:
> tags 1026617 patch
> thanks
>
> > [javac] both class com.ibm.as400.access.Record in
> > com.ibm.as400.access and class java.lang.Record in java.lang match
> > [javac]
> >
Hi Peter,
On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 09:17:50AM +, Peter Green wrote:
> Source: byte-buddy
> Version: 1.8.2-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: bookworm, sid
> Justification: rc policy - "Packages must be buildable within the same
> release"
> User:debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags:
Source: libphonenumber
Version: 8.12.57+ds-2
Severity: serious
Creating this for tracking and coordination purposes. After this [1]
upload, libphonenumber is FTBFS. Please refer to the buildd logs [2].
[1]
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 03:26:12PM +, Stephan Verbücheln wrote:
> From changelog:
>
> libphonenumber (8.12.57+ds-1+b1) sid; urgency=low, binary-only=yes
>
> * Binary-only non-maintainer upload for amd64; no source changes.
> * Rebuild against libicu72
>
> -- amd64 / i386 Build Daemon
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 01:45:26PM +, Stephan Verbücheln wrote:
> Evolution gives the following confusing error message.
>
> $ evolution
> evolution: symbol lookup error: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libebook-
> contacts-1.2.so.4: undefined symbol:
>
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 06:28:04AM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-11-22 at 21:11 -0800, tony mancill wrote:
>
> I guess it must be doing some kind of dynamic loading stuff? OTOH, it
> seems to be just linked as a plain shared lib:
> $ libtree /usr/lib/x
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 05:02:16AM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Package: libphonenumber8
> Version: 8.12.57+ds-1+b2
> Severity: serious
>
> After the upgrade, evolution crashes when started:
> $ evolution
> evolution: symbol lookup error:
>
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 05:02:16AM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> After the upgrade, evolution crashes when started:
> $ evolution
> evolution: symbol lookup error:
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libebook-contacts-1.2.so.4: undefined symbol:
>
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 05:51:50AM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Hey Tony.
>
> On Tue, 2022-11-22 at 20:40 -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> > Thank you for the bug report. libphonenumber 8.12.57+ds-1 has been
> > in
> > testing for longer than a month at t
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 05:02:16AM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Package: libphonenumber8
> Version: 8.12.57+ds-1+b2
> Severity: serious
>
>
> Hey.
>
> After the upgrade, evolution crashes when started:
> $ evolution
> evolution: symbol lookup error:
>
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1022388 in jacoco reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 05:06:01PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Source: syncany
> Version: 0.4.9~alpha-4
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
> Justification: fails to build from source
>
> Hi,
>
> syncany recently started to FTBFS:
Hello Andreas,
Thank you for the bug report. I'm not sure
On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 04:57:14PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Package: tucnak
> Version: 4.36-1
> Severity: grave
>
> tucnak doesn't start here:
>
> $ LC_ALL=C tucnak
Hi Christoph,
Hmm... it starts and runs here, so I don't think it is broken for
everyone. I uninstalled and reinstalled to
Hi Paul,
On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 09:51:03PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 3 Jul 2022 21:25:49 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Your package failed to build from source on arm64 and armhf while it
> > built there successfully in the past.
>
> I just checked to see if there would be a
Hello Thomas,
On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 04:00:20PM +0200, Thomas Uhle wrote:
> Package: libitext5-java
> Version: 5.5.13.2-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: security upstream
> X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@security.debian.org
> Control: found -1 5.5.13-1
>
> Dear maintainers,
>
> there is a new bugfix release
Hi Markus,
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 12:52:59AM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Hi tony,
>
> Am Sonntag, dem 15.05.2022 um 11:17 -0700 schrieb tony mancill:
>
> > [...]
> > Any thoughts? It's a tad messy either way, but using current versions
> > simplifies the port
1 - 100 of 555 matches
Mail list logo
