Bug#339424: pygmy: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev'

2005-11-16 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: pygmy Version: 0.45+svn77-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'pygmy' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: dh_testroot # Add here commands to clean up after the build process. python setup.py clean --all make: python: Command not found make: *** [clean]

Bug#339429: udev requires unix sockets when starting.

2005-11-16 Thread Robbert Muller
Package: udev Version: 0.074-3 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system udev uses unix sockets. if those not available the system end in a state where the dev directory is empty and nothing works rebooting to single usermode with init=/bin/bash and adding the following line as

Bug#339430: Virtual package octave should depend on the recommended octave2.1

2005-11-16 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
Package: octave Version: 2.9.4-1 Severity: serious This RC bug report is just to prevent the virtual octave package from entering testing. It was wrongly uploaded with octave2.9. The virtual package octave should actually depend on octave2.1, which is the recommended branch. I will keep this

Bug#339431: CVE-2005-3186: Integer overflow in gdk-pixbuf's XPM code

2005-11-16 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: gtk+2.0 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole An integer overflow in gdk-pixbuf's XPM rendering code can be exploited to overwrite the heap and exploit arbitrary code through crafted images. Please see

Bug#338529: mcvs: FTBFS: dangling symlink /usr/lib/clisp/base/lispinit.mem

2005-11-16 Thread Peter Van Eynde
On Thursday 10 November 2005 21:29, Roland Stigge wrote: cd code; ./install.sh /usr /tmp/buildd/mcvs-1.0.13/debian/mcvs/ /usr/lib/clisp/base/lisp.run: operating system error during load of initialization file `/usr/lib/clisp/base/lispinit.mem' [spvw_memfile.d:834] Is the clisp package

Bug#339437: HTTP Response Splitting vulnerability

2005-11-16 Thread Michal Čihař
Package: phpmyadmin Version: 4:2.6.4-pl3-1 Severity: grave Tags: security Hi I'm not sure if you're aware of new security issue found in phpMyAdmin: http://www.phpmyadmin.net/home_page/security.php?issue=PMASA-2005-6 I know it's too young to be already in archives, however I just want to

Bug#339439: openoffice.org-impress: wrong image colors rendering during fullscreen slideshow

2005-11-16 Thread klein
Package: openoffice.org-impress Version: 2.0.0-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable when an image is inserted in a presentation from a file, the image colors are wrongly rendered during a fullscreen slide show. The color rendering is correct in the windowed view. looks like

Bug#339407: sgt-puzzles: ftbfs [sparc] make[1]: *** [blackboxgame.6] Broken pipe

2005-11-16 Thread Ben Hutchings
You wrote: sgt-puzzles failed to build on a sparc buildd, but did build on my sparc pbuilder. make -f Makefile.doc make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/sgt-puzzles-6452' halibut --winhelp=puzzles.hlp --text=puzzles.txt puzzles.but halibut --text=HACKING devel.but perl

Bug#334979: marked as done (proftpd - fails to build)

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2005 03:02:09 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#334979: fixed in proftpd 1.2.10-25 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#339446: synaptic_0.57.5.1.exp4(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: build-dep to lax?

2005-11-16 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
Package: synaptic Version: 0.57.5.1.exp4 Severity: serious Hi, you probably need to tighten your build-dependencies on libapt-pkg-dev... | Automatic build of synaptic_0.57.5.1.exp4 on odin by sbuild/sparc 69 | Build started at 20051116-0728

Bug#339437: HTTP Response Splitting vulnerability

2005-11-16 Thread Piotr Roszatycki
Dnia Wednesday 16 of November 2005 11:23, Michal Čihař napisał: I'm not sure if you're aware of new security issue found in phpMyAdmin: http://www.phpmyadmin.net/home_page/security.php?issue=PMASA-2005-6 I know it's too young to be already in archives, however I just want to notify you.

Processed: Re: Bug#339429: udev requires unix sockets when starting.

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 339429 normal Bug#339429: udev requires unix sockets when starting. Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#339429: udev requires unix sockets when starting.

