Package: module-assistantVersion: 0.10.7Severity: graveJustification: renders package unusable*** Please type your report below this line ***Cannot build ieee80211 module, this makes impossible to use the bcm43xx
module for wifi cards.dh_gencontrol: command returned error code 65280- -- System
Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
I noticed that it's non-trivial to install the libgif4 .deb at the
moment. It conflicts with libungif4g since the latter ships symlinks of
libgif.so.4 and libgif.so.4.1.4, and just about everything using
libungif.so.4 has a versioned dependency so the Provides doesn't
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 08:05:29PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Can you please provide an example document that shows this problem?
Ideally a minimized one.
I now have a better understanding of the problem.
This works:
-=-=-=
?xml version=1.0?
!DOCTYPE para PUBLIC -//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML
true, I don't do much, other than update the debian package at http://
members.iinet.net.au/~spos once a month or two, and send it off to my
sponsor.
As a TWiki developer, rather than a debian developer, I don't feel
supported by you guys, just attacked, but none the less, I maintain
what
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 396932 ieee80211-source
Bug#396932: module-assistant: Cannot build ieee80211 module
Bug reassigned from package `module-assistant' to `ieee80211-source'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 12:30:59PM +, Dafydd Harries wrote:
Ar 03/11/2006 am 13:08, ysgrifennodd Andreas Jochens:
Package: libgtk-mozembed-ruby
Version: 0.3.1-6
Severity: serious
When building 'libgtk-mozembed-ruby' in a clean unstable chroot,
I get the following error:
This
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sat Oct 28 02:44:48 2006):
Let's go to the source instead. The following error appears in the build
log on i386:
gcc-4.0 -I. -I../src/include/ -c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -Wno-unused
-Wno-format -W -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
I don't know. Mark Sapiro claims that smtplib debug info goes to
stderr, but it goes to stdout. Maybe this explains it.
My mistake. In Python 2.4, smtplib.py debug output does go to stderr,
but in Python 2.3 it goes to stdout.
--
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 02 Nov 2006, Roland Stigge wrote:
Hi,
you can either do this:
===
diff -ruN initrd-tools-0.1.84.1.orig/mkinitrd initrd-tools-0.1.84.1/mkinitrd
--- initrd-tools-0.1.84.1.orig/mkinitrd 2006-04-24 01:08:14.0
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 01:49:42PM +0100, Carl =?UTF-8?Q?F=C3=BCrstenberg ?=
wrote:
This bug is as per today, not fixed:
Yes it is.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libapache2-mod-php5.1: Depends: apache2-common (= 2.0.55-4) but it
is not installable
That's not a Debian
Package: lynx-cur
Version: 2.8.7dev1-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Lynx attempts to use the .mime.types and .mailcap files located in the
current directory:
$ strace lynx -dump 21 | grep '^open([^/]'
open(.mailcap, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such
Your message dated Fri, 3 Nov 2006 15:53:34 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#396931:
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/hd-media/boot.img.gz makes
usb-stick unusable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Sven Dowideit wrote:
true, I don't do much, other than update the debian package at http://
members.iinet.net.au/~spos once a month or two, and send it off to my
sponsor.
May I ask who is your sponsor? Would you accept me as a backup sponsor?
As a TWiki developer, rather than a debian
Amaya wrote:
I am looking at your last package. I am thinking of uploading it as it
closes several RC and security bugs. Can I add some patches here and
there (i10 mostly) so that Twiki releases with etch in good shape?
I find your package fine, but i has several lintian warnings:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 389267 serious
Bug#389267: CVE-2006-4294: Directory traversal vulnerability in TWiki
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
thanks!
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
--
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Package: binutils-h8300-hms
Version: 2.16.1-1
Severity: grave
All is said in the subject. For example:
/usr/h8300-hitachi-coff/bin/ld -
/build/buildd/binutils-h8300-hms-2.16.1/debian/binutils-h8300-hms/usr/bin/h8300-hitachi-coff-ld
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers
On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 20:33:02 +0100 Sebastien Blondeel wrote:
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 08:05:29PM +0100, Frank K=FCster wrote:
Can you please provide an example document that shows this problem?
Ideally a minimized one.
I now have a better understanding of the problem.
This works:
-=3D-=3D-=3D
Hi Andreas,
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 08:02:24PM +0100, Andreas Hoenen wrote:
I'm currently working at high pressure on a debian release of dblatex
0.2 with this bug fix included. I hope to get someone to sponsor the
new release quickly, thus hopefully this problem should be out of the
world
Upstream security advisory: http://www.bugzilla.org/security/2.18.5/
These are fixed in 2.22.1 which would be suitable for sid.
