Bug#973122: marked as done (rust-core-foundation: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: librust-core-foundation-sys-0.7+default-dev)

Your message dated Sun, 6 Dec 2020 03:02:28 + with message-id <5067a991-a4f7-db1c-7790-a76412992...@p10link.net> and subject line re: rust-core-foundation: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: librust-core-foundation-sys-0.7+default-dev has caused the Debian Bug report #973122, regarding

Bug#976475: Bug#976535: Bug#976495: also happens on amd64, should be worked around by 1.8.20-5 but the real fix will come with 1.8.20-6

Lucas Nussbaum writes: > There was a texlive update in the meantime. Here are the versions of > packages that differ. I explored this a bit today -- there's something quite amiss with the docbook toolchain. I'm seeing a lot of this error: ! Undefined control sequence.

Processed: builds with 2.4.2-0.2, will be fixed in next openssl upload

Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #976107 [src:python-asyncssh] python-asyncssh FTBFS: FAIL: test_expired_root (tests.test_x509._TestX509) Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 976107: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=976107 Debian Bug Tracking

Bug#976107: builds with 2.4.2-0.2, will be fixed in next openssl upload

Control: severity -1 important builds with 2.4.2-0.2, will be fixed in next openssl upload

Bug#962553: marked as done (gffread: autopkgtest needs update for new version of gff2aplot: warning on stderr)

Your message dated Sun, 06 Dec 2020 00:18:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#962553: fixed in gffread 0.12.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #962553, regarding gffread: autopkgtest needs update for new version of gff2aplot: warning on stderr to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#976475: Bug#976405: Bug#976495: also happens on amd64, should be worked around by 1.8.20-5 but the real fix will come with 1.8.20-6

Hi thanks for the digging through the errors. > < texlive-base_2020.20200925-1 > --- > > texlive-base_2020.20201203-2 > Also, I noticed a few new latex-related failures in this archive rebuild. [...] It seems that something in the interface with hyperref has changed. Unfortunately the

Processed: lib3mf: diff for NMU version 1.8.1+ds-3.1

Processing control commands: > tags 957420 + pending Bug #957420 [src:lib3mf] lib3mf: ftbfs with GCC-10 Added tag(s) pending. -- 957420: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=957420 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed (with 1 error): Predictprotein RM title, severity

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 963927 RM: predictprotein -- ROM; does not work; code is not Bug #963927 [ftp.debian.org] [ROM] Please remove predictprotein Changed Bug title to 'RM: predictprotein -- ROM; does not work; code is not' from '[ROM] Please remove

Bug#976624: python3-xcbgen: not compatible with python 3.9

Package: xcb-proto Severity: serious Tags: patch upstream Hello Maintainer, Python 3.9 deprecated fractions.gcd in favor of math.gcd, this causes a FTBFS in polybar #975795[0]. I believe this issue can cause FTBFS in other packages and thus I picked the serious severity (same one applied to the

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 975795 by 976624 Bug #975795 [src:polybar] polybar: FTBFS: ImportError: cannot import name 'gcd' from 'fractions' (/usr/lib/python3.9/fractions.py) 975795 was not blocked by any bugs. 975795 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s)

Processed: Re: blender: Blender does not support python 3.9 (crash on extrude)

Processing control commands: > severity -1 grave Bug #976378 [blender] blender: Blender does not support python 3.9 (crash on extrude) Severity set to 'grave' from 'important' -- 976378: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=976378 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#976409: marked as done (glibc breaks node-iconv autopkgtest: AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: Missing expected exception)

Your message dated Sat, 05 Dec 2020 11:14:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#976409: fixed in node-iconv 2.3.5-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #976409, regarding glibc breaks node-iconv autopkgtest: AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: Missing expected exception to be marked as done.

Bug#969839: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#969839: rust-failure: Should rust-failure be removed from unstable?

