Source: ceres-solver
Version: 1.14.0-14
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> 42: ERROR: something wrong with flag 'logtostderr' in file
>
Source: nipype
Version: 1.6.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> === FAILURES
> ===
Source: lam
Version: 7.1.4-6.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> compiling ROMIO in directory mpi-io
> make[5]: Entering directory '/<>/romio/mpi-io'
>
Source: satpy
Version: 0.25.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> === short test summary info
>
>
Source: networkx
Version: 2.5+ds-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering directory '/<>/doc/build/latex'
> latexmk -pdf -dvi- -ps-
Source: assembly-stats
Version: 1.0.1+ds-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/c++ -I/usr/include/gtest -Wall -g -O3 -pthread -MD -MT
>
Source: camitk
Version: 4.1.2-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/c++ -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=.
> -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat
Source: meson
Version: 0.59.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ld: bobuser.p/bobuser.c.o: in function `main':
> ./b 52a78b9866/../test
Source: symfony
Version: 4.4.19+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> There were 2 errors:
>
> 1)
>
Source: anjuta-extras
Version: 3.26.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/bash ../../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
>
Source: kmplayer
Version: 1:0.12.0b-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src && /usr/bin/c++
>
Source: arduino-builder
Version: 1.3.25-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> # Remove tests which download stuff:
>
Source: tbb
Version: 2020.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> dh_compress -X*/examples/*
> make[1]: Leaving
Source: python-biopython
Version: 1.78+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> mkdir -p Tests_avoid
> for avoid in
Source: arpalert
Version: 2.0.12-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc version 11.2.0 (Debian 11.2.0-10)
> ... rest of stderr output deleted ...
>
Source: cargo
Version: 0.47.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> failures:
>
> build_script::custom_build_script_failed stdout
> running
Source: aspectc++
Version: 1:2.3-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/rules clean
> dh_testdir
> dh_testroot
> dh_clean build-*stamp
Source: console-setup
Version: 1.205
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Compiling compact keymaps for amiga...
> Compiling compact keymaps for
Source: ascd
Version: 0.13.2-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering directory '/<>/libworkman'
> gcc -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -g
Source: apt-xapian-index
Version: 0.52
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> dh_auto_build
> I: pybuild base:232:
Source: libvirt
Version: 7.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
> Summary of Failures:
>
> 146/169 virstoragetest FAIL 0.20s exit status 1
>
>
Source: aiorwlock
Version: 1.0.0-0.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> === short test summary info
>
Source: xiphos
Version: 4.2.1+dfsg1-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src/main && /usr/bin/c++
> -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
Source: acedb
Version: 4.9.39+dfsg.02-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -g -Wall -DACEDB4 `../w3rdparty/include-config glib-2.0 gtk+-2.0` -g -O2
Source: qtbase-opensource-src-gles
Version: 5.15.2+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -o "../bin/qmake" main.o meta.o option.o project.o
Source: ktexteditor
Version: 5.86.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-gensymbols: warning: some new symbols appeared in the symbols file: see
>
Source: gimp-texturize
Version: 2.1-11
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I.. -pthread -I/usr/include/gimp-2.0
>
Source: grub2
Version: 2.04-20
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[6]: Entering directory '/<>/obj/grub-pc'
> PASS: example_unit_test
> PASS:
Source: packer
Version: 1.6.6+ds1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> ? github.com/hashicorp/packer/provisioner/windows-shell/version [no
>
Source: aegisub
Version: 3.2.2+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering directory '/<>'
> header.mk:5: /<>/Makefile.inc: No such file
Source: 7zip
Version: 21.03~beta+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=.
>
Source: fprintd
Version: 1.90.9-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
> ==
> ERROR: test_pam_timeout
Attached to this message is a trivial patch that makes the binutils-avr
package build correctly against GCC 11.
Best,
Rafael Laboissière
--- binutils-avr-2.26.20160125+Atmel3.6.2.orig/binutils/bfd/plugin.c
+++ binutils-avr-2.26.20160125+Atmel3.6.2/binutils/bfd/plugin.c
@@ -338,7 +338,7 @@
Hi,
On 21-10-2021 23:15, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> For the record,
> from the package maintainer perspective: good communication on the BTS,
Always :)
> integrating the proposed change,
or telling the NMU'er to upload without delay if it's the only change.
