severity 208344 important
thanks
Well, I looked at the e-mail logcheck just sent me, and I found this:
gconfd (me-19567): Failed to get lock for daemon, exiting: Failed to
lock '/tmp/gconfd-me/lock/ior': probably another process has the lock, or
your operating system has NFS file locking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 208344 important
Bug#208344: lots of CORBA errors
Severity set to `important'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.18
severity 364395 grave
Bug#364395: sasl2-bin failed when upgraded
Severity set to `grave'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
tags 361139 + patch
thanks
I've attached a diff.gz for the new upstream release, which fixes the
security problem. I also fixed some other things in the package -
lintian errors/warnings and other bugs. Changelog entry:
acidbase (1.2.4-0.1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Non-maintainer upload.
Package: sasl2-bin
Version: 2.1.19.dfsg1-0.1
Followup-For: Bug #364395
Setting up sasl2-bin (2.1.19.dfsg1-0.1) ...
Starting SASL Authentication Daemon: (failed).
invoke-rc.d: initscript saslauthd, action start failed.
dpkg: error processing sasl2-bin (--configure):
subprocess post-installation
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
tags 361139 + patch
Bug#361139: CVE-2006-1505: Authentication bypass in acidbase
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 361004 + patch
Bug#361004: Please upgrade to using python 2.4
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
tags 361004 + patch
thanks
I prepared the attached patch to carpaltunnel that makes it use optparse
if available, and optik otherwise. It updates the dependencies and
changelog too.
This package could use an overhaul and switching to a non-native package
--
bye,
pabs
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 01:32:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#362192: fixed in gnustep-base 1.11.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: gv
Version: 1:3.6.1-13
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After upgrading to Xorg, GV fails to start and gives the following error
message:
10:33:39 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-2-eaf1]$ gv
Warning: Cannot convert string
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
package libqof1 libqof1-dbg libqof-dev qof
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: qof libqof-dev libqof1-dbg libqof1
tags 364048 + pending
Bug#364048: qof_0.6.4-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS on
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 363445 serious
Bug#363445: libgtk2.0-dev: Should depend on version of libx11-dev that provides
x11.pc
Severity set to `serious'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Let's please get this bug fixed? OK, informing upstream and getting them
to fix it appropriately is nice, but that's not a reason for stop to
keep failing meanwhile. Just say you're fine with it and I'll NMU, or
prepare a fixed package and I'll be happy to sponsor it.
Cheers,
--
Guilherme de S.
Hi Ralf,
do you care for some help with fixing this bug? I can either sponsor the
upload of a package prepared by you to fix it or NMU it, as long as you
approve it.
Cheers,
--
Guilherme de S. Pastore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 12:53:39 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line overlooked
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
This one time, at band camp, Jonas Smedegaard said:
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 01:35:55 +0200 Bill Allombert wrote:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 03:34:58PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
Package: lessdisks-terminal
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.4
Package: python2.4
Version: 2.4.3-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package failed to build on a few arches with the following
error:
test_tarfile
test_tcl
make: *** [stamp-check] Terminated
Build killed with signal 15 after 150 minutes of inactivity
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 03:32:12 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#360197: fixed in klog 0.3.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 04:17:12 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#361958: fixed in manpages 2.25-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 04:17:12 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#361369: fixed in manpages 2.25-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 04:17:12 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#361369: fixed in manpages 2.25-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Kurt Roeckx writes:
Package: python2.4
Version: 2.4.3-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package failed to build on a few arches with the following
error:
test_tarfile
test_tcl
make: *** [stamp-check] Terminated
Build killed with signal 15 after 150 minutes of inactivity
no, that looks
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 04:17:12 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#363252: fixed in manpages 2.25-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 04:17:12 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#361958: fixed in manpages 2.25-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 04:17:11 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#360843: fixed in manpages 2.25-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 04:17:11 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#360843: fixed in manpages 2.25-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 04:17:11 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#360843: fixed in manpages 2.25-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 04:17:12 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#363252: fixed in manpages 2.25-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 04:17:11 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#360843: fixed in manpages 2.25-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 04:17:11 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#360843: fixed in manpages 2.25-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
tag 361004 pending
kthxbye
Hi,
as we are currently in Bug-Squashing Party period (see
debian-devel-announce), and your package contained an RC bug unanswered
to, it has been NMUd. The package has been uploaded to tfheen's delayed
queue, though, and you have until approximately an hour before
* Guilherme de S. Pastore [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Ralf,
do you care for some help with fixing this bug? I can either sponsor the
upload of a package prepared by you to fix it or NMU it, as long as you
approve it.