2005-11-16 Thread Marco d'Itri
severity 339429 normal thanks On Nov 16, Robbert Muller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The startup script should check for those conditions before mounting an empty How? Is the existence of /proc/net/unix enough? Anyway, on a correctly configured system af_unix would be autoloaded. -- ciao, Marco

Processed: Re: Bug#339437: HTTP Response Splitting vulnerability

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: found 339437 4:2.6.4-pl3-1 Bug#339437: HTTP Response Splitting vulnerability Bug marked as found in version 4:2.6.4-pl3-1. -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#339456: gconf2_2.12.1-2(m68k/experimental):

2005-11-16 Thread wouter
Package: gconf2 Version: 2.12.1-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of gconf2_2.12.1-2 on quickstep by sbuild/m68k 69 Build started at 20051115-2140 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (

Bug#339431: CVE-2005-3186: Integer overflow in gdk-pixbuf's XPM code

2005-11-16 Thread Loic Minier
tags 339431 + patch thanks On Wed, Nov 16, 2005, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: An integer overflow in gdk-pixbuf's XPM rendering code can be exploited to overwrite the heap and exploit arbitrary code through crafted images. Please see

Processed: Re: Bug#339431: CVE-2005-3186: Integer overflow in gdk-pixbuf's XPM code

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 339431 + patch Bug#339431: CVE-2005-3186: Integer overflow in gdk-pixbuf's XPM code Tags were: security Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Processed: Re: Bug#339437: HTTP Response Splitting vulnerability

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: found 339437 4:2.6.2-3sarge1 Bug#339437: HTTP Response Splitting vulnerability Bug marked as found in version 4:2.6.2-3sarge1. -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#339431: CVE-2005-3186: Integer overflow in gdk-pixbuf's XPM code

2005-11-16 Thread Loic Minier
Security team, did you start work on CVE-2005-3186 and CVE-2005-2975, CVE-2005-2976 (not described in this report)? Ubuntu has released some packages which might help http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-216-1. Do you need the Gtk maintainers to prepare an upload for stable? Uploads are being

Bug#339431: CVE-2005-3186: Integer overflow in gdk-pixbuf's XPM code

2005-11-16 Thread Loic Minier
clone 339431 -1 reassign -1 gdk-pixbuf thanks Hi, I believe gdk-pixbuf is affected as well. I suppose you can grab useful patches from the Ubuntu security fixes: http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-216-1 Cheers, -- Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] What do we want? BRAINS!When do

Bug#339431: CVE-2005-3186: Integer overflow in gdk-pixbuf's XPM code

2005-11-16 Thread Steve Kemp
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 02:05:11PM +0100, Loic Minier wrote: Security team, did you start work on CVE-2005-3186 and CVE-2005-2975, CVE-2005-2976 (not described in this report)? Ubuntu has released some packages which might help http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-216-1. Do you need the Gtk

Processed: Re: Bug#339431: CVE-2005-3186: Integer overflow in gdk-pixbuf's XPM code

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 339431 -1 Bug#339431: CVE-2005-3186: Integer overflow in gdk-pixbuf's XPM code Bug 339431 cloned as bug 339458. reassign -1 gdk-pixbuf Bug#339458: CVE-2005-3186: Integer overflow in gdk-pixbuf's XPM code Bug reassigned from package `gtk+2.0' to

Processed: Fixed in upload of cupsys 1.1.99.b1.r4841-1 to experimental

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 339120 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#339120: cupsys_1.1.99.b1.r4748-4(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: ld failed Tags were: experimental Tags added: fixed-in-experimental quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian

Bug#339456: marked as done (gconf2_2.12.1-2(m68k/experimental):)

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:08:36 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#339456: gconf2_2.12.1-2(m68k/experimental): has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#339431: CVE-2005-3186: Integer overflow in gdk-pixbuf's XPM code

2005-11-16 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Loic Minier wrote: An integer overflow in gdk-pixbuf's XPM rendering code can be exploited to overwrite the heap and exploit arbitrary code through crafted images. Please see www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=339type=vulnerabilities for more details. Did you identify other