> and uploading without cancelling
: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Entering directory '/<>/build/documentation'
> cd /<>/build/
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 995339
Bug #995339 [lalrpop] lalrpop: Incomplete license information
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
995339: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995339
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 995339 0.17.2-7
Bug #995339 [lalrpop] lalrpop: Incomplete license information
No longer marked as found in versions rust-lalrpop/0.17.2-7.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
995339:
Source: rust-lalrpop
Followup-For: Bug #995339
The d/copyright file is about the source package not the binary package, you
are misinterpreting policy.
In fact there is nowhere in the d/copyright file format to put this
information; and it would not be efficient to do so since the information
Your message dated Sat, 23 Oct 2021 18:45:15 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#997008: llvm-toolchain-12: FTBFS on armel: undefined
reference to `__atomic_load_8' in scudo
has caused the Debian Bug report #997008,
regarding llvm-toolchain-12: FTBFS on armel: undefined reference to
Your message dated Sat, 23 Oct 2021 18:44:16 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#996947: llvm-toolchain-12: FTBFS on armel since
1:12.0.1-11: error: instruction requires: data-barriers
has caused the Debian Bug report #996947,
regarding llvm-toolchain-12: FTBFS on armel since
Your message dated Sat, 23 Oct 2021 18:43:20 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#996829: llvm-toolchain-12: 1:12.0.1-9 FTBFS on armel:
llvm-ar.cpp.o: undefined reference to symbol
'__atomic_fetch_sub_4@@LIBATOMIC_1.0'
has caused the Debian Bug report #996829,
regarding
> With 10.3.29 running, I've dumped all databases (mysqldump --all-databases -p
> >mysql.dump),
> then dropped all databases, stopped mariadb and deleted /var/lib/mysql/ib*.
> Then restarted mariadb, restored databases (source mysql.dump) and finally
> upgraded to 10.3.31.
>
> So my problem is
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed ipv6 patch
Bug #997059 [src:intake] intake FTBFS on IPV6-only buildds
Added tag(s) patch, confirmed, and ipv6.
> reassign -1 python3-tornado
Bug #997059 [src:intake] intake FTBFS on IPV6-only buildds
Bug reassigned from package 'src:intake' to
Source: libreoffice
Version: 1:7.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: sqlalchemy-i18n
Version: 1.0.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> c
Source: numba
Version: 0.52.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: python2.7
Version: 2.7.18-9
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: node-handlebars
Version: 3:4.7.6+~4.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: statsmodels
Version: 0.12.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: qemu
Version: 1:6.1+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> powerpc64-linux-
Source: openvdb
Version: 8.1.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Hi Adrian,
Adrian Bunk, on 2021-10-23:
> Note that while the IPV6-only nature of x86-conova-01 is the most likely
> explanation
> why it only fails there, it is not 100% confirmed that this is the problem.
Thanks for that data point, it would explain why I failed to
reproduce this issue on my
On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 19:20:35 +0100 Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 2/21/21 4:32 PM, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/OpenOrienteering/mapper/issues/1214
>
> Your package FTBFS with PROJ 8.0.0:
>
> CMake Error at
> This was caused by a change in jinja and fixed in pydata-sphinx-theme
> upstream, see
>
> https://github.com/pydata/pydata-sphinx-theme/pull/395
pydata-sphinx-theme 0.7.1 (which contains that fix) has just been
uploaded to unstable
--
Sandro "morph" Tosi
My website: http://sandrotosi.me/
Me
Processing control commands:
> block 993577 by -1
Bug #993577 [ftp.debian.org] RM: gnome-shell-extension-remove-dropdown-arrows
-- ROM; No longer needed in GNOME 40
Bug #997005 [ftp.debian.org] RM: gnome-shell-extension-remove-dropdown-arrows
-- ROM; No longer needed/useful with gnome-shell
Package: progress-linux-gnome-desktop
Version: 20211008-1
Severity: serious
Justification: cannot migrate to testing with these dependencies in place
Control: block 993577 by -1
Similar to bfh-gnome-desktop, progress-linux-gnome-desktop Depends on
gnome-shell-extension-remove-dropdown-arrows,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 993577 997005
Bug #993577 [ftp.debian.org] RM: gnome-shell-extension-remove-dropdown-arrows
-- ROM; No longer needed in GNOME 40
Bug #997005 [ftp.debian.org] RM: gnome-shell-extension-remove-dropdown-arrows
-- ROM; No longer
Package: bfh-gnome-desktop
Version: 20211009-1
Severity: serious
Justification: cannot migrate to testing with these dependencies in place
Control: block 993577 by -1
bfh-gnome-desktop Depends on gnome-shell-extension-remove-dropdown-arrows,
which is no longer relevant for GNOME Shell >= 40
Processing control commands:
> block 993577 by -1
Bug #993577 [ftp.debian.org] RM: gnome-shell-extension-remove-dropdown-arrows
-- ROM; No longer needed in GNOME 40
993577 was not blocked by any bugs.