That's no problem, I'll fix that today.
But I really wonder how the package was
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 04:17:11 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#361084: fixed in manpages 2.25-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 04:17:11 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#361084: fixed in manpages 2.25-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 04:17:11 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#361084: fixed in manpages 2.25-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 04:17:12 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#363252: fixed in manpages 2.25-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 04:17:12 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#361369: fixed in manpages 2.25-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 04:17:12 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#361958: fixed in manpages 2.25-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 04:17:12 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#363252: fixed in manpages 2.25-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 04:17:12 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#361369: fixed in manpages 2.25-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 04:17:12 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#361958: fixed in manpages 2.25-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 361004 pending
Bug#361004: Please upgrade to using python 2.4
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 04:17:12 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#361369: fixed in manpages 2.25-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 04:17:12 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#363252: fixed in manpages 2.25-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 04:17:11 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#361084: fixed in manpages 2.25-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
paul cannon wrote:
It seems rather like manpages-dev /should/ be the one to own these, and
a bug should be filed on modutils to get these manpages out of there.
In a former time it was the job of manpages/manpages-dev to document
the interface to the kernel and libc, i.e. system calls etc.
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 04:17:12 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#361958: fixed in manpages 2.25-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 04:17:11 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#361084: fixed in manpages 2.25-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
tags 335274 + patch
usertags 335274 + sentpatch
thanks
I've attached some new packaging that is a vast improvement over the old
packaging.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
matanza_0.13-3.2.diff.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
signature.asc
Description: This is a
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 04:32:11 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#356996: fixed in chicken 2.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Do you need someone to sponsor the upload? If you send me the package
today, I can do it for you.
Cheers,
--
Guilherme de S. Pastore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 351646 -1
Bug#351646: atlas3: FTBFS: No rule to make .../3dnow/liblapack.so
Bug 351646 cloned as bug 364431.
reassign -1 make 3.80+3.81.b3-1
Bug#364431: atlas3: FTBFS: No rule to make .../3dnow/liblapack.so
Bug reassigned from package `atlas3'
clone 351646 -1
reassign -1 make 3.80+3.81.b3-1
severity -1 important
thanks
Hi,
This seems to be a bug in make, so I think atleast the make
maintainers should have a look at it.
I've set the version to 3.80+3.81.b3-1, and this is my best guess
of the version that first showed the problem.
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 01:24:55PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Kurt Roeckx writes:
Package: python2.4
Version: 2.4.3-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package failed to build on a few arches with the following
error:
test_tarfile
test_tcl
make: *** [stamp-check] Terminated
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 05:32:09 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#359061: fixed in libopenobex 1.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 06:17:47 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#363438: fixed in kdebase 4:3.5.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
tag 364080 pending
kthxbye
Hi,
as we are trying to clean up after the X11R7 transition and a
bug-squashing party is taking place this weekend, I have prepared a
non-maintainer upload for this FTBFS bug. It has been uploaded to the
DELAYED-4 queue, though, so you have time to react if you do not
severity 364290 important
retitle 364290 wmaker segfaults if it rgb.txt is missing
thanks
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 03:01:00PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
Directly after upgrading to X11R7, wmaker simply segfaults on startup,
giving me the familiar crash dialog. I'm not really sure why it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 364080 pending
Bug#364080: xpaint: FTBFS: xpm.h: No such file or directory
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 364290 important
Bug#364290: wmaker: segfaults since upgrade to x11r7
Severity set to `important'.
retitle 364290 wmaker segfaults if it rgb.txt is missing
Bug#364290: wmaker: segfaults since upgrade to x11r7
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Hopefully my classification justification is correct, otherwise I have
to apologize.
