On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 12:21:56AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
This bug is closed by the new kernel-package version, and linux-2.6 only needs
to be rebuilt with it, which is scheduled for -4, and amply discussed here
previously.
Is linux-2.6 binNMU-safe? Could we binNMU linux-2.6 to fix this
On Wed 18 Oct 2006, Tatsuki Sugiura said:
I'll upload new version soon, please wait...
Waiting... 8-)
--
Andrew McNamara, Senior Developer, Object Craft
http://www.object-craft.com.au/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Hi Mathew
(Anyone on debian-legal: please note and maintain the Cc:s)
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 04:26:38PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:00:15PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
(Anyone on debian-legal: please note and maintain the Cc:s)
As you say you need the
Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi
First I want to tell to you Kyle and Matthew, that this is not a personal
thing against you, and that I have noted the question mark in the end of the
subject (Contains obfuscated source code, DFSG violation?). I actually want
to thank you for
Hi Goswin
Thanks for your response, and interesting new view (option C)
on this matter.
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:20:44PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...CUT...
Let me take two examples:
* Person A create a driver by reverse engineering,
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:00:15PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
(Anyone on debian-legal: please note and maintain the Cc:s)
As you say you need the prefered form of _modification_, which means
that if we change things, we are not allowed to obfuscate it. I can not
see anything that enfoce the
Hi Sven
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 07:32:02PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
...CUT...
Will all reverse engineered drivers with hardcoded values be considered
as closed source? Must you always release everything that you know
when you release somehting as open source?
Must we release the
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:26:38 + Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:00:15PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
(Anyone on debian-legal: please note and maintain the Cc:s)
Including the From: field (that is you) and the To: field (that is Ola
Lundqvist)? Let's assume the answer is
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 09:06:50PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Sven
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 07:32:02PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
...CUT...
Will all reverse engineered drivers with hardcoded values be considered
as closed source? Must you always release everything that you know
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 23:59:18 +0100 Sven Luther wrote:
[...]
Nope, because you can ship the source code and the object file if you
wanted.
Already now, major parts of debian/main are not cleanly buildable out
of the box, due to cyclic bootstraping dependencies.
But those major parts of
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:50:19 +0100 Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Mathew
(Anyone on debian-legal: please note and maintain the Cc:s)
Again assuming that this means you and Matthew want to be Cc:ed as
well...
[...]
That's perfectly acceptable. Upstream can do whatever they want.
However, if
Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:17:45 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#380728: fixed in apt-watch 0.3.2-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:21:36 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#393396: fixed in mailutils 1:1.1+dfsg1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 10:24:22PM +0200, Jonas Genannt wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
Then the test needs fixing, because autobuilders will not necessarily have
home directories for the buildd user, and packages need to build correctly
in such an environment because they're not supposed to
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 03:59:57PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 12:21:56AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
This bug is closed by the new kernel-package version, and linux-2.6 only
needs
to be rebuilt with it, which is scheduled for -4, and amply discussed here
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 12:55:45AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 23:59:18 +0100 Sven Luther wrote:
[...]
Nope, because you can ship the source code and the object file if you
wanted.
Already now, major parts of debian/main are not cleanly buildable out
of the box,
Your message dated Wed, 01 Nov 2006 01:46:35 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#396480: ASUS P5W DH de luxe + E6600
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 396480 normal
Bug#396480: installation-reports: D-I does not work on ASUS P5W DH de luxe +
E6600
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:48:03 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#392392: fixed in amarok 1.4.4-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 06:55:02PM +0200, Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) wrote:
Plugins in /usr/share/netdude/plugins and .../protocols should be moved
to /usr/lib.
The attached diff should _almost_ fix the problem. AFAICS, it should fix the
issues themselves; however, after fiddling with
reassign 396352 libswt-gtk-3.2-java
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This patch might help:
http://www.fastcgi.com/archives/fastcgi-developers/2005-December/004060.html
Looks like mod_fastcgi uses a deprecated 1.3 interface, and the
compatibility #defines that existed in 2.0 are gone in 2.2.
The patch worked for me (once I worked out that I needed to build
Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:51:50 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#396352: fixed in swt-gtk 3.2.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 16:19 -0500, Philippe Cloutier wrote:
Sure.
This bug should normally be closed, as nvidia-graphics-modules-i386 is
no longer in testing and therefore nvidia-graphics-modules-i386 can't
FTBFS in testing anymore. However, when nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-2-686 and
company
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 396471 linux-2.6
Bug#396471: linux-image-2.6.18-1-parisc64-smp: fails to install
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.18-1-parisc64-smp' to `linux-2.6'.
merge 396471 395110
Bug#395110: linux-2.6: cannot configure
Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2006 17:50:55 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#379552: fixed in webfs 1.21-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Ok, I just uploaded a rebuild. Rene, do you want me to close
the bug or reassign it back to OOo?
- Jarno
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
block 356055 by 396291
Bug#356055: loadlin: loadlin.exe cannot be built from source
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs of 356055 added: 396291
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
block 356055 by 396291
thanks
Hi,
Samuel Thibault, le Sun 29 Oct 2006 21:02:52 +0100, a écrit :
http://dept-info.labri.fr/~thibault/tmp/patch-loadlin
this builds, runs, and boots fine!!
I cleaned the patch a bit, it now also compiles with legacy TASM.EXE,
so the patch should be fine to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
reassign 396352 libswt-gtk-3.2-java
Bug#396352: azureus: fails to start, NoClassDefFoundError
(org/eclipse/swt/widgets/Display)
Bug reassigned from package `azureus' to
tags 394283 etch-ignore
thanks
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 07:17:16PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
I'm not sure about your policies in these things, but maybe this
progress already warrants an etch-ignore tag?
Yes, the below seems to warrant an etch-ignore tag under the stated policy.
Theppitak
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 394283 etch-ignore
Bug#394283: thailatex: License is no-commercial
There were no tags set.
Tags added: etch-ignore
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Package: libgl1-mesa-dev
Version: 6.5.1-0.2
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log for arkrpg:
...
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -g -Wall -O2 -Wall -fno-exceptions -g -O0
-I/usr/include/SDL -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -D_REENTRANT -g -Wall -O2 -Wall
-fno-exceptions -g -O0 -c GLRenderer.cpp
On Wednesday 01 November 2006 00:17 am, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 10:12:17PM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote:
After the recent upload of libsdl1.2-dev downgrading the *-dev
dependencies to recommends, lots of packages (for example mednafen,
missing a libgl-dev dependency)
Package: gambas
Version: 1.0.15-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
Automatic build of gambas_1.0.15-1 on nasya by sbuild/sparc 0.50
Build started at 20061101-0233
**
...
Package: vlc
Version: 0.8.6-svn20061012.debian-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
Automatic build of vlc_0.8.6-svn20061012.debian-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 98
Build started at 20061101-0450
Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2006 23:17:20 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#396251: fixed in digikamimageplugins 0.9.0~beta3-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
hi
Even after a clean install v 2.2.3-2 from testing and 2.2.3-3 from
unstable segfault on PowerPC.
[Wed Nov 01 08:22:15 2006] [notice] child pid 2990 exit signal
Segmentation fault (11)
bhb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
101 - 138 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