There is no upstream fix for the 2.16 series, as used in sarge. I am
looking at the upstream fix for the 2.18 series to see whether it is
applicable or easily
(I am not subscribed to mailman-users; please CC me on replies. Please
also keep the Debian bug entry in the CC list if appropriate.)
(I'm one of the maintainers of the Mailman package in Debian, the
OS - slash - GNU/Linux distribution that Lukasz is using.)
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lukasz
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 393414 pending
Bug#393414: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's
Tags were: etch-ignore pending
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 396949 -1
Bug#396949: lynx: uses .mime.types and .mailcap from the current directory
(arbitrary shell code execution)
Bug 396949 cloned as bug 396964.
reassign -1 lynx
Bug#396964: lynx: uses .mime.types and .mailcap from the current directory
On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 13:55:36 PST Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Andreas,
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 08:02:24PM +0100, Andreas Hoenen wrote:
I'm currently working at high pressure on a debian release of dblatex
0.2 with this bug fix included. I hope to get someone to sponsor the
new release quickly,
tags 396762 patch
thanks
FWIW, here's a patch to only link zlib statically to dmraid while linking
dynamically to the other libs.
Since crc32 is the only function used from zlib, the size difference is
minimal. On i386, here's the before:
$ du -sh debian/dmraid/sbin/dmraid
160K
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 10:43:17PM +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 07:46:01PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
Removing the embedded copies of FFmpeg libraries from MPlayer is a bad
idea.
For the workload on the security team and the overall quality of Debian
(a single
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 396762 patch
Bug#396762: /sbin/dmraid depends on /usr/lib/libz.so.1
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
found 396964 2.8.5-2sarge2.1
Bug#396964: lynx: uses .mime.types and .mailcap from the current directory
(arbitrary shell code execution)
Bug marked as found in version 2.8.5-2sarge2.1.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
What do you think?
*I* do think that, if that bug is RC for debian-edu-config, then
another one should be opened for localization-config, which does
exactly the same (actually not in very good shape for etch as it
basically does nothing). BTW, localization-config is maintained as
part of
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 10:18:59PM +0100, Stephan A Suerken wrote:
pwd_optionsfile is declared as char*, then used via strcpy() without
initialization. And conveniently, this is in the code related to retrieving
$HOME from the environment. Looks like a broken Debian patch to me.
Argl,
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 11:07:18AM +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 12:49:35AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
* Use -O0 in CXXFLAGS in plus/Makefile.in instead of -O1, to avoid an
ICE when building on alpha. Closes: #394626.
I thought people were
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 11:34:37PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
That benchmark was done on x86. But let's face it, it's the
architecture that counts. Mind that I am writing this from a PPC, which
is my main machine..
I disagree, amd64 would be the architecture which counts and amd64
has
* Ben Hutchings ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) :
Based on the advisory at http://www.bugzilla.org/security/2.18.5/ I
would say that:
[...]
Ben, thanks a lot for your work regarding that issue.
If you have an alioth account, feel free to ask Sean Finney to add you
to the webapps-common team, so you can
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 395094 + confirmed
Bug#395094: CVE-2006-545[3-5]: Multiple security issues in bugzilla
Tags were: security
Tags added: confirmed
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
On October 12, 2006 at 10:42PM +0900,
tats (at debian.org) wrote:
tags 391780 patch
thanks
On October 11, 2006 at 11:21PM +0200,
allomber (at math.u-bordeaux.fr) wrote:
[...]
http://people.debian.org/~ballombe/misc/mell.log
It was recorded today.
The log seems that this bug is a
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 03:03:36PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Sorry, it didn't occur to me that you would feel strongly about being
credited here. This doesn't mean that I don't appreciate your work, it just
means (in my case) that I didn't use your patch directly, but re-derived it
after
tags 395094 + confirmed
thanks
* Ben Hutchings ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) :
Upstream security advisory: http://www.bugzilla.org/security/2.18.5/
These are fixed in 2.22.1 which would be suitable for sid.
I'm working on the packaging of that new upstream release.
--
Alexis Sukrieh [EMAIL
Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 15:49:13 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#393149: fixed in uae 0.8.25-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 15:47:51 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#378091: fixed in libtunepimp 0.4.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 15:47:51 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#380056: fixed in libtunepimp 0.4.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 15:47:28 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#396702: fixed in ikiwiki 1.32
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
tags 395094 + sarge
thanks
I've just uploaded bugzilla 2.22.1 to sid, urgency set to high.
That bug is now closed in sid.
We can focus on the sarge patches now.
--
Alexis Sukrieh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
0x1EE5DD34
Debian http://www.debian.org
Package: gdb
Version: 6.4.90.dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Any program linked with -lpthread will make GDB unusable with the following
error:
Cannot find user-level thread for LWP 28988: generic error
Here's an example:
$ cat simple.c
int main(void) {
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 395094 + sarge
Bug#395094: CVE-2006-545[3-5]: Multiple security issues in bugzilla
Tags were: confirmed security
Tags added: sarge
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
tags 395897 patch fixed-upstream
stop
Upstream removed the LDFLAGS in revision 594434 [1].
