Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 939022 src:pyresample
Bug #939022 [pyresample] pyresample: autopkgtest failure with PROJ 6 (epsg data
file removed)
Bug reassigned from package 'pyresample' to 'src:pyresample'.
No longer marked as found in versions pyresample/1.12.3-5.
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 src:pyresample
Bug #939128 [src:basemap] basemap: AttributeError: module 'pyproj' has no
attribute 'pyproj_datadir'
Added indication that 939128 affects src:pyresample
--
939128: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=939128
Debian Bug
Source: basemap
Version: 1.2.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream fixed-upstream
Justification: makes the package in question unusable or mostly so
Control: affects -1 src:pyresample
Dear Maintainer,
With transition to PROJ 6 pyproj was updated to 2.x which no longer
provides the
Just extra information: I just found node-postcss also fails the same
way (to confirm it is indeed a gulp issue).
Is there a way we can find which file brings this error?
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: serious
gcc-7_7.4.0-12_source.changes REJECTED
Source-only uploads to NEW are not allowed.
binary:gcc-7-source is NEW.
no, it's not
doko: more info. gcc-7-source is only in stable. stable does not accept
uploads
waldi: well, then the question is, why
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2019 08:41:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#935577: fixed in debhelper 12.5.4
has caused the Debian Bug report #935577,
regarding debhelper: dh_makeshlibs confused by --add-udeb (broken in 12.5.3)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2019 08:41:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#935780: fixed in debhelper 12.5.4
has caused the Debian Bug report #935780,
regarding debhelper: adds dh_makeshlibs, dh_shlibdeps to the binary-indep
sequence
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
On 01.09.19 13:52, Michael Biebl wrote:
> I guess gnustep-base-runtime explicitly needs to remove the existing
> /etc/rc?.d/???gdomap symlinks on upgrades in preinst (possibly guarded
> by a check which reads the old /etc/default/gdomap and tests if
> ENABLED=NO) so they can be properly re-created
On 01/09/2019 12:52, Michael Biebl wrote:
On 01.09.19 13:24, Alan Jenkins wrote:
Package: gnustep-base-runtime
Version: 1.26.0-4
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Dear Maintainer,
I had "gnustep-base-runtime" installed on my system, probably as a
dependency of
control: tags -1 +moreinfo
[2019-08-30 16:44] Jean-Marc LACROIX
> Package: sysvinit
> Version: 2.93-8
> Severity: grave
>
> Dear maintainers,
>
> It seems there is a dependency issue when installing sysvinit-core as
> indicated in following trace
> [...]
> Package: *systemd*
> Pin: release *
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 +moreinfo
Bug #938952 [sysvinit] [debian Buster] [arm64 pinebook] [sysvinit-core]
libsoup2.4-1 : Depends: glib-networking (>= 2.32.0) but it is not going to be
installed
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
938952:
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 +moreinfo
Bug #938952 [sysvinit] [debian Buster] [arm64 pinebook] [sysvinit-core]
libsoup2.4-1 : Depends: glib-networking (>= 2.32.0) but it is not going to be
installed
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #938952 to the same tags previously set
--
Package: php-horde-imap-client
Version: 2.29.16-1
Severity: grave
Dear maintainer,
A server uses courier-imap and php-horde-imp to read e-mail. After
upgrading the server from Stretch to Buster, reading e-mail does not
work anymore; the mailboxes show no e-mails, and a message "IMAP
tag 925782 + patch
thanks
Hi,
attached is a patch that fixes the FTBFS with g++-9.
Best regards,
Joachim
Index: mp3check-0.8.7/texception.h
===
--- mp3check-0.8.7.orig/texception.h
+++ mp3check-0.8.7/texception.h
@@ -38,10 +38,10
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 9:15 PM, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
And fancy-log package.json wants chalk ^1.1.1 and we have chalk 2.4.2
which to me looks like a possible culprit.
This was a false positive, I suspect
debian/patches/update-process-nextick-args.patch is not correct.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 925782 + patch
Bug #925782 [src:mp3check] mp3check: ftbfs with GCC-9
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
925782: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=925782
Debian
Package: gnustep-base-runtime
Version: 1.26.0-4
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Dear Maintainer,
I had "gnustep-base-runtime" installed on my system, probably as a
dependency of "unar".
When I upgrade from Debian 9 to Debian 10 (and reboot), there is a
network
Hi Sebastiaan,
I have a workaround for the basemap issue but there are still a couple
of tests failing.
cheers
antonio
Il 01/09/19 15:05, Sebastiaan Couwenberg ha scritto:
> On 8/31/19 7:14 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> I'm going to reassign.
>>
>> That doesn't seem appropriate,
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 9:12 PM, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
On Sun, 01 Sep 2019 19:29:44 +0500 Pirate Praveen
mailto:prav...@onenetbeyond.org>> wrote:
> Just extra information: I just found node-postcss also fails the
same
> way (to confirm it is indeed a gulp issue).
