Bug#292242: [debacle@debian.org: Re: [jeroen@wolffelaar.nl: [brlink@debian.org: Bug#292242: manpage looks not distributeable, as license not adhered]]]

Relicensed manpages for snacc (from GFDL to GPL) attached; somebody from QA to do an upload or should I do it myself ? Regards, Frederic ---BeginMessage--- On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 10:30:22PM +0100, Frederic Peters wrote: Would you mind relicensing berdecode and snacc-config under the

Processed: Fixed in upload of gcc-4.0 4.0ds4-0pre5 to experimental

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 290950 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#290950: libgcj6-dev: missing conflict Tags were: experimental Tags added: fixed-in-experimental tag 291075 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#291075: gij-4.0: /usr/bin/gij-wrapper-4.0 point to gij-3.4 There were no tags

Bug#290950: marked as done (libgcj6-dev: missing conflict)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:13:34 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in upload of gcc-4.0 4.0ds4-0pre5 to experimental has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Processed: crack bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 292249 woody Bug#292249: phpgroupware-todo: Todo Pasor Err Tags were: patch Tags added: woody severity 292249 grave Bug#292249: phpgroupware-todo: Todo Pasor Err Severity set to `grave'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Processed: Re: mysql++: FTBFS: unsatisfied build dependencies.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 291281 patch Bug#291281: mysql++: FTBFS: unsatisfied build dependencies. There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#291281: mysql++: FTBFS: unsatisfied build dependencies.

tags 291281 patch thanks Attached is a patch for debian/control that fixes this problem. This package does not appear to build without source changes against libmysqlclient14-dev, so this patch uses libmysqlclient12-dev for building. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer diff -u

Processed: Fixed in NMU of alsaplayer 0.99.76-0.3

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 289217 + fixed Bug#289217: alsaplayer-common: Uninstallable, please rebuild with libflac-dev 1.1.1-1 Tags were: sid Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#292304: libembperl-perl: Apache/Server.pm ( dropped in libapache2-mod-perl2 1.999.20-1 ) required

Package: libembperl-perl Version: 2.0debian-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, Embperl depends on Apache/Server.pm that is dropped in the last version of modperl2 ( libapache2-mod-perl2 1.999.20-1 ). Other packages have the same problem :

Bug#283896: libdbd-sqlite-perl: version mismatch with sqlite package.

On pi, 2005-01-21 at 09:00 -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: Hi Steve, On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 04:44:22AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: - First, this bug is not critical: it does not break unrelated packages or the whole system. It is at most grave (if it makes the package

Bug#292242: [debacle@debian.org: Re: [jeroen@wolffelaar.nl: [brlink@debian.org: Bug#292242: manpage looks not distributeable, as license not adhered]]]

On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 09:01:12AM +0100, Frederic Peters wrote: Relicensed manpages for snacc (from GFDL to GPL) attached; somebody from QA to do an upload or should I do it myself ? Cool! You can upload yourself, just upload mentionioning QA Upload and use a regular maintainer version

Bug#292230: marked as done (manpage looks not distributeable, as license not adhered)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2005 05:02:44 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#292230: fixed in groff 1.18.1.1-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#292229: marked as done (manpage looks not distributeable, as license not adhered)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2005 05:02:44 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#292229: fixed in groff 1.18.1.1-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#292242: [debacle@debian.org: Re: [jeroen@wolffelaar.nl: [brlink@debian.org: Bug#292242: manpage looks not distributeable, as license not adhered]]]

On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 09:01:12AM +0100, Frederic Peters wrote: Relicensed manpages for snacc (from GFDL to GPL) attached; somebody from QA to do an upload or should I do it myself ? Just do it yourself. If this isn't possible due to time or other constraints, I would be happy to help out,

Bug#291680: marked as done (firehol: insecure temporary directory handling)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:09:52 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Reached testing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#292242: marked as done (manpage looks not distributeable, as license not adhered)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2005 05:17:21 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#292242: fixed in snacc 1.3bbn-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#231712: marked as done (coriander: cannot upgrade to 1.0.0 - depends on X 4.3)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:41:17 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line bug solved in 1.0.0-pre1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#292282: mdadm: unable to assemble devices in degraded mode

Andres Salomon wrote: According to Neil Brown, mdadm 1.8.1 is a development version (http://www.issociate.de/board/post/141215/Multipath_problem.html); he recommends 1.8.0. If this is indeed the case, we should definitely not be releasing sarge w/ this version. The severity of this bug is grave