Hello, Le 09/11/2020 à 08:15, Salvatore Bonaccorso a écrit : Hi Peter, [...] So you are right, thanks for spotting my mistake, which is because I indeed only check if dak rm would cause any issues. I agree that we thus likely cannot remove it for now from unstable. It has been removed

Bug#975953: libtorrent-rasterbar: diff for NMU version 1.2.9-0.2

Control: tags 975953 + patch Control: tags 975953 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for libtorrent-rasterbar (versioned as 1.2.9-0.2) and uploaded it to DELAYED/0. Regards. -- WBR, wRAR diff -Nru libtorrent-rasterbar-1.2.9/debian/changelog

Processed: libtorrent-rasterbar: diff for NMU version 1.2.9-0.2

Processing control commands: > tags 975953 + patch Bug #975953 [python3-libtorrent] Can't be imported, undefined symbol: _ZNK10libtorrent5entry4dictEv Bug #975891 [python3-libtorrent] deluge: error from deluge/_libtorrent.py Added tag(s) patch. Added tag(s) patch. > tags 975953 + pending Bug

Bug#976546: libmiglayout-java: FTBFS: [ERROR] /<>/swt/src/main/java/net/miginfocom/swt/MigLayout.java:[527,33] cannot find symbol

Source: libmiglayout-java Version: 5.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976545: ufoai-maps: FTBFS: "mkdir /sbuild-nonexistent" failed, reason: "Permission denied"."mkdir /sbuild-nonexistent/.ufoai" failed, reason: "No such file or directory"."mkdir /sbuild-nonexistent

Source: ufoai-maps Version: 2.5-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976572: bio-eagle: FTBFS: MemoryUtils.hpp:34:10: fatal error: xmmintrin.h: No such file or directory

Source: bio-eagle Version: 2.4.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976569: numcodecs: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.8 3.9" returned exit code 13

Source: numcodecs Version: 0.7.2+ds-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976566: opencolorio: FTBFS: Imath.h:13:10: fatal error: OpenEXR/OpenEXRConfig.h: No such file or directory

Source: opencolorio Version: 1.1.1~dfsg0-6 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976567: libhmsbeagle: FTBFS: GPUInterface.h:221:27: error: there are no arguments to ‘malloc’ that depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of ‘malloc’ must be available [-fpermissive]

Source: libhmsbeagle Version: 3.1.2+dfsg-8 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976568: zvmcloudconnector: FTBFS: make[1]: pyversions: No such file or directory

Source: zvmcloudconnector Version: 1.4.1-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976570: libstatgen: FTBFS on arm64: E: Build killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of inactivity

Source: libstatgen Version: 1.0.14-7 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976571: xfonts-100dpi on arm64: FTBFS: configure: error: /bin/bash ../font-bh-100dpi/config.sub aarch64-linux-gnu failed

Source: xfonts-100dpi Version: 1:1.0.4+nmu1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976565: golang-github-disintegration-imaging: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-aarch64-linux-gnu && go test -vet=off -v -p 4 github.com/disintegration/imaging returned exit code 1

Source: golang-github-disintegration-imaging Version: 1.6.0+really1.6.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also

Bug#976547: opensp: FTBFS: latex errors

Source: opensp Version: 1.5.2-13 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#976549: golang-github-robertkrimen-otto: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-aarch64-linux-gnu && go test -vet=off -v -p 4 github.com/robertkrimen/otto github.com/robertkrimen/otto/ast github.com/r

Source: golang-github-robertkrimen-otto Version: 0.0~git20180617.15f95af-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also

Bug#976552: dune-localfunctions: FTBFS: tests failed

Source: dune-localfunctions Version: 2.7.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant

Bug#976553: mojoshader: FTBFS: segfaults

Source: mojoshader Version: 0.0~hg1314+dfsg-1.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant

Bug#976548: akuma: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /usr/lib/jvm/default-java/bin/java -noverify -cp /usr/share/maven/boot/plexus-classworlds-2.x.jar -Dmaven.home=/usr/share/maven -Dmaven.multiModuleProjec

Source: akuma Version: 1.10-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#976561: sword-text-web: FTBFS: Binary files engWEB2015eb/nt.bzs and modules/texts/ztext/engWEB2015eb/nt.bzs differ

Source: sword-text-web Version: 349.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976562: golang-github-montanaflynn-stats: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-aarch64-linux-gnu && go test -vet=off -v -p 4 github.com/montanaflynn/stats returned exit code 1

Source: golang-github-montanaflynn-stats Version: 0.6.3-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64

Bug#976564: golang-github-linuxkit-virtsock: FTBFS: dh_auto_build: error: cd obj-aarch64-linux-gnu && go install -trimpath -v -p 4 github.com/linuxkit/virtsock/cmd/sock_stress github.com/linuxkit/virt

Source: golang-github-linuxkit-virtsock Version: 0.0~git20170720.0.0416e3d-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know

Bug#976558: python-fluids: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.8 3.9" returned exit code 13

Source: python-fluids Version: 0.1.78-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976559: python-x2go: FTBFS: NameError: name 'AF_INET' is not defined

