On Apr 29, Matt Taggart wrote:
I'd also be happy to use something not based on '90's technology, but
I have yet to find anything that works as well. If people have
suggestions I would love to hear them.
There are not many. With the same functionality there's only
kdiff3 and maybe meld. But
Package: cxref
Version: 1.6e-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.3
Dear Maintainer,
on a fresh installation cxref complains about a locally modified config file:
A new version (/tmp/cxref-cpp.defines) of configuration file
/etc/cxref/cxref-cpp.defines is available, but the
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.16.9
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Dear Maintainer,
before and after the upgrade from squeeze to wheezy I checked
my system with debsums. After the upgrade I found several
modified files. I tried to fix the changed files by reinstalling
the
Package: python-wxgtk2.8
Version: 2.8.12.1-11
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Hello,
the upgrade from squeeze to wheezy aborts with the following
error message:
E: Could not perform immediate configuration on 'python-wxgtk2.8'. Please see
man 5 apt.conf under
Package: iptotal
Version: 0.3.3-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi
After upgrading from etch to lenny the iptotal web page does not show traffic
graphs anymore. The reason is a wrong image path in the generated HTML code:
IMG
Package: adjtimex
Version: 1.26-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.3
Hi
The upgrade of adjtimex overwrites the TICK and FREQ values in the config
file /etc/default/adjtimex without a question or warning.
After seeing the 2 debconf values below I checked the package configuration
Package: python2.5
Version: 2.5.2-15
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi
'aptitude full-upgrade' from etch to lenny aborts with the error:
Processing was halted because there were too many errors.
These errors are probably caused by a wrong installation order of python
Hi Tomas
So please Kent, Ben, Leonardo, Norman, Mind Booster, Daniel, Uwe, Mike an
Luke - could you tell us from which openbsd-inetd (or xinetd or
netkit-inetd) you were upgrading from?
I also was upgrading from openbsd-inetd version 0.20050402-4.
But downgrading and upgrading again does
Package: openbsd-inetd
Version: 0.20050402-5
Followup-For: Bug #386469
This bug is not fixed, I just got it on two different machines during
an upgrade:
Setting up openbsd-inetd (0.20050402-5) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/openbsd-inetd ...
Starting internet superserver:
Hi Junichi,
version 0.0.63 does the job with the proxy for me. Good work!
But apt-listbugs now reclaims about http_proxy is set and aborts,
which is not nice:
# apt-listbugs list apt-listbugs
/usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:395:in `parse_options': E: sanity check failed:
environment variable http_proxy
Hi
On Oct 06, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Have you read the manpage?
No, at least not the one from the new version :).
I just have done it ...
If you have configured proxy in your apt.conf, you don't need to think
about it, but If you are configuring your proxy with HTTP_PROXY
variable set, you
Hi
On Oct 06, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Could you try to reproduce with
/usr/sbin/apt-listbugs list apt-listbugs -d
# /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs list apt-listbugs -d
http_proxy: http://http-proxy:8080/ : http-proxy 8080
http://bugs.debian.org:80/
indexdir = /indices/
Reading
Hi
On Oct 04, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
.58 fixes the issue with http-proxy, please try.
This is what I get with .58 installed:
# apt-get upgrade
[..]
35 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 6 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/46.0MB of archives.
After unpacking 824kB of additional disk space
Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.0.57
Followup-For: Bug #389681
This bug still exists in version 0.0.57:
Retrieving bug reports... 0% ... E: undefined local variable or method `pkg'
for Factory::BugsFactory:Module
E: Sub-process if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .* ok installed';
Hi
On Oct 03, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Could you reproduce a full screen log for the apt session? Which
package you tried to install, etc.
# apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
freeguide (0.8.6-1 =
If the network connection does matter in any way: I have to use a
http-proxy here, the network has no direct routing to the internet.
Regards,
Uwe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: pvm
Version: 3.4.2-17
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
pvm needs libpvm3.so.3, which is in package libpvm3:
$ ldd /usr/bin/pvm
libpvm3.so.3 = not found
libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40029000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2
17 matches
Mail list logo