Bug#290291: evolution: Evolution does not authenticate using MD5 methods (DIGEST/CRAM) and remains plaintext
So, to eventually close this bug. It is identified in 2.0.3 by upstream maintainers and a patch[1] has been issued to fix the bug. What I could see for now : bug is triggered when you open any email account preferences. All accounts auth type is then reset to plaintext authentification, although you may not have edited other accounts. Indeed, I changed an account settings last thursday, day on which I began to experienced the problem. So, nothing related to a package update. To get things back, one have to repeat procedure explained in previous message (or apply patch). [1] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=13703 -- http://www.netexit.com/~sid/ PGP KeyID: 157E98EE FingerPrint: FA62226DA9E72FA8AECAA240008B480E157E98EE Hi! I'm your friendly neighbourhood signature virus. Copy me to your signature file and help me spread! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290726: mozilla-enigmail is uninstallable; requires Mozilla 1.7.3 but unstable has 1.7.5
Package: mozilla-enigmail Version: 2:0.89.0.experimental-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental The mozilla-enigmail package is uninstallable, because it requires Mozilla 1.7.3, but unstable has 1.7.5 . - Josh Triplett signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#284952: The USB block device should be disabled
Package: kernel-image-2.6.9-powerpc Version: 2.6.9-4 Followup-For: Bug #284952 The USB block device is known to be experimental and buggy. CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UB=m should be set to 'n'. Since the ub modules takes preference of the old, though working usb-storage, hotplug loads ub. Blacklisting ub doesn't help, loading usb-storage doesn't work either. I really would like for UB to be disable until proven reasonably stable. Greetings, Paul -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-powerpc Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages kernel-image-2.6.9-powerpc depends on: ii initrd-tools 0.1.76 tools to create initrd image for p ii module-init-tools 3.1-rel-2 tools for managing Linux kernel mo -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#286305: wlang modules are unbuildable from source in main, ...
Hello, Here is a log of a discussion held with vorlon and Zomb about this issue, just so that this knowledge doesn't dissapears again as my original followup apparently did. 10:58 vorlon svenl: why exactly did you mark 242068 as grave? 11:08 svenl vorlon: let me check. 11:10 svenl vorlon: mmm, maybe i would not have. 11:10 svenl vorlon: it makes the package unusable on powerpc. 11:11 svenl vorlon: since the new airport is unsupported (being a broadcom chip), this mean a major chunk of wifi chips is not supported. 11:12 svenl vorlon: the bug has been open 286 days, is reported to be functional on powerpc (in the 2.6.6 days). Not sure what the situation is on other arches, but the maintainer don't seem to do his job seriously about this one. 11:12 svenl vorlon: so i would either remove the package or fix this. 11:13 svenl vorlon: this could be a primary installation method for d-i in addition. 11:14 svenl vorlon: notice that #286305 is 27 days old and also grave, and a solution to it would fix the other one too. And there is #290047 too. 11:14 svenl vorlon: what is the MIA status of Bradley Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? 12:51 svenl vorlon: do you think 242068 should be downgraded ? 12:52 vorlon svenl: yes, I don't see why having a lack of binaries on an architecture is RC. It's common enough for module packages to only provide i386 binaries. 12:53 svenl vorlon: when there is only x86 binaries. 12:53 svenl vorlon: and i tried to build the stuff for myself, and failed. 12:53 svenl vorlon: so there is more than just that broken. 12:53 svenl vorlon: and there is also the bug about x86 2.4.27 stuff. 12:53 svenl vorlon: and there is a report of them working on powerpc. 12:54 vorlon ok, well you didn't *say* any of that when you raised the bug severity. You raised the severity on a bug report asking for *powerpc modules in the archive*. 12:54 svenl vorlon: yep, but i told it to you a bit above. 12:54 svenl you didn't seem to react on it. 12:55 svenl vorlon: that package seem utterly abandoned by its maintainer anyway. 3 RC bugs it has right now. 12:55 svenl vorlon: i would just quick it out of sarge for now, more secure like that. 12:56 vorlon the other bugs I was already planning to NMU for, because I understand why they're RC. You didn't mention anything about the package being unusable on powerpc when you try to rebuild it above, and a lack of binaries on powerpc isn't RC. 12:56 jvw svenl: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with suspecions 12:57 svenl vorlon: i am not entirely sure about this. 12:57 svenl vorlon: and i raised the RC level to catch attention, which it did. 12:57 vorlon 286305 may have been open for 27 days, but it wasn't actually fixable until 2.4.27-2 was available. 12:58 svenl vorlon: i don't understand why there is no more info, i though i replied to this bug report, i wonder if it has dissapeared or i did a mismanipulation. 12:58 vorlon Er... that's a crappy reason to raise the severity of a bug to RC when it's not an RC issue. 12:58 svenl vorlon: the one in question is open since 248 days or something such. 12:58 svenl vorlon: if i had not done it, we would not be discussing this. 12:59 svenl vorlon: and i disagree with you about this. Raising RC level on certain bugs we want fixed is a good thing to do, expecially as we will be multiplicating bug-fix-parties and such. 12:59 vorlon what failed when you tried to build the powerpc binaries for yourself? 12:59 svenl vorlon: but i know not everyone agrees with me because of that. 13:00 svenl vorlon: i don't know even how i should do it, it seem to me that a -source package was missing or something, i was fully unable to understand how even the x86 modules where built. 13:00 svenl vorlon: i mailed doko, but he also didn't remember how he managed to build them. 13:00 vorlon The release managers *and* the BTS admins disagree with you about this. You should not be raising the severity just because it's a pet bug of yours -- the RC severities are clearly defined. 13:01 svenl vorlon: sure, so you can downgrade them once you notice. 13:02 svenl vorlon: the package is fully unusable for me though. I mean, i do package a kernel module and am in the kernel maintainer team, and was not able to find the stuff to build it from, and the maintainer seems MIA, or at st not caring about the package, do we really want to ship a package like that ? 13:02 vorlon What the hell good did it do to have me notice it? If it wasn't RC (and you should have enough experience with the BTS to figure this out for yourself), all I was going to do with it when I saw it was downgrade it. If the package couldn't build from source, someone NMUing it would have noticed this anyway without you
Bug#290733: torsmo: Floating point exception