When I'm using xawtv in overlay mode and at the same time, nxtvepg is
capturing vbi data, I can easily cause the console and syslog
Package: gnunet
Version: 0.7.0c-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
gnunet doesn't use ${shlibs:Depends} since ages which could easily yield
to wrong Depends (and as a matter of fact they are wrong currently, at
least libgtk2.0-0 and libncurses5 are missing). dh_shlibdeps is called
nonetheless in
I think that a page very similar to
http://spohr.debian.org/~joeyh/testing-security.html
would help making the public aware of how things are going on for Debian
stable, from a security point of view.
Such a page should list all known security issues that affect packages
in stable, their status
Heya,
This patch both fixes the FTBFS reported as #356829 and changes the
packaging to use libtest-simple-perl.
Marc
--
Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt
151: SUN recommended patches
Mit den Patches ist es wie mit dem Bier nach einer durchzechten Nacht.
Einer wird wohl
Package: f-spot
Version: 0.1.8-1.1
Severity: grave
The f-spot package is missing a depend on libmono-sqlite1.0-cil. I had to
install it manually to make f-spot start. Otherwise:
** (/usr/lib/f-spot/f-spot.exe:25785): WARNING **: The following assembly
referenced from /usr/lib/f-spot/f-spot.exe
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 07:47:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#359970: fixed in asterisk 1:1.2.7.1.dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 07:47:09 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#360181: fixed in asterisk 1:1.2.7.1.dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 07:47:09 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#364195: fixed in asterisk 1:1.2.7.1.dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 07:47:09 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#360233: fixed in asterisk 1:1.2.7.1.dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package wnpp
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: wnpp
severity 361342 serious
Bug#361342: ITP: liblasi0 -- creation of PostScript documents containing
Unicode symbols
Severity set to `serious'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Package: kmail
Version: 4:3.5.2-1+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When I start kmail from a konsole I get the following messages:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ kmail
kdecore (KAction): WARNING: KAction::plugAccel(): call to deprecated
action.
kdecore (KAction): WARNING:
tags 345240 unreproducible moreinfo
tags 354132 unreproducible moreinfo
severity 345240 important
severity 354132 important
thanks
John,
We have been unable to confirm your bug report and as there haven't been any
confirmation reports I'm lowering the severity to important as this problem
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 345240 unreproducible moreinfo
Bug#345240: mozilla-thunderbird: incorrect scrolling in the inbox when messages
are marked as 'Junk'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo
tags 354132 unreproducible moreinfo
Bug#354132:
Hello,
Could you try to build gwget2 using the package i have prepared [0] ?
Regards,
Arnaud Fontaine
[0] http://velma.mini-dweeb.org/~arnau/deb/official/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 364283
Bug#364283: udev: /dev/null not writable
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
severity 364283 critical
Bug#364283: udev: /dev/null not writable
Severity set to `critical'.
merge 364283 364235
Bug#364235: thinkpad-base: bad interaction
Package: pdns-recursor
Version: 2.9.20-1+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Severity is grave because it seems this happens a lot, and it happens
100% reliably for me.
The symptom is that the recursor starts answering all requests with
SERVFAIL. It seems that this is
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 05:38:37PM +0200, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
Hello,
Could you try to build gwget2 using the package i have prepared [0] ?
Regards,
Arnaud Fontaine
[0] http://velma.mini-dweeb.org/~arnau/deb/official/
Could you please sign the .dsc file?
