Processed: Re: Bug#300765: r-doc-html: Documents have nothing to do in /usr/lib
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 300765 serious Bug#300765: r-doc-html: Documents have nothing to do in /usr/lib Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of libgda 0.2.96-6.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 299159 + fixed Bug#299159: gda-mysql must be rebuilt against libmysqlclient12 Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed tag 300839 + fixed Bug#300839: libgda: documentation misbuilds due to undefined SGML element Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300703: maybe the init.s script is broken?
FP == Francesco Potorti` [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: FP This one fixed the problem. FP cd /etc/init.d/ FP diff -pu /etc/init.d/autofs\~ /etc/init.d/autofs FP --- /etc/init.d/autofs~ 2005-02-21 12:37:43.0 +0100 FP +++ /etc/init.d/autofs 2005-03-21 17:25:54.0 +0100 FP @@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ start) FP stop) FP echo -n 'Stopping automounter:' FP - umount_loopback FP + umount_loopback || true FP any=0 FP for file in `ls /var/run/autofs/*.pid 2/dev/null` FP Diff finished at Mon Mar 21 17:26:46 I didn't have any loopback-mounts, so this one probably only fixed another problem. The real problem is 'start-stop-daemon --stop' failing. And it is probably solved by the suggested change to --name instead of --exec. / Anders -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300842: libc6: upgrade fails in i386 chroot on amd64 system
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64 Severity: critical Tags: experimental Justification: breaks the whole system Hi, here is the problem: Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 (using .../libc6_2.3.4-1_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libc6 ... Setting up libc6 (2.3.4-1) ... dpkg: relocation error: /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: symbol _dl_starting_up, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file ld-linux.so.2 with link time reference cat: relocation error: /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: symbol _dl_starting_up, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file ld-linux.so.2 with link time reference dpkg: error processing libc6 (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 127 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-9-amd64-k8 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages libc6 depends on: ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 300765 is normal
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11 severity 300765 normal Bug#300765: r-doc-html: Documents have nothing to do in /usr/lib Severity set to `normal'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300767: r-doc-html: HTML documents in /usr/lib/R/doc/manual are loop symlinks
Scribit Dirk Eddelbuettel dies 21/03/2005 hora 20:49: You better check again. You may have a problem with your /usr/share/doc hierarchy, or something else is going one. I don't see the point. The files are in /usr/lib, and are symlinks on themselves. Why would it be a /usr/share/doc issue? BTW, I purged the package and installed it, and everything's fine. I don't understand. Is it possible that something was wrong in a maintainer's script, something dealing with configuration files? (I had resintalled it two times before, the dangling symlinks were still there) Strangely, Nowhere man -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: tagging 298173
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11 tags 298173 - sarge Bug#298173: sylpheed: [security] buffer overflow (= 1.0.2), now 1.0.3 is released Tags were: woody sarge security Tags removed: sarge End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299947: Improving ifplugd
If the patches I submitted upstream (cc:ed to #219000) get applied to ifplugd.c then it will be possible to restart ifplugd cleanly: i.e., stop ifplugd using SIGQUIT and restart it using the --no-startup option. Then -q can be dropped from the default list of options. In order to minimize the amount of time that ifplugd is not running, both stopping and starting should be done in the postinst. (Currently, ifplugd is stopped in the prerm and started again in the postinst.) This means that custom postinst code will have to be used instead of the snippets generated by dh_installinit. -- Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295306: debian/uw-imapd-ssl.postinst clobbers existing imaps line params
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 22-03-2005 06:30, Steve Langasek wrote: This RC bug has been open for a long time now, and there has been no activity on it for three weeks. I have prepared an NMU with the attached patch, based on the one prepared by Adeodato and Pierre but without the intrusive (and currently broken) template-based maintainer scripts. I will be uploading this to unstable shortly according to the 0-day NMU policy. Thanks alot for your help! - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCP96Tn7DbMsAkQLgRAkkSAJ9sFKUHqGTaokrm52ZAopLEd9WxOwCgiKR7 BpaBcPfPFGKHPzbpPS9YxiA= =fLnt -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#300848: doesn't work anymore: fatal error
Package: polygen Version: 1.0.6-4 Severity: grave $ polygen Fatal error: cannot load shared library dllunix Reason: dllunix.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory thanks Christian -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686-smp Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages polygen depends on: ii ocaml-base-nox3.08.3-1 Runtime system for ocaml bytecode -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300851: libdb version check
Package: slapd Version: 2.2.23-0.pre6 Tags: experimental Severity: serious The BDB backend checks if the right version of libdb is installed. This sucks as upgrades to the library force upgrades of slapd. We have to disable this version check or at least make it a warning. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#300852: dpkg: error /var/cache/apt/archives/libxine1_1.0-1_i386.deb (--unpack)
Package: libxine1 Version: 1.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable after update: apt-get install libxine1 return errors in package -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages libxine1 depends on: ii libasound2 1.0.8-3 ALSA library ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libmodplug0 1:0.7-4 shared libraries for mod music bas ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libspeex11.0.rel.4-1 The Speex Speech Codec ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-8 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-3 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300848: doesn't work anymore: fatal error
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 10:34:58AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: $ polygen Fatal error: cannot load shared library dllunix Reason: dllunix.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory I didn't do anything! I swear! I trust you :) It looks like a side effect of some change in some Ocaml runtime. Zack, can you give me any clue? Actually we are in these days in the process of migrating from ocaml 3.08.2 to ocaml 3.08.3, and the first uploaded version of ocaml 3.08.3 is broken wrt dynamic loading of shared objects (like dllunix.so). _If_ polygen depends only on the ocaml runtime then you could solve the problem either getting ocaml 3.08.3-2 (actually in incoming and rebuilding) or by patching /usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/ld.conf so that it contains the following: /usr/local/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/stublibs /usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/stublibs instead of /usr/local/lib/ocaml/3.08/stublibs /usr/lib/ocaml/3.08/stublibs For references have a look at the thread starting here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-ocaml-maint/2005/03/msg00095.html In the meantime, you should reinstall the graphic SCSI mouse to connect a periferic. But pay attention: you either cannot boot an attachment, or never have to cancel the connector to overclock a pointer over a jumper over a pointer. I also suggest reinstalling the USB tea cup heater. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy [EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: libwvstreams4.0-extras: failure in initializing USB modem
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 297694 libwvstreams0.4-extras Bug#297694: SmartLink WinModem no longer works with wvdial 1.54 Warning: Unknown package 'libwvstreams0.4-extras' Bug reassigned from package `wvdial' to `libwvstreams0.4-extras'. merge 297554 297694 Bug#297554: libwvstreams4.0-extras: failure in initializing USB modem Bug#297694: SmartLink WinModem no longer works with wvdial 1.54 Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged: Values for `package' don't match: #297554 has `libwvstreams4.0-extras'; #297694 has `libwvstreams0.4-extras' tags 297554 patch Bug#297554: libwvstreams4.0-extras: failure in initializing USB modem There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 300848
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11 tags 300848 sid Bug#300848: doesn't work anymore: fatal error There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297554: libwvstreams4.0-extras: failure in initializing USB modem
reassign 297694 libwvstreams0.4-extras
merge 297554 297694
tags 297554 patch
thanks
The attached patch fixes this bug by making the TIOCSSERIAL and TIOCGSERIAL
ioctl calls completely optional, since one or both have been shown to fail
on some types of modems under Linux. I'm uploading this patch as a 0-day
NMU to fix this RC bug for sarge.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
diff -u wvstreams-4.0.1/debian/changelog wvstreams-4.0.1/debian/changelog
--- wvstreams-4.0.1/debian/changelog
+++ wvstreams-4.0.1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+wvstreams (4.0.1-1.4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Further setup_modem fixes: don't depend on TIOCSSERIAL or
+TIOCGSERIAL working at all, since they apparently don't with USB
+modems and some WinModems. (Closes: #297694, #297554)
+
+ -- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:40:51 -0800
+
wvstreams (4.0.1-1.3) unstable; urgency=high
* Non-maintainer upload.
diff -u wvstreams-4.0.1/streams/wvmodem.cc wvstreams-4.0.1/streams/wvmodem.cc
--- wvstreams-4.0.1/streams/wvmodem.cc
+++ wvstreams-4.0.1/streams/wvmodem.cc
@@ -192,22 +192,16 @@
#if HAVE_LINUX_SERIAL_H
struct serial_struct old_sinfo, sinfo;
sinfo.reserved_char[0] = 0;
-if (ioctl(getrfd(), TIOCGSERIAL, old_sinfo) 0)
+if (ioctl(getrfd(), TIOCGSERIAL, old_sinfo) = 0)
{
- seterr(Cannot get information for serial port.);
- return;
-}
-sinfo = old_sinfo;
-// Why there are two closing wait timeouts, is beyond me
-// but there are... apparently the second one is deprecated
-// but why take a chance...
-sinfo.closing_wait = ASYNC_CLOSING_WAIT_NONE;
-sinfo.closing_wait2 = ASYNC_CLOSING_WAIT_NONE;
+sinfo = old_sinfo;
+// Why there are two closing wait timeouts, is beyond me
+// but there are... apparently the second one is deprecated
+// but why take a chance...
