Bug#680414: aircrack-ng: FTBFS on most architectures

2012-07-27 Thread Hector Oron
Hello, On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 06:56:03PM +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote: So, I would like to upload this new version [2] to unstable, but I need a sponsor since Paul is on holidays. Will you be willing to sponsor it or should I fill a RFS on debian-mentors? I am willing to

Bug#680414: aircrack-ng: FTBFS on most architectures

2012-07-27 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 27/07/12 17:17, Hector Oron wrote: Hello, On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 06:56:03PM +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote: So, I would like to upload this new version [2] to unstable, but I need a sponsor since Paul is on holidays. Will you be willing to sponsor it or should I fill a RFS

Bug#680414: aircrack-ng: FTBFS on most architectures

2012-07-27 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 28/07/12 00:13, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote: * Removed patch 013-workaround-681113-kfreebsd.diff (not longer needed since bug #681113 was fixed) ^^^ Seems that #681113 was fixed, but the build machines are running an older version of eglibc, so the build broke on the kfreebsd

Bug#680414: aircrack-ng: FTBFS on most architectures

2012-07-20 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote (19 Jul 2012 16:56:03 GMT) : We won't have aircrack-ng on the next stable release :( That's a bit sad, but this was huge work, no guarantee to succeed in time, and we have backports for that kind of case, so the awesome work you and others put into it is not

Bug#680414: aircrack-ng: FTBFS on most architectures

2012-07-20 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 21/07/12 02:51, intrigeri wrote: I had a look at the debdiff. To be honest, I don't feel competent to evaluate the gnutls/gcrypt patches myself, so I'd rather not upload this into Debian unless I'm convinced upstream will integrate these patches, or they are reviewed by a knowledgeable

Bug#680414: aircrack-ng: FTBFS on most architectures

2012-07-20 Thread intrigeri
hi, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote (21 Jul 2012 02:08:33 GMT) : This patches were already reviewed by upstream [1] and will be committed to the aircrack-ng repository ASAP. Looks good! :) There are minor differences (in changes to src/Makefile) with the patch submitted upstream, though.

Bug#680414: aircrack-ng: FTBFS on most architectures

2012-07-20 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 21/07/12 04:32, intrigeri wrote: hi, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote (21 Jul 2012 02:08:33 GMT) : This patches were already reviewed by upstream [1] and will be committed to the aircrack-ng repository ASAP. Looks good! :) There are minor differences (in changes to src/Makefile)

Bug#680414: aircrack-ng: FTBFS on most architectures

2012-07-19 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 18/07/12 20:06, intrigeri wrote: Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote (18 Jul 2012 17:45:08 GMT) : I have the new version ready on mentors. Cool! I will let you know when I get the OK from the release-team to the unblock request. Sure. Seems that the release-team is not willing to

Bug#680414: aircrack-ng: FTBFS on most architectures

2012-07-18 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote (05 Jul 2012 22:39:11 GMT) : I don't think that the current version (1:1.1-3) should go into Wheezy because of this issues. Perhaps (1:1.1-4) if the release team give an exception could be the only chance of having aircrack-ng on Wheezy. Will be working

Bug#680414: aircrack-ng: FTBFS on most architectures

2012-07-18 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 18/07/12 19:37, intrigeri wrote: Hi, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote (05 Jul 2012 22:39:11 GMT) : I don't think that the current version (1:1.1-3) should go into Wheezy because of this issues. Perhaps (1:1.1-4) if the release team give an exception could be the only chance of having

Bug#680414: aircrack-ng: FTBFS on most architectures

2012-07-18 Thread intrigeri
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote (18 Jul 2012 17:45:08 GMT) : I have the new version ready on mentors. Cool! I will let you know when I get the OK from the release-team to the unblock request. Sure. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of