Bug#339136: marked as done (Changes in stat package output break apt-move)

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2005 05:47:10 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#339136: fixed in coreutils 5.93-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#335842: hmake FTBFS - error in confhc (and another error in HInteractive.hs)

2005-11-16 Thread Stefan Potyra
Tags: patch Hi, the error Daniel reported, is caused by a difference in the new ghc6 (6.4.1), which produces an output of several lines instead of a only one-liner, when it precompiles (-E) the program, that consists only of: __GLASGOW_HASKELL__ Since scripts/confhc uses this output in

Bug#339431: CVE-2005-3186: Integer overflow in gdk-pixbuf's XPM code

2005-11-16 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Loic Minier wrote: The Redhat security advisory also fixes CVE-2005-2975, for which I see no entry in the Debian changelog, could you please investifate on this id and report whether gtk1 and gtk2 are affected for Debian? The vulnerability matrix for Woody and Sarge (the entries are the

Bug#339469: helix-player: FTBFS due to different errors on all architectures

2005-11-16 Thread Wolfram Quester
Package: helix-player Version: 1.0.6-2 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Tags: patch Hi, I just had a look at the helix-player package and noticed that it failed to build on all architectures. Each time it seems to be a different error. Btw, in Bug #330337 you list

Bug#330895: marked as done (blender [CVE-2005-3302]: Arbitrary code execution when importing a .bvh file)

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:54:07 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#330895: [CVE-2005-3302] blender: Arbitrary code execution when importing a .bvh file has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#337439: marked as done (php-pager: FTBFS: Can't rm -*/package.xml)

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2005 06:32:13 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#337439: fixed in php-pager 2.3.4-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#337437: marked as done (php-cache-lite: FTBFS: can't rm -*/package.xml (missing Build-Depends?))

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2005 06:32:11 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#337437: fixed in php-cache-lite 1.5.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: Fixed in upload of gtk+2.0 2.8.7-1 to experimental

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 339431 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#339431: CVE-2005-3186: Integer overflow in gdk-pixbuf's XPM code Tags were: patch security Tags added: fixed-in-experimental quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#337442: marked as done (php-simpletest: FTBFS: Can't rm -*/package.xml)

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2005 06:32:15 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#337442: fixed in php-simpletest 1.0.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#337584: alternatives

2005-11-16 Thread Charles Fry
Well, in order to get my RC bugs closed, I temmporarily switched to xmlstarlet. Nonetheless, I do believe that this is a serious issue that should be addressed. There is no reason that I can come up with that a computer without a network connection should be prevented from running xpath on a local

Bug#335881: Bug cause

2005-11-16 Thread Florian Weimer
This bug is caused by a change in GAS which makes it prefer shorter instruction sequences: 80580c1: 8d 14 52lea(%edx,%edx,2),%edx 80580c4: 8d ac 95 17 00 00 00lea0x17(%ebp,%edx,4),%ebp 80580cb: 89 c2 mov%eax,%edx 80580cd:

Bug#339424: marked as done (pygmy: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev')

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2005 07:47:08 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#339424: fixed in pygmy 0.45+svn77-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#339480: security patch in 4.0.1-2 breaks tkdiff

2005-11-16 Thread Joe Drew
Package: tkdiff Version: 1:4.0.2-2 Severity: grave For every subversion file I try to tkdiff, I get the following error: Error in startup script: can not find channel named fid while executing close fid (procedure tmpfile line 11) invoked from within tmpfile $index (procedure

Processed: please

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: merge 323112 332534 Bug#323112: heaplayer: ftbfs [sparc] there are no arguments to 'setTidMap' that depend on a template parameter Bug#332534: heaplayers_3.2.2-2 (unstable): fails to build Merged 323112 332534. thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#339485: kernel-image-2.6.8-powerpc: Installation fails in half-installed state, can neither install nor remove

2005-11-16 Thread Rich Johnson
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-powerpc Version: 2.6.8-12 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.7.3 kernel-image-bug -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (1001, 'testing'), (990, 'stable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked

Bug#339487: kernel-image-2.6.8-powerpc: Installation fails in half-installed state; can neither install nor remove

2005-11-16 Thread Rich Johnson
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-powerpc Version: 2.6.8-12 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.7.3 Post-removal script fails reporting Not a directory: --verbose (or '-v'). kernel-image-2.6.8-powerpc is left stuck in a half-installed state and can not be installed, removed, or upgraded via

Bug#339488: apt-src: Needs to install build-deps before clean

2005-11-16 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Package: apt-src Version: 0.25.1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 7.6 Quoting Policy 7.6: Build-Depends, Build-Conflicts The Build-Depends and Build-Conflicts fields must be satisfied when any of the following targets is invoked: build, clean, binary, binary-arch,

Bug#339048: (no subject)

2005-11-16 Thread John Carline
Works perfect. Thanks for your work, Daniel. John -- Powered by the Penguin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#339437: PMASA-2005-6 when register_globals = on

2005-11-16 Thread Piotr Roszatycki
Dnia Wednesday 16 of November 2005 13:17, Martin Schulze napisał: Vuln 1: Full Path Disclosures in the following files: Vuln 2: Http Response Splitting in libraries/header_http.inc.php Do you know if this is the same vulnerability as the first one above? The Full Path Disclosure is not

Bug#339485:

2005-11-16 Thread Rich Johnson
This should be merged with 339487 (typed --body option rather than --body-file) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#339431: marked as done (CVE-2005-3186: Integer overflow in gdk-pixbuf's XPM code)

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2005 09:17:08 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#339431: fixed in gtk+2.0 2.6.10-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#339492: uninstallable

2005-11-16 Thread Steffen Joeris
Package: guile-gnome0-dev Severity: serious Hi Sorry but guile-gnome0-dev is uninstallable. I need it for a package and under sid it failed to install with the following warning: The following packages have unmet dependencies: guile-gnome0-dev: Depends: g-wrap (= 1.9.4) but it is not going to

Bug#333947: marked as done (Unsatisfiable build-dep xlibmesa-glu-dev)

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2005 09:47:08 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#333947: fixed in gngb 20040115-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: tagging 339458

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8 tags 339458 pending Bug#339458: CVE-2005-3186: Integer overflow in gdk-pixbuf's XPM code Tags were: patch security Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here.

Bug#336114: marked as done (gcc-4.0_4.0.1-9 backwards incompatible changes)

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2005 10:32:19 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#336114: fixed in gcc-4.0 4.0.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#336463: marked as done (Floating point exception ICE on mips and mipsel)

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2005 10:32:19 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#336463: fixed in gcc-4.0 4.0.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#336167: marked as done (gcc-4.0: breaks kernel builds in random ways.)

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2005 10:32:19 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#336463: fixed in gcc-4.0 4.0.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#337391: libcgi-ssi-perl: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on netbase

2005-11-16 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hello people, Also, you need to make sure the package builds on a machine which is offline, since requiring network access during a package build is a serious problem -- although I haven't yet been able to check whether that's the case here. I can confirm that the package doesn't build

Bug#339509: FTBFS on hppa using expect

2005-11-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: binutils Version: 2.16.1cvs20051109-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch Using expect-tcl8.3 lets the build succeed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#335881: Patch

2005-11-16 Thread Florian Weimer
The first few instruction bundles are not 12 bytes long, as required, but 11 bytes, with catastrophic consequences. I will see what can be done about this. Technically, this is not a GAS bug. Below is a first attempt at a patch. It doesn't pass the test suite (but debian/rules doesn't

Bug#339458: marked as done (CVE-2005-3186: Integer overflow in gdk-pixbuf's XPM code)

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:32:07 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#339458: fixed in gdk-pixbuf 0.22.0-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#339517: findlib: FTBFS on m68k (ocaml segfault)

2005-11-16 Thread Julien Cristau
Package: findlib Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Hi, findlib currently fails to build on m68k with the following error: make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/findlib-1.1/src/findlib-toolbox' ocamlc -o make_wizard -I +labltk -I ../findlib unix.cma str.cma

