Your message dated Tue, 20 Dec 2022 13:20:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1025744: fixed in greetd 0.8.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1025744,
regarding greetd - FTBFS with new version of rust-nix.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Tue, 20 Dec 2022 13:20:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1025872: fixed in greetd 0.8.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1025872,
regarding installing greetd immediately reboots and prevents any logins
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Source: sssd
Version: 2.8.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: libvigraimpex
Version: 1.11.1+dfsg-10
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: puppet-beaker
Version: 4.30.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: wcc
Version: 0.0.2+dfsg-4.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin
Source: ruby-image-processing
Version: 1.10.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /
Source: python-ltfatpy
Version: 1.0.16-8
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: django-assets
Version: 2.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: eclipse-wtp
Version: 3.18-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: pexpect
Version: 4.8.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: libembperl-perl
Version: 2.5.0-16
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: rows
Version: 0.4.1-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bin
Source: leiningen-clojure
Version: 2.9.1-9
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: puppetdb
Version: 7.11.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: wine
Version: 7.0~repack-10
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: python-aiosmtpd
Version: 1.4.2-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: python-wsme
Version: 0.11.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: python-oauth2client
Version: 4.1.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: onionbalance
Version: 0.2.2-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: python-blessed
Version: 1.19.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: metakernel
Version: 0.27.5-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: python-coverage
Version: 6.5.0+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: ca-certificates
Version: 20211016
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: ormar
Version: 0.12.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bin
Source: neuron
Version: 7.6.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: Enter
Source: sqlalchemy
Version: 1.4.31+ds1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: request-tracker4
Version: 4.4.6+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: lirc
Version: 0.10.1-7.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Enter
Source: ruby-prof
Version: 1.4.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ruby
Source: python-jsondiff
Version: 1.3.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: specutils
Version: 1.9.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: openjpa
Version: 2.4.2-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bu
Source: maven-javadoc-plugin
Version: 3.0.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: python-clickhouse-driver
Version: 0.2.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
Source: binutils-or1k-elf
Version: 1.0.6
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs patch
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: i...@hack3r.moe
Dear maintainer(s),
binutils-or1k-elf recently failed to build due to failure applying patch:
```
make[1]:
Source: ruby-faraday-middleware
Version: 1.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: python-eventlet
Version: 0.33.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: debian-installer
Version: 20220917
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: python-skbio
Version: 0.5.6-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: vdr-plugin-remote
Version: 0.7.0-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: mediathekview
Version: 13.2.1+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: jekyll
Version: 3.9.0+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/lib/r
Source: python-executing
Version: 1.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: python-param
Version: 1.9.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: gpodder
Version: 3.11.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: check-manifest
Version: 0.46-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: termit
Version: 3.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Enter
Source: ripe-atlas-sagan
Version: 1.2.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: roundcube
Version: 1.6.0+dfsg-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: hiro
Version: 0.5.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: gcc-10
Version: 10.4.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/bash ./libt
Source: reprotest
Version: 0.7.22
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: core-async-clojure
Version: 1.5.648-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: python-randomize
Version: 0.14-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: dbus-python
Version: 1.3.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: vdr-plugin-femon
Version: 2.4.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: mutter
Version: 43.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: lib...@packages.debian.org, debian-...@lists.debian.org
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: armel armhf
Recent uploads of mutter have
Source: openclonk
Version: 8.1-2
Followup-For: Bug #984274
X-Debbugs-Cc: i...@hack3r.moe
Hello,
I've attached a patch that includes header in relevant file and fixes
GCC 11 build. If more help is needed, please let me know.