+sinfo.closing_wait = ASYNC_CLOSING_WAIT_NONE;
+sinfo.closing_wait2 = ASYNC_CLOSING_WAIT_NONE;
-if (ioctl(getrfd(), TIOCSSERIAL, sinfo) 0 getuid() == 0)
-{
- seterr(Cannot set information for serial port.);
- return;
+ioctl(getrfd(), TIOCSSERIAL, sinfo);
}
#endif
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#300852: dpkg: error /var/cache/apt/archives/libxine1_1.0-1_i386.deb (--unpack)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 300852 important Bug#300852: dpkg: error /var/cache/apt/archives/libxine1_1.0-1_i386.deb (--unpack) Severity set to `important'. tags 300852 unreproducible moreinfo Bug#300852: dpkg: error /var/cache/apt/archives/libxine1_1.0-1_i386.deb (--unpack) There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity 273525 serious
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 273525 serious Bug#273525: ldmud requires byacc to build, not bison Severity set to `serious'. retitle 273525 ldmud: FTBFS: remove bison dependency Bug#273525: ldmud requires byacc to build, not bison Changed Bug title. tags 273525 patch Bug#273525: ldmud: FTBFS: remove bison dependency There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of wvstreams 4.0.1-1.4
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 297554 + fixed Bug#297554: libwvstreams4.0-extras: failure in initializing USB modem Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed tag 297694 + fixed Bug#297694: SmartLink WinModem no longer works with wvdial 1.54 There were no tags set. Warning: Unknown package 'libwvstreams0.4-extras' Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300182: tetex-bin still vulnerable to CAN-2004-0888 (CAN-2005-0206)
On 18.03.05 Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hilmar Preusse wrote: Hi, As recently discovered the patch, which fixed CAN-2004-0888, seems to be broken on all 64bit platforms (tested only on ia64 though).[1] Note that CAN-2005-0206 has been assigned for this issue. BTW, since you were able to track this one down, do you have any info about the other packages (cupsys, xpdf, etc) that also has CAN-2004-0888? Do they also need fixes, and do you have a patch for them? Martin Pitt martin at piware.de told me, that tetex-bin is not vulnerable as the file debian/patches/patch-CAN-2004-0888 continas not the original patch form the xpdf developer, but already a fixed version of the patch. So we should not be affected. Sorry for the confusion! Hilmar -- sigmentation fault pgpmDcZZlwGR4.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: time's up
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 261824 important Bug#261824: Fast Data Access MMU Miss on SunFire 280R Bug#267791: Fast Data Access MMU Miss on SunFire 280R Severity set to `important'. severity 267428 important Bug#267428: Silo 1.4.8 fails to boot 2.4.26 kernel on an Ultra 5 Bug#281641: Ultra 2 boot fails early with FP Disabled message Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297806: Dietlibc
Do the dietlibc-people know about the problem. Could not find any bugreport about that. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296717: ftp.debian.org: Please remove raidtools2
I uploaded heartbeat_1.2.3-9 this morning, this removes any dependancy on raidtools2. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#261824: time's up
severity 261824 important severity 267428 important thanks Time's up, folks; if no fix has been found yet for these bootloader bugs, they'll have to remain hardware-specific errata for sarge. They will no longer be allowed to block the release, since silo still works on the majority of sparc hardware. Someone should, however, document these problems for the install manual and/or d-i errata. If someone can determine one way or another whether the gcc-2.95 rebuild actually fixes the problem on Ultra5 for someone other than Geert, that would help me in deciding whether an NMU is warranted. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Fixed in NMU of perl 5.6.1-8.9
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 286905 + fixed Bug#286905: perl-modules: File::Path::rmtree makes setuid Tags were: woody security Bug#286922: perl-modules: File::Path::rmtree removes arbitrary Tags added: fixed tag 286922 + fixed Bug#286922: perl-modules: File::Path::rmtree removes arbitrary Tags were: fixed woody security Bug#286905: perl-modules: File::Path::rmtree makes setuid Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300863: gpg 1.4.0 stopped talking to gpg-agent
Package: gnupg-agent Version: 1.9.15-5 Severity: grave File: /usr/bin/gpg-agent Hi, since the last upgrade, for reasons I don't know, stable gpg (1.4.0) stopped working with gpg-agent. Here are some program outputs: $ gpg-agent gpg-agent: gpg-agent running and available gpg-agent: secmem usage: 0/16384 bytes in 0 blocks $ LANG=C gpg --version gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.0 Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. See the file COPYING for details. Home: ~/.gnupg Supported algorithms: Pubkey: RSA, RSA-E, RSA-S, ELG-E, DSA Cipher: 3DES, CAST5, BLOWFISH, AES, AES192, AES256, TWOFISH Hash: MD5, SHA1, RIPEMD160, SHA256, SHA384, SHA512 Compression: Uncompressed, ZIP, ZLIB, BZIP2 $ echo bla|LANG=C gpg --sign --armour -u 4743206C! You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for user: Joachim Breitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024-bit DSA key, ID 4743206C, created 2002-08-27 gpg: problem with the agent - disabling agent use Enter passphrase: [..] Hope that help, greetings, Joachim -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10.otto Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages gnupg-agent depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcrypt11 1.2.0-11 LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr ii libgpg-error0 1.0-1library for common error values an ii libpth2 2.0.1-2 The GNU Portable Threads ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4compression library - runtime -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300767: r-doc-html: HTML documents in /usr/lib/R/doc/manual are loop symlinks
On 22 March 2005 at 09:03, Pierre THIERRY wrote: | Scribit Dirk Eddelbuettel dies 21/03/2005 hora 20:49: | You better check again. You may have a problem with your /usr/share/doc | hierarchy, or something else is going one. | | I don't see the point. The files are in /usr/lib, and are symlinks on | themselves. Why would it be a /usr/share/doc issue? I am unsure about what could cause it. That was just an educated guess based on an issue we once had years ago when we migrated /usr/doc - /usr/share/doc/. But if your system isn't old, this doesn't apply. | BTW, I purged the package and installed it, and everything's fine. I | don't understand. Is it possible that something was wrong in a | maintainer's script, something dealing with configuration files? (I had How could it be? There is _no maintainer script involved_. Look at 'dpkg -c /path/to/r-doc-html_*.deb' which already contains the symlinks. No local action on your part. | resintalled it two times before, the dangling symlinks were still there) I really don't know but as long as this is irreproducible it doesn't constitute a bug. Dirk -- Better to have an approximate answer to the right question than a precise answer to the wrong question. -- John Tukey as quoted by John Chambers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300182: xpdf vulnerability?
Please please keep the bugnumber in the Cc! Bastian Blank wrote: On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 12:04:21PM -0500, Hubert Chan wrote: (which, if you're using from C++ code, you'll have to #define __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS before you include stdint.h). This name is reserved. It is undefined behaviour if you define it. So what is the recommended way to do this correctly? And why is my analysis wrong that INT_MAX is defined in limits.h? Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
Bug#300182: tetex-bin still vulnerable to CAN-2004-0888 (CAN-2005-0206)
Hi Martin, Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 18.03.05 Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hilmar Preusse wrote: Hi, As recently discovered the patch, which fixed CAN-2004-0888, seems to be broken on all 64bit platforms (tested only on ia64 though).[1] Note that CAN-2005-0206 has been assigned for this issue. BTW, since you were able to track this one down, do you have any info about the other packages (cupsys, xpdf, etc) that also has CAN-2004-0888? Do they also need fixes, and do you have a patch for them? Martin Pitt martin at piware.de told me, that tetex-bin is not vulnerable as the file debian/patches/patch-CAN-2004-0888 continas not the original patch form the xpdf developer, but already a fixed version of the patch. Martin, good to hear that. Did you also read the other messages in this thread, namely Hamish's confusion about CAN-2004-0888 vs. CAN-2004-0889? And, by the way, why didn't you answer to the bug, or the security list(s)? Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
Processed: Re: Bug#300863: gpg 1.4.0 stopped talking to gpg-agent
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 300863 +unreproducible Bug#300863: gpg 1.4.0 stopped talking to gpg-agent There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible severity 300863 important Bug#300863: gpg 1.4.0 stopped talking to gpg-agent Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300863: gpg 1.4.0 stopped talking to gpg-agent
tag 300863 +unreproducible
severity 300863 important
thanks
Hi,
Joachim Breitner:
since the last upgrade, for reasons I don't know, stable gpg (1.4.0)
stopped working with gpg-agent.
Not for me:
@kiste ~ $ echo bla|LANG=C gpg --sign --armour
You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for
user: Matthias Urlichs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024-bit DSA key, ID D70AAFF9, created 1998-11-20
[ window pops up ]
-BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
owGbwMvMwCT4+UUIw3Wu9T8ZT3MlMTg5cG1Nyknk6rBnZgVzYLKCTLMkGOaX8+v9
+Vd7I8L7RY/Ntc3xifcsn3oxzI9OCzfil2cT/D8vzqbaUqWnusujEwA=
=PTFD
-END PGP MESSAGE-
@kiste ~ $ gpg-agent
gpg-agent: gpg-agent running and available
@kiste ~ $
Is that reproducible when you kill and restart the agent?