Bug#338529: mcvs: FTBFS: dangling symlink /usr/lib/clisp/base/lispinit.mem

2005-11-16 Thread Roland Stigge
Hi, Peter Van Eynde wrote: cd code; ./install.sh /usr /tmp/buildd/mcvs-1.0.13/debian/mcvs/ /usr/lib/clisp/base/lisp.run: operating system error during load of initialization file `/usr/lib/clisp/base/lispinit.mem' [spvw_memfile.d:834] Is the clisp package configured? This should not happen if

Bug#339480: security patch in 4.0.1-2 breaks tkdiff

2005-11-16 Thread adrian
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 11:00:12 -0500 (-0500), Joe Drew wrote: Package: tkdiff Version: 1:4.0.2-2 Severity: grave Arrgh - my deepest apologies. There was typo in the patch (missing $). If you goto line 464 and change it to: close $fid That'll fix it. New upload on its way Adrian --

Bug#338934: parrot - FTBFS: Segmentation fault

2005-11-16 Thread Florian Ragwitz
tag 338934 + confirmed fixed-upstream thanks I fixed this bug in the SVN tree, as well as the hppa and ia64 build failures. I currently work on mips and mipsel. Regards, Flo -- BOFH excuse #94: Internet outage signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Processed: note buggy versions

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: found 326103 2.16.1-2 Bug#326103: binutils: gcc -u hits ld segfault w/ certain -u options Bug#335713: mklibs: [powerpc] failfs when building the gtk d-i. Bug#335885: mklibs: [powerpc] failfs when building the gtk d-i. Bug marked as found in version

Processed: Fixed in NMU of amap 4.8-1.1

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 285090 + fixed Bug#285090: amap: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#287635: marked as done (mcdp: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid storage class for function 'cd_cddbsum')

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:02:21 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#287635: fixed in mcdp 0.4-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#339458: acknowledged by developer (Bug#339458: fixed in gdk-pixbuf 0.22.0-11)

2005-11-16 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Changes: gdk-pixbuf (0.22.0-11) unstable; urgency=high . * Fix for integer overflows in io-xpm.c which could be exploited to execute arbitrary code (CVE-2005-2975 and CVE-2005-2976 from

Processed: cloning 338436, reassign -1 to sylpheed-claws-gtk2

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8 clone 338436 -1 Bug#338436: sylpheed-claws: Buffer overflow in LDIF/pine/mutt import Bug 338436 cloned as bug 339529. #Affects also GTK2 version reassign -1 sylpheed-claws-gtk2

Bug#339409: typo in lib64z1-dev dependency

2005-11-16 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 04:43:40AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: s/lib64c-dev/lib64c6-dev/ The version of glibc in unstable seems to disagree with that one (not that it matters too much given your subsequent message). -- You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever.

Bug#339437: marked as done (HTTP Response Splitting vulnerability)

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:47:15 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#339437: fixed in phpmyadmin 4:2.6.4-pl4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#339458: acknowledged by developer (Bug#339458: fixed in gdk-pixbuf 0.22.0-11)

2005-11-16 Thread Ryan Murray
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 11:33:35PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Changes: gdk-pixbuf (0.22.0-11) unstable; urgency=high . * Fix for integer overflows in io-xpm.c which could be exploited to execute arbitrary code (CVE-2005-2975 and

Bug#337756: dependency problem

2005-11-16 Thread Kevin Dalley
No, having a broken kig is not the least bad solution. Linking with a testing approved library will allow a consistent version of kig to be in testing. -- Kevin Dalley [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Bug#339125: marked as done (FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on ocaml-nox-3.08.3)

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 Nov 2005 00:06:55 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on ocaml-nox-3.08.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#320375: Processed: Re: Bug#320375: conquest-gl: fail to start (Assertion `window-Window.VisualInfo != ((void *)0)' failed.)