This patch removes all three instances of LDFLAGS from the source,
equivalent to the upstream change. It fixed FTBFS on my powerpc machine
and passed program starts OK testing.
[1] Upstream revision
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 395897 patch fixed-upstream
Bug#395897: FTBFS: now: No such file or directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch, fixed-upstream
stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 07:29:59PM -0500, Nick Lewycky wrote:
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Obviously not for everyone; it passes the testsuite during package
build.
I can only assume that either your C library or kernel has somehow
gotten broken. Could you run
Just a quick note, I noticed this bug using rc-alert.
mbr is still useful, at least in one specific case,
which is when using grub and a Highpoint HPT366 or 370
device (and possible later devices)
Basically, these IDE/RAID controllers use a sector on
the disk which is also one of the sectors
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 08:05:32PM -0500, Nick Lewycky wrote:
Attached. Here's the exact session I ran:
ptrace(0x19 /* PTRACE_??? */, 29003, 0xc, 0xff888354) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid
argument)
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel:
Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 17:18:12 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#375518: fixed in cenon.app 3.81-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 08:05:32PM -0500, Nick Lewycky wrote:
Attached. Here's the exact session I ran:
ptrace(0x19 /* PTRACE_??? */, 29003, 0xc, 0xff888354) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid
argument)
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18.1
Does
Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 20:53:18 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line (No subject header)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 04:42:30PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
At the very least, I would appreciate it if you could verify whether
the bug is reproducible or not.
See bug #378346 for the bug report.
Here is the error that triggers the abort:
Package: mlton
Version: 20061026-1
Severity: serious
Hi Stephen,
The fix for bug #394981 isn't propagating to testing, because the new
version of mlton now fails to build on all architectures except for i386,
not all with the same error. Since Packages-arch-specific already lists
mlton as being
Hi Steffen,
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 09:32:21PM +1100, Steffen Joeris wrote:
I know that this is an old and long discussed bug, but please allow me to
raise the discussion again right now as I think that the issue is not
completely clear.
First of all the bug is called: debian-edu-config:
Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:47:30 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#377895: fixed in libnss-ldap 251-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:47:30 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#391167: fixed in libnss-ldap 251-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:47:30 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#391167: fixed in libnss-ldap 251-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:47:30 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#375215: fixed in libnss-ldap 251-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:47:30 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#375077: fixed in libnss-ldap 251-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:47:30 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390926: fixed in libnss-ldap 251-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 396836 unreproducible
Bug#396836: Segfaults on loading
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
--
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:47:30 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#391053: fixed in libnss-ldap 251-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:47:30 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#391053: fixed in libnss-ldap 251-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:47:30 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390926: fixed in libnss-ldap 251-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:47:30 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#391167: fixed in libnss-ldap 251-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
tags 396836 unreproducible
--
Can you provide mor details regarding this segfault? Does it happen only
on startup? Or anytime you load the plugin during gaim use?
Could you try reseting your generetad keys to see if it persists? (Keep
the old ones as backup, in case this proves helpful they can
Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:47:30 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#375077: fixed in libnss-ldap 251-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:47:30 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#375215: fixed in libnss-ldap 251-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:47:30 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#375215: fixed in libnss-ldap 251-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:47:30 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#375077: fixed in libnss-ldap 251-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 20:02:28 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#396842: fixed in util-linux 2.12r-15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
For people (like me) who've picked up this bug via rc-alert or
apt-list-bugs and paniced..
The change is simply that partition numbers start at 1, not 0.
See [1]
As for the bug itself...
I'd suggest a NEWS.Debian file entry that says that grub2 users
must do an install-grub and update-grub
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
# fixed but not done? sigh
close 385660 1.8.70-1
Bug#385660: bogofilter/qdbm build fails testsuite due to bus errors in vlopen
'close' is deprecated; see
Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 20:32:12 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#394845: fixed in davfs2 1.1.2-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 20:47:15 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#395278: fixed in ttf-vlgothic 20061026-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 395927 serious
Bug#395927: xlbiff: Causes upgrade of x11-common to fail with trying to
overwrite `/usr/X11R6/bin', which is also in package xlbiff
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
severity 396279 important
Bug#396279: x11-common:
severity 395927 serious
severity 396279 important
thanks
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 08:29:29PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
The Sarge package xlbiff includes the file /usr/X11R6/bin/xlbiff
The xlbiff package in sarge is at version 4.1-1, and x11-common in etch
already has a conflicts: with
Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 21:02:17 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#396851: fixed in ecasound2.2 2.4.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
101 - 178 of 178 matches
Mail list logo