Source: python-x2go Version: 0.6.1.3-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976556: latex-make: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

Source: latex-make Version: 2.4.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976557: kafs-client: FTBFS: cc: error: unrecognized command-line option ‘-m64’

Source: kafs-client Version: 0.5-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#975953: Can't be imported, undefined symbol: _ZNK10libtorrent5entry4dictEv

On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 07:24:27PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > * There is some magic parsing in bindings/python/setup.py related to extra > flags, with -std= being explicitly mentioned in a comment. This is indeed the cause. The "compile_cmd" file contains "g++ -std=c++11", which is the

Bug#975953: marked as done (Can't be imported, undefined symbol: _ZNK10libtorrent5entry4dictEv)

Your message dated Sat, 05 Dec 2020 12:56:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#975953: fixed in libtorrent-rasterbar 1.2.9-0.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #975953, regarding Can't be imported, undefined symbol: _ZNK10libtorrent5entry4dictEv to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#975891: marked as done (deluge: error from deluge/_libtorrent.py)

Your message dated Sat, 05 Dec 2020 12:56:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#975953: fixed in libtorrent-rasterbar 1.2.9-0.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #975953, regarding deluge: error from deluge/_libtorrent.py to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#976536: rapidjson: FTBFS: reader.h:1476:57: error: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type [-Werror=type-limits]

Source: rapidjson Version: 1.1.0+dfsg2-6 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976523: spades: FTBFS: jemalloc_internal.h:292:6: error: #error "No LG_QUANTUM definition for architecture; specify via CPPFLAGS"

Source: spades Version: 3.13.1+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976522: golang-gopkg-libgit2-git2go.v28: FTBFS: src/gopkg.in/libgit2/git2go.v28/git_dynamic.go:10:3: error: #error "Invalid libgit2 version; this git2go supports libgit2 v0.28"

Source: golang-gopkg-libgit2-git2go.v28 Version: 0.28.5-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64

Bug#976543: golang-github-rcrowley-go-metrics: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-aarch64-linux-gnu && go test -vet=off -v -p 4 github.com/rcrowley/go-metrics github.com/rcrowley/go-metrics/exp github

Source: golang-github-rcrowley-go-metrics Version: 0.0~git20180125.8732c61-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know

Bug#976542: python-biopython: FTBFS: AssertionError: 0 != 24

Source: python-biopython Version: 1.78+dfsg-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant

Bug#976544: fontconfig: FTBFS: latex errors

Source: fontconfig Version: 2.13.1-4.2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976538: gitmagic: FTBFS: latex errors

Source: gitmagic Version: 20160304-1.2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976540: clippoly: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

Source: clippoly Version: 0.11-9 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#976533: pulseview: FTBFS: util.cpp:140:6: error: no match for ‘operator<<’ (operand types are ‘QTextStream’ and ‘’)

Source: pulseview Version: 0.4.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976535: nickle: FTBFS: latex errors

Source: nickle Version: 2.87 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#976530: dolphin-emu: FTBFS: tests failed

Source: dolphin-emu Version: 5.0+dfsg-6 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976532: rust-cpuid-bool: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /usr/share/cargo/bin/cargo test --all returned exit code 101

Source: rust-cpuid-bool Version: 0.1.2-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976534: jctools: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /usr/lib/jvm/default-java/bin/java -noverify -cp /usr/share/maven/boot/plexus-classworlds-2.x.jar -Dmaven.home=/usr/share/maven -Dmaven.multiModuleProj

Source: jctools Version: 2.0.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#976541: libgit2-glib: FTBFS: ../libgit2-glib/ggit-clone-options.c:152:5: error: token ""1.0"" is not valid in preprocessor expressions

Source: libgit2-glib Version: 0.28.0.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976525: plast: FTBFS: SmallGapHitIteratorSSE8.cpp:294:5: error: ‘__m128i’ was not declared in this scope

Source: plast Version: 2.3.2+dfsg-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976529: ring-clojure: FTBFS: Syntax error (FileNotFoundException) compiling at (potemkin/macros.clj:1:1).