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 11:19:52AM +0100, fellow wrote: Package: torsmo Version: 0.18-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi! The 0.17 version was good, but the new won't run. It's simply write to the stdout: Floating point exception The full strace is here: http://fellow.linuxforum.hu/egyeb/torsmo_starce Dp you need any other information? (I have a custom kernel: 2.6.10-ck4 + 2.6.10-as1.) It looks like it might be failing because of the /proc/cpuinfo differences between 2.4 and 2.6. Can you try with 2.4? Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290733: torsmo bug
Hi, Did torsmo used to work for you? I just tested the testing version and the sid version both on 2.6.10, and didn't get an FPE. Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#267799: nvidia-glx: confirming; discussing the priority and the workaround
Package: nvidia-glx Version: 1.0.6111-1 Followup-For: Bug #267799 metoo However, once this happened, I just added nvidia to /etc/modules, and the problem was worked around. I disagree that the bug is grave given the simplicity of the workaround available to the users meanwhile. -- Package-specific info: uname -r: Linux ilmarinen 2.6.8-1-686 #1 Thu Nov 25 04:34:30 UTC 2004 i686 GNU/Linux /proc/version: Linux version 2.6.8-1-686 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-2)) #1 Thu Nov 25 04:34:30 UTC 2004 /proc/driver/nvidia/version: :01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV18 [GeForce4 MX 440 AGP 8x] (rev c1) -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686 Locale: LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R (charmap=KOI8-R) Versions of packages nvidia-glx depends on: ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii nvidia-kernel-2.6.8- 1.0.6111-1+2.6.8-10 NVIDIA binary kernel module for Li ii xlibmesa-glu [libglu 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 Mesa OpenGL utility library [XFree ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii xserver-common 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 files and utilities common to all -- debconf information: nvidia-glx/tlsyes: false * nvidia-glx/tlsno: true -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290145: marked as done (multipath-tools: initrd script breaks booting lvm root)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2005 17:40:42 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#288150: multipath-tools: initrd script breaks booting lvm root has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2005 22:02:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 12 14:02:52 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.22] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CoqZo-0003r9-00; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 14:02:52 -0800 Received: from banaan.xs4all.nl (banaan.xs4all.nl [80.126.2.237]) by smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j0CM2oVk029924; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 23:02:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by banaan.xs4all.nl (8.11.6/8.11.6) id j0CM2op19602; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 23:02:50 +0100 Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 23:02:50 +0100 From: Erik van Konijnenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: multipath-tools: initrd script breaks booting lvm root Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: multipath-tools Version: 0.4.1-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Tags: patch If multipath-tools-0.4.1-1 is installed, the initrd generated by initrd-tools-0.1.76 is non-bootable for systems using an LVM root device. Symptoms: pivot_root: no such file or directory; sbin/init not found; panic: attempting to kill init. The cause: multipath adds a script /etc/mkinitrd/scripts/01_udev; this mounts a new /dev and lets udevstart run on it. This happens after /script is executed, which is where the LVM command vgchange -a y vg0 is executed to create LVM devices. Unfortunately, udevstart has no way of creating the /dev/mapper nodes required by LVM, so the root device /dev/mapper/vg0 stays missing. One possible fix would be not to mount an empty /dev in 01_udev, so that the LVM devices remain visible. However, mounting a new /dev protects against a possible read-only prior /dev, and the prior /dev is indeed read-only. (it is part of the initrd image and contains some symlinks to ../devfs) So the attached patch instead copies the contents of the old /dev to the new /dev. It's possible that a similar problem would occur for other virtual devices such as MD; these too are not created by hotplugging but by an init.d script. I have not tested this, but the patch should cover such cases. The patch was tested on a PC with LVM devices on a SATA disk but no actual multipath devices: I only installed multipath-tools to take a look at the documentation ... I'm including #288150 (initrd no longer works unless busybox is installed) on the Cc list. That report mentions /bin/sleep missing from initrd image. The missing sleep is still missing after attached patch, but it does not seem to harm anything. No claim that this patchs solves #288150, but the symptoms seem similar enough to justify a cross reference. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages multipath-tools depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0]1.4.41 Debian configuration management sy ii hotplug 0.0.20040329-16 Linux Hotplug Scripts ii initscripts 2.86.ds1-1 Standard scripts needed for bootin ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdevmapper1.00 2:1.00.20-1 The Linux Kernel Device Mapper use ii libsysfs11.1.0-1 Interface library to sysfs ii makedev 2.3.1-75Creates device files in /dev ii udev 0.050-4 /dev/ management daemon -- no debconf information --- 01_udev.org 2005-01-12 10:57:58.0 +0100 +++ 01_udev.works 2005-01-12 22:51:22.0 +0100 @@ -4,8 +4,9 @@ cp /sbin/udevstart
Processed: tagging 275875
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5 tags 275875 patch Bug#275875: gmemusage: memory is displayed as negative There were no tags set. Tags added: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#275875: gmemusage bug
Hi, I'm following up on a gmemusage bug you reported. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=275875 This program reads /proc/memusage, the format of which changed in the 2.6 series kernels. I have a patch, and I was hoping you could test it. I can provide binaries, too, if you use an x86 architecture (or amd64). Current patch is here: http://rtfo.org/~justin/gmemusage-patch2.6 Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#284096: Re : Bug#284096: Bug seems to have disappeared
