Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 496956 normal
Bug#496956: e2fsprogs: e2fsck does not complete check and reboots system
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
severity 496956 normal
thanks
Sounds like your kernel is crashing when a certain part of the disk is
being accessed. If a userspace program can cause a system crash, by
definition that's a kernel bug, not a userspace bug. The fact that
the system is crashing on you any way if you abort e2fsck
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
package libtonezone1 libtonezone-dev zaptel zaptel-source
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: zaptel-source libtonezone1 libtonezone-dev zaptel
tags 493397 + pending
Bug#493397:
The logic expressed in the #gnucash discussion is bogus. Errors like
ENLNK or EMLNK would also prevent link but not prevent copying. There
is no harm in at least trying copying if EROFS comes in, and the code
shouldn't assume that every error on link will be an error on copying.
Thomas
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Thu Aug 28 20:03:18 UTC 2008
# Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
# http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
#
# Source package in NEW: qsampler
tags 280576 + pending
Bug#280576: ITP: qsampler -- A LinuxSampler Qt GUI
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 496357 normal
Bug#496357: opensync-plugin-palm: Impossible to install the package
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
tags 496357 +unreproducible
Bug#496357: opensync-plugin-palm: Impossible to install the package
There were no tags set.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
The logic expressed in the #gnucash discussion is bogus. Errors like
ENLNK or EMLNK would also prevent link but not prevent copying. There
is no harm in at least trying copying if EROFS comes in, and the
severity 496357 normal
tags 496357 +unreproducible
thanks
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 08:04:44PM +0200, nb wrote:
Package: opensync-plugin-palm
Version: 0.22-2
Severity: grave
When I try to install the package, I have the following error :
Please show me the failure.
thanks,
Michael
--
Package: general
Severity: grave
Since late last week, my system completely hangs - it stops accepting
any input from keyboard or mouse - after 3 to 5 minutes after booting.
This happens both in a text console and when running X.
Of course I suspected a hardware problem first, but the
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 05:06:26PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
Package: libwine-jack
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: grave
This bug seems to make libwine-jack audio output completely
unusable on amd64.
1. Start `jackd -d alsa`, or oss backend, doesn't matter
2. winecfg
3. Audio - Jack backend
The problem is that the override is not being set if the file is empty
and the package creates empty files.
Having said that, the package needs a lot of work with lintian errors
and such. Part of those fixes would be a sane installation and using
'ucf' to manage the updates of the files. As that
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
# via tagpending
#
# mailreader (2.3.36-3.1) unstable; urgency=low
#
# * Uninstallable as a bug in postinst (Closes: #484322)
package mailreader
Ignoring bugs not assigned to:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
# via tagpending
#
# mailreader (2.3.36-3.1) unstable; urgency=low
#
# * Uninstallable as a bug in postinst (Closes: #484322)
package mailreader
tags 484322 + pending
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
But also, there is most certainly an sshfs bug here. It has no business
whatsoever returning ENOSYS in response to a link call.
I tried to figure out who is doing wrong here. If at all it's the fault
of fuse,
Your message dated Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:32:25 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#496807: fixed in gnucash 2.2.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #496807,
regarding gnucash: silently removes main files while trying to save without lock
to be marked as done.
This means
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
retitle 496822 RM: ov511 -- RoQA: broken, obsolete: merged into Linux kernel
Bug#496822: RM: ov511-source -- Doesn't build with current kernels, merged into
Linux kernel
Changed Bug
Your message dated Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:34:11 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#495246: fixed in xosd 2.2.14-1.6
has caused the Debian Bug report #495246,
regarding Build-Conflict field is wrong
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:47:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#494227: fixed in xmlroff 0.6.0-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #494227,
regarding xmlroff: Segmentation fault xmlroff --backend cairo
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:34:11 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#495246: fixed in xosd 2.2.14-1.6
has caused the Debian Bug report #495246,
regarding xosd source package control info contains unexpanded variable
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:34:11 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#495246: fixed in xosd 2.2.14-1.6
has caused the Debian Bug report #495246,
regarding version syntax error in Build-Conflicts (unexpanded substvar
${Source-Version})
to be marked as done.
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 23:39 +0200, Micha Lenk wrote:
There are far better error codes to return.
... what error codes listed in the link(2) manpage do you think of?
The best one that comes to my mind is EPERM: The filesystem containing
oldpath and newpath does not support the creation of
[A]s epiphany and firefox just work fine otherwhise and it
only happens on specific URLs I don't think this is an RC bug.
(...) IMHO it deserves normal or at most important severity.