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Package: libgecko-cil
Version: 0.6-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable (uninstallable)
libgecko-cil still depends on mono-assemblies-base, which is no longer
available in unstable (and has a tight dependency on the corresponding
no-longer-available version of
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 18:17:39 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line NMU accepted
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Package: alsa-lib
Version: 1.0.11-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on amd64 with the following
error:
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/alsa-lib-1.0.11/bibuild/src'
mkdir -p debian/lib32asound2/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib
cp -a debian/bitmp/usr/lib/libasound.so.* \
tags 364452 + pending confirmed
thanks
On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 11:54 -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
libgecko-cil still depends on mono-assemblies-base, which is no longer
available in unstable (and has a tight dependency on the corresponding
no-longer-available version of mono-classlib-1.0). Could
Package: yelp
Version: 2.12.2-4
Followup-For: Bug #362476
The issue disappeared after also upgrading libscrollkeeper0 to release
0.3.14-10.1 which has entered etch on April 21st. Beforehand I had only
upgraded scrollkeeper to that release. The following line is no longer
displayed when starting
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 364452 + pending confirmed
Bug#364452: libgecko-cil: depends on obsolete mono-assemblies-base
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending, confirmed
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Am 2006-04-21 11:06:54, schrieb Julien Cristau:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 20:04:39 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Package: grep
Version: 2.5.1.ds1-4
Severity: grave
Error description:
/bin/zgrep: 103: Syntax error: Bad substitution
Hi,
zgrep is part of the gzip package,
Paul van Tilburg, 2006-04-23 16:04:33 +0200 :
Package: f-spot
Version: 0.1.8-1.1
Severity: grave
The f-spot package is missing a depend on libmono-sqlite1.0-cil.
This has been fixed in version 0.1.11-1, presently in unstable.
Apparently the automatic build failed on powerpc, which explains
Am 2006-04-21 11:06:54, schrieb Julien Cristau:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 20:04:39 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Package: grep
Version: 2.5.1.ds1-4
Severity: grave
Error description:
/bin/zgrep: 103: Syntax error: Bad substitution
Hi,
zgrep is part of the gzip package,
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 09:11:27PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2006-04-21 11:06:54, schrieb Julien Cristau:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 20:04:39 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Package: grep
Version: 2.5.1.ds1-4
Severity: grave
Error description:
/bin/zgrep: 103:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005, Rob Weir wrote:
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
tags 342470 unreproducible
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
thanks
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
tags 342470
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 19:20:42 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line [Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#364455: alsa-lib: FTBFS on amd64: cp:
cannot create symbolic link `/libasound.so.2': Permission denied
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# fixed in SVN
package smokeping
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: smokeping
tags 363439 pending
Bug#363439: Wrong lib path in smokeping.cgi
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
tags 364165 pending
Bug#364165: [intl:fr] smokeping : French debconf
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 the mental interface of
Kurt Roeckx told:
Package: alsa-lib
Version: 1.0.11-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on amd64 with the following
error:
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/alsa-lib-1.0.11/bibuild/src'
mkdir -p
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005, Rob Weir wrote:
tags 342470 unreproducible
thanks
tags 342470 -unreproducible
thanks dude
This appears to work fine for me with 1.4.3 in a current sid chroot, on
i386.
I don't see any 1.4.3 in sid :(
But 1.4.2-2 actually FTBFS:
1/ problem with the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
retitle 364454 mozilla-firefox-locale-all: please upload a compatible version
Bug#364454: firefox-locale-de: not compatible with Firefox 1.5.0.2
Changed Bug title.
severity 364454
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 356829 + patch
Bug#356829: libtest-warn-perl: FTBFS: failed tests
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 20:06:43 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Fixed in NMU of rfb 0.6.1-11.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hi
On 2006-04-22 Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
You can see attached a proof of the fact that debian-sys-maint cannot
grant privileges now, as this user as the rights to do it in the table
mysql.user, I tend to believe that this is a bug.
Grant_priv for a normal user means that this user may delegate
severity 361678 important
tags 361678 + unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
While talking with the bugreporter on IRC, he could not make this
problem reproducible. But it happened 2 times for him, enough to be sure
there is a bug in some corner case. Thus I am downgrading this bug to
severity
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 08:18:25AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package wnpp
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: wnpp
severity 361342 serious
Bug#361342: ITP: liblasi0 -- creation of PostScript documents containing
Unicode symbols
* Christian Hammers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
You might be successfull if you modify your statement to explicitly say
GRANT read,write TO ... but although I try not to change the
debian-sys-maint user (and IMHO did not during the last months) it's not
encouraged to use him and Sean's
Heya,
As said on IRC, I've NMUed
libshell-posix-select-a-long-name-really-perl-modules-always-do-that-perl.
Patch attached #-)
Marc
--
Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt
5: Breitbandkommunikation
Porno MPEGs mit Ton (Kristian Köhntopp)
diff -u
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
