On 04.12.04 Shawn K. Quinn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
Package: linux-wlan-ng-modules-2.4.27-1-k7
Version: 2.4.27-2+0.2.0+0.2.1pre21-1
That package does not exist any more. It has been superseded by
linux-wlan-ng-modules-2.4.27-2-k7 to reflect the abi-change in the
kernel:
linux-wlan-ng
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 10:53:16AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
It seems that kernel-patch-2.6.8-hppa doesn't work with
kernel-source-2.6.8 (ie version 2.6.8-12), so it is simply unuseable:
Thanks, I've already fixed this in my working tree, but I've been working
fairly heavily with Bdale and
Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri, Jan 21, 2005:
Do you suggest removing from the archive all packages whose licenses
impose uncommon restrictions or just this one?
In this software the problem is two folds, some parts of the software
are clearly free, and some other parts are a fork of
Your message dated Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:48:49 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Finally plone 2.x is entering in sarge..
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:48:49 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Finally plone 2.x is entering in sarge..
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
NMU patch attached.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
diff -Naur wvdial-1.54.0.bak/debian/changelog wvdial-1.54.0/debian/changelog
--- wvdial-1.54.0.bak/debian/changelog 2005-01-21 09:42:24.0 +0100
+++ wvdial-1.54.0/debian/changelog
Marco wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] the APSL 2.0 is not, in the opinion of many (and AFAICT, according
to the consensus of the debian-legal mailing list), a free license under the
Where many in this context should be read as an handful of people on
the debian-legal mailing list who
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 289236 + fixed
Bug#289236: wvdial: FTBFS with libwvstreams 4.0.1-1.1
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
tag 291506 + fixed
Bug#291506: wvdial: unsatisfiable depends on libwvstreams3-base in unstable
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
quit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 291501 sid
Bug#291501: policycoreutils_1.20-2(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depend
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 291064 + sid fixed
Bug#291064: Arbitrary command execution
Tags were: patch sarge security
Bug#291306: awstats: possible remote command execution vulnerability (iDEFENSE)
Tags added: sid, fixed
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: libglib2.0-0
Version: 2.6.1-2
Severity: critical
The @local in G_FILENAME_ENCODING which is the only way to not coredump
any glib application if the filesystem is not utf-8 do not work anymore
in the newest version of the glib.
As this
Stephen Frost wrote:
* Matthijs Mohlmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
We are running debian sarge on some of our servers now and are getting
data and index corruption (every few weeks). On different servers
(configured the same) we experience those problems. I think it is
openldap that causes this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity #291537 important
Bug#291537: exim4: upgrade from 4.34-10 to 4.43-4 bounces all my mails!
Severity set to `important'.
# this doesn't render the package completly unuseable to everyone
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
the user replied only to me, I'm not sure what's up with this.
luke
- Forwarded message from julian [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 11:42:51 +0100
From: julian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Luke Schierer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#291355: gaim-gnome: installation fails,
Your message dated Fri, 21 Jan 2005 07:02:18 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#291513: fixed in xsok 1.02-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 289466 patch
Bug#289466: viewcvs: breaks config file on upgrade
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
tags 289466 patch
thanks
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 01:42:18AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
The viewcvs bug is clearly caused by the use of vhosts in the
configuration file. The script just isn't capable of dealing with
this at all. I think the maintainer script should at least
detect if the
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-25
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi!
After upgrading tetex-bin, it stopped working. On reinstalling, this is
what I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ LANG=en_US sudo apt-get install
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
severity 288274 grave
Bug#288274: ftp.debian.org: remove astats package, better package replace it
Severity set to `grave'.
merge 288274 288297
Bug#288274: ftp.debian.org: remove
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
retitle 270481 RM: i2c-old -- RoM
Bug#270481: RM: i2c-old [!i386] -- Rom: NBS (ANAIS), i386 kernel modules
Changed Bug title.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
retitle 270481 RM: i2c-old -- RoM; obsolete source package
Bug#270481: RM: i2c-old -- RoM
Changed Bug title.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 09:58:21AM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri, Jan 21, 2005:
Do you suggest removing from the archive all packages whose licenses
impose uncommon restrictions or just this one?