Source: ring-clojure Version: 1.6.2-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Processed: Bug#976409 marked as pending in node-iconv

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #976409 [src:glibc, src:node-iconv] glibc breaks node-iconv autopkgtest: AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: Missing expected exception Added tag(s) pending. -- 976409: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=976409 Debian Bug Tracking

Bug#976409: marked as pending in node-iconv

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #976409 in node-iconv reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#971933: HELP needed for uploading a new debianisation of the Rheolef package

Hi Andreas, I just commit with git a new release 7.1-2 of the debianisation of the rheolef package: it fixes a FTBFS bug #971933 (see d/changelog). The upstream version is unchanged (7.1). Could you please upload it in debian ? Many thanks for your help. Best regards, Pierre --

Bug#976450: libelfin: autopkgtest failure with clang 11

Source: libelfin Version: 0.3-2 Severity: serious Control: affects -1 src:llvm-defaults Control: block 973480 by -1 https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/libe/libelfin/8647182/log.gz ... In file included from x.cpp:1: In file included from /usr/include/libelfin/elf/elf++.hh:9:

Processed: libelfin: autopkgtest failure with clang 11

Processing control commands: > affects -1 src:llvm-defaults Bug #976450 [src:libelfin] libelfin: autopkgtest failure with clang 11 Added indication that 976450 affects src:llvm-defaults > block 973480 by -1 Bug #973480 [release.debian.org] transition: llvm-defaults 973480 was blocked by: 971415

Bug#936609: Advent calendar bug squashing issue (Was: Bug#936609: cblas / gsl hint needed (Was: Bug#936609: Ported ghmm to Python3 but issues with clapack))

Hi folks, this issue is something for our advent calendar. Anybody with cblas knowledge? Kind regards Andreas. On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:55:25AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi again, > > with my last mail I wanted to express: H, to stupid to turn > this hint into real code.

Processed: block 976386 with 976436

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 976386 with 976436 Bug #976386 [release.debian.org] transition: octave 976386 was blocked by: 976202 976200 976198 976203 976205 976201 976212 976210 976207 976206 976199 976381 976204 976382 976385 976386 was not blocking any bugs. Added

Bug#976510: xfonts-cyrillic: FTBFS on arm64: configure: error: /bin/bash ../font-cronyx-cyrillic/config.sub aarch64-linux-gnu failed

Source: xfonts-cyrillic Version: 1:1.0.4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976509: golang-github-shirou-gopsutil: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-aarch64-linux-gnu && go test -vet=off -v -p 4 github.com/shirou/gopsutil github.com/shirou/gopsutil/cpu github.com/shirou/

Source: golang-github-shirou-gopsutil Version: 2.19.11-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64

Bug#976508: muttprint: FTBFS: latex errors

Source: muttprint Version: 0.73-8 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976506: conda-package-handling: FTBFS on arm64: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13

Source: conda-package-handling Version: 1.7.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant

Bug#976519: tig: FTBFS: latex errors

Source: tig Version: 2.4.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#976515: olive-editor: FTBFS: dh_dwz: error: dwz -mdebian/olive-editor/usr/lib/debug/.dwz/aarch64-linux-gnu/olive-editor.debug -M/usr/lib/debug/.dwz/aarch64-linux-gnu/olive-editor.debug -- debian/o

Source: olive-editor Version: 20200620-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976517: bmagic: FTBFS: cc1plus: error: unknown value ‘core2’ for ‘-march’

Source: bmagic Version: 6.3.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#976513: tuxmath: FTBFS: ld: network.o:./src/network.c:57: multiple definition of `lan_player_info'; menu_lan.o:./src/menu_lan.c:40: first defined here

Source: tuxmath Version: 2.0.3-6 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#976514: tinyarray: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.8 3.9" --test-pytest --test-args=../../../test_tinyarray.py returned exit code 13

Source: tinyarray Version: 1.2.3-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976518: gsound: FTBFS: Unescaped left brace in regex is passed through in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/^${ <-- HERE abs_top_builddir}/gsound$/ at /usr/bin/automake line 5755.

Source: gsound Version: 1.0.2-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#976578: golang-github-labstack-gommon: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-aarch64-linux-gnu && go test -vet=off -v -p 4 github.com/labstack/gommon github.com/labstack/gommon/bytes github.com/labst

Source: golang-github-labstack-gommon Version: 0.2.6-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64

Bug#976577: librsvg: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check VERBOSE=1 "TESTS=api loading crash render-crash dimensions errors infinite-loop" returned exit code 2

Source: librsvg Version: 2.50.2+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976574: libraw1394: FTBFS: latex errors

Source: libraw1394 Version: 2.1.2-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976575: abseil: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd shared && make -j4 test ARGS\+=-j4 returned exit code 2

Source: abseil Version: 0~20200923.2-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976573: pandas: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.8 3.9" returned exit code 13

Source: pandas Version: 1.1.4+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976576: spring: FTBFS: {standard input}:37: Error: unknown mnemonic `fstcw' -- `fstcw [sp,18]'

Source: spring Version: 104.0+dfsg-7 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976583: ompl: FTBFS: Failed to copy 'usr/bin/ompl_benchmark_statistics.py': No such file or directory at /usr/share/dh-exec/dh-exec-install-rename line 51, <> line 2.