Is there a way we
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> merge 935885 935916
Bug #935885 [fuse] fuse installtion postinst script syntax error
Bug #935916 [fuse] Debian testing net installation fails while "configuring
fuse"
Merged 935885 935916
> tags 935916 = bullseye sid
Bug #935916 [fuse] Debian
On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 23:09:26 +0200 Xavier wrote:
> Le 06/06/2019 à 22:28, Xavier a écrit :
> > Le 06/06/2019 à 09:07, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2019, ജൂൺ 6 11:00:16 AM IST, Xavier wrote:
> >>> My reducejs tool gives a new analysis:
> >>> * downgraded modules to embed
> >>> -
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 07:43:54PM +, Matthias Klose wrote:
> [...]
>
> [0m
> YAML Error found in the stdout of [fast][t29][np=1]
> [31m--- !ERROR
> src_file: inwffil.F90
> src_line: 246
> mpi_rank: 0
> message: |
> Missing data file: t27o_WFK
> ...
> [0m
> Command
On 9/1/19 7:44 PM, Antonio Valentino wrote:
> It seems that the problem can be fixed by upgrading pyproj to v2.3.1
> (see [2]).
> I made a quick test with python3-pyproj 2.3.1+ds-1~exp1 (available in
> experimental) and I can confirm that all tests pass now.
>
> I'm going to add a versioned
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2019 09:19:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#874867: fixed in fbreader 0.12.10dfsg2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #874867,
regarding [fbreader] Future Qt4 removal from Buster
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 939022 pyresample
Bug #939022 [basemap] pyresample: autopkgtest failure with PROJ 6 (epsg data
file removed)
Bug reassigned from package 'basemap' to 'pyresample'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #939022 to the same
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 939022 pyresample/1.12.3-5
Bug #939022 [pyresample] pyresample: autopkgtest failure with PROJ 6 (epsg data
file removed)
Marked as found in versions pyresample/1.12.3-5.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
On 8/31/19 7:14 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> I'm going to reassign.
>
> That doesn't seem appropriate, pyresample needs to be updated too. It
> does things like this:
>
> pyresample/test/test_geometry.py:
> projections = {'+init=epsg:3006': 'init: epsg:3006'}
>
> Note the
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2019 16:34:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#932367: fixed in sagemath 8.8-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #932367,
regarding sagemath: FTBFS in sid
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2019 16:34:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#932367: fixed in sagemath 8.8-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #932367,
regarding sagemath: sage command does not work due to it crashed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2019 16:34:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#932367: fixed in sagemath 8.8-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #932367,
regarding sagemath ftbfs in unstable (too many test failures)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2019 16:34:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#932367: fixed in sagemath 8.8-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #932367,
regarding sagemath: Sage does not start because of a missing symbol in GAP
wrapper
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2019 16:34:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#934171: fixed in sagemath 8.8-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #934171,
regarding sagemath: FTFBS with libreadline8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Processing control commands:
> fixed -1 241.3-1+debian1
Bug #939101 [elogind] elogind: elogind 239 in bullseye FTBFS with gcc-9
Marked as fixed in versions elogind/241.3-1+debian1.
> block -1 by 934132
Bug #939101 [elogind] elogind: elogind 239 in bullseye FTBFS with gcc-9
939101 was not blocked
Package: elogind
Version: 239.3+20190131-1+debian1
Severity: serious
Control: fixed -1 241.3-1+debian1
Control: block -1 by 934132
Reproducible builds of src:elogind 239.3+20190131-1+debian1 in bullseye
have FTBFS for the last few days. This seems to be related to the
migration of gcc-9 to
On 01.09.19 13:24, Alan Jenkins wrote:
> Package: gnustep-base-runtime
> Version: 1.26.0-4
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I had "gnustep-base-runtime" installed on my system, probably as a
> dependency of "unar".
>
> When I
On Sun, 01 Sep 2019 19:29:44 +0500 Pirate Praveen
wrote:
>
>
> > Just extra information: I just found node-postcss also fails the same
> > way (to confirm it is indeed a gulp issue).
>
> Is there a way we can find which file brings this error?
>
Running the following command in node-postcss
Control: severity -1 important
I've fixed this issue in the devel branch, but that required a ton of
other changes, so it is waiting for a new release of Debbugs.
In the meantime, I've put in a rewrite proxy rule to switch this
particular request to the devel branch so it should "work"
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 931943 serious
Bug #931943 {Done: Gert Wollny } [src:vtk6] vtk6: FTBFS with
PROJ 6
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
931943:
On Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 11:33:55AM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> The issue appears to be the STRING_FOREACH macro and was fixed in
> systemd in v241:
Sorry, that should be FOREACH_STRING macro.
Mark
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2019 11:21:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#934457: fixed in fuse 2.9.9-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #934457,
regarding installation in chroot failing with Unknown device "/dev/fuse": No
such device
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2019 11:21:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#935496: fixed in fuse 2.9.9-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #935496,
regarding Fails to install: Invalid action '-p'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2019 11:21:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#935496: fixed in fuse 2.9.9-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #935496,
regarding fuse installtion postinst script syntax error
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
[somehow messed up the CC list, s/pkg-gnome/pkg-systemd/]
Am 01.09.19 um 14:44 schrieb Alan Jenkins:
> On 01/09/2019 12:52, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> On 01.09.19 13:24, Alan Jenkins wrote:
>>> Package: gnustep-base-runtime
>>> Version: 1.26.0-4
>>> Severity: grave
>>> Tags: security
>>>
Dear Maintainer,
I guess the actual segmentation fault is fixed since kamoso 3.2.4-1.