In this software the problem is two folds, some parts of the
On Friday 21 January 2005 08:09, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 01:00:47AM -0500, Joe Mason wrote:
libwvstreams3 seems to have disappeared from Debian unstable, but
retchmail still depends on it instead of libwvstreams4:
Just a quick note: I investigated if this would be a
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 08:43:41AM -0500, Patrick Patterson wrote:
On Friday 21 January 2005 08:09, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 01:00:47AM -0500, Joe Mason wrote:
libwvstreams3 seems to have disappeared from Debian unstable, but
retchmail still depends on it instead
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
tags 291033 fixed
Bug#291033: Multiple Vendor ImageMagick .psd Image File Decode Heap Overflow
Vulnerability
Tags were: sarge security patch
Bug#291118: vulnerable to CAN-2005-0005,
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 09:18:40AM -0500, Simon Law wrote:
Odd. I didn't ask for libwvstreams3 to get yoinked.
You don't need to. If you upload a new version of a source package
that builds different binary packages than the one before the old
ones will be removed semi-automatically (next time
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
tags 290974 - sid
Bug#290974: apache: Temporary usage bugs that can be used in symlink attacks
Tags were: sarge security sid
Tags removed: sid
End of message, stopping processing
Hi Krzysztof,
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 09:33:16AM +0100, Krzysztof Krzyzaniak wrote:
Take look at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-perl/2004/12/msg00030.html,
http://lists.debian.org/debian-perl/2004/12/msg00039.html (and below).
Question is in upstream changes and very confusing schema
Hi Steve,
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 04:44:22AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
- First, this bug is not critical: it does not break unrelated
packages or the whole system. It is at most grave (if it makes
the package unusable), or serious (if it's your opinion that this
bug makes the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
retitle 291006 installation-reports: LVM install failed due to missing dmsetup
Bug#291006: Package: installation-reports
Changed Bug title.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri, Jan 21, 2005:
I don't really think it's acceptable to move half of gnome into contrib.
Fortunately, if the package dependencies of libhowl0 are accurate, this
shouldn't be required; mdnsresponder isn't a dependency of libhowl0, only a
recommends: which
Package: libavcodec-dev
Version: 0.cvs20050106-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
[Cc'ing security@, as at least xine-lib embeds libavcodec, there may be
more, I haven't investigated whether they are affected, but I assume it's
the case]
The most recent
Your message dated Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:55:12 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Source package gone
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:15:00 +0100 Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
g++ -O2 -g -c `wx-config --cflags` -o sffview.o sffview.cpp
In file included from sffview.cpp:36:
common.h:36:37: boost/filesystem/path.hpp: No such file or directory
of policycoreutils_1.20-2 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 1.170.5
Build started at 20050121-0631
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: libselinux1-dev (= 1.14-1), libpam0g-dev, libsepol1-dev, file
[...]
make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/policycoreutils-1.20/audit2allow
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 01:16:28 +0100 Adeodato =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sim=F3?= [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
hydrogen needs to be rebuilt against the latest libflac-dev in order to
link to libflac6 instead of libflac4 and become functional again. See:
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: serious
The 'setserial' package remains problematic on many systems. In the worst
cases, having the package installed with the default debconf choice taken
will cause a hard system crash on boot. There seems to be general agreement
that this package, while
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
severity 261873 serious
Bug#261873: Move setserial out of base (?)
Severity set to `serious'.
merge 261873 291585
Bug#261873: Move setserial out of base (?)
Bug#291585: downgrade and
Package: hwtools_0.8-4_i386.deb
Version: hwtools
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This is what I get when trying to install it:
Preparing to replace hwtools 0.8-3 (using .../hwtools_0.8-4_i386.deb)
...