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#300182: tetex-bin still vulnerable to CAN-2004-0888 (CAN-2005-0206)
Hi! Frank Küster [2005-03-22 12:49 +0100]: Martin, good to hear that. Did you also read the other messages in this thread, namely Hamish's confusion about CAN-2004-0888 vs. CAN-2004-0889? He is certainly not the only one who is confused about these. All patches that I ever saw fix both CANs, and the description of both CANs are nearly identical. I really don't know which particular fix belongs to which CAN. And, by the way, why didn't you answer to the bug, or the security list(s)? Hmm, I replied to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I can see my reply at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=300182 Didn't you get this mail? If not, I shall probably reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in addition, but I thought this would happen automatically. Martin -- Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.ubuntulinux.org Debian Developer http://www.debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#300874: lsh-utils_2.0.1-1_sparc: FTBFS: m4: command not found
Package: lsh-utils Version: 2.0.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid The most recent attempt to build lsh-utils on sparc has failed with the following error: [...] gcc -g -O2 -ggdb3 -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wstrict-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wbad-function-cast -Wnested-externs shadata.o -lgmp -lm -o shadata m4 /build/buildd/lsh-utils-2.0.1/src/nettle/asm.m4 machine.m4 config.m4 \ aes.asm aes.s /bin/sh: m4: command not found make[6]: *** [aes.o] Error 127 make[6]: Leaving directory /build/buildd/lsh-utils-2.0.1/src/nettle' [...] this appears to be a missing build-dependency; m4 is priority: standard only, and not build-essential. Other architectures seem to build the package just fine, because this m4 command is not executed there -- it seems to be some sparc-specific assembly? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: adjust severity
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package phpgroupware-todo Ignoring bugs not assigned to: phpgroupware-todo # isn't believe to break unrelated software as claimed in report severity 292249 important Bug#292249: phpgroupware-todo: Todo Pasor Err Severity set to `important'. tag 292249 +wontfix Bug#292249: phpgroupware-todo: Todo Pasor Err Tags were: moreinfo woody patch Tags added: wontfix thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299223: downgrade?
I recommend that this report be downgraded+tag unreproducible, if someone can report success setting up masquerading via webmin-firewall and iptables 1.2.11-8. Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298173: sylpheed: [security] buffer overflow (= 1.0.2), now 1.0.3 is released
Hi Ricardo, Sun, 6 Mar 2005 13:35:15 +0100, Ricardo Mones Re: Bug#298173: sylpheed: [security] buffer overflow (= 1.0.2), now 1.0.3 is released There was no security bug at the time I made the packages (see their dates), that's the reason there are no references to this bug there. Ah, OK. But if you would note about security fix in changelog when you notice it, we can track it more easier, I think. * Is fixed version in woody available? No, still not, sorry. That will take some time I currently lack, so patches are fully welcome :) I've contacted to upstream author Hiroyuki Yamamoto, he checked it carefully and it found that vulnerability exists after 0.8.0, so there is no security bug in woody's version. Thanks a lot, Hiroyuki! :) -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ samba.gr.jp/iijmio-mail.jp Key fingerprint = 4555 82ED 38B6 C870 E099 388C 22ED 21CB C4C7 264B -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300306: patch
I think that comments in the wine BTS indicate that this patch will be
no longer necessary after the 20050310 release, but it is a bit
ambiguous.
In the meantime,
http://bugs.winehq.com/attachment.cgi?id=765action=view
is the included patch.
Justin
--- wine-20050211/misc/registry.c Mon Feb 14 14:06:36 2005
+++ wine-20050214/misc/registry.c Mon Feb 14 13:36:42 2005
@@ -1227,7 +1227,7 @@
ret = _xmalloc(50);
for (count = 0;;) {
sprintf(ret,/tmp/reg%lx%04x.tmp,(long)getpid(),count++);
-if ((tmp_fd = open(ret,O_CREAT | O_EXCL | O_WRONLY,0666)) != -1) break;
+if ((tmp_fd = open(ret,O_CREAT | O_EXCL | O_WRONLY,0600)) != -1) break;
if (errno != EEXIST) {
ERR(Unexpected error while open() call: %s\n,strerror(errno));
free(ret);
Bug#300885: cursel: FTBFS: cursel Build-Depends on objc-poc which has been removed from the archive
Package: cursel Severity: serious The Build-Depends on 'objc-poc' can no longer be installed because the 'objc-poc' package has been remove from the archive. Regards Andreas Jochens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300874: lsh-utils_2.0.1-1_sparc: FTBFS: m4: command not found
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The most recent attempt to build lsh-utils on sparc has failed with the following error: m4 /build/buildd/lsh-utils-2.0.1/src/nettle/asm.m4 machine.m4 config.m4 \ aes.asm aes.s /bin/sh: m4: command not found make[6]: *** [aes.o] Error 127 [...] Other architectures seem to build the package just fine, because this m4 command is not executed there -- it seems to be some sparc-specific assembly? Nettle contains assembler for sparc and for x86 (or really ia32, there's no assembler for any of the 64-bit variants of x86). So m4 ought to be executed also on the common x86 architecture. Regards, /Niels
Bug#298173: marked as done (sylpheed: [security] buffer overflow (= 1.0.2), now 1.0.3 is released)
Your message dated Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:35:47 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298173: sylpheed: [security] buffer overflow (= 1.0.2), now 1.0.3 is released has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2005 11:18:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 05 03:18:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from c201166.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp (grapefruit) [210.155.201.166] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D7XIl-0007xD-00; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 03:18:31 -0800 Received: by grapefruit (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5733A445A; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 20:24:05 +0900 (JST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Hideki Yamane [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: sylpheed: [security] buffer overflow (= 1.0.2), now 1.0.3 is released Tag: security, woody, sarge, sid X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 20:24:04 +0900 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: sylpheed Severity: critical -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear sylpeed maintainer, A buffer overflow bug was found and fixed at 1.0.3. This problem exists in almost all of the older version, so it affects woody, sarge and sid. Please update sylpheed package. See http://sylpheed.good-day.net/index.cgi.en and check its detail. - -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ samba.gr.jp/iijmio-mail.jp -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCKZbUIu0hy8THJksRAlqQAJ40zoYIwFu454/mVdiw25RKTHDG5wCcDXK5 VGs/7WPl3JXpB1Quzx8e4YI= =yHMo -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- Received: (at 298173-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2005 14:35:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 22 06:35:58 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.56] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DDkUA-00064n-00; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 06:35:58 -0800 Received: from localhost (cpe-24-59-54-124.twcny.res.rr.com [24.59.54.124]) by ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j2MEZnJj004911; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:35:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from pryzbyj by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DDkU0-0001J1-00; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:35:48 -0500 Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:35:47 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Ricardo Mones [EMAIL PROTECTED], Hiroyuki Yamamoto [EMAIL PROTECTED], Hideki Yamane [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#298173: sylpheed: [security] buffer overflow (= 1.0.2), now 1.0.3 is released Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i From: Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 11:13:32PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: Hi Ricardo, Sun, 6 Mar 2005 13:35:15 +0100, Ricardo Mones Re: Bug#298173: sylpheed: [security] buffer overflow (= 1.0.2), now 1.0.3 is released There was no security bug at the time I made the packages (see their dates), that's the reason there are no references to this bug there. Ah, OK. But if you would note about security fix in changelog when you notice it, we can track it more easier, I think. * Is fixed version in woody available? No, still not, sorry. That will take some time I currently lack, so patches are fully welcome :) I've contacted to upstream author Hiroyuki Yamamoto, he checked it carefully and it found that vulnerability exists after 0.8.0, so there is no security bug in
Bug#299634: marked as done (lapack-doc: Upgrade failed due to conflict.)
Your message dated 22 Mar 2005 10:21:03 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#299634: lapack-doc: Upgrade failed due to conflict. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Mar 2005 15:08:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 15 07:08:33 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from rock.esc.cam.ac.uk [131.111.41.250] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DBDer-0001S5-00; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 07:08:33 -0800 Received: from parabrisas.esc.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.44.165] ident=Debian-exim) by rock.esc.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DBDeF-0003g3-On for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:08:30 + Received: from tow by parabrisas.esc.cam.ac.uk with local (Exim 4.44) id 1DBDeF-dy-2P for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:07:55 + Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: lapack-doc: Upgrade failed due to conflict. X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:07:55 + Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: lapack-doc Version: 3.0.2531a-25 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Preparing to replace lapack-doc 3.0.2531a-25 (using .../lapack-doc_3.0.2 531a-27_all.deb) ... Document `lapack-doc.qref' is not installed, cannot remove. Document `lapack-doc.release' is not installed, cannot remove. Document `lapack-doc.faq' is not installed, cannot remove. Document `lapack-doc.lug' is not installed, cannot remove. Unpacking replacement lapack-doc ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/lapack-doc_3.0.2531a-27_all.d eb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man3/cgbequ.3.gz', which is also in package lapack3-doc -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (101, 'testing'), (99, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_GB) -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 299634-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2005 15:21:56 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 22 07:21:55 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from h-66-134-96-17.phlapafg.covad.net (intech19.enhanced.com) [66.134.96.17] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DDlCd-0001iQ-00; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 07:21:55 -0800 Received: from camm by intech19.enhanced.com with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1DDlBn-0003ue-00; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:21:03 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#299634: lapack-doc: Upgrade failed due to conflict. References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 22 Mar 2005 10:21:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lines: 50 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Greetings, and thanks for your report! This issue has been fixed to my knowledge in current testing/unstable, which is at -27. Please reopen if I am in error. Take care, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Package: lapack-doc Version: 3.0.2531a-25 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Preparing to replace lapack-doc 3.0.2531a-25 (using .../lapack-doc_3.0.2 531a-27_all.deb) ... Document `lapack-doc.qref' is not installed, cannot remove. Document `lapack-doc.release' is not installed, cannot remove. Document `lapack-doc.faq' is not installed, cannot remove. Document `lapack-doc.lug' is not installed, cannot remove. Unpacking replacement lapack-doc ... dpkg: error processing
Bug#294404: Status?