993577 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 993577: 997074
--
993577:
Your message dated Sat, 23 Oct 2021 15:30:22 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#993187: gnome-shell-extension-hide-activities: does
not declare compatibility with GNOME Shell 40
has caused the Debian Bug report #993187,
regarding gnome-shell-extension-hide-activities: does not
Your message dated Sat, 23 Oct 2021 15:29:47 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#993189: gnome-shell-extension-hide-veth: does not
declare compatibility with GNOME Shell 40
has caused the Debian Bug report #993189,
regarding gnome-shell-extension-hide-veth: does not declare
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 993065 gnome-shell-extension-xrdesktop: Please update for gnome-shell
> 41
Bug #993065 [src:gnome-shell-extension-xrdesktop]
gnome-shell-extension-xrdesktop: Please update for gnome-shell 40
Changed Bug title to
Your message dated Sat, 23 Oct 2021 15:31:02 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#993185: gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons: does not
declare compatibility with GNOME Shell 40
has caused the Debian Bug report #993185,
regarding gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons: does not declare
Your message dated Sat, 23 Oct 2021 15:27:09 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#993192: gnome-shell-extension-multi-monitors: does not
declare compatibility with GNOME Shell 40
has caused the Debian Bug report #993192,
regarding gnome-shell-extension-multi-monitors: does not declare
Your message dated Sat, 23 Oct 2021 15:27:59 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#993191: gnome-shell-extension-move-clock: does not
declare compatibility with GNOME Shell 40
has caused the Debian Bug report #993191,
regarding gnome-shell-extension-move-clock: does not declare
Your message dated Sat, 23 Oct 2021 15:22:35 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#993201: gnome-shell-extension-trash: does not declare
compatibility with GNOME Shell 40
has caused the Debian Bug report #993201,
regarding gnome-shell-extension-trash: does not declare compatibility with
Your message dated Sat, 23 Oct 2021 15:25:01 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#993199: gnome-shell-extension-tilix-dropdown: does not
declare compatibility with GNOME Shell 40
has caused the Debian Bug report #993199,
regarding gnome-shell-extension-tilix-dropdown: does not declare
Your message dated Sat, 23 Oct 2021 15:26:23 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#993194: gnome-shell-extension-panel-osd: does not
declare compatibility with GNOME Shell 40
has caused the Debian Bug report #993194,
regarding gnome-shell-extension-panel-osd: does not declare
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 993200 gnome-shell-extension-tilix-shortcut: does not declare
> compatibility with GNOME Shell 41
Bug #993200 [gnome-shell-extension-tilix-shortcut]
gnome-shell-extension-tilix-shortcut: does not declare compatibility with GNOME
Shell
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 996074
> https://gitlab.com/bertoldia/gnome-shell-trash-extension/-/merge_requests/23
Bug #996074 [gnome-shell-extension-trash] gnome-shell-extension-trash: does not
declare compatibility with GNOME Shell 41
Set Bug
I've fixed this problem with commit 10f838:
https://sourceforge.net/p/refind/code/commit_browser
You should be able to cherry-pick that, although changes to NEWS.txt and
include/version.h might need to be ignored. Also, there are a number of
other changes that have been made, and some others
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 993204 gnome-shell-timer: does not declare compatibility with GNOME
> Shell 41
Bug #993204 [gnome-shell-timer] gnome-shell-timer: does not declare
compatibility with GNOME Shell 40
Bug #996079 [gnome-shell-timer] gnome-shell-timer: does
Source: geoalchemy2
Version: 0.9.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> F
Source: bornagain
Version: 1.19.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/o
Source: keras
Version: 2.3.1+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: gromacs
Version: 2021.3-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Enter
Source: ceph
Version: 14.2.21-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/c++ -g
Source: libpmemobj-cpp
Version: 1.13.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
> 99%
Source: emscripten
Version: 2.0.26~dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
KDE/Plasma (package dependencies) are currently completely broken under
