I don't think you should remove /usr/lib/fglrx/diversions/libglx.so by
hand. This file belongs to xserver-xorg-core (that's why there is a
diversion). I think it is related to the fact that fglrx-glx.postrm
removes fglrx-driver diversions although it shouldn't. Could you test
the last revision
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 20:49:13 +0200 Bertrand Marc Bertrand wrote:
I don't think you should remove /usr/lib/fglrx/diversions/libglx.so by
hand. This file belongs to xserver-xorg-core (that's why there is a
diversion).
agreed. that is just a temporary solution to get the problematic
package
fixed 542400 1:9-8-2
thanks
tested revision 278. your changes have fixed this problem. thanks!
mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
fixed 542400 1:9-8-2
Bug #542400 [fglrx-driver] Unable to remove package, post removal script fails
There is no source info for the package 'fglrx-driver' at version '1:9-8-2'
with architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version
Package: fglrx-glx
Version: 1:9-7-2
Severity: serious
~-r...@ioapt-get remove fglrx-glx
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
fglrx-glx
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 26 not
Package: fglrx-glx
Version: 1:9-7-2
Severity: serious
~-r...@ioapt-get remove fglrx-glx
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
fglrx-glx
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 26 not
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
may you please retest it with 9-8-1? The diversion handling has been
changed there..
Is that in experimental?
I am happy to test that, if I can get rid of the damn^W package.
I have seen this reported before, tofether with a bunch of other stuff,
but lost in the noise,
7 matches
Mail list logo