I was having this problem previously. Selecting font tab in modify style Or Format-Character would crash Writer. This was on a new sarge/sid KDE desktop that I reinstall a couple weeks ago. So last week (on the 10/01/2005) I was getting this happening with a document I was writing. Now today for some reason its not occuring. Unfortunately I don't have apt-listchanges install, otherwise I might tell if anything I've upgraded since this date might have affected this. I confirm this chnage. However, single word color selection is still impossible (see bug #289715) and, from experience, a bug that misteriously disappear may also reappear... -- eric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Vdr should not be released unless this bug is fixed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 287899 critical Bug#287899: vdr: run as non-root user Severity set to `critical'. tags 287899 security Bug#287899: vdr: run as non-root user Tags were: pending Tags added: security thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290794: perdition: missing depends on libvanessa-adt0
package: perdition severity: grave version: 1.15-3 justification: renders package unusable I just upgraded to 1.15-3 and perdition failed to start: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/perdition start Starting /usr/sbin/perdition.pop3... /usr/sbin/perdition.pop3: error while loading shared libraries: libvanessa_adt.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directoryStarting /usr/sbin/perdition.pop3s... /usr/sbin/perdition.pop3s: error while loading shared libraries: libvanessa_adt.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Starting /usr/sbin/perdition.imap4... /usr/sbin/perdition.imap4: error while loading shared libraries: libvanessa_adt.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Starting /usr/sbin/perdition.imaps... /usr/sbin/perdition.imaps: error while loading shared libraries: libvanessa_adt.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory It seems that perdition is missing a depends on libvanessa-adt0: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-file search libvanessa_adt.so.0 libvanessa-adt0: usr/lib/libvanessa_adt.so.0 libvanessa-adt0: usr/lib/libvanessa_adt.so.0.0.3 Installing this package, fixes the problem: Setting up libvanessa-adt0 (0.0.6-2) ... Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done Reading task descriptions... Done [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/perdition start Starting /usr/sbin/perdition.pop3... Starting /usr/sbin/perdition.pop3s... Starting /usr/sbin/perdition.imap4... Thanks, -- -jamie [EMAIL PROTECTED] | spamtrap: [EMAIL PROTECTED] w: http://www.silverdream.org | p: [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp key @ http://silverdream.org/~jps/pub.key 21:30:02 up 17 min, 2 users, load average: 2.65, 2.52, 1.58 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#290798: kernel-package: grub configuration wrong when root partion is on a SATA/libata disk
Package: kernel-package Version: 8.111 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system The libata driver uses scsi naming (e.g. /dev/sda) for SATA devices, but when making a menu.lst (grub configuration file), make-kpkg uses ATA naming (e.g /dev/hde) for such devices. When root partition is located on a SATA device, this causes a kernel panic at boot because root partiotion is not found by the bootloader. This problem ocured when running 2.4 kernel not using the libata driver, and building a 2.6 kernel with libata included. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.22-07sept03 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages kernel-package depends on: ii dpkg 1.10.25 Package maintenance system for Deb ii dpkg-dev 1.10.23 Package building tools for Debian ii gcc [c-compiler] 4:3.3.5-1 The GNU C compiler ii gcc-2.95 [c-compiler]1:2.95.4-22 The GNU C compiler ii gcc-3.0 [c-compiler] 1:3.0.4-7 The GNU C compiler. ii gcc-3.3 [c-compiler] 1:3.3.5-5 The GNU C compiler ii gcc-3.4 [c-compiler] 3.4.2-2 The GNU C compiler ii make 3.80-9 The GNU version of the make util ii perl 5.8.4-3 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290803: login: /var/log/btmp is created with insecure permissions
Package: login Version: 1:4.0.3-30.7 Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: root security hole It seems that /var/log/btmp is created as a world readable file. This is insecure (and it is reported by 'tiger') because this file contains failed logins , including unknown usernames. It is possible for a user to see the root password (and others too) by running /usr/bin/lastb. Tiger reports this as an error: # Checking for existence of log files... --FAIL-- [logf005f] Log file /var/log/btmp permission should be 660 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages login depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libpam-modules 0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules f ii libpam-runtime 0.76-22 Runtime support for the PAM librar ii libpam0g0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290805: eric puts an own sitecustomize.py in sys.path
Package: eric Version: 3.5.0 Severity: grave Tags: patch eric includes /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/sitecustomize.py into it's package, changing the behaviour of site.py for all packages installed. Please install this file into a directory not in sys.path, i.e. /usr/share/eric. A patch can be found at http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/eric/, together with an update to 3.5.1 and the packaged translations. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290803: login: /var/log/btmp is created with insecure permissions
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 09:51:44PM +0200, Stefanos Harhalakis wrote: Package: login Version: 1:4.0.3-30.7 Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: root security hole It seems that /var/log/btmp is created as a world readable file. This is insecure (and it is reported by 'tiger') because this file contains failed logins , including unknown usernames. Aren't the usernames alwyas visible in /etc/password? It is possible for a user to see the root password (and others too) by running /usr/bin/lastb. lastb isn't show me any passwords; just valid usernames as seen in passwd and dates. Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290803: marked as done (login: /var/log/btmp is created with insecure permissions)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2005 15:37:56 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#290803: login: /var/log/btmp is created with insecure permissions has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jan 2005 19:52:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 16 11:52:14 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from alpha.it.teithe.gr [195.251.240.232] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CqGRa-o4-00; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 11:52:14 -0800 Received: from archimedes.it.teithe.gr (archimedes.it.teithe.gr [195.251.123.237]) by alpha.it.teithe.gr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j0GJq4AC005583; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:52:05 +0200 (EET) Received: from archimedes.it.teithe.gr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by archimedes.it.teithe.gr (8.13.2/8.13.2/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j0GJpiql020852; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:51:44 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by