Processed: still present in sarge

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 289295 Bug#289295: heimdal-kdc: fresh installation fails: Section realms::REALM.ORG doesn't exist Bug reopened, originator not changed. tags 289295 +sarge Bug#289295: heimdal-kdc: fresh installation fails: Section realms::REALM.ORG doesn't

Processed: still present in sarge

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 289446 Bug#289446: needs Getopt/Std.pm but doesn't depend on perl-modules Bug reopened, originator not changed. tags 289446 +sarge Bug#289446: needs Getopt/Std.pm but doesn't depend on perl-modules Tags were: patch Tags added: sarge thanks

Processed: this is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 289310 serious Bug#289310: galeon-common: Remove complains about missing /etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults/apps/galeon Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#292325: License does not permit redistribution

Package: libforms-doc Version: 0.89-2 Severity: serious Quoting debian/copyright: --- Copyright (c) 1996-2000 by T.C. Zhao and Mark Overmars Copyright (c) 1999-2000 by T.C. Zhao and Steve Lamont ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this document may be reproduced, in any form or by any means,

Bug#289310: this is important

severity 289310 serious thanks I hope you won't mind me fiddling with your bug priorities, but galeon-common can't be removed (for = 17 days now) and that's got to be 'serious' rather than 'minor'. It's serious because it makes the package unsuitable for release. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB

Bug#292285: migrate devfs to udev: no terminal, no cdrom, no sound

udev bind mounts /dev/ to /.dev/. Check your /dev/; I bet there's little if anything there. Didn't udev say you should restart your computer at the earliest possible convenience, and shouldn't expect stuff to work if you enable udev without doing so? It used to do that. Maybe it is a problem

Bug#292339: mssstest: License does not permit modification, but source is modified

Package: mssstest Version: 2.0-1 Severity: serious This package's license does not permit modification, but mssstest-2.0/makefile and mssstest-2.0/roxburgh.cpp have been modified anyway. I suggest you either revert the modifications or obtain the required permission. Quoting debian/copyright:

Bug#292285: migrate devfs to udev: no terminal, no cdrom, no sound

On Jan 26, Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: udev bind mounts /dev/ to /.dev/. Check your /dev/; I bet there's little if anything there. Didn't udev say you should restart your computer at the earliest possible convenience, and shouldn't expect stuff to work if you enable udev without

Bug#290115: knoda: FTBFS: `listdatasource_is_table' undeclared

On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:25:25 -0800 Daniel Schepler wrote: From my build log, using pbuilder in an ia32 chroot: [Most of knoda FTBFS log snipped] hk_kdesimplegrid.cpp: In member function `virtual QWidget* hk_kdesimplegrid::createEditor(int, int, bool) const': hk_kdesimplegrid.cpp:585:

Bug#292347: gpsd: remote security problem with format strings

Subject: gpsd: remote security problem with format strings Package: gpsd Severity: grave Justification: user security hole Tags: security Hello, a remote security problem with format strings has been reported: http://seclists.org/lists/fulldisclosure/2005/Jan/0843.html The patch is changing

Bug#291970: emacspeak: Horribly outdated version of regexp-opt.el shadows Emacs' copy of this file

Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: emacspeak Version: 17.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: breaks other emacs add-ons, unsuitable for release M-x list-load-path-shadows: [...] /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/emacspeak/regexp-opt hides

Processed: Re: Bug#292325: License does not permit redistribution

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 292325 + pending Bug#292325: License does not permit redistribution There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#292325: License does not permit redistribution

tags 292325 + pending thanks Göran Weinholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: libforms-doc Version: 0.89-2 Severity: serious Quoting debian/copyright: --- Copyright (c) 1996-2000 by T.C. Zhao and Mark Overmars Copyright (c) 1999-2000 by T.C. Zhao and Steve Lamont ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Processed: Re: Bug#292325: License does not permit redistribution

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 292325 minor Bug#292325: License does not permit redistribution Severity set to `minor'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#292325: License does not permit redistribution

severity 292325 minor thanks On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 09:49:01AM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote: [...] I was hoping that the documentation would be freed sufficiently soon to avoid uploading another package to non-free. Guess it's time to nudge and nag again. Ah, it's being freed, excellent!