Unpacking replacement hwtools ...
dpkg: error processing
Package: kbugbuster
Version: 4:3.3.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable (uninstallable)
kbugbuster still depends on libkcal2, which has recently been
superseded by the binary-incompatible (sigh) libkcal2a. Could you
please rebuild it against libkcal2-dev (= 4:3.3.2)?
On Friday 03 Dec 2004 16:10, Pontus Lidman wrote:
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1.1.3-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Writer crashes in the style edit dialog. How to reproduce:
1) start oowriter
2) select any style in the stylist, right-click, select 'modify'
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
retitle 288274 Please remove obsolete astats package
Bug#288274: ftp.debian.org: remove astats package, better package replace it
Changed Bug title.
End of message, stopping
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
tags 266707 security
Bug#266707: provides no security
Tags were: patch
Tags added: security
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Package: zvbi
Version: 0.2.12-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on all arches with the following
error:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -Wall -Wunused -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wmissing-declarations -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -I/usr/include/libpng10
-Wall -g -O2 -c
Package: gibraltar-bootcd
Severity: serious
I was just attempting to build gibraltar-bootcd version 0.40 from the
source using pbuilder and it failed horribly.
Upon investigation I found that debian/rules is calling two scripts:
build-discover (which attempts to download the source for curl,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
forwarded 291599 Michael Schimek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#291599: zvbi: FTBFS: wss.c:44:21: libzvbi.h: No such file or directory
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
Couldn't we just use a dummy mount? Bind mount /bin/ as /tmp/`mktemp
-d`/, then test retval=diropen(/tmp/`mktemp`)? (Or
fopen(/tmp/`mktemp`/ls) or sth similar).
(I didn't say it was clean ... :) But this test is probably better
than nothing, as it prevents /dev/ from being unusable. Just
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 291380 + pending
Bug#291380: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: iDEFENSE Security Advisory 01.19.05: MySQL MaxDB
Web Agent Multiple Denial of Service Vulnerabilities]
Tags were: sarge security
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
retitle 288672 Causes scripts to fail in undebugable ways
Bug#288672: php4 4.3.10-2 cuases scripts to fail in undebugable ways
Changed Bug title.
End of message, stopping processing
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: zvbi
Version: 0.2.12-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on all arches with the following
error:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -Wall -Wunused -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wmissing-declarations -D_REENTRANT
Package: zapping
Version: 0.8.0-2
Severity: serious
Hi, your package is failing to build because it's using a
static non fPIC lib to make a shared lib.
Here is an extract from the build log:
/bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=link x86_64-linux-gcc -Wall -g -O2 -o
libteletext.zapping.la -rpath
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
tags 291595 sid
Bug#291595: hwtools_0.8-4_i386.deb: fails to install
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.6
retitle 290650 xserver-xfree86: [ati/atimisc] server won't start on Mach64 LN
rev 100 [monitor sync ranges misconfigured]
Bug#290650: xserver-xfree86: Startup fails for clamshell
On Friday 21 January 2005 02:09 am, Martin Schulze wrote:
These problems have been discovered by Wouter Coekaerts in the konversation
IRC client. Affected are version 0.15, CVS until 18-19/01/2005, and
some older versions too. They are fixed in 0.15.1.
Fixed in 0.15-3, which needs to be
I'll sponsor this upload to get the security fix in quickly.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
As the maintainer of this package, I can say that I agree that it
should have lowered priority to optional or extra.
Regards,
// Ola
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 10:02:27AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: serious
The 'setserial' package remains problematic on many
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
merge 289715 284096
Bug#284096: openoffice.org: writer crash in 'modify style' when selecting
another tab
Bug#289715: openoffice.org-bin: Impress single Word color modification is
broken again
Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged:
Values
merge 289715 284096
tags 289715 + moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
On Monday 10 Jan 2005 18:07, Eric Valette wrote:
Well done guys. Could you backup your erroneous patches once again...
