On 3/14/22 11:51 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
Am Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 12:13:50AM + schrieb Torrance, Douglas:
On Sun 13 Mar 2022 04:50:32 PM EDT, M. Zhou wrote:
Recently I'm not able to test the build of libtbb-dev's reverse dependencies
as my build machine was out of access. That blocks
Hi,
Am Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 12:13:50AM + schrieb Torrance, Douglas:
> On Sun 13 Mar 2022 04:50:32 PM EDT, M. Zhou wrote:
> > Recently I'm not able to test the build of libtbb-dev's reverse dependencies
> > as my build machine was out of access. That blocks my submission of the
> > transition
On Sun 13 Mar 2022 04:50:32 PM EDT, M. Zhou wrote:
Recently I'm not able to test the build of libtbb-dev's reverse dependencies
as my build machine was out of access. That blocks my submission of the
transition bug and hence I'm stalled at this point.
According to some archlinux developers,
Hi,
Recently I'm not able to test the build of libtbb-dev's reverse dependencies
as my build machine was out of access. That blocks my submission of the
transition bug and hence I'm stalled at this point.
According to some archlinux developers, this transition breaks a lot of
reverse dependencies
Hi Mo,
On 2/23/22 11:01 AM, M. Zhou wrote:
Hello guys. Finally it's all green on our release architectures
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=onetbb=experimental
I shall request the slot for transition once finished the rebuild
of its reverse dependencies and filed FTBFS bugs if
On Wed, 2022-02-23 at 00:31 -0500, M. Zhou wrote:
> Hello guys. Finally it's all green on our release architectures
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=onetbb=experimental
>
> I shall request the slot for transition once finished the rebuild
> of its reverse dependencies and filed
Am Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 12:31:07AM -0500 schrieb M. Zhou:
> Hello guys. Finally it's all green on our release architectures
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=onetbb=experimental
>
> I shall request the slot for transition once finished the rebuild
> of its reverse dependencies and
Hello guys. Finally it's all green on our release architectures
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=onetbb=experimental
I shall request the slot for transition once finished the rebuild
of its reverse dependencies and filed FTBFS bugs if any.
On Tue, 2022-02-08 at 17:59 -0500, M. Zhou
Hi Diane,
Thank you. I have added that patch in the git repository.
On Tue, 2022-02-08 at 13:49 -0800, Diane Trout wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After Andreas pointed it out I looked through some of the build
> failures for onetbb and talked to upstream about the i386 failure.
>
Hi,
After Andreas pointed it out I looked through some of the build
failures for onetbb and talked to upstream about the i386 failure.
https://github.com/oneapi-src/oneTBB/issues/370#issuecomment-1030387116
They have a patch.
Hi Mo,
thanks a lot. I asked on IRC for priorisation of this
package.
Kind regards
Andreas.
Am Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 08:30:57PM -0500 schrieb M. Zhou:
> Hi all,
>
> The good news is that I managed to upgrade onetbb. It
> is in the NEW queue now:
>
Hi all,
The good news is that I managed to upgrade onetbb. It
is in the NEW queue now:
https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/onetbb_2021.4.0-1~exp1.html
All changes have been pushed onto salsa (master branch).
SOVERSION was bumped from 2 to 12 so NEW is inevitable.
There are also some non-trivial
On Thu, 2021-12-23 at 11:03 -0500, M. Zhou wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm back.
>
> I've just finished my final exams so I could do something during
> the holiday. That TBB repository is still work-in-progress and
> FTBFS from the master branch is something expected. I will finalize
> it soon. Andreas
Hi,
Am Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 11:03:56AM -0500 schrieb M. Zhou:
>
> I've just finished my final exams so I could do something during
> the holiday.
Great. Hope you finished the exams successfully. ;-)
> That TBB repository is still work-in-progress and
> FTBFS from the master branch is
Hi all,
I'm back.
I've just finished my final exams so I could do something during
the holiday. That TBB repository is still work-in-progress and
FTBFS from the master branch is something expected. I will finalize
it soon. Andreas said in previous posts that we prefer a faster
NEW queue process.
On 2021-12-23 10:24, Drew Parsons wrote:
On 2021-12-23 06:57, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
Am Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 05:09:35PM -0800 schrieb Diane Trout:
On Wed, 2021-12-22 at 22:24 +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>
> Actually because of the current state of numba, several reverse
> depends are FTBFS
On 2021-12-23 06:57, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
Am Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 05:09:35PM -0800 schrieb Diane Trout:
On Wed, 2021-12-22 at 22:24 +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>
> Actually because of the current state of numba, several reverse
> depends are FTBFS so it's
> bit urgent to push. Apologies for
Hi,
Am Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 05:09:35PM -0800 schrieb Diane Trout:
> On Wed, 2021-12-22 at 22:24 +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> >
> > Actually because of the current state of numba, several reverse
> > depends are FTBFS so it's
> > bit urgent to push. Apologies for getting on your nerves, though.
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