archimedes.it.teithe.gr (8.13.2/8.13.2/Submit) id j0GJpiib020851; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:51:44 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Authentication-Warning: archimedes.it.teithe.gr: v13 set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Stefanos Harhalakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: login: /var/log/btmp is created with insecure permissions X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2 Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:51:44 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: login Version: 1:4.0.3-30.7 Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: root security hole It seems that /var/log/btmp is created as a world readable file. This is insecure (and it is reported by 'tiger') because this file contains failed logins , including unknown usernames. It is possible for a user to see the root password (and others too) by running /usr/bin/lastb. Tiger reports this as an error: # Checking for existence of log files... --FAIL-- [logf005f] Log file /var/log/btmp permission should be 660 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages login depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libpam-modules 0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules f ii libpam-runtime 0.76-22 Runtime support for the PAM librar ii libpam0g0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 290803-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jan 2005 20:38:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 16 12:38:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from stratton-four-forty-two.mit.edu (cz.mit.edu) [18.187.6.187] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CqH9u-000161-00; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 12:38:02 -0800 Received: by cz.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 71FA7E0063; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 15:37:56 -0500 (EST) To: Stefanos Harhalakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#290803: login: /var/log/btmp is created with insecure permissions References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Sam Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 15:37:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stefanos Harhalakis's message of Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:51:44 +0200) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Stefanos == Stefanos Harhalakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Stefanos It seems that /var/log/btmp is created as a world Stefanos readable file. This is insecure
Bug#290803: login: /var/log/btmp is created with insecure permissions
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 10:36:46PM +0200, Stefanos Harhalakis wrote: On Sunday 16 January 2005 22:24, Justin Pryzby wrote: On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 09:51:44PM +0200, Stefanos Harhalakis wrote: Package: login Version: 1:4.0.3-30.7 Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: root security hole It seems that /var/log/btmp is created as a world readable file. This is insecure (and it is reported by 'tiger') because this file contains failed logins , including unknown usernames. Aren't the usernames alwyas visible in /etc/password? It is possible for a user to see the root password (and others too) by running /usr/bin/lastb. lastb isn't show me any passwords; just valid usernames as seen in passwd and dates. It also contains unknown usernames. Really? $ strings /var/log/btmp UNKNOWN pryzbyj root UNKNOWN $ lastb UNKNOWNSun Jan 16 15:40 - 15:40 (00:00) root Sun Jan 16 15:21 - 15:21 (00:00) pryzbyjWed Jan 12 13:25 - 13:25 (00:00) UNKNOWNWed Jan 5 11:22 - 11:22 (00:00) btmp begins Wed Jan 5 11:22:54 2005 Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290803: [v13@it.teithe.gr: Re: Bug#290803: login: /var/log/btmp is created with insecure permissions]
- Forwarded message from Stefanos Harhalakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] - X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Stefanos Harhalakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#290803: login: /var/log/btmp is created with insecure permissions Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on steelfarms.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.63 On Sunday 16 January 2005 22:24, Justin Pryzby wrote: On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 09:51:44PM +0200, Stefanos Harhalakis wrote: Package: login Version: 1:4.0.3-30.7 Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: root security hole It seems that /var/log/btmp is created as a world readable file. This is insecure (and it is reported by 'tiger') because this file contains failed logins , including unknown usernames. Aren't the usernames alwyas visible in /etc/password? It is possible for a user to see the root password (and others too) by running /usr/bin/lastb. lastb isn't show me any passwords; just valid usernames as seen in passwd and dates. It also contains unknown usernames. This includes any logins that you've entered the password (or something else) as the username. If you enter test123 as the username then the btmp will contain the word 'test123' which can be your root or user password. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: not yet
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 289595 Bug#289595: libofx0c102: library version changed but package name did not Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#287899: Vdr should not be released unless this bug is fixed
I demand that Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña may or may not have written... [snip] Also notice that the patch provided to this bug is not correct: 1.- the postinst will not check if the user exists before creating. It should do something like: --- [snip] addgroup --quiet --system $HONEYUSERGROUP ITYM $CREATEGROUP ;-) (FWIW, I'm applying this to my unofficial vdr package.) 2.- The postrm should remove this user/group combination if they exist. This is usually done as follows (for user, similar for group): I suggest that this is NOT done *unless* /var/lib/vdr, /var/cache/vdr, /etc/vdr and /var/lib/video and all of their contents are removed (i.e. on purge). And I'm not convinced that /var/lib/video should be removed: there are third-party tools (vdrconvert, vdr2dvd.pl etc.) which can be used to access the recordings. -- | Darren Salt | linux (or ds) at | nr. Ashington, | woody, sarge, | youmustbejoking | Northumberland | RISC OS | demon co uk | Toon Army | I don't ask for much, just untold riches... Don't take life too seriously; you won't get out of it alive. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 278191
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5 tags 278191 confirmed Bug#278191: xtrlock unlocks upon very long input Tags were: security Bug#278190: xtrlock unlocks upon very long input Tags added: confirmed End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290810: [Dummy bug] Keep exim docs for 4.4x out of sarge until exim4 4.4x itself can propagate