Cheers,
Eric
--- a/src/script/C4AulParse.cpp
+++
Your message dated Tue, 20 Dec 2022 16:04:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026458: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #799805,
regarding kytea: FTBFS: kytea-model.cpp:180:12: error: cannot convert 'int*' to
'double*' in assignment
to be marked as
Your message dated Tue, 20 Dec 2022 16:04:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026458: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #799805,
regarding kytea: Problem with upcoming new version of liblinear
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 20 Dec 2022 16:04:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026457: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #816393,
regarding debget: does not download tar.xz orig files
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Tue, 20 Dec 2022 16:05:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026459: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1006290,
regarding kvmtool: CVE-2021-45464: hypervisor escape and host code execution
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Tue, 20 Dec 2022 16:05:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026459: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #966893,
regarding kvmtool: FTBFS: string_fortified.h:34:10: error: writing 1 byte into
a region of size 0
Your message dated Tue, 20 Dec 2022 16:04:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026457: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #999257,
regarding debget: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means that
Source: theano
Version: 1.0.5+dfsg-8
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: trapperkeeper-scheduler-clojure
Version: 1.1.3-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1019634 serious
Bug #1019634 [src:ruby-jekyll-remote-theme] ruby-jekyll-remote-theme: FTBFS:
ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed:
/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/specification.rb:1413:in `rescue in block in
activate_dependencies': Could
Source: aiosmtplib
Version: 1.1.6-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: python-certbot
Version: 2.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: ipykernel
Version: 6.17.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: criu
Version: 3.17.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: nitpic
Version: 0.1-17
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ld:
>
According to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984286,
maybe fix those `throw` statements to comply C++17 standard:
> GCC 11 defaults to the GNU++17 standard. If your package installs
> header files in /usr/include, please don't work around C++17 issues
> by choosing a lower C++
Control: severity -1 important
On Sun, 18 Dec 2022 at 15:58:06 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> It looks as though the specific test-case that is segfaulting is
> consistently the one after stacking/unmaximize-new-size.metatest, which
> should be stacking/workspace-basic.metatest. That's consistent
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #1024438 [src:mutter] mutter: autopkgtest regression: segfault in
workspace-basic.metatest
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
1024438: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024438
Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Dec 2022 12:05:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1024264: fixed in omniorb-dfsg 4.2.5+ds1-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1024264,
regarding omniorb-dfsg: Build for all supported python3 versions or
Build-Depend on python3-dev
to be marked as done.
Quack,
I just packaged DXVK 2.0 which brings lots of improvements.
It is the first time since I took over that the requirements were bumped
and the bar is high: Wine 7.1 and Mesa3d 22.0 (minimum version, not
recommended):
https://github.com/doitsujin/dxvk/wiki/Driver-support
With the
Your message dated Tue, 20 Dec 2022 15:58:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026451: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #965464,
regarding coinor-flopc++: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in
bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Tue, 20 Dec 2022 15:59:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026452: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #915041,
regarding does not create a subcommand '[test_without_migrations]'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 20 Dec 2022 15:58:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026451: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1017927,
regarding RM: coinor-flopc++ -- RoQA, unmaintained, RC buggy, no reverse deps
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Tue, 20 Dec 2022 15:58:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026451: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #897723,
regarding coinor-flopc++: ftbfs with GCC-8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Tue, 20 Dec 2022 15:58:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026428: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #863596,
regarding mytop can't be installed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Control: tag -1 pending
Hi,
On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 at 17:54:56 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> There was 1 failure:
>>
>> 1) Rcmail_Rcmail::test_format_date
>> Failed asserting that two strings are identical.
>> --- Expected
>> +++ Actual
>> @@ @@
>> -'6/1/20, 12:20 PM'
>> +'6/1/20, 12:20 PM'
>>
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1026528 [src:roundcube] roundcube: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:105:
override_dh_auto_test] Error 1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1026528: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1026528
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Processing control commands:
> forcemerge 1008244 -1
Bug #1008244 [ca-certificates] ca-certificates: certdata2pem.py doesn't work
with cryptography != 3.0
Unable to merge bugs because:
package of #1026508 is 'src:ca-certificates' not 'ca-certificates'
Failed to forcibly merge 1008244: Did not
kworm sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
>
>
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > make[2]: Entering directory '/<>/mozi
Source: python-pgpy
Version: 0.5.4-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: android-platform-system-extras
Version: 10.0.0+r36+ds-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: pyro4
Version: 4.82-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: python-omemo-backend-signal
Version: 0.3.0~beta-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: python-xxhash
Version: 3.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> x86_64-li
Source: mpv-mpris
Version: 0.7.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cc mpris.c
Source: libjt400-java
Version: 9.4-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: mkdocstrings-python-legacy
Version: 0.2.3-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: rust-trust-dns-client
Version: 0.21.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: libresample
Version: 0.1.3-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/o
Source: python-fire
Version: 0.4.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: flask-flatpages
Version: 0.6-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: binutils-mipsen
Version: 9+c4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> config.sta
1 - 100 of 389 matches
Mail list logo