2005-11-16 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Clint Adams wrote: I hate to sound patronising, but does glutInit definitely get called before any other glut call? Seems pretty unconditional here. You're welcome to look at the source. I'll prepare an upload of freeglut 2.4 Real Soon Now, and then we'll see if

Processed: closing 339125

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8 close 339125 0.7-2 Bug#339125: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on ocaml-nox-3.08.3 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in

Bug#339458: acknowledged by developer (Bug#339458: fixed in gdk-pixbuf 0.22.0-11)

2005-11-16 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Ryan Murray wrote: On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 11:33:35PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Changes: gdk-pixbuf (0.22.0-11) unstable; urgency=high . * Fix for integer overflows in io-xpm.c which could be exploited to execute arbitrary

Bug#339523: libxine1: fails to build

2005-11-16 Thread Siggi Langauf
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, A.M.P. Boelens wrote: I try to rebuild linxine1 without stripping because it hangs on a certain mp3, but it won't build. I get the following error: [...] gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../.. -I../../../.. -I../../../../include -I../../../../include

Processed: merge some bugs

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 338469 normal Bug#338469: libatomic-ops_1.0-3(m68k/unstable/vault13): FTBFS on m68k Severity set to `normal'. merge 338469 322027 Bug#322027: libatomic-ops: FTBFS on m68k: Cannot implement AO_compare_and_swap_full on this architecture.

Bug#339523: libxine1: fails to build

2005-11-16 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 11:20:32PM +0100, A.M.P. Boelens wrote: Package: libxine1 Version: 1.0.1-1.3 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source I try to rebuild linxine1 without stripping because it hangs on a certain mp3, but it won't build. I get the following error:

Bug#339541: xemacs21-mule: installation fails

2005-11-16 Thread Matthew Vernon
Package: xemacs21-mule Version: 21.4.17-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, this package doesn't install on a freshly-upgraded-from-woody system. I include a typescript of attempting to configure the package. HTH, Matthew Script started on Thu Nov 17 00:58:52 2005

Bug#337391: libcgi-ssi-perl: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on netbase

2005-11-16 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hello all, You need netbase to be installed for /etc/protocols to be available. I can confirm that the package doesn't build correctly when the host is offline, see below. I fixed both of these issues. Please see attached patch. If no objections arise, I'm planning to NMU this. Of course

Processed: raise severity of bug reports filed for libstdc++ allocator changes

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 339142 serious Bug#339142: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change) Severity set to `serious'. severity 339143 serious Bug#339143: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change) Severity set to

Processed: tagging 337391

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8 tags 337391 + patch Bug#337391: libcgi-ssi-perl: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on netbase There were no tags set. Tags added: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Bug#339255: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Doko, On 17 November 2005 at 03:22, Matthias Klose wrote: | Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the | archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can | upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures | because the

Bug#339541: xemacs21-mule: installation fails

2005-11-16 Thread OHURA Makoto
Hi. From: Matthew Vernon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bug#339541: xemacs21-mule: installation fails Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 01:04:05 + this package doesn't install on a freshly-upgraded-from-woody system. I include a typescript of attempting to configure the package. install/gnus:

Bug#339275: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures because the packages with the new

Bug#339255: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 339255 important thanks On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 09:16:37PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: On 17 November 2005 at 03:22, Matthias Klose wrote: | Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the | archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You

Processed: Re: Bug#339255: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 339255 important Bug#339255: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change) Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#326961: acknowledged by developer (Bug#326961: fixed in iproute 20041019-4)

2005-11-16 Thread LaMont Jones
reopen 326961 -- You need the 2nd half of the patch (found in my reply to the original bug report, as well as below...) thanks, lamont diff -urNad iproute-20041019/tc/paretonormal.c

Processed: Re: Bug#326961 acknowledged by developer (Bug#326961: fixed in iproute 20041019-4)

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 326961 Bug#326961: FTBFS: normal.c heap corrution due to table overflow Bug reopened, originator not changed. -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#339290: marked as done (flashplugin-nonfree: Version 7,0,61,0 released to fix CVE-2005-2628)

2005-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 Nov 2005 15:42:56 +0900 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#339290: flashplugin-nonfree: Version 7,0,61,0 released to fix CVE-2005-2628 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt