On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 01:12:11AM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
On 2008-08-24 20:36, Luk Claes wrote:
I guess bug submitters and/or patch providers would also count as
contributor?
#417310 - patch by Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All of my contributions to the release notes were
Hi,
Op Sun 24 Aug 2008 om 07:00:56 +0200 schreef W. Martin Borgert:
Somehow Luk managed to make me say OK, I'll collect the release
notes for lenny. That's DebConf before the first coffee. At
this moment I was not aware of the license issue: There is
currently no license. The practical impact
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 09:58:25PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 07:26:38PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
But, in such an (unlikely) court battle the onus would be on them to
prove that the stuff they committed was both copyrightable in the first
place as well as not
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 08:55:24PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 09:58:25PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 07:26:38PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
But, in such an (unlikely) court battle the onus would be on them to
prove that the stuff they committed
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 05:42:12AM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
Obviously the implicit copyright all rights reserved would apply by
default,
but given that all contributions were explicitly published by all of the
authors, I think that considering the work to be released into the
Josip Rodin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 05:42:12AM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
Obviously the implicit copyright all rights reserved would apply by
default,
but given that all contributions were explicitly published by all of the
authors, I think that considering the work to be
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 07:26:38PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
But, in such an (unlikely) court battle the onus would be on them to
prove that the stuff they committed was both copyrightable in the first
place as well as not infringing on previous work (which they apparently
didn't have any
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 02:45:50AM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
From http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=332782#87, we have
these contributors not listed in your mail:
- Daniel Nylander
Swedish translation.
Translations being copyrightable works in their own right, their
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 12:19:46PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 07:00:56PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
I ask hereby - and in private mails following this one - all
authors of the release notes to place their contribution to the
release notes under the GNU General
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 01:12:11AM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
On 2008-08-24 20:36, Luk Claes wrote:
I guess bug submitters and/or patch providers would also count as
contributor?
Yes. There are 16 bugs with a patch tag:
#404891 - patch by Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2008-08-24 23:54, Steve Langasek wrote:
Translations being copyrightable works in their own right, their authors
should be asked to ratify the GPLv2 license to give us the best chance of
reusing material; or is there another reason you mention here that he's a
translator?
Of course, it's
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 07:00:56PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
I ask hereby - and in private mails following this one - all
authors of the release notes to place their contribution to the
release notes under the GNU General Public license (version 2 or
higher) by an GPG-signed e-mail to
On 2008-08-25 23:36, Josip Rodin wrote:
Why do I have to be on top of the list of copyright mischief?! ;)
Your name is the first in the author list :~)
Obviously the implicit copyright all rights reserved would apply by default,
but given that all contributions were explicitly published by
Somehow Luk managed to make me say OK, I'll collect the release
notes for lenny. That's DebConf before the first coffee. At
this moment I was not aware of the license issue: There is
currently no license. The practical impact is probably small,
but I really want to solve the issue now. The bug
W. Martin Borgert wrote:
Somehow Luk managed to make me say OK, I'll collect the release
notes for lenny. That's DebConf before the first coffee. At
this moment I was not aware of the license issue: There is
currently no license. The practical impact is probably small,
but I really want to
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 07:00:56PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
Somehow Luk managed to make me say OK, I'll collect the release
notes for lenny. That's DebConf before the first coffee. At
this moment I was not aware of the license issue: There is
currently no license. The practical impact
On 2008-08-24 20:36, Luk Claes wrote:
I guess bug submitters and/or patch providers would also count as
contributor?
Yes. There are 16 bugs with a patch tag:
#404891 - patch by Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#339081, #363056 - Japanese translation fixes by Kobayashi Noritada
[EMAIL
On 2008-08-24 12:19, Steve Langasek wrote:
I was a release note editor for the last release only; my contributions are
far less than those of many others on that list, it's not really fair to
call me a main author...
OK.
Legally, there is no reason to require GPG-signed email; and there's no
18 matches
Mail list logo