Bug#289310: this is important

Hi Hamish, Le 26.01.2005 12:53:14, Hamish Moffatt a écrit : severity 289310 serious thanks I hope you won't mind me fiddling with your bug priorities, but It is not *my* bug, it is *a* bug I've reported. ;-) And I can understand you raise the priority. galeon-common can't be removed (for = 17

Bug#292339: mssstest: License does not permit modification, but source is modified

On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 03:41:55PM +0100, Steffen Moeller wrote: Hello Göran, where does the license say that I am not allowed to do modifications? The default of copyright law doesn't allow you to do very much with the software. So to distribute modified versions of the software, you need a

Bug#292366: loop on incorrect charset

Package: debian-installer Severity: grave I have installed a couple of sparc64 machines (One netra and one V100) and in both of them I had a problem at the end of the installation. On the first reboot, it enters on the menu where you will set up the root password and some other configs. But I

Bug#292285: migrate devfs to udev: no terminal, no cdrom, no sound

in README.Debian: - since modules are not loaded on demand, if you do not have a working hotplug package which can synthetize PCI hotplug events at boot time you will have to manually load all the drivers you need from /etc/modules. - some modules are not hardware drivers and cannot be loaded

Processed: merging 292347 292370

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5 merge 292347 292370 Bug#292347: gpsd: remote security problem with format strings Bug#292370: debian unstable / testing gpsd bug Merged 292347 292370. End of message, stopping

Processed: Re: webmin-ldap-user-simple gives wrong error message

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 291124 normal Bug#291124: webmin-ldap-user-simple gives wrong error message Severity set to `normal'. thank you Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#291124: webmin-ldap-user-simple gives wrong error message

severity 291124 normal thank you * Klaus Ade Johnstad ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050118 13:40]: Package:webmin-ldap-user-simple Version: 1.3-20 Severity:critical When I upgrade debian-edu-config to 0.394-1.desa2004021, some new ldap schemas are introduced . The way webmin-ldap-user-simple

Bug#292339: mssstest: License does not permit modification, but source is modified

Hello again, I sent upstream an email asking for the permission. To me this is all a bit strange, distracting myself and upstream from the real work we need to do; however the lawsuit between SCO and IBM is strange, too, so I should feel thankful for your help. Sorry for the premature

Bug#292380: cupsys-client: cupsaddsmb doesn't install cups for windows drivers

Package: cupsys-client Version: 1.1.23-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable cupsaddsmb fails to do its job, without error message. When looking to drivers directory, i see that : -W32X86 directory is not created and the cups drivers files are copied nowhere. After looking

Bug#292382: kdebase: dummy bug to prevent testing migration (wrong urgency)

Package: kdebase Version: 4:3.3.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid We had .changes hiccup and the Urgency field for the 3.3.2-1 upload was set to high, when it would have been low if all had gone well. Using this bug report to prevent it entering testing before it was intended. --

Bug#292383: kdeadmin: dummy bug to prevent testing migration (wrong urgency)

Package: kdeadmin Version: 4:3.3.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid We had .changes hiccup and the Urgency field for the 3.3.2-1 upload was set to high, when it would have been low if all had gone well. Using this bug report to prevent it entering testing before it was intended. --

Processed: Re: Processed: this is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 289310 important Bug#289310: galeon-common: Remove complains about missing /etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults/apps/galeon Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#289310: Processed: this is important

severity 289310 important thanks Hi, I've searched in my in and out mails, and couldn't find a trace of the reply I could swear I have typed on this problem, but I know of the problem, and I was ready to fix it with next upload. I noticed the bug after the 1.3.19 upload since I was

Bug#286482: drivel: Drivel still breaks mime database

Package: drivel Version: 1.2.3-2 Followup-For: Bug #286482 it seems that oregano and drivel are still colliding in mime database. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (101, 'testing'), (99, 'unstable'), (9, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686)

Processed: Re: Bug#292366: loop on incorrect charset

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 292366 normal Bug#292366: loop on incorrect charset Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To

Bug#292366: loop on incorrect charset

severity 292366 normal thanks On Wednesday 26 January 2005 17:20, Sergio Rua wrote: On the first reboot, it enters on the menu where you will set up the root password and some other configs. But I was unable to do anything here as the server entered on a loop with the error Incorrect charset