This RC bug was assigned to mdadm over a month ago and there has been no comment from the maintainer. What is the status of this bug? -- Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#291757: Evolution is not unusable
This bug certainly does not render the package unusable! -- Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299486: paste causes crash
I've also noticed that my browser crashes about half of the time when I try to paste text into the location bar, either using Ctl-V or middle-click paste. Oddly, I have two profiles which I use on the same computer, at the same time and this only happens in one of them. I deleted and recreated the profile in which it happened and it still happens. I haven't been able to figure out the difference between the two profiles yet. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299572: [debian-ntp] Bug#299572: ntp-server: strace log
Matthias Urlichs wrote: Hi, Harald Staub: I tried on one of the servers that has problems, and there, I still have segfaults, while the mentioned cvs version works fine. I attach an strace. Gah. Can you send me - the output of ifconfig - the contents of your ntp.conf Thanks. As mentioned earlier, the last dist-upgrade of this server was several months back. Today, I had the opportunity to dist-upgrade to current sarge (ntp from sid: 4.2.0a+stable-8). And ntp looks fine now :-) I am sorry I could not do this earlier :-/ Cheers Harry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299947: Reproducible?
Can you reproduce this problem when installing ifplugd 0.26-1, or is this a reproducible problem introduced in 0.26-2, ... or is the problem not reproducible at all? -- Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300829: lshw: ftbfs [sparc] missing wget, tries to fetch over internet durring build
Hello On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 08:46:57PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote: Package: lshw Version: 02.03-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source lshw fails to build from source on sparc and other architectures, duplicated on sparc pbuilder. It is missing a build dependancy on wget, and is trying to fetch http://pciids.sourceforge.net/pci.ids durring the build process. This makes the package unbuildable when the remote system is inaccessable. I think the best way is to change so that it do not fetch that file. I have discussed this kind of issues before and that alone is a RC bug, unfortunatly. It should not be hard to fix though. Regards, // Ola c++ -g -Wall -Os -I./core/ -DPREFIX=\/usr\ -DSBINDIR=\/usr/sbin\ -DMANDIR=\/usr/share/man\ -DDATADIR=\/usr/share\ -c lshw.cc -o lshw.o c++ -L./core/ -o lshw lshw.o -llshw wget http://pciids.sourceforge.net/pci.ids make[2]: wget: Command not found make[2]: *** [pci.ids] Error 127 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/lshw-02.03/src' -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297806: Dietlibc
Hello On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 11:53:52AM +0100, Helmut Toplitzer wrote: Do the dietlibc-people know about the problem. Could not find any bugreport about that. I do not know. I have not checked yet. I'll file a bugreport about it. Regards, // Ola -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297203: marked as done (kernel-source-2.6.8: race which could allow for privilege escalation on Radeon)
Your message dated Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:18:11 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#297203: fixed in kernel-source-2.6.8 2.6.8-15 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Feb 2005 21:59:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 27 13:59:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D5WRN-0002SA-00; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:59:06 -0800 Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr20.m-online.net [192.168.3.148]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76B605752 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:59:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from k.local (ppp-82-135-12-75.mnet-online.de [82.135.12.75]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E2D57C12 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:59:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from stf by k.local with local (Exim 4.44) id 1D5WRL-0003jI-Sw for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:59:03 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Stefan Fritsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kernel-source-2.6.8: race which could allow for privilege escalation on Radeon X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:59:03 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: kernel-source-2.6.8 Version: 2.6.8-13 Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: root security hole There is a race condition in the radeon driver which has been fixed in 2.6.11-rc4. This is part of BID-12555: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/12555 The same code is already in 2.6.8 The corresponding changeset is at: http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/cset%4042088d17CO1mOAfgW4R46WRTm9gkwA?nav=index.html|[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) --- Received: (at 297203-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2005 16:25:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 22 08:25:09 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DDmBp-0002KV-00; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 08:25:09 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DDm55-LI-00; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:18:11 -0500 From: Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#297203: fixed in kernel-source-2.6.8 2.6.8-15 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:18:11 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: kernel-source-2.6.8 Source-Version: 2.6.8-15 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of kernel-source-2.6.8, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: kernel-doc-2.6.8_2.6.8-15_all.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.6.8/kernel-doc-2.6.8_2.6.8-15_all.deb kernel-patch-debian-2.6.8_2.6.8-15_all.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.6.8/kernel-patch-debian-2.6.8_2.6.8-15_all.deb kernel-source-2.6.8_2.6.8-15.diff.gz to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.6.8/kernel-source-2.6.8_2.6.8-15.diff.gz kernel-source-2.6.8_2.6.8-15.dsc to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.6.8/kernel-source-2.6.8_2.6.8-15.dsc kernel-source-2.6.8_2.6.8-15_all.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.6.8/kernel-source-2.6.8_2.6.8-15_all.deb kernel-tree-2.6.8_2.6.8-15_all.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.6.8/kernel-tree-2.6.8_2.6.8-15_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will
Bug#268438: marked as done (csh: FTBFS on powerpc: -Werror vs. unsigned char)
Your message dated Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:02:10 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#268438: fixed in csh 20050313-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Aug 2004 16:13:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 27 09:13:09 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk [193.201.200.170] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0jLh-0007hh-00; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 09:13:09 -0700 Received: from [192.168.124.112] (helo=riva.lab.dotat.at) by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with esmtp for [EMAIL PROTECTED] id 1C0jLf-0005ZO-00; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 17:13:07 +0100 Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) for [EMAIL PROTECTED] id 1C0jLf-0001zU-00; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 17:13:07 +0100 Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 17:13:07 +0100 From: Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: csh: FTBFS on powerpc: -Werror vs. unsigned char Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: csh Version: 20020413-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build on current unstable on arm/powerpc/s390 On arm, powerpc, and s390, char is unsigned by default. csh's current isvisible() macro causes the compiler to emit a warning by comparing an unsigned char = UCHAR_MAX. Automatic build of csh_20020413-1 on cairhien by sbuild/powerpc 1.169 Build started at 20040827-1700 [...] cc -O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE -I/home/buildd/csh-20020413/src/bin/csh/../../include -I/home/buildd/csh-20020413/src/bin/csh -I. -DBUILTIN -DFILEC -DNLS -DSHORT_STRINGS -Werror -c /home/buildd/csh-20020413/src/bin/csh/../../lib/libc/gen/vis.c /home/buildd/csh-20020413/src/lib/libc/gen/vis.c: In function `strnvis': /home/buildd/csh-20020413/src/lib/libc/gen/vis.c:180: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type *** Error code 1 Stop. pmake: stopped in /home/buildd/csh-20020413/src/bin/csh make: *** [stamp-build] Error 1 Thanks, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 268438-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2005 17:12:44 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 22 09:12:44 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DDmvs-0001nI-00; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:12:44 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DDmle-0001zT-00; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:02:10 -0500 From: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#268438: fixed in csh 20050313-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:02:10 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: csh Source-Version: 20050313-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of csh, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: csh_20050313-1.diff.gz to pool/main/c/csh/csh_20050313-1.diff.gz csh_20050313-1.dsc to pool/main/c/csh/csh_20050313-1.dsc csh_20050313-1_i386.deb to pool/main/c/csh/csh_20050313-1_i386.deb csh_20050313.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/c/csh/csh_20050313.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated csh package) (This message was generated automatically at their
Bug#282062: mozilla.bin
Why does mozilla.bin every time I try to use Netscape 7.2? I have a 1994 Model of iMac (the half dome). I cannot run Netscape 7.2 without the above named file. Cheryl M Nordgulen [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#282062: mozilla.bin
I think I need a new copy of Mozilla.bin as the one I have on my half dome 1994 iMac G4 with 758K of RAM, crashes whenever I try to use Netscape 7.2 as my browser. Cheryl Nordgulen [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297806: util-vserver: first FTBFS patch (powerpc)