I'm afraid that backing up will only delay things since these changes are
backported from 2.0 so any bugs are
Showing a warning before running each applet is a good idea. Using
debconf to display a warning is a bad idea, because only the
administrator will see it (debconf is/was never mean for such
things).
Justin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
On Friday 21 January 2005 02:09 am, Martin Schulze wrote:
These problems have been discovered by Wouter Coekaerts in the konversation
IRC client. Affected are version 0.15, CVS until 18-19/01/2005, and
some older versions too. They are fixed in 0.15.1.
Fixed
Your message dated Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:22:00 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:17:14 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#291245: fixed in koffice 1:1.3.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: ldaptor
Version: 0.0.30
Severity: serious
Tags: sarge
Hi,
Your package if failing to build in sarge with the following
error:
dh_python -p'python-ldaptor' -P'debian/install/python-ldaptor'
dh_python: Python is not installed, aborting. (Probably forgot to
Build-Depend on python.)
make:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 254785 patch
Bug#254785: dhcp3-server: purging fails on woody
Tags were: woody
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Attached is a proposed patch which should fix this issue.
(I included some other simple changes, too)
While preparing what was supposed to be a l10n NMU, I went on a few
other simple to fix issues:
* Lintian fixes (the obvious ones):
- Remove dh-make boilerplate in copyright
-
Your message dated Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:47:04 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#291503: fixed in konversation 0.15-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 10:54:21PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Package: systraq
Version: 0.0.20041118-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build because it's trying to connect
to the internet. A package should be completly build from the
source and should not need anything
Your message dated Fri, 21 Jan 2005 17:02:25 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#291136: fixed in tiff 3.7.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 04:17:25PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Great, so something like this? (Untested)
Worked for me.
--
Wesley W. Terpstra
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package konversation
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: konversation
reopen 291503
Bug#291503: CAN-2005-0129/130/131: Multiple vulnerabilities in Konversation
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
tags 291503 - sid
Bug#291503: CAN-2005-0129/130/131:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 291244 + fixed
Bug#291244: CAN-2005-0064: Arbitrary code execution in gpdf
Tags were: patch sarge security sid
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Package: gnucash
Version: 1.8.9-4
Severity: grave
I'm sitting here watching a (likely futile) attempt to restore two months'
worth of lost information for a user. While it's likely that nothing can get
the data back, I finally think I figured out what happened and how the data
was lost. I
tag 291623 + sarge
thanks
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Package: mysql-admin
Version: 1.0.14-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build in sarge because it still build
depends on libmysqlclient-dev (4.0.20) and libmysqlclient-dev is
a virtual package.
You seem to have changed it to use
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 291623 + sarge
Bug#291623: mysql-admin: FTBFS in sarge: Versioned build dependency on virtual
libmysqlclient-dev.
Tags were: sarge
Tags added: sarge
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
tags 291623 + sarge
thanks
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 06:04:22PM -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
So what do you want me to do about it? I provided the patch that should
fix #285071. All new MySQL based packages should use
libmysqlclient14-dev and not 12 or 10 because these old clients are not
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 04:31:55PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 02:16:45PM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
The Desktop task failed to install while installing Debian because
gs-gpl failed to configure because gs-common was not configured:
dpkg: dependency problems
So it sounds like you did:
Create file named foo.xac
Do lots of edits on foo.xac [set 1]
Then open file named foo.2004xx.xac (a backup of foo).
Do lots of edits on foo.2004xx.xac [set 2]
Then open foo.xac again.
Do lots of edits on foo.xac [set 3], which triggers the backup purger and
Your message dated Fri, 21 Jan 2005 18:01:34 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line CAN-2005-0012: Arbitrary code execution in dillo
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forwarded 291632 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=164875
Bug#291632: Destroys backup files by default with little sanity checking
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=164875.
tags
Package: nessus-plugins
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Upstream claims that large parts of nessus-plugins has never been
licensed under the GPL. The copyright status of many NASL scripts is
indeed very unclear.
The new upstream license does not give permission to redistribute, so
80 matches
Mail list logo