Processed: severity of 292210 is grave, tagging 292210

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 severity 292210 grave Bug#292210: FWD: [SECURITY] [DSA 655-1] New zhcon packages fix unauthorised file access Severity set to `grave'. tags 292210 security Bug#292210: FWD:

Processed: Re: Bug#292359: catdoc_0.91.5-1.woody4_i386.deb does not install on woody

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 292359 ftp.debian.org Bug#292359: catdoc_0.91.5-1.woody4_i386.deb does not install on woody Bug reassigned from package `catdoc' to `ftp.debian.org'. merge 292359 290838 Bug#290838: Please remove catdoc_0.91.5-1.woody4 from archive

Bug#292359: catdoc_0.91.5-1.woody4_i386.deb does not install on woody

reassign 292359 ftp.debian.org merge 292359 290838 thanks a lot On Jan 26, 3:55pm, Debian User wrote: Package: catdoc Version: N/A; reported 2005-01-26 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable catdoc_0.91.5-1.woody4_i386.deb from stable-proposed-updates depends on

Bug#289708: CAN-2004-1235 patch for Debian/Woody

Still no sign of a DSA for this, so I'll point in the direction of a patch [1] I made against 2.4.18-14.3 for some locally built packages. It's based on diffs extracted [2] from BitKeeper that relate to recent efforts for 2.4.29, and I've tested the published exploit on a 2.4.18-1-k7 kernel built

Processed: Fixed in NMU of zhcon 1:0.2.3-8.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 292210 + fixed Bug#292210: FWD: [SECURITY] [DSA 655-1] New zhcon packages fix unauthorised file access Tags were: security Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#292401: kdm_config override /etc/kde3/kdm/kdmrc which is a conffile

Package: kdm Version: 4:3.3.1-4 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.7.3 Hello KDE maintainers, kcontrol overwrite the conffile /etc/kde3/kdm/kdmrc without respecting comment and formating. For example if you start with the file provided in the current kdm package, launch kcontrol, choose

Processed: xwhois_0.4.2-6: FTBFS: automake-1.4 is needed

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 292015 serious Bug#292015: FTBFS: timeskew problems on m68k Severity set to `serious'. merge 292015 292048 Bug#292015: FTBFS: timeskew problems on m68k Bug#292048: xwhois_0.4.2-6: FTBFS: automake-1.4 is needed Merged 292015 292048. thanks

Processed: Re: Processed: this is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 289310 serious Bug#289310: galeon-common: Remove complains about missing /etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults/apps/galeon Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#292404: webmin-telnet: tries to open non-existent file jta20.jar

Package: webmin-telnet Version: 1.160-2 Severity: serious The package creates web pages which attempt to use the jta20.jar file via a symlink in the package and the reference to the symlink in the webpage, but the jta package now (sarge) provides jta25.jar instead. This clearly needs fixing.

Bug#292403: octave2.1: FTBFS: Failed to clean.

Package: octave2.1 Version: 2.1.64-2 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build on all arches with the following error: /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean dh_testdir dh_testroot /usr/bin/make -i distclean || /usr/bin/make -f Makefile.in distclean make[1]: Entering directory

Bug#292408: gcompris: error while loading shared libraries

Package: gcompris Version: 6.4-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I just installed gcompris with an apt-get and I get this error: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp# gcompris gcompris: error while loading shared libraries: libSDL-1.1.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file

Bug#288180: nis kills sparc64

Assuming that this really is a bug in the kernel... Given that the reporter claimed that the problem affected 2.6.8-1-sparc64-smp 2.6.8-5 too, should it really be blocking kernel-image-2.6.8-2-sparc64 from entering sarge? p7sM8CopGc4nN.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Processed: Re: Bug#292337: doc++ segfaults on m68k, including during its own build

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 292337 important Bug#292337: doc++ segfaults on m68k, including during its own build Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#292401: kdm_config override /etc/kde3/kdm/kdmrc which is a conffile

On Wednesday 26 January 2005 05:56 pm, Bill Allombert wrote: Package: kdm Version: 4:3.3.1-4 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.7.3 Hello KDE maintainers, kcontrol overwrite the conffile /etc/kde3/kdm/kdmrc without respecting comment and formating. For example if you start with