I noticed that it is not just on sparc that util-vserver fails to build from source, but also on various other architectures. The following to pages list the logs: http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?arch=pkg=util-vserver http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=pkg=util-vserver The latter one lists mipsel, s390, sparc, hppa, powerpc, and m68k as the architectures that have failed for version 0.30.204-1. Andreas Barth gave me an account on his powerpc machine, set up a sid chroot, and installed the build dependencies on it, and I quickly found three problems that prevent the powerpc build: * in src/vshelper-sync.c, there is a test for __linux, but this is not defined with gcc --std=c99 (which configure wants to use); using __linux__ instead works * in dietlibc's sys/types.h, there is a similar test for powerpc, instead of __powerpc__, that fails with gcc --std=c99; this can be worked around by adding -Dpowerpc to CFLAGS; I have reported this as bug #300917 * util-vserver's build wants to use libtool and libtool wants to use /usr/lib/diet/lib-powerpc, but dietlibc has /usr/lib/diet/lib-ppc instead. I worked around this by asking Andreas to add a symlink. I've reported this as a bug against dietlibc-dev as well, but haven't yet received the bug number. Attached is a patch for the first two problems. The latter problem requires an update to dietlibc, I expect. At least some of the other architectures probably have similar problems to these. I'll see if I can find access to suitable machines for testing things, and if so, will send further patches. I hope this has been helpful. Happy hacking. diff -ru util-vserver-0.30.204.orig/debian/rules util-vserver-0.30.204/debian/rules --- util-vserver-0.30.204.orig/debian/rules 2005-03-22 18:37:47.329587000 +0100 +++ util-vserver-0.30.204/debian/rules 2005-03-22 18:39:14.282724214 +0100 @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ # so far. #MAKE_OPTS = pkglibdir=/var/lib/util-vserver PKGLIBDIR=/var/lib/util-vserver -CFLAGS = -Wall -g +CFLAGS = -Wall -g -Dpowerpc ifneq (,$(findstring noopt,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) CFLAGS += -O0 diff -ru util-vserver-0.30.204.orig/src/vshelper-sync.c util-vserver-0.30.204/src/vshelper-sync.c --- util-vserver-0.30.204.orig/src/vshelper-sync.c 2004-04-21 11:44:05.0 +0200 +++ util-vserver-0.30.204/src/vshelper-sync.c 2005-03-22 18:39:27.484200368 +0100 @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ FD_ZERO(fds); FD_SET(fd, fds); -#ifndef __linux +#ifndef __linux__ # error vshelper relies on the Linux select() behavior (timeout holds remaining time) #endif
Bug#300928: socketapi: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'file'
Package: socketapi Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'socketapi' in a clean chroot, I get the following error: ../socketapi/.libs/libsctpsocket.so: undefined reference to `vtable for __cxxabiv1::__class_type_info' ../socketapi/.libs/libsctpsocket.so: undefined reference to `operator delete[](void*)' ../socketapi/.libs/libsctpsocket.so: undefined reference to `std::_Rb_tree_insert_and_rebalance(bool, std::_Rb_tree_node_base*, std::_Rb_tree_node_base*, std::_Rb_tree_node_base)' ../socketapi/.libs/libsctpsocket.so: undefined reference to `std::_Rb_tree_rebalance_for_erase(std::_Rb_tree_node_base*, std::_Rb_tree_node_base)' ../socketapi/.libs/libsctpsocket.so: undefined reference to `__cxa_guard_release' ../socketapi/.libs/libsctpsocket.so: undefined reference to `vtable for __cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type_info' ../socketapi/.libs/libsctpsocket.so: undefined reference to `std::ios_base::Init::~Init()' ../socketapi/.libs/libsctpsocket.so: undefined reference to `operator new[](unsigned long)' ../socketapi/.libs/libsctpsocket.so: undefined reference to `std::basic_ostreamchar, std::char_traitschar std::endlchar, std::char_traitschar (std::basic_ostreamchar, std::char_traitschar )' ../socketapi/.libs/libsctpsocket.so: undefined reference to `std::_Rb_tree_increment(std::_Rb_tree_node_base*)' ../socketapi/.libs/libsctpsocket.so: undefined reference to `__gnu_cxx::__pooltrue::_M_reserve_block(unsigned long, unsigned long)' ../socketapi/.libs/libsctpsocket.so: undefined reference to `__gnu_cxx::__pooltrue::_M_get_thread_id()' ../socketapi/.libs/libsctpsocket.so: undefined reference to `__gnu_cxx::__pooltrue::_M_destroy_thread_key(void*)' ../socketapi/.libs/libsctpsocket.so: undefined reference to `__cxa_guard_acquire' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [combined_server_1to1] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/socketapi-1.3.1/socket_programs' make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/socketapi-1.3.1' make: *** [build] Error 2 Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'file' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/socketapi-1.3.1/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/socketapi-1.3.1/debian/control 2005-03-22 18:06:55.988893564 +0100 +++ ./debian/control2005-03-22 18:06:53.041462364 +0100 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Standards-Version: 3.6.1 -Build-Depends: libglib1.2-dev, sctplib-stable-dev | sctplib-dev, chrpath +Build-Depends: file, libglib1.2-dev, sctplib-stable-dev | sctplib-dev, chrpath Package: socketapi1 Section: libs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300834: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#300834: python2.3-libxml2: not purgeing cleanly breaks other programs
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 07:14:08AM +0100, Ingo Saitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: python2.3-libxml2 Version: 2.6.16-3 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I installed python2.3-libxml2 as a dependency package and removed it again sometime later. I also use straw as a rss reader an suddenly it failed to fetch new data after a restart (see below). But straw was still working in a clean sid chroot, so I dug... It seems, python2.3-libxml2 does not bytecompile its files in /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages on its own, but somehow I got bytecompiled files (*.pyc and *.pyo for every *.py file), probably due to a python update which recompiled everything. These files were left over on the package purge causing straw to hiccup. Please read the Debian Python Policy, especially 2.5 Modules Bytecompilation how to correctly bytecompile and clean up: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ch-module_packages.html#s-bytecompilation Erf. You know what ? I was considering using dh_python some day, I'm being pushed here ;) Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: python-simpy: FTBFS: make: python: Command not found
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 300741 serious Bug#300741: python-simpy: FTBFS: make: python: Command not found Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: python-simpy: FTBFS: make: python: Command not found
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 300741 + sid Bug#300741: python-simpy: FTBFS: make: python: Command not found Tags were: patch Tags added: sid thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300940: stk: FTBFS: Missing build dependency.
Package: stk Version: 4.2.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: sid Hi, Your package is failing to build because you try to copy the new config.guess/config.sub files. You need to add a build dependency on autotools-dev in that case. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300944: python-librdf breaks with latest libcurl3 in sarge and sid
Package: python2.3-librdf Version: 1.0.0.2-1 Tags: sarge, sid Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ python Python 2.3.4 (#2, Dec 3 2004, 13:53:17) [GCC 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-2)] on linux2 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information. import RDF Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in ? File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/RDF.py, line 130, in ? import Redland ImportError: /usr/lib/libcurl.so.3: undefined symbol: tld_strerror [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg --list python2.3-librdf libcurl3 Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name VersionDescription +++-==-==- ii python2.3-libr 1.0.0.2-1 Python 2.3 language bindings for the Redland ii libcurl3 7.13.1-1 Multi-protocol file transfer library, now wi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo dpkg -i ~darrint/libcurl3_7.13.0-2_i386.deb dpkg - warning: downgrading libcurl3 from 7.13.1-1 to 7.13.0-2. (Reading database ... 70836 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace libcurl3 7.13.1-1 (using .../libcurl3_7.13.0-2_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libcurl3 ... Setting up libcurl3 (7.13.0-2) ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ python Python 2.3.4 (#2, Dec 3 2004, 13:53:17) [GCC 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-2)] on linux2 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information. import RDF [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300943: libc6: Java VM locking on highly multithreaded Java apps
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-20 Severity: grave Tags: patch Justification: renders package unusable Hello, I have investigated the Java VM locking problem more closely: (http://lists.debian.org/debian-glibc/2005/02/msg00080.html) Kevin A. Burton We're running a java application server thats highly multithreaded and we're noticing that the VM is locking hard after about 30 minutes when I increase the thread count. This is still a lot of threads (600 or so) but there's no reason the entire process should lock. It also won't respond to a kill -9... I've added the suggested two patches and identified one more from the RHEL3 glibc SRPM With these three patches I get no more Java VM lockups. Please consider applying these patches - a locking Java VM is not much fun when you need to run big J2EE applications. You can find more detailed instructions on: http://ubuntu.uni-klu.ac.at/UbuntuGlibcHoary Thanks, Gerald Hochegger -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (1001, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-uk-srv-p4 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages libc6 depends on: ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#289182: kino endianness issues on powerpc
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 03:39:16PM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 05:41:26PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
I can confirm the XV problem is the same old problem that a patch had
been posted for in http://jira.schirmacher.de/jira-kino/browse/KINO-76.
I've added some #ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN__ around that, the following patch
should finally fix the display issue:
Err, this patch did fix the display problems for you!? It does
not touch a single line of code that was executed in the Debian
build that uses libdv to do the decoding. (Actually, this is no
longer true as of today. Now with ffmpeg in main, I've
uploaded a new version that uses libavcodec instead of libdv
for the decoding part.)
mmh, after testing the patch, it does look much better with :)
Furthermore, it looks obviously buggy. Eg. the little-endian
version of the first loop uses values Y[0] and Y[1], while the
big-endian variant reuses Y[0] twice. And I can't make sense of
the other array indices, either. I was expecting something like
dest_big_endian = bswap_32(dest_little_endian); maybe that's
what was intended, and the current version of the patch makes
little difference with smooth input data?
well, i am not familiar with these maths, but it does look like
there's some logic:
LE - BE
Cr[0] 24 - Cr[0]
Y [1] 16 - Y [0] 8
Cb[0] 8 - Cb[1] 16
Y [0]- Y [0] 24
and for the third line (dest + 4)
Y [2]- Y [0] 24
Cb[0] 8 - Cb[3] 16
Y [3] 16 - Y [0] 8
Cr[0] 24 - Cr[2]
there is probably a better mean to do so though, ie checking what
type of conversion is needed according to libavcodec, but it does
effectively fixes the XV Display of kino.
--- src/frame.cc.org2005-02-14 16:59:13.798585200 +0100
+++ src/frame.cc2005-02-14 17:14:01.196680184 +0100
attached is and updated patch to go in debian/patches
I've uploaded kino 0.75-5 that should make the archive by today's
dinstall run. It includes a comprehensive patch that might fix the
endianness problems with audio. Alas, I had to do some guessing on the
endianness of the input data, so it might actually do worse than before,
but in any case the framework is now in place to fix this with a few
keypresses.
audio seems to work better now. there are a few glitches but at
least it's not white noise. oh and export to mpeg2 and wav bot
work.
The second change in 0.75-5 related to this bug was the
mentioned switch from libdv to libavcodec for video decoding. There's a
small chance that it fixes the display problem out of the box already.
I can confirm that the switch did not fix anything.
IMO with this last patch the bug should be closed, as the main
functionalities of kino (ie display and export) have been fixed.
there are other bugs around, but they are probably not endian
related nor RC.
