Package: tetex-ucs
Severity: serious
When I reassigned a bug report to tetex-ucs, I got the attached
bounce. The Maintainer address of a package ought to be deliverable
IMO, even if it only exists in stable.
Daniel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
On 2008-07-08 16:14 +0200, Daniel Burrows wrote:
Package: tetex-ucs
Severity: serious
When I reassigned a bug report to tetex-ucs, I got the attached
bounce. The Maintainer address of a package ought to be deliverable
IMO, even if it only exists in stable.
Even if the package does not
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 04:17:48PM +0200, Sven Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
On 2008-07-08 16:14 +0200, Daniel Burrows wrote:
Package: tetex-ucs
Severity: serious
When I reassigned a bug report to tetex-ucs, I got the attached
bounce. The Maintainer address of a
On 2008-07-08 16:30 +0200, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 04:17:48PM +0200, Sven Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
Even if the package does not exist at all? ;-) You're looking for
latex-ucs, not tetex-ucs.
d'oh, sorry about that. latex, tetex, texlive, ...
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 07:30:09AM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 04:17:48PM +0200, Sven Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
On 2008-07-08 16:14 +0200, Daniel Burrows wrote:
Package: tetex-ucs
Severity: serious
When I reassigned a bug report to
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 03:50:18PM +0100, Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 07:30:09AM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
Interesting question, though: I checked packages.debian.org and this
*does* have a real maintainer (Martin Pitt). So maybe this is a
6 matches
Mail list logo