Bug#291585: marked as done (downgrade and move setserial)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2005 22:45:15 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line setserial no longer in base has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#292116: marked as done (module-init-tools: breaks boot-up if modutils is not installed)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2005 16:47:02 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#292116: fixed in module-init-tools 3.2-pre1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#270816: marked as done (lib64gcc1 - depends against optional amd64-libs)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2005 23:04:57 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line lib64gcc1 is optional has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#292420: razor: Insecure /tmp usage

Package: razor Version: 2.610-2 Severity: grave Tags: security patch sid testing The use done of files under /tmp by Razor for logging is unsafe and open to symlink attacks. It would be best if Razor would use safely created temporary files and directories to prevent a local installation from

Bug#292401: kdm_config override /etc/kde3/kdm/kdmrc which is a conffile

severity 292401 important stop On January 26, 2005 17:56, Bill Allombert wrote: Package: kdm Version: 4:3.3.1-4 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.7.3 ...which states: Configuration file handling must conform to the following behavior: * local changes must be preserved during a

Bug#292419: nmap: NMap possibly violates The Debian Free Software Guidelines (DFSG)

Package: nmap Version: 3.75-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.1 The DFSG #5 states that The license must not discriminate against any person or group of persons. Although nmap is liscenced under the GPL, it specifically forbids the SCO Group from distributing nmap. I do not know if this

Bug#291281: Patch for 1.7.9.sp4-5.1 NMU of mysql++

Package: mysql++ Severity: normal On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 12:18:29AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: Attached is a patch for debian/control that fixes this problem. This package does not appear to build without source changes against libmysqlclient14-dev, so this patch uses libmysqlclient12-dev

Bug#270388: debian-pkg-add-load-path-item cannot handle nil in load-path

Hi Rob, I've prepared a 0-day NMU for emacsen-common to fix this RC bug, which will be uploaded shortly. The complete changeset, equivalent to Manoj's patch plus a changelog entry, is attached. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer diff -Nru

Bug#290501: spamscan in debbugs does not work any more after upgrading to spamassassin 3.0.2-1

On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 02:14:50PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: since upgrading to new version of spamassassin today (from 2.X to 3.0.2-1), spamscan from package debbugs does not work any more. I'm completely unable to find spamscan in _any_ Debian package. Are you sure this bug is in the

Bug#292419: nmap: NMap possibly violates The Debian Free Software Guidelines (DFSG)

On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 05:11:48PM -0500, astronut wrote: The DFSG #5 states that The license must not discriminate against any person or group of persons. Although nmap is liscenced under the GPL, it specifically forbids the SCO Group from distributing nmap. That is not discrimination

Processed: Re: Bug#290501: spamscan in debbugs does not work any more after upgrading to spamassassin 3.0.2-1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 290501 important Bug#290501: spamscan in debbugs does not work any more after upgrading to spamassassin 3.0.2-1 Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Processed: Re: Processed: merging RC bugs

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 290951 galeon-common Bug#290951: galeon: Dpkg error while upgrading Galeon Bug reassigned from package `galeon' to `galeon-common'. merge 289310 290951 Bug#289310: galeon-common: Remove complains about missing

Processed: Fixed in NMU of mysql++ 1.7.9.sp4-5.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 291281 + fixed Bug#291281: mysql++: FTBFS: unsatisfied build dependencies. Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#270388: debian-pkg-add-load-path-item cannot handle nil in load-path

Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've prepared a 0-day NMU for emacsen-common to fix this RC bug, which will be uploaded shortly. The complete changeset, equivalent to Manoj's patch plus a changelog entry, is attached. That looks fine, and sorry I haven't done it sooner myself. I

Bug#292419: nmap: NMap possibly violates The Debian Free Software Guidelines (DFSG)

On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:55:26 -0800, Fyodor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip That is not discrimination against any specific person or group-- the GPL states (section 4 and 5) that companies must accept the GPL in order to redistribute GPL'd software such as Nmap. Since SCO refuses to accept the

Processed: Fixed in NMU of emacsen-common 1.4.15-0.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 270388 + fixed Bug#270388: debian-pkg-add-load-path-item cannot handle nil in load-path Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#244274: marked as done (ttcn3parser: FTBFS: versioned Build-Depends for antlr / libantlr-dev unsatisfyable)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2005 18:20:31 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#244274: fixed in ttcn3parser 20050122-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#292419: marked as done (nmap: NMap possibly violates The Debian Free Software Guidelines (DFSG))