Cheers, piem
#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
## 40_yuv_endian_fix.dpatch by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
##
## All lines beginning with `## DP:' are a description of the patch.
## DP: No description.
@DPATCH@
diff -urNad kino-0.75/src/frame.cc /tmp/dpep.RS5WqC/kino-0.75/src/frame.cc
--- kino-0.75/src/frame.cc 2005-03-22 20:29:47.0 +
+++ /tmp/dpep.RS5WqC/kino-0.75/src/frame.cc 2005-03-22 20:30:25.0
+
@@ -1052,7 +1052,11 @@
for ( int x = 0; x width; x += 2 )
{
+#if defined __BIG_ENDIAN__ || defined _BIG_ENDIAN
+*reinterpret_castuint32_t*( dest ) = Cr[ 0 ]
+ ( Y[ 0 ] 8 ) + ( Cb[ 1 ] 16 ) + ( Y[ 0 ] 24 );
+#else
*reinterpret_castuint32_t*( dest ) = Y[ 0 ] +
( Cb[ 0 ] 8 ) + ( Y[ 1 ] 16 ) + ( Cr[ 0 ] 24 );
+#endif
dest += 4;
Y += 2;
@@ -1071,8 +1075,13 @@
for ( int x = 0; x width; x += 4 )
{
+#if defined __BIG_ENDIAN__ || defined _BIG_ENDIAN
+*reinterpret_castuint32_t*( dest ) = Cr[ 0 ]
+ ( Y[ 0 ] 8 ) + ( Cb[ 1 ] 16 ) + ( Y[ 0 ] 24 );
+*reinterpret_castuint32_t*( dest + 4 ) = Cr[
2 ] + ( Y[ 0 ] 8 ) + ( Cb[ 3 ] 16 ) + ( Y[ 0 ] 24 );
+#else
*reinterpret_castuint32_t*( dest ) = Y[ 0 ] +
( Cb[ 0 ] 8 ) + ( Y[ 1 ] 16 ) + ( Cr[ 0 ] 24 );
*reinterpret_castuint32_t*( dest + 4 ) = Y[ 2
] + ( Cb[ 0 ] 8 ) + ( Y[ 3 ] 16 ) + ( Cr[ 0 ] 24 );
+#endif
dest += 8;
Y += 4;
Processed: tagging 289182
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11 tags 289182 pending Bug#289182: kino endianness issues on powerpc There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#272191: marked as done (bacula-director-pgsql postinst fails if half-installed)
Your message dated Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:47:51 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#272191: fixed in bacula 1.36.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2004 06:39:57 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 17 23:39:57 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ps10.kent.dot.net.au [202.147.78.201] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C8Yt2-0001vG-00; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 23:39:57 -0700 Received: from ip-80-116.dot.net.au ([202.147.80.116] helo=democritus.tekno.house) by ps10.kent.dot.net.au with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #4) id 1C8YsX-0001rv-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 16:39:25 +1000 Received: from yosamite (yosamite.tekno.house [10.1.75.21]) by democritus.tekno.house (Postfix) with SMTP id 8928D19386 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 16:39:22 +1000 (EST) Received: by yosamite (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 18 Sep 2004 16:39:42 +1000 Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 16:39:42 +1000 From: Sam Couter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: bacula-director-pgsql postinst fails if half-installed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=HKEL+t8MFpg/ASTE Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.6 on a i686 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --HKEL+t8MFpg/ASTE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: bacula-director-pgsql Version: 1.34.6-1 If the postinst gets as far as creating the database and then fails, when it is run again it will always fail trying to create a database which already exists. --=20 Sam Eddie Couter | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian Developer| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP fingerprint: A46B 9BB5 3148 7BEA 1F05 5BD5 8530 03AE DE89 C75C --HKEL+t8MFpg/ASTE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBS9guhTADrt6Jx1wRAmqfAJ9jjXNJkqmiSTqjYdsP1y1lyzIM6ACgwny1 CcPk0MgNDjqSbPWWrWUpfuI= =+NVa -END PGP SIGNATURE- --HKEL+t8MFpg/ASTE-- --- Received: (at 272191-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2005 20:54:01 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 22 12:54:01 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DDqO0-0005Lc-00; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:54:00 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DDqI3-0003FY-00; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:47:51 -0500 From: Jose Luis Tallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#272191: fixed in bacula 1.36.2-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:47:51 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: bacula Source-Version: 1.36.2-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of bacula, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: bacula-client_1.36.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/b/bacula/bacula-client_1.36.2-1_all.deb bacula-common_1.36.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/b/bacula/bacula-common_1.36.2-1_all.deb bacula-console-gnome_1.36.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/b/bacula/bacula-console-gnome_1.36.2-1_i386.deb bacula-console_1.36.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/b/bacula/bacula-console_1.36.2-1_i386.deb bacula-director-common_1.36.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/b/bacula/bacula-director-common_1.36.2-1_i386.deb bacula-director-mysql_1.36.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/b/bacula/bacula-director-mysql_1.36.2-1_i386.deb
Bug#285135: Remove from sarge
These are all fixed in 0.3.3-1, which is blocked from even making it into sid because liboil0.3 is in NEW. So should swf-player be removed from sarge? -- Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#289838: marked as done (postinst script unusable due to serious errors)
Your message dated Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:47:51 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#289838: fixed in bacula 1.36.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jan 2005 10:17:00 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 11 02:17:00 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from robur.caltha.pl [80.72.33.166] (daemon) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CoJ5A-0004Zp-00; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 02:17:00 -0800 Received: from [192.168.1.4] (cnv163.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [:::83.31.175.163]) (AUTH: PLAIN [EMAIL PROTECTED], SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by robur.caltha.pl with esmtp; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 11:11:08 +0100 id 00048061.41E3A63C.4538 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 11:16:54 +0100 From: Rafal Krzewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Caltha - Gajda, Krzewski, Mach, Potempski Sp.j. User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: postinst script unusable due to serious errors Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: bacula-director-pgsql Version: 1.36.1-1 Severity: critical 1) the script attempts to use $DB_ADMIN and $dbadmin variables that are never set. Would expect them to be set from conf variable bacula-director-pgsql/pgsql_root_username but the script does not do that. 2) the script uses incorrect su command syntax. It sets the following variable: PGSQLCMD=su -s /bin/sh $dbadmin -c /usr/bin/psql And then attempts to execute the command appeding different suffixes to the variable value. Su expects the username as the last argument. IE su -c psql postgres -l does not work, but su -c psql -l postgres works. Because of that all su invocations PGSQLCMD invocations in the script need to be changed. There may be more problems, but the above are definite showstoppers. --- Received: (at 289838-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2005 20:53:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 22 12:53:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DDqN8-0004iX-00; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:53:06 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DDqI3-0003Fr-00; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:47:51 -0500 From: Jose Luis Tallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#289838: fixed in bacula 1.36.2-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:47:51 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6 Source: bacula Source-Version: 1.36.2-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of bacula, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: bacula-client_1.36.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/b/bacula/bacula-client_1.36.2-1_all.deb bacula-common_1.36.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/b/bacula/bacula-common_1.36.2-1_all.deb bacula-console-gnome_1.36.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/b/bacula/bacula-console-gnome_1.36.2-1_i386.deb bacula-console_1.36.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/b/bacula/bacula-console_1.36.2-1_i386.deb bacula-director-common_1.36.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/b/bacula/bacula-director-common_1.36.2-1_i386.deb bacula-director-mysql_1.36.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/b/bacula/bacula-director-mysql_1.36.2-1_i386.deb bacula-director-pgsql_1.36.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/b/bacula/bacula-director-pgsql_1.36.2-1_i386.deb bacula-director-sqlite_1.36.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/b/bacula/bacula-director-sqlite_1.36.2-1_i386.deb bacula-doc_1.36.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/b/bacula/bacula-doc_1.36.2-1_all.deb bacula-fd_1.36.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/b/bacula/bacula-fd_1.36.2-1_i386.deb
Bug#300944: python-librdf breaks with latest libcurl3 in sarge and sid
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 15:25 -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote: Package: python2.3-librdf Version: 1.0.0.2-1 Tags: sarge, sid Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ python Python 2.3.4 (#2, Dec 3 2004, 13:53:17) [GCC 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-2)] on linux2 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information. import RDF Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in ? File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/RDF.py, line 130, in ? import Redland ImportError: /usr/lib/libcurl.so.3: undefined symbol: tld_strerror [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg --list python2.3-librdf libcurl3 Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name VersionDescription +++-==-==- ii python2.3-libr 1.0.0.2-1 Python 2.3 language bindings for the Redland ii libcurl3 7.13.1-1 Multi-protocol file transfer library, now wi Can you please try it with the actual latest one in sarge - 7.13.1-2 The changelog for that says: * Rebuilt to get the correct libidn11 dependency (closes: #299348). which could be the missing symbol as the bug message mentions tld_strerror. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo dpkg -i ~darrint/libcurl3_7.13.0-2_i386.deb dpkg - warning: downgrading libcurl3 from 7.13.1-1 to 7.13.0-2. (Reading database ... 70836 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace libcurl3 7.13.1-1 (using .../libcurl3_7.13.0-2_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libcurl3 ... Setting up libcurl3 (7.13.0-2) ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ python Python 2.3.4 (#2, Dec 3 2004, 13:53:17) [GCC 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-2)] on linux2 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information. import RDF [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ Cheers Dave -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#299634: marked as done (lapack-doc: Upgrade failed due to conflict.)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 299634 Bug#299634: lapack-doc: Upgrade failed due to conflict. Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300951: hevea: Removed with latest version of ocaml
Package: hevea Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Should depend on ocaml-base-nox now. Please fixxor. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages hevea depends on: ii gs8.01-5 Transitional package ii gs-esp [gs] 7.07.1-9 The Ghostscript PostScript interpr ii gs-gpl [gs] 8.01-5 The GPL Ghostscript PostScript int ii netpbm2:10.0-8 Graphics conversion tools pn ocaml-base-nox-3.08 Not found. ii tetex-bin 2.0.2-26 The teTeX binary files -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299634: marked as done (lapack-doc: Upgrade failed due to conflict.)