Package: eximdoc4 Severity: serious Version: 4.40-1 Tags: sid eximdoc4 4.4x must not go into sarge if exim 4.4x does not. This bug will (should) be closed once exim4 is ready. cu andreas -- See, I told you they'd listen to Reason, [SPOILER] Svfurlr fnlf, fuhggvat qbja gur juveyvat tha. Neal Stephenson in Snow Crash http://downhill.aus.cc/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#290811: meld crashes on start
Package: meld Version: 0.9.4.1-1 Severity: grave Since a while back, meld simply stopped working: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/scratch/kevin meld test/mn_fit_v5_03 mn-fit-5.03 /usr/lib/meld/gnomeglade.py:145: GtkWarning: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: raleigh, image = gtk.Image() /usr/lib/meld/gnomeglade.py:46: GtkWarning: file gtklabel.c: line 2792 (gtk_label_set_use_underline): assertion `GTK_IS_LABEL (label)' failed self.xml = gtk.glade.XML(file, root, gettext.textdomain() ) /usr/lib/meld/gnomeglade.py:46: GtkWarning: gtkwidget.c:3076: widget `GtkToolButton' has no activatable signal clicked without arguments self.xml = gtk.glade.XML(file, root, gettext.textdomain() ) (meld:1619): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: gsignal.c:1657: signal `pressed' is invalid for instance `0x8393338' /usr/lib/meld/dirdiff.py:278: DeprecationWarning: _(Hide %s) % f.label, , icon, self._update_name_filter, i ) /usr/lib/meld/dirdiff.py:278: GtkWarning: mixing deprecated and non-deprecated GtkToolbar API is not allowed _(Hide %s) % f.label, , icon, self._update_name_filter, i ) Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/meld, line 88, in ? meldapp.main() File /usr/lib/meld/meldapp.py, line 911, in main app.append_diff(args) File /usr/lib/meld/meldapp.py, line 798, in append_diff self.append_dirdiff(paths) File /usr/lib/meld/meldapp.py, line 770, in append_dirdiff doc = dirdiff.DirDiff(self.prefs, len(dirs)) File /usr/lib/meld/dirdiff.py, line 242, in __init__ self.create_name_filters() File /usr/lib/meld/dirdiff.py, line 279, in create_name_filters toggle.set_active(f.active) AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'set_active' -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-ac6 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages meld depends on: ii python2.3.4-5An interactive high-level object-o ii python-glade2 2.4.1-2GTK+ bindings: Glade support ii python-gnome2 2.6.1-1Python bindings for the GNOME desk ii python-gtk2 2.4.1-2Python bindings for the GTK+ widge -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 284096 + unreproducible Bug#284096: openoffice.org: writer crash in 'modify style' when selecting another tab There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible tag 284096 + moreinfo Bug#284096: openoffice.org: writer crash in 'modify style' when selecting another tab Tags were: unreproducible Tags added: moreinfo tag 289715 + unreproducible Bug#289715: openoffice.org-bin: Impress single Word color modification is broken again There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible tag 289715 + moreinfo Bug#289715: openoffice.org-bin: Impress single Word color modification is broken again Tags were: unreproducible Tags added: moreinfo Grüße/Regards, Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. René Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: file conflicts in libsmokeqt1 libsmokeqt-dev libqt-perl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 274779 -sarge Bug#274779: file conflicts in libsmokeqt1 libsmokeqt-dev libqt-perl Tags were: sarge patch Tags removed: sarge tags 274779 +fixed Bug#274779: file conflicts in libsmokeqt1 libsmokeqt-dev libqt-perl Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#278191: patch
--- xtrlock.c 2002-09-01 00:46:29.0 -0400
+++ xtrlock.c.new 2005-01-16 19:58:30.0 -0500
@@ -197,9 +197,11 @@
break;
default:
if (clen != 1) break;
-if (rlen (sizeof(rbuf) - 1)) rbuf[rlen]= cbuf[0];
/* allow space for the trailing \0 */
-rlen++;
+if (rlen (sizeof(rbuf) - 1)) {
+ rbuf[rlen]= cbuf[0];
+ rlen++;
+ }
break;
}
break;
Bug#290826: postfix: Upgrade from Postfix 2.1.4-5 to 2.1.5-4 fails
Package: postfix Version: 2.1.4-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-386 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages postfix depends on: ii adduser 3.59 Add and remove users and groups ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.30.11Debian configuration management sy ii dpkg1.10.25 Package maintenance system for Deb ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb4.24.2.52-17Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [ ii libgdbm31.8.3-2 GNU dbm database routines (runtime ii netbase 4.19 Basic TCP/IP networking system -- debconf information: postfix/master_upgrade_warning: postfix/db_upgrade_warning: true postfix/mailname: /etc/mailname postfix/dynamicmaps_upgrade_warning: postfix/recipient_delim: + * postfix/main_mailer_type: No configuration postfix/transport_map_warning: postfix/append_dot_mydomain: false postfix/relayhost: postfix/procmail: postfix/bad_recipient_delimiter: postfix/chattr: Faux postfix/root_address: NONE postfix/rfc1035_violation: false postfix/mynetworks: 127.0.0.0/8 postfix/destinations: postfix/nqmgr_upgrade_warning: postfix/not_configured: postfix/mailbox_limit: 0 Installing new package fails when running newsaliases: Running newaliases postalias: fatal: open /etc/aliases.db: No such file or directory E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) /etc/aliases.db exists but is deleted during the new package install Doing a rollback to the old package solves the issue but the new one can't be installed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 290828 sarge security Bug#290828: gpsd: Version in Sid contains security related bugfixes... There were no tags set. Tags added: sarge, security thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290821: [Pkg-mono-group] Bug#290821: mono-mcs: can't install while pnet-compiler installed
This is fixed in my local tree, and will be included in the 0.6.12 upload (hopefully this week). As far as I can tell both mono pnet utilities do the same thing, and I have just renamed pnet's to al.pnet. -- Andrew Mitchell Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: patch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 275875 important Bug#275875: gmemusage: memory is displayed as negative Severity set to `important'. severity 255111 important Bug#255111: process called linux is said to take all memory Severity set to `important'. merge 276990 255111 275875 Bug#255111: process called linux is said to take all memory Bug#275875: gmemusage: memory is displayed as negative Bug#276990: gmemusage: Problems with linux 2.6.x because of changes /proc/meminfo Merged 255111 275875 276990. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#275875: patch
severity 275875 important
severity 255111 important
merge 276990 255111 275875
thanks
Patch allowing use on 2.6 kernels, and correcting a bug in the
reported size of the kernel (was 10). This patch should be used
instead of the one on rtfo.org (which is not presently accessible, so
I cannot update it).