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2005 16:16:24 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#292419: nmap: NMap possibly violates The Debian Free Software Guidelines (DFSG) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#290234: confirmed

Yes, we get the same problem too, it happened between the switch from mono 1.0.2 to 1.0.4. I investigated already and it's not upstream related, but packaging related. Mono 1.0.2 built fine the 1.0.4 version though. I am further investigating Thanks for your bugreport -- Regards, Mirco

Bug#289310: marked as done (galeon-common: Remove complains about missing /etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults/apps/galeon)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2005 18:32:22 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#289310: fixed in galeon 1.3.19-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#290951: marked as done (galeon: Dpkg error while upgrading Galeon)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2005 18:32:22 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#289310: fixed in galeon 1.3.19-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: Re: Bug#292380: cupsys-client: cupsaddsmb doesn't install cups for windows drivers

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 292380 important Bug#292380: cupsys-client: cupsaddsmb doesn't install cups for windows drivers Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#292380: cupsys-client: cupsaddsmb doesn't install cups for windows drivers

severity 292380 important thanks At Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:36:25 +0100, PROD'HOMME Nicolas DDSC SDAM BSI wrote: Package: cupsys-client Version: 1.1.23-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable cupsaddsmb fails to do its job, without error message. OK, I'll check it. But

Bug#287847: marked as done (Unresolved symbols in alsa-modules-2.4.27-1-686)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:02:57 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#284181: fixed in alsa-modules-i386 1.0.8+1+1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#287783: marked as done (alsa-modules-2.4.27-1-k7: unresolved symbol with new kernel-image-2.4.27-1-k7)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:02:57 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#284181: fixed in alsa-modules-i386 1.0.8+1+1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#284463: marked as done (Alsa modules no longer load after minor kernel update)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:02:57 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#284181: fixed in alsa-modules-i386 1.0.8+1+1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#284181: marked as done (alsa-modules-2.4.27-1-686: plenty of unresolved symbols)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:02:57 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#284181: fixed in alsa-modules-i386 1.0.8+1+1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#284485: marked as done (failed loading alsa driver)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:02:57 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#284181: fixed in alsa-modules-i386 1.0.8+1+1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#287153: marked as done (depmod: *** Unresolved symbols)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:02:57 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#284181: fixed in alsa-modules-i386 1.0.8+1+1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#287483: marked as done (alsa-modules-i386: 2.4.27 modules don't work with recent kernel upgrade)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:02:57 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#284181: fixed in alsa-modules-i386 1.0.8+1+1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#291339: marked as done (alsa-modules-2.4.27-1-686: undefined symbols)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:02:57 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#284181: fixed in alsa-modules-i386 1.0.8+1+1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#292443: libsnacc0: depends on experimental libgcc1 on i386

Package: libsnacc0 Version: 1.3bbn-7 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable (uninstallable) The following packages have unmet dependencies: libsnacc0: Depends: libgcc1 (= 1:4.0) but 1:3.4.3-7 is installed. Please rebuild against packages that are actually available on sid,

Bug#292450: tinc: Upgrade fails when answering 'n' to MAKEDEV

Package: tinc Version: 1.0.3-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Opon `apt-get install tinc` for new tinc version; the following question is asked: Setting up tinc (1.0.3-1) ... You don't seem to have the necessary devices available. If you want, I can create them for you

Bug#292408: marked as done (gcompris: error while loading shared libraries)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:25:36 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line gcompris: error while loading shared libraries has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#289182: kino endianness issues on powerpc

severity 289182 grave thanks Hi Daniel, You're right that this bug is not a policy violation; this is a grave bug, which is the severity for bugs that render a package unusable or mostly so. We should not be releasing unusable binaries for any architecture; either the binaries for all

Bug#288180: nis kills sparc64

On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 04:22:47PM -0500, Chaskiel M Grundman wrote: Assuming that this really is a bug in the kernel... Given that the reporter claimed that the problem affected 2.6.8-1-sparc64-smp 2.6.8-5 too, should it really be blocking kernel-image-2.6.8-2-sparc64 from entering sarge? If

Bug#292467: comp broken (at least for external editors, maybe more)

Package: exmh Version: 1:2.7.2-1 Severity: grave After upgrading exmh today when I click on the Comp button I get an Error Info dialog popup with the following contents, can't read install(dir,bin): no such variable while executing exec $wish -f $install(dir,bin)/exmh-async -- [winfo name .]