testing. Is there currently a chance to (somehow simply) block the partial
transition of plasma 5.23 to testing (so that not related package updates are
easy)? Selectively upgrading single packages with dependencies one
Your message dated Sat, 23 Oct 2021 13:34:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#996055: fixed in gnome-shell-extension-easyscreencast
1.4.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #996055,
regarding gnome-shell-extension-easyscreencast: does not declare compatibility
with GNOME Shell 41
to
Your message dated Sat, 23 Oct 2021 13:34:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#993061: fixed in gnome-shell-extension-easyscreencast
1.4.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #993061,
regarding gnome-shell-extension-easyscreencast: Not compatible with gnome-shell
40
to be marked as
Source: minieigen
Version: 0.50.3+dfsg1-12
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs bookworm sid
Hi Maintainer
As can be seen in reproducible builds [1], minieigen FTBFS with sphinx
4.2.0. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below.
Regards
Graham
[1]
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 984055 2.184+dfsg-8
Bug #984055 [src:fastqtl] fastqtl: ftbfs with GCC-11
The source 'fastqtl' and version '2.184+dfsg-8' do not appear to match any
binary packages
Marked as fixed in versions fastqtl/2.184+dfsg-8.
> close 984055
Bug
Hello, a closer look on the log files shows that actually
the failed test (elevation) download a corrupted data file on the armhf CI box
by comparison against the size of the same data file downloaded on the other
CI boxes.
It sound pretty much as a subtle bug form some of the dependencies.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> merge 974793 974813
Bug #974793 [oclgrind] oclgrind: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-11
Bug #974813 [oclgrind] oclgrind: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-11
Bug #974813 [oclgrind] oclgrind: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-11
Merged 974793
FTR, after the update in unstable of firefox-esr/91.2.0esr-1 the
behaviour is gone.
Regards,
Salvatore
Source: intake
Version: 0.6.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=intake=all
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=intake=amd64=0.6.4-1=1634402033=0
...
=== FAILURES ===
This was caused by a change in jinja and fixed in pydata-sphinx-theme
upstream, see
https://github.com/pydata/pydata-sphinx-theme/pull/395
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 libcmark0.30.1 0.30.2-1
Bug #997055 [gnome-builder] gnome-builder does not start up (missing library)
Bug reassigned from package 'gnome-builder' to 'libcmark0.30.1'.
No longer marked as found in versions gnome-builder/41.1-2.
Ignoring request to alter
Source: ganeti
Version: 3.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs bookworm sid
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=ganeti=3.0.1-2%2Bb1
...
Linking src/hluxid ...
cp -pf src/hluxid src/ganeti-luxid
PYTHONPATH=. ./autotools/run-in-tempdir \
/<>/./autotools/build-bash-completion --compact >
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #996951 [src:linux] linux-image-5.14.0-3-amd64: iouring looses requests
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #996951 to the same tags previously set
--
996951: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996951
Debian Bug Tracking
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 11:03:16PM +1100, Daniel Black wrote:
> retested 5.14.14. Sorry not fixed there yet. Guess this is going upstream.
>
> few other fixes to try:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/log/?h=io_uring-5.15
>
> $
Source: libocxl
Version: 1.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libocxl=all=1.2.1-1=1634831235=0
...
gcc -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -I
src/include -I kernel/include -fPIC -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wl,-z,relro
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 994240 0.9-2
Bug #994240 {Done: Nilesh Patra } [src:yosys] fix ftbfs with
GCC 11
Bug #984414 {Done: Nilesh Patra } [src:yosys] yosys: ftbfs
with GCC-11
No longer marked as found in versions yosys/0.9-2.
No longer marked as found in
Your message dated Sat, 23 Oct 2021 06:18:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#997045: fixed in saga 7.3.0+dfsg-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #997045,
regarding saga: missing build dependency on pkg-config
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
601 - 696 of 696 matches
Mail list logo