Justin
--- proc.c.old 2005-01-16 11:49:25.0 -0500
+++ proc.c 2005-01-16 20:31:34.0 -0500
@@ -23,6 +23,9 @@
/*
* Set values for various memory usages
*/
+#define MemTotalLine MemTotal:
+#defineMemFreeLine MemFree:
+#defineBuffersLine Buffers:
static void
SetMemInfo ( void )
{
@@ -63,12 +66,28 @@
{
if ( !strncmp ( buf , MemLine , MemLineLen ) )
{
+/* Linux 2.4 (and earlier?) */
/* Mem: total used free shared buffers cached */
sscanf ( buf , %*s %d %*d %d %*d %d , totalmem , freemem ,
buffermem ) ;
break ;
+
+ /* Linux 2.6 (and later?) */
+ } else if (!strncmp(buf, MemTotalLine, strlen(MemTotalLine))) {
+ sscanf(buf, %*s %d, totalmem);
+ } else if (!strncmp(buf, MemFreeLine, strlen(MemFreeLine))) {
+ sscanf(buf, %*s %d, freemem);
+ } else if (!strncmp(buf, BuffersLine, strlen(BuffersLine))) {
+ sscanf(buf, %*s %d, buffermem);
}
}
+
+ if (!totalmem) {
+ fprintf(stderr, Fatal error reading /proc/meminfo\n);
+ exit(1);
+ }
+
+ sysmem /= 1024 ;
sysmem /= 1024 ;
totalmem /= 1024 ;
freemem /= 1024 ;
Bug#290794: perdition: missing depends on libvanessa-adt0
Hi Jamie, Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I will add the missing dependanciy and upload ASAP. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#252895: typo in directory ?
Hi folks, Today's update runs update-fonts-dir on /usr/lib/X11/fonts/truetype This throws up warning: /usr/lib/X11/fonts/truetype does not exist or is not a directory during the upgrade process. My system does have a /usr/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType The really scary thing is that this wouldn't matter on a microsoft system. regards Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#284117: gentoo's patch
Gentoo has a patch at: http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=43329 I think only the last section is relevent; other parts are controlled only by the local user. Upstream is aware of the problem as of last week and is apparently working with gentoo on an update: http://prozilla.genesys.ro/ Free BSD links to a new version, though it may not be official: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/2005-January/049000.html Here's someone who say's that they're waiting for upstream permission to release a new version, and who says he's working on a version 2 rewrite: http://www.advogato.org/person/richdawe/ And that takes me to google hit#50, at which point I quit. Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290733: torsmo bug
Hi, Did torsmo used to work for you? I just tested the testing version and the sid version both on 2.6.10, and didn't get an FPE. Justin Hi! Yes, the torsmo_0.17-4_i386.deb is working with the same kernel. It's simply write to the stdout: Floating point exception Could you post a coredump? ulimit -c unlimited, (bash specific) then rerun it, produces core. http://fellow.linuxforum.hu/egyeb/torsmo_coredump fellow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290828: gpsd: Version in Sid contains security related bugfixes...
I missed the opportunity to set urgency to 'high' with the last upload, but will do so on the next one. Please do *not* re-upload just to change the urgency. Version 2.7-1 has already built on all architectures, and the release team can bump the urgency for you on the existing package for purposes of testing propagation. I have already done this, so gpsd should move into testing tomorrow. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#284117: gentoo's patch
Em Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:21:25 -0500, Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Gentoo has a patch at: http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=43329 I think only the last section is relevent; other parts are controlled only by the local user. Upstream is aware of the problem as of last week and is apparently working with gentoo on an update: http://prozilla.genesys.ro/ Upstream author, Kalum, is absolutely inactive for years, as I've previously mentioned. We're upstream: people with access to some resources (CVS, website, etc) working on prozilla. Free BSD links to a new version, though it may not be official: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/2005-January/049000.html Here's someone who say's that they're waiting for upstream permission to release a new version, and who says he's working on a version 2 rewrite: http://www.advogato.org/person/richdawe/ This guy is working with us on prozilla 1.3.7, probably the last version before the 2.0 series. Believe me, I do know what's going on out there. =P -- Guilherme de S. Pastore (fatalerror) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nada e mais perigoso que um bom conselho seguido de um mau exemplo. -- Madame de Sable; escritora francesa. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: update
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 288046 +patch Bug#288046: kernel: NFS fh_verify causes lost output (2.4 kernel) There were no tags set. Tags added: patch tag 288046 +pending Bug#288046: kernel: NFS fh_verify causes lost output (2.4 kernel) Tags were: patch Tags added: pending -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290794: marked as done (perdition: missing depends on libvanessa-adt0)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2005 23:17:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#290794: fixed in perdition 1.15-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jan 2005 18:39:21 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 16 10:39:21 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from lorien.silverdream.org [82.133.58.131] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CqFJ2-00030G-00; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 10:39:21 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lorien.silverdream.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D49DA4805235 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 18:38:48 + (GMT) Received: from lorien.silverdream.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lorien.silverdream.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 01979-05 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 18:38:45 + (GMT) Received: from [192.168.100.214] (pegasus.pinklemon.net [82.133.58.129]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by lorien.silverdream.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CF3480522B for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 18:38:45 + (GMT) Subject: perdition: missing depends on libvanessa-adt0 From: Jamie L. Penman-Smithson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary==-TCxstktYElVEMoD/LJy/ Organization: PinkLemon Internet Services Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 18:38:44 + Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-maia-1.0.0-rc5 (Debian) at silverdream.org Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --=-TCxstktYElVEMoD/LJy/ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable package: perdition severity: grave version: 1.15-3 justification: renders package unusable I just upgraded to 1.15-3 and perdition failed to start: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/perdition start Starting /usr/sbin/perdition.pop3... /usr/sbin/perdition.pop3: error while loading shared libraries: libvanessa_adt.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directoryStarting /usr/sbin/perdition.pop3s... /usr/sbin/perdition.pop3s: error while loading shared libraries: libvanessa_adt.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Starting /usr/sbin/perdition.imap4... /usr/sbin/perdition.imap4: error while loading shared libraries: libvanessa_adt.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Starting /usr/sbin/perdition.imaps... /usr/sbin/perdition.imaps: error while loading shared libraries: libvanessa_adt.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory It seems that perdition is missing a depends on libvanessa-adt0: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-file search libvanessa_adt.so.0 libvanessa-adt0: usr/lib/libvanessa_adt.so.0 libvanessa-adt0: usr/lib/libvanessa_adt.so.0.0.3 Installing this package, fixes the problem: Setting up libvanessa-adt0 (0.0.6-2) ... Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done Reading task descriptions... Done [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/perdition start Starting /usr/sbin/perdition.pop3... Starting /usr/sbin/perdition.pop3s... Starting /usr/sbin/perdition.imap4... Thanks, --=20 -jamie [EMAIL PROTECTED] | spamtrap: [EMAIL PROTECTED] w: http://www.silverdream.org | p: [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp key @ http://silverdream.org/~jps/pub.key 21:30:02 up 17 min, 2 users, load average: 2.65, 2.52, 1.58 --=-TCxstktYElVEMoD/LJy/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBB6rS00mxM1DK1CAsRAmZPAJ0dW4IGYvV7ATSD74hD/gwfaPwbAQCeNODE +NeoDvEACJJJTonEFGraBYY= =uf49 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --=-TCxstktYElVEMoD/LJy/-- --- Received: (at 290794-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jan 2005 04:23:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 16 20:23:06 2005 Return-path:
Bug#290841: nautilus opens connections for each file on a samba share
Package: nautilus Version: 2.9.2-0ubuntu1 Severity: serious Strangely, nautilus appears to open a different connection for every file in a samba directory when browsing directories. This becomes a huge problem for larger directories (over 600 files will make working with a directory impossible) as hundreds of connections are spawned. I have remote preview turned off in file management preferences but was curious whether that option or getting the mime information for each of the files (in this case 600 mp3 files) could be the root of the evil. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-2-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages nautilus depends on: ii capplets1:2.9.4-0ubuntu1 configuration applets for GNOME 2 ii desktop-file-ut 0.9-1ubuntu1 Utilities for .desktop files ii libart-2.0-22.3.16-6 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.9.0-0ubuntu1 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libaudiofile0 0.2.6-5 Open-source version of SGI's audio ii libbonobo2-02.8.0-4 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbonoboui2-0 2.8.0-0ubuntu1 The Bonobo UI library ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20ubuntu1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libeel2-2 2.9.2-0ubuntu1 Eazel Extensions Library (for GNOM ii libesd-alsa0 [l 0.2.35-2 Enlightened Sound Daemon (ALSA) - ii libexif10 0.6.9-4 The EXIF library allows you to par ii libgail-common 1.8.2-1 GNOME Accessibility Implementation ii libgail17 1.8.2-1 GNOME Accessibility Implementation ii libgconf2-4 2.9.2-0ubuntu2 GNOME configuration database syste ii libglade2-0 1:2.5.0-0ubuntu2 Library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-02.6.1-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome-deskto 2.9.4-0ubuntu1 Utility library for loading .deskt ii libgnome2-0 2.8.0-6ubuntu1 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomecanvas2 2.8.0-1 A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeui-02.8.0-3 The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-0 2.9.3-0ubuntu1 The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.1-1ubuntu1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice6 6.8.1-1ubuntu10 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libnautilus-ext 2.9.2-0ubuntu1 libraries for nautilus components ii liborbit2 1:2.12.0-0ubuntu1libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.0-2 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpopt01.7-5lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii librsvg2-2 2.8.1-2 SAX-based renderer library for SVG ii libsm6 6.8.1-1ubuntu10 X Window System Session Management ii libstartup-noti 0.8-0ubuntu1 library for program launch feedbac ii libx11-66.8.1-1ubuntu10 X Window System protocol client li ii libxml2 2.6.11-5ubuntu1 GNOME XML library ii nautilus-data 2.9.2-0ubuntu1 data files for nautilus ii shared-mime-inf 0.15cvs20050107-0ubuntu1 FreeDesktop.org shared MIME databa ii xlibs 6.8.1-1ubuntu10 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4ubuntu1 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#284952: The USB block device should be disabled
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 12:33:48PM +0100, Paul van Tilburg wrote: Package: kernel-image-2.6.9-powerpc Version: 2.6.9-4 Followup-For: Bug #284952 The USB block device is known to be experimental and buggy. CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UB=m should be set to 'n'. Since the ub modules takes preference of the old, though working usb-storage, hotplug loads ub. Blacklisting ub doesn't help, loading usb-storage doesn't work either. I really would like for UB to be disable until proven reasonably stable. I thought it already was marked as n. Does anyone have an objection to making this so? -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290474: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: impossible to mount the root partition on a SATA disk
reassign 290474 initrd-tools thanks On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 11:37:46AM +0100, Olivier Lecarme wrote: Package: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686 Version: 2.6.10-3 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686 depends on: ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2The GNU core utilities ii initrd-tools 0.1.76 tools to create initrd image for p ii module-init-tools 3.1-rel-2 tools for managing Linux kernel mo -- no debconf information I have a Dell Optiplex computer with a SATA hard drive. Kernel 2.4 works OK with the disk in non-SATA mode. Kernel 2.6 panics on booting with the message /dev/console not found, preceded by a message from pivot_root which does not found the root partition. I tried both SATA modes in the BIOS: combination, or normal. I tried root=/dev/hda5 or root=/dev/sda5 in the Grub menu.lst file. I tried to omit initrd in this file. This almost certainly won't work, as the kernel-image doesn't have enough drivers to boot more or less any system. These are provided by the initrd image. I would suspect that the prblem is that mkinitrd is not adding the drivers that are needed for your system to the initrd image. With this in mind I am reassigning the bug to initrd-tools. Do you have any idea what modules are required for your system. Do you have a working 2.6 debian kernel image. If so could you provide the output of lsmod. Ditto for 2.4, though that is probably less useful. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#285051: marked as done (FTBFS: applying patch fails on ppc)
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jan 2005 08:05:05 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcc-4.0_4.0ds3-0pre4 upload has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Dec 2004 10:37:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 10 02:37:25 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from honk1.physik.uni-konstanz.de [134.34.140.224] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cci9N-00026D-00; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 02:37:25 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by honk1.physik.uni-konstanz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F1E72BC43; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 11:37:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from honk1.physik.uni-konstanz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (honk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20520-08; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 11:37:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from halley.zuhause (unknown [134.34.147.114]) by honk1.physik.uni-konstanz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FE512BC3E; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 11:37:16 +0100 (CET) Received: by halley.zuhause (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AACF12885FF; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 11:35:39 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 11:35:39 +0100 From: Wolfram Quester [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: applying patch fails on ppc Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at honk.physik.uni-konstanz.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: gcc-4.0 Version: 4.0-0pre2 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Hi,=20 I just wanted to compile gcc-4.0 to get a fortran 95 compiler and the build fails on my ppc with DEB_VERSION=3D'4.0-0pre2'; export DEB_VERSION; \ debian/patches/powerpc-biarch.dpatch -patch -d /home/wolfi/src/fortran/gcc-= 4.0-4.0ds1/src patching file gcc/config.gcc Hunk #1 FAILED at 1760. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gcc/config.gcc.rej patching file gcc/config/rs6000/t-linux64 make: *** [stamps/02-patch-stamp-powerpc-biarch] Error 1 debuild: fatal error at line 764: dpkg-buildpackage failed! Thanks, Wolfi -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-rc2-wjq Locale: LANG=3Den_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8) (ignor= ed: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBuXv6H0o2mefAfsQRAqe7AJ9ugS6EH3XNNJnzvQNvJfwpvgauugCdGQF9 rcFW+1d2BBjneMuoPp83p8A= =kKiz -END PGP SIGNATURE- --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+-- --- Received: (at 285051-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jan 2005 07:05:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 16 23:05:23 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CqQwz-0006zt-00; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 23:05:21 -0800 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA10938; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 08:05:16 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C388F216; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 08:05:16 +0100 (MET) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 28648-09; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 08:05:05 +0100 (MET) Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 08:05:05 +0100 (MET)
