Hello Julien,
Julien Cristau [2011-01-18 12:01 +0100]:
That doesn't address Riddell's point. You're mixing GPL 2 (poppler)
with GPL 2+ (PDF reflow plugin) with GPL 3 (calibre). I don't think
that works.
As I see no way to sensibly untangle this for squeeze, I propose to
upload a version to
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:49:38 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
Hello Julien,
Julien Cristau [2011-01-18 12:01 +0100]:
That doesn't address Riddell's point. You're mixing GPL 2 (poppler)
with GPL 2+ (PDF reflow plugin) with GPL 3 (calibre). I don't think
that works.
As I see no way to
Hello Julien,
Julien Cristau [2011-01-25 13:00 +0100]:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:49:38 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
As I see no way to sensibly untangle this for squeeze, I propose to
upload a version to t-p-u which removes the pdfreflow plugin. I still
need to build it, as otherwise the
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 07:58:26 -0600, Martin Pitt wrote:
Julien Cristau [2011-01-14 11:05 +0100]:
It doesn't sound like this has been addressed?
How do you mean in particular? The PDF reflow plugin now is GPL 2 or
later, so it should be compatible with poppler again?
That doesn't
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 21:17:33 +, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
The question is if the plugin is a derived work of both the GPL 2 only
libpoppler and the GPL 3 only application. Since it can't exist
without either then it almost certainly is. And since the licences
are incompatible that
Hello Adam,
Adam D. Barratt [2011-01-13 22:46 +]:
Does this change apply retrospectively, or just to the new upstream
release?
Formally only to the new upstream release, so I'll try my luck first
with asking for a freeze exception.
Martin
--
Martin Pitt|
Julien Cristau [2011-01-14 11:05 +0100]:
It doesn't sound like this has been addressed?
How do you mean in particular? The PDF reflow plugin now is GPL 2 or
later, so it should be compatible with poppler again?
It hasn't been addressed in testing yet. While I have you here, what
do you think
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 18:29 -0600, Martin Pitt wrote:
Hello Karsten,
debbug609581.609581.iri...@recursor.net [2011-01-11 18:54 +0100]:
The current source from http://calibre-ebook.com/download_linux
at http://status.calibre-ebook.com/dist/src (tarball) has an updated
COPYING file, which
Hello Karsten,
debbug609581.609581.iri...@recursor.net [2011-01-11 18:54 +0100]:
The current source from http://calibre-ebook.com/download_linux
at http://status.calibre-ebook.com/dist/src (tarball) has an updated
COPYING file, which contains:
=COPYING=
Files:
The current source from http://calibre-ebook.com/download_linux
at http://status.calibre-ebook.com/dist/src (tarball) has an updated
COPYING file, which contains:
=COPYING=
Files: src/calibre/ebooks/pdf/*.h,*.cpp
License: GPL-2 or later
The full text of the GPL is
The question is if the plugin is a derived work of both the GPL 2 only
libpoppler and the GPL 3 only application. Since it can't exist
without either then it almost certainly is. And since the licences
are incompatible that makes it illegal to distribute.
Jonathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
11 matches
Mail list logo