Source: ompl Version: 1.4.2+ds1-6 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976582: backward-cpp: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-aarch64-linux-gnu && make -j4 test ARGS\+=-j4 returned exit code 2

Source: backward-cpp Version: 1.5-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976579: libgsecuredelete: FTBFS: gsecuredelete.vapi:8.3-8.25: error: `Gsd.Intl' already contains a definition for `init'

Source: libgsecuredelete Version: 0.3-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#972870: Should libhal1-flash be shipped in bullseye?

It should be removed, indeed.

Bug#974168: marked as done (bioperl-run: autopkgtest failure)

Your message dated Sat, 05 Dec 2020 11:06:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#974168: fixed in bioperl-run 1.7.3-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #974168, regarding bioperl-run: autopkgtest failure to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#976429: marked as done (jellyfish: missing Breaks+Replaces: jellyfish-examples (<< 2.3.0-7))

Your message dated Sat, 05 Dec 2020 11:11:41 + with message-id and subject line Bug#976429: fixed in jellyfish 2.3.0-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #976429, regarding jellyfish: missing Breaks+Replaces: jellyfish-examples (<< 2.3.0-7) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 972870 ftp.debian.org Bug #972870 [libhal1-flash] Should libhal1-flash be shipped in bullseye? Bug reassigned from package 'libhal1-flash' to 'ftp.debian.org'. No longer marked as found in versions hal-flash/0.3.3-3. Ignoring request to

Bug#973776: marked as done (relion-cuda: undeclared build-depends)

Your message dated Sat, 05 Dec 2020 12:57:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#973776: fixed in relion-cuda 3.1.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #973776, regarding relion-cuda: undeclared build-depends to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#976478: libecpint: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-aarch64-linux-gnu && make -j4 test ARGS\+=-j4 returned exit code 2

Source: libecpint Version: 1.0.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976479: scrappie: FTBFS: scrappie_matrix.h:5:14: fatal error: immintrin.h: No such file or directory

Source: scrappie Version: 1.4.2-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976467: rust-core-arch: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /usr/share/cargo/bin/cargo build returned exit code 101

Source: rust-core-arch Version: 0.1.5-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976468: python-ptrace: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13

Source: python-ptrace Version: 0.9.3-2.2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976469: haskell-xml-html-qq: FTBFS: tests failed

Source: haskell-xml-html-qq Version: 0.1.0.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant

Bug#976471: xfonts-75dpi: FTBFS on arm64: configure: error: /bin/bash ../font-adobe-75dpi/config.sub aarch64-linux-gnu failed

Source: xfonts-75dpi Version: 1:1.0.4+nmu1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976473: r-cran-s2: FTBFS: ../inst/include/s2/third_party/absl/base/internal/unaligned_access.h:289:8: error: ‘uint64’ does not name a type; did you mean ‘uint64_t’?

Source: r-cran-s2 Version: 1.0.3-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976472: rust-packed-simd: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /usr/share/cargo/bin/cargo build returned exit code 101

Source: rust-packed-simd Version: 0.3.3-5 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976474: bcachefs-tools: FTBFS: include/linux/log2.h:281:27: error: ‘PAGE_SHIFT’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘PAGE_SIZE’?

Source: bcachefs-tools Version: 0.1+git20201025.742dbbdb-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64

Bug#976475: shared-mime-info: FTBFS: latex errors

Source: shared-mime-info Version: 2.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976584: rust-generator: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /usr/share/cargo/bin/cargo test --all returned exit code 101

Source: rust-generator Version: 0.6.20-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976588: rapmap: FTBFS: cc: error: unrecognized command-line option ‘-msse4.1’

Source: rapmap Version: 0.15.0+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64). Relevant part

Bug#976589: node-source-map-support: FTBFS: chmod: cannot access 'debian/node-source-map-support/usr/share/nodejs/source-map-support/build.js': No such file or directory

Source: node-source-map-support Version: 0.5.19+ds-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on arm64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64

  1   2   3   >