What do others think about this?
I'm not a DD, just a regular debian user, bit I consider this bug RC. It's
tags 487598 + patch
tags 492235 + patch
tags 492236 + patch
tags 496034 + patch
thanks
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my havp 0.88-1.1 NMU.
diff -u havp-0.88/debian/havp.init havp-0.88/debian/havp.init
--- havp-0.88/debian/havp.init
+++ havp-0.88/debian/havp.init
@@ -43,6 +43,9 @@
chown -R
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 487598 + patch
Bug#487598: [INTL:sv] Swedish translation of debconf templates
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added: patch
tags 492235 + patch
Bug#492235: havp: does not delete temp files
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
tags 492236 + patch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 493184
Bug#493184: aufs: Deadlocks in the rename() call.
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
found 493184
Your message dated Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:23:46 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#496822: fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #496822,
regarding RM: ov511 -- RoQA: broken, obsolete: merged into Linux kernel
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
reopen 493184
found 493184 0+20080719-4
thanks
Hi,
this bug is back.. looks like -3 or -4 did break it again.
You can verify it with debian-live 5.0 beta1 images.
Regards,
Daniel
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
notfound 493184 0+20080719-4
Bug#493184: aufs: Deadlocks in the rename() call.
Bug no longer marked as found in version 0+20080719-4.
close 493184
Bug#493184: aufs: Deadlocks in the rename() call.
'close' is deprecated; see
notfound 493184 0+20080719-4
close 493184
thanks
sorry for the noise - I forgot that the lenny l-m-e was built against a
previous aufs version (and should have been requested to be binNUMed to
be able to close #493184).
Regards,
Daniel
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3,
Hi,
so let us review the options here.
the diff is ~90 lines of code change (see below), with about half of
these (all of cache.c, some in sshfs.c, too) going into the caching fix
for a bug with potential file corruption and one part of the rest fixing
a protocol.
Options for lenny might be
-
Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Hi,
so let us review the options here.
the diff is ~90 lines of code change (see below), with about half of
these (all of cache.c, some in sshfs.c, too) going into the caching fix
for a bug with potential file corruption and one part of the rest fixing
a protocol.
Luk Claes wrote:
Options for lenny might be
- stay at 2.0,
- pick the most important fix(es) and have ~50-~70 (code-) lines diff,
- take the whole 2.1 and have the full diff.
Does the release team have a preference?
I prefer seeing the whole diff :-)
It's not uploaded yet, attached is a
Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Luk Claes wrote:
Options for lenny might be
- stay at 2.0,
- pick the most important fix(es) and have ~50-~70 (code-) lines diff,
- take the whole 2.1 and have the full diff.
Does the release team have a preference?
I prefer seeing the whole diff :-)
It's not
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 496922 important
Bug#496922: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome: mouse cursor disappeared after
upgrade
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
tag 496922 moreinfo
Bug#496922: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome: mouse cursor disappeared after
severity 496922 important
tag 496922 moreinfo
thanks
2008/8/28 Paolo Cavallini [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Package: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome
Version: 1:0.2.902+svn579-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
No, it doesn't.
After the last upgrade, the driver causes the mouse
I just tested with a fresh lenny installation, this bug is fixed (at
least for me)
--
Florian Maier
gpg fingerprint: 18D6 0A4D 5719 12E6 88DA 6DCC E624 7AF6 8E27 8B26
http://www.marsmenschen.com/ - - http://www.planetlimux.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Package: libpam-modules
Version: 1.0.1-3
Severity: grave
Hi,
the 1.0.1-3 build for libpam-modules on mips does not ship unix_chkpwd
sgid, breaking everything that relies on it, say screen.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/cache/apt/archives$ dpkg --contents
libpam-modules_1.0.1-3_mips.deb | grep chk
Hi,
according to the buildd logs, pam was built with sudo (and not fakeroot)
on exactly alpha and mips*.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ii libxml2 2.6.32.dfsg-2+lenny1 GNOME XML library
That's been causing segfaults all over the place. Please would
you upgrade to 2.6.32.dfsg-3 and retest?
Cheers,
Steve
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Your message dated Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:17:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#483035: fixed in pyrex 0.9.7.2-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #483035,
regarding python-pyrex: dictionary access is broken
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:47:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#496694: fixed in soya 0.13.2-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #496694,
regarding python-soya: missing dependency on python-pyrex / fails to build from
source
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:47:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#493163: fixed in soya 0.13.2-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #493163,
regarding python-soya: Can't init sound
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
101 - 142 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