Instead it should print this message:
The webcam controller was unable to find or load wrappercamerabinsrc plugin;
please make sure all required gstreamer plugins are installed.
The last question would
Hi Sebastiaan,
after the workaround committed in [1], remaining issues are:
==
ERROR: test_create_area_def
(pyresample.test.test_geometry.TestStackedAreaDefinition)
Test create_area_def and the four sub-methods that call it in
Version: 9.0.24-1
Emmanuel,
> What is the issue with the dependency on systemd? I was under the
there is new data related to that:
In bullseye/sid, there’s elogind as desktop/logind alternative that
implements the logind API but does not otherwise try to take over
the system, allowing other
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #923510 [bugs.debian.org] bugs.debian.org: 500 Internal Server Error when
accessing bugs for 'linux'
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
923510: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923510
Debian Bug Tracking
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2019 19:27:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#939086: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #925789,
regarding nsntrace: ftbfs with GCC-9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 939022 + pending
Bug #939022 [src:pyresample] pyresample: autopkgtest failure with PROJ 6 (epsg
data file removed)
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
939022:
Dixi quod…
>branch and testing it; can we please merge it into master and upload
>to unstable once it has been tested (should be no problem, I already
FWIW, it builds and installs (as upgrade) and starts.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
15:41⎜ Somebody write a testsuite for helloworld :-)
control: forcemerge 935749 -1
Hello Paul,
On Sat 31 Aug 2019 at 03:25PM +02, Paul Gevers wrote:
> With a recent upload of pikepdf and with a recent upload of ghostscript
> and with a recent upload of pytest (althought that pulls in the others)
> the autopkgtest of ocrmypdf fails in testing when
Processing control commands:
> forcemerge 935749 -1
Bug #935749 [src:ocrmypdf] ocrmypdf: autopkgtest regression: This test may fail
if Tesseract language packs are missing
Bug #939044 [src:ocrmypdf] ocrmypdf: autopkgtest not compatible with new
pikepdf, ghostscript and/or pytest
Severity set to
Package: grub-efi-amd64-signed
Version: 1+2.04+2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi!
While trying to enable Secure Boot on my laptop installing mandatory
packages, I faced this:
$ sudo apt install grub-efi-amd64-signed
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency
On 25.08.19 13:33, Felix Geyer wrote:
Hi Micha,
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 20:19:28 +0200 Micha Lenk wrote:
Hi Christian,
I understand your bug report and confirm it to be an issue.
Unfortunately I don't have much capacity at the moment to work on an updated package in a timely
manner. But I do
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 935749 serious
Bug #935749 [src:ocrmypdf] ocrmypdf: autopkgtest regression: This test may fail
if Tesseract language packs are missing
Bug #939044 [src:ocrmypdf] ocrmypdf: autopkgtest not compatible with new
pikepdf, ghostscript and/or
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2019 19:34:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#939156: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #911571,
regarding src:haskell-hastache: deprecated and broken
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 936011 src:pytimechart
Bug #936011 [pytimechart] pytimechart: should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package 'pytimechart' to 'src:pytimechart'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #936011 to the same values
Your message dated Mon, 02 Sep 2019 01:04:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#936092: fixed in cross-gcc 232
has caused the Debian Bug report #936092,
regarding gcc-9 patches apply even less
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
On 2019, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 1 10:13:24 PM IST, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
>
>
>On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 9:15 PM, Pirate Praveen
> wrote:
>> And fancy-log package.json wants chalk ^1.1.1 and we have chalk 2.4.2
>
>> which to me looks like a possible culprit.
>
>This was a false positive, I suspect
On Sun, 7 Jul 2019 20:39:10 +0200 Christoph Berg wrote:
> I and #debian-devel in general were pretty surprised that our "buster"
> systems couldn't properly "apt-get update" anymore today:
I recently had a similar issue with the backports repos:
E: Repository
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 936011 939185
Bug #936011 [pytimechart] pytimechart: should this package be removed?
Unable to merge bugs because:
package of #939185 is 'src:pytimechart' not 'pytimechart'
Failed to forcibly merge 936011: Did not alter merged bugs.
>
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2019 18:38:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#936049: fixed in odb-api 0.18.1-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #936049,
regarding metview: missing libopenmpi-dev dependency?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Package: src:python-quantities
Version: 0.12.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
While reviewing your package in the New queue, I noticed that the
license currently in the package is radically different than that in
debian/copyright. I'm accepting the package anyway, since this is an
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2019 06:49:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#934293: fixed in fuse3 3.6.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #934293,
regarding fuse3.postinst fails
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
64 matches
Mail list logo