Bug#289912: binary module packages built against old debian kernel abiname
severity 289912 wishlist retitle 289912 please provide binary module packages for 2.4.27-2 thanks The binary module packages that were built against the old Debian kernel abiname have been removed from unstable, and will drop from testing automatically with the next run of britney tomorrow now that this bug has been downgraded. The only remaining issue here is for the maintainer to upload new binary modules packages for the current ABI, which I would consider optional. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#280142: marked as done (FTBFS (unstable/m68k) ICE during build)
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jan 2005 08:08:21 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#280142: FTBFS (unstable/m68k) ICE during build has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Nov 2004 15:13:42 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 07 07:13:42 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from s010600e029962405.cg.shawcable.net (lucifer.0c3.net) [68.147.203.152] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CQoje-0007Y0-00; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 07:13:42 -0800 Received: from adconrad by lucifer.0c3.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CQojc-nL-00; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 08:13:40 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Adam Conrad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS (unstable/m68k) ICE during build X-Mailer: reportbug 3.1 Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2004 08:13:40 -0700 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: gcc-snapshot Version: 20041030-1 Severity: serious gcc-snapshot ICEs during (or shortly after?) stage1 when building on m68k. Please see the build log at buildd.debian.org[1] for further info. ... Adam [1] http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-snapshotver=20041030-1arch=m68kstamp=1099773321file=logas=raw -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages gcc-snapshot depends on: ii binutils2.15-4 The GNU assembler, linker and bina pn libart-2.0-2 Not found. pn libatk1.0-0 Not found. ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libglib2.0-02.4.7-1 The GLib library of C routines pn libgtk2.0-0 Not found. pn libpango1.0-0Not found. ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-3compression library - runtime --- Received: (at 280142-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jan 2005 07:08:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 16 23:08:29 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CqR00-0007Xg-00; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 23:08:28 -0800 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA11368; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 08:08:24 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56C5F216; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 08:08:23 +0100 (MET) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 07453-03; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 08:08:22 +0100 (MET) Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 08:08:22 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j0H78Llx025972; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 08:08:21 +0100 (MET) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 08:08:21 +0100 To: Adam Conrad [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#280142: FTBFS (unstable/m68k) ICE during build In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) Common Lisp XEmacs Lucid X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Adam Conrad
Bug#287644: marked as done (gij-4.0: does not run because it cannot find a library)
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jan 2005 08:05:05 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcc-4.0_4.0ds3-0pre4 upload has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Dec 2004 09:52:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 29 01:52:23 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bal.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.15] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CjaVD-00033E-00; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 01:52:23 -0800 Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.17]) by bal.lis.inpg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FFF43067C2; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 10:51:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DEC62C80FD; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 10:51:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17591-09; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 10:51:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from irancy.lis.inpg.fr (irancy.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.167]) by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with SMTP id A06522C80E1; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 10:51:48 +0100 (CET) Received: by irancy.lis.inpg.fr (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 29 Dec 2004 10:51:48 +0100 From: Laurent Bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gij-4.0: does not run because it cannot find a library X-Mailer: reportbug 3.5 Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 10:51:48 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at lis.inpg.fr Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: gij-4.0 Version: 4.0-0pre2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, here is the problem: $ /usr/bin/gij-4.0 /usr/bin/gij-4.0: error while loading shared libraries: libgij.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory $ ldd -r /usr/bin/gij-4.0 libgij.so.0 = not found libgcj.so.6 = /usr/lib/libgcj.so.6 (0x427da000) libpthread.so.0 = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0 (0x426e4000) libdl.so.2 = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libdl.so.2 (0x426cb000) libz.so.1 = /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x426d) libgcc_s.so.1 = /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x427cf000) libc.so.6 = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (0x42571000) libm.so.6 = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libm.so.6 (0x426a7000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x42558000) undefined symbol: main (/usr/bin/gij-4.0) The library is here: /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/lib/libgij.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/lib/libgij.so.0 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages gij-4.0 depends on: ii gcc-4.0-base4.0-0pre2The GNU Compiler Collection (base ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcj6 4.0-0pre2Java runtime library for use with ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 287644-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jan 2005 07:05:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 16 23:05:23 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CqQwz-0006zt-00; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 23:05:21 -0800 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA10938; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 08:05:16 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C388F216; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 08:05:16 +0100 (MET) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 28648-09; Mon,