reopen 299634 thanks On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 07:52:18AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Greetings, and thanks for your report! This issue has been fixed to my knowledge in current testing/unstable, which is at -27. Please reopen if I am in error. You are in error. The transcript from the initial message showed that this error happened while trying to *install* -27. This file needs to be removed from one of lapack3-doc and lapack-doc, or the two packages need to conflict with one another, or you need to use alternatives for the manpage in question. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer Preparing to replace lapack-doc 3.0.2531a-25 (using .../lapack-doc_3.0.2 531a-27_all.deb) ... Document `lapack-doc.qref' is not installed, cannot remove. Document `lapack-doc.release' is not installed, cannot remove. Document `lapack-doc.faq' is not installed, cannot remove. Document `lapack-doc.lug' is not installed, cannot remove. Unpacking replacement lapack-doc ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/lapack-doc_3.0.2531a-27_all.d eb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man3/cgbequ.3.gz', which is also in package lapack3-doc signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: tagging 300940
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 300940 sid Bug#300940: stk: FTBFS: Missing build dependency. Tags were: sid Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 300943 is important
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 severity 300943 important Bug#300943: libc6: Java VM locking on highly multithreaded Java apps Severity set to `important'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#285135: Remove from sarge
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 10:03:29PM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote: These are all fixed in 0.3.3-1, which is blocked from even making it into sid because liboil0.3 is in NEW. So should swf-player be removed from sarge? No, why? It's fixed in sid. (Did I put the wrong tag on it?) dave... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity 300788 serious
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 300788 serious Bug#300788: lshw: FTBFS(amd64/gcc-4.0): Missing Build-Depends on 'wget' Severity set to `serious'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 300951
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 300951 sid Bug#300951: hevea: Removed with latest version of ocaml There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#285135: Remove from sarge
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 13:41 -0800, David Schleef wrote: On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 10:03:29PM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote: These are all fixed in 0.3.3-1, which is blocked from even making it into sid because liboil0.3 is in NEW. So should swf-player be removed from sarge? No, why? It's fixed in sid. (Did I put the wrong tag on it?) No, I was just going by the information in the BTS as quoted above. I should have checked to see if 0.3.3-1 had made it into sid. Sorry for the bother. -- Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300834: marked as done (python2.3-libxml2: not purgeing cleanly breaks other programs)
Your message dated Tue, 22 Mar 2005 16:32:19 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#300834: fixed in libxml2 2.6.16-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2005 06:14:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 21 22:14:20 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mx.stud.uni-hannover.de (studserv.stud.uni-hannover.de) [130.75.176.3] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DDcei-0002tN-00; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 22:14:20 -0800 Received: from schwan ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1]) by studserv.stud.uni-hannover.de (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j2M6EAJ5024818; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 07:14:10 +0100 (MET) Received: by schwan (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A9004C184; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 07:14:08 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ingo Saitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: python2.3-libxml2: not purgeing cleanly breaks other programs X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9 Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 07:14:08 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: python2.3-libxml2 Version: 2.6.16-3 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I installed python2.3-libxml2 as a dependency package and removed it again sometime later. I also use straw as a rss reader an suddenly it failed to fetch new data after a restart (see below). But straw was still working in a clean sid chroot, so I dug... It seems, python2.3-libxml2 does not bytecompile its files in /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages on its own, but somehow I got bytecompiled files (*.pyc and *.pyo for every *.py file), probably due to a python update which recompiled everything. These files were left over on the package purge causing straw to hiccup. Please read the Debian Python Policy, especially 2.5 Modules Bytecompilation how to correctly bytecompile and clean up: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ch-module_packages.html#s-bytecompilation Straw was displaying the errormessage 'module' object has no attribute 'create_parser' in the gui and the following Traceback on the console it was started at: PollManager.py:195:http_results: exception in summaryparser Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/straw/straw/PollManager.py, line 193, in http_results parsed = straw.SummaryParser.parse(data, self._feed) File /usr/lib/straw/straw/SummaryParser.py, line 47, in parse parsed_content = feedparser.parse(content) File /usr/lib/straw/straw/feedparser.py, line 2152, in parse saxparser = xml.sax.make_parser(PREFERRED_XML_PARSERS) File /usr/lib/python2.3/xml/sax/__init__.py, line 81, in make_parser return _create_parser(parser_name) File /usr/lib/python2.3/xml/sax/__init__.py, line 106, in _create_parser return drv_module.create_parser() AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'create_parser' Ingo - -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (800, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-schwan20050302 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages python2.3-libxml2 depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libxml2 2.6.16-3 GNOME XML library ii python2.3 2.3.5-1 An interactive high-level object-o -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCP7ew4XrXtQkN2NURAoL2AKCkM5TMWml0D5CUrbcYv7HvgyYIXQCeJ0LF SlHc9WV/+AsscB5T8IpvnFQ= =SKtk -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- Received: (at 300834-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2005 21:47:40 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 22 13:47:40 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DDrDv-0006Vl-00; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:47:40 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
Bug#299709: Shall I upload libexif1 to unstable
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 08:46:17PM +, Mark Purcell wrote: Now that libikexif1 has hit experimental shall I upload the release version to unstable? Both libkexif1 libkexif0 can co-exist in unstable together and libkexif0 won't be removed until all reverse dependancies are taken care of. That's not true; libkexif0 and libkexif1 are both built from the libkexif source package, so if you upload the experimental version of libkexif to unstable, the old libkexif0 binaries will be removed. If you change the source package name, it will have to go through NEW processing, AFAIK (and probably be rejected for a gratuitous name change). $ apt-cache rdpends libkexi0 libkexif0 Reverse Depends: digikam showimg libkexif0-dev kipi-plugins Given how few packages depend on this library, and given that one of them is already broken, there's probably no reason to hold off on uploading the new libkexif to unstable. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#300944: marked as done (python-librdf breaks with latest libcurl3 in sarge and sid)
Your message dated Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:46:26 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#300944: python-librdf breaks with latest libcurl3 in sarge and sid has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2005 20:26:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 22 12:26:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from jeffindy.licquia.org [216.37.46.185] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DDpwx-0006bK-00; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:26:03 -0800 Received: from sentinel.licquia.org (unknown [192.168.53.1]) by jeffindy.licquia.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E91851BB06 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:26:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.internal.licquia.org (server2.internal.licquia.org [192.168.50.4]) by sentinel.licquia.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC17BD22 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:25:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server2.internal.licquia.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3866710A70E for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:25:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.internal.licquia.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02570-02 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:25:51 -0500 (EST) Received: by server2.internal.licquia.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 14E7D10A710; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:25:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.52.2] (laptop1.internal.licquia.org [192.168.52.2]) by server2.internal.licquia.org (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:25:39 -0500 (EST) Subject: python-librdf breaks with latest libcurl3 in sarge and sid To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:25:31 -0500 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jeff Licquia [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.0.3 (Seattle Slew) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at licquia.org Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: python2.3-librdf Version: 1.0.0.2-1 Tags: sarge, sid Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ python Python 2.3.4 (#2, Dec 3 2004, 13:53:17) [GCC 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-2)] on linux2 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information. import RDF Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in ? File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/RDF.py, line 130, in ? import Redland ImportError: /usr/lib/libcurl.so.3: undefined symbol: tld_strerror [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg --list python2.3-librdf libcurl3 Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name VersionDescription +++-==-==- ii python2.3-libr 1.0.0.2-1 Python 2.3 language bindings for the Redland ii libcurl3 7.13.1-1 Multi-protocol file transfer library, now wi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo dpkg -i ~darrint/libcurl3_7.13.0-2_i386.deb dpkg - warning: downgrading libcurl3 from 7.13.1-1 to 7.13.0-2. (Reading database ... 70836 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace libcurl3 7.13.1-1 (using .../libcurl3_7.13.0-2_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libcurl3 ... Setting up libcurl3 (7.13.0-2) ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ python Python 2.3.4 (#2, Dec 3 2004, 13:53:17) [GCC 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-2)] on linux2 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information. import RDF [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ --- Received: (at 300944-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2005 21:46:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 22 13:46:26 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DDrCk-0006PL-00; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:46:26 -0800 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix,
Processed: merge 300788 300829
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: merge 300788 300829 Bug#300788: lshw: FTBFS(amd64/gcc-4.0): Missing Build-Depends on 'wget' Bug#300829: lshw: ftbfs [sparc] missing wget, tries to fetch over internet durring build Merged 300788 300829. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300780: marked as done (File conflict with liblucene-java-doc on unpacking)
Your message dated Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:17:20 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#300780: fixed in lucene 1.4.3-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2005 20:18:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 21 12:18:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from www15.mailshell.com (mailshell.com) [209.157.66.245] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DDTLf-0006nZ-00; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 12:18:03 -0800 Received: (qmail 9476 invoked by uid 99); 21 Mar 2005 20:18:02 - Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=GfX/QB7fLlpe/q1T6t4hsBuJKcj42XPA/Zx63/BNRz+JgYMbQZMT7O1carRmm7tmS5xOTCGVJYl/pkxAsIZAk+CDxao12HJGE3DcyRXgS2UKDzSKWWlQ44zaIPkg14BroD7HtjEzgrEs8ZAiFsPX8ySiwCMZXTXuskIlfdRH8eA= Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 12:11:10 -0800 Subject: File conflict with liblucene-java-doc on unpacking Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: liblucene-java Version: 1.4.3-3 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 7.5.1 Upon upgrading all installed packages, installation halted with the unpacking of the new version of liblucene-java because one of the files in the new version conflicted with a file in the old version of liblucene-java-doc. When I ran the upgrade command again, it ran to completion. It seems like this should simply require the appropriate versioned Conflicts/Replaces relationships to be declared. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7+phil1 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages liblucene-java depends on: ii j2sdk [java2-runtime] 1.4.2-1 J2SE Development Kit ii kaffe-pthreads [java1- 2:1.1.4.PRECVS8-2 A POSIX threads enabled version of -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 300780-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2005 22:29:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 22 14:29:15 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DDrsB-00045k-00; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:29:15 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DDrge-0003b7-00; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:17:20 -0500 From: Barry Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#300780: fixed in lucene 1.4.3-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:17:20 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: lucene Source-Version: 1.4.3-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of lucene, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: liblucene-java-doc_1.4.3-4_all.deb to pool/contrib/l/lucene/liblucene-java-doc_1.4.3-4_all.deb liblucene-java_1.4.3-4_all.deb to pool/contrib/l/lucene/liblucene-java_1.4.3-4_all.deb lucene_1.4.3-4.diff.gz to pool/contrib/l/lucene/lucene_1.4.3-4.diff.gz lucene_1.4.3-4.dsc to pool/contrib/l/lucene/lucene_1.4.3-4.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Barry Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated lucene package) (This message was generated
Bug#298806: marked as done (rebuild without libhowl0 dep)
Your message dated Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:04:44 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#295774: fixed in daapd 0.2.4a-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 01:49:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 09 17:49:20 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.73] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9Cnd-0003zD-00; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 17:49:17 -0800 Received: from double-helix.org ([68.154.213.225]) by imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 20:48:24 -0500 Received: by anemone (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C0C5DC6AD; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 20:46:02 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 20:46:02 -0500 From: Erinn Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: rebuild without libhowl0 dep Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-GPG-Key-Server: pgp.mit.edu User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: daapd Severity: grave Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free (on behalf on RM Steve Langasek) Please rebuild daapd without the libhowl0 dependency since it's moving to non-free. Thanks. -- off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide --- Received: (at 295774-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2005 22:27:52 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 22 14:27:52 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DDrqq-0003nG-00; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:27:52 -0800 Received: from joerg by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DDrUS-0002iw-00; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:04:44 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael A. Dickerson) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#295774: fixed in daapd 0.2.4a-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:04:44 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 7 Source: daapd Source-Version: 0.2.4a-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of daapd, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: daapd_0.2.4a-1.diff.gz to pool/contrib/d/daapd/daapd_0.2.4a-1.diff.gz daapd_0.2.4a-1.dsc to pool/contrib/d/daapd/daapd_0.2.4a-1.dsc daapd_0.2.4a-1_i386.deb to pool/contrib/d/daapd/daapd_0.2.4a-1_i386.deb daapd_0.2.4a.orig.tar.gz to pool/contrib/d/daapd/daapd_0.2.4a.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Michael A. Dickerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated daapd package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 15:58:13 -0800 Source: daapd Binary: daapd Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.2.4a-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Michael A. Dickerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Michael A. Dickerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: daapd - Serves music files using the Apple DAA protocol Closes: 289819 291517 293398 294920 295774 296386 298806 Changes: daapd (0.2.4a-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release. * daapd package is moving to contrib
Bug#295774: marked as done (Build-depends on libhowl-dev, which will become non-free or removed)
Your message dated Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:04:44 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#295774: fixed in daapd 0.2.4a-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jan 2005 12:19:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 11 04:19:43 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from (tsunami.hypair.net) [195.94.213.117] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CoKzu-0004xn-00; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 04:19:43 -0800 Received: from pe72.czempien.sdi.tpnet.pl (pe72.czempien.sdi.tpnet.pl [217.96.182.72]) by tsunami.hypair.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1336888EE for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 13:18:48 +0100 (CET) From: Jakub Stachowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mdnsresponder: Wrong license Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 13:20:33 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.91 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: mdnsresponder Version: 0.9.8-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.5 *** Please type your report below this line *** copyright file installed along with mdnsresponder contains standard BSD license. Hovewer: 1) COPYING file from original source states that portions of code are covered by APSL 2.0. This is because howl package consists of forked Apple's mDNSResponder (covered by APSL) and Porchdog's client library covered by BSD 2) mdnsresponder package contains almost only APSL2-licensed code. Therefore installing BSD license into /usr/doc/mdnsresponder/copyright is completely wrong. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (50, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-rc3eng Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2) (ignored: LC_ALL set to pl_PL) Versions of packages mdnsresponder depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 295774-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2005 22:27:52 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 22 14:27:52 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DDrqq-0003nG-00; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:27:52 -0800 Received: from joerg by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DDrUS-0002iw-00; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:04:44 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael A. Dickerson) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#295774: fixed in daapd 0.2.4a-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:04:44 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 7 Source: daapd Source-Version: 0.2.4a-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of daapd, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: daapd_0.2.4a-1.diff.gz to pool/contrib/d/daapd/daapd_0.2.4a-1.diff.gz daapd_0.2.4a-1.dsc to pool/contrib/d/daapd/daapd_0.2.4a-1.dsc daapd_0.2.4a-1_i386.deb to pool/contrib/d/daapd/daapd_0.2.4a-1_i386.deb daapd_0.2.4a.orig.tar.gz to pool/contrib/d/daapd/daapd_0.2.4a.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Michael A. Dickerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated daapd package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
Bug#285135: Remove from sarge
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 01:41:22PM -0800, David Schleef wrote: On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 10:03:29PM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote: These are all fixed in 0.3.3-1, which is blocked from even making it into sid because liboil0.3 is in NEW. So should swf-player be removed from sarge? No, why? It's fixed in sid. (Did I put the wrong tag on it?) Having this bug fixed in unstable doesn't do us any good for sarge if it's been replaced by a package that can't be built from source. Why does swf-player need liboil0.3? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#299634: marked as done (lapack-doc: Upgrade failed due to conflict.)
Greetings, and my apologies -- I bungled the fix I intended for -27 somwhere before the final upload, and also misread the original transcript. Am rebuilding now. Thanks again! Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: reopen 299634 thanks On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 07:52:18AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Greetings, and thanks for your report! This issue has been fixed to my knowledge in current testing/unstable, which is at -27. Please reopen if I am in error. You are in error. The transcript from the initial message showed that this error happened while trying to *install* -27. This file needs to be removed from one of lapack3-doc and lapack-doc, or the two packages need to conflict with one another, or you need to use alternatives for the manpage in question. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer Preparing to replace lapack-doc 3.0.2531a-25 (using .../lapack-doc_3.0.2 531a-27_all.deb) ... Document `lapack-doc.qref' is not installed, cannot remove. Document `lapack-doc.release' is not installed, cannot remove. Document `lapack-doc.faq' is not installed, cannot remove. Document `lapack-doc.lug' is not installed, cannot remove. Unpacking replacement lapack-doc ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/lapack-doc_3.0.2531a-27_all.d eb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man3/cgbequ.3.gz', which is also in package lapack3-doc -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED] == The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens. -- Baha'u'llah -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#299007: base-files: Insecure PATH
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 299007 critical Bug#299007: base-files: Insecure PATH in /root/.profile Severity set to `critical'. justification root security hole Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300961: rebuild without libhowl0 dep
Package: epiphany-browser Severity: grave Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free (on behalf on RM Steve Langasek) Please rebuild epiphany-browser without the libhowl0 dependency since it's moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on multiple architectures, so there should be a sourceful upload. Thanks. -- off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#273871: libsilc: Please sort this out, will you?
Package: libsilc Version: 0.9.12-4 Followup-For: Bug #273871 Oh come on, guys, this situation is very regrettable. Everybody involved in this case shares a common goal: to provide high-quality software to people. A lot of people has contributed a lot of work to the infrastructure of the Debian GNU/Linux OS. A lot of people has contributed a lot of work to this nice piece of software, SILC. These two efforts reach about 99% of the work that is needed to make SILC enter Debian. And the remaining 1% is missing, and this is a) keeping silky out of Sarge b) keeping the silc-gaim plugin out of Debian. All that is to be done is to integrate SILC to Debian properly. The amount of work required for this is insignificant compared to the work that has already been done. If you stop now, the efforts are wasted. Please, Toma, Please, Please, follow the rules of Debian! There are a _lot_ of Debian users out here, who NEED YOUR WORK! PLEASE, correct this bug, so that we can have it in Debian! You have solved many way more complex problems before... -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10 Locale: LANG=hu_HU, LC_CTYPE=hu_HU (charmap=ISO-8859-2) Versions of packages libsilc depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity inflation
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 299007 wishlist Bug#299007: base-files: Insecure PATH in /root/.profile Severity set to `wishlist'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299007: base-files: Insecure PATH
I have now sent the following to the BugTraq and FullDisclosure mailing lists, see e.g. http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/393997 http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2005-March/032804.html Cheers, Paul Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/ School of Mathematics and Statistics University of SydneyAustralia --- From psz Wed Mar 23 09:11:45 2005 To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com, full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk Subject: root-equivalent groups Most UNIX/Linux installations have some groups (or users) whose members may be able to become root, for example: Group WhatDo bin /usr/bincreate trojan disk/dev/hdaraw write and create setuid root kmem/dev/kmem read root password shadow /etc/shadow crack root password staff /usr/local/bin create trojan tape/dev/st0read confidential backup tape tty /dev/ttyadd keystrokes, run any code Often there are no users in these groups nor setgid binaries, so this may not matter; and in fact be useless, could be owned by root instead. Group staff is probably special in that administrators may add users to that group, thinking that this is a lesser privilege than root. Even in the absence of users in the group, it may be possible for attackers to get that group, via become-any-group-but-root bugs. Such bugs are quite common: when a group of machines share writable (e.g. user home) directories via NFS exported from somewhere with default root-squash, getting root on any one machine gives precisely that on all others of the group. There have been genuine such bugs also e.g. in sendmail. Please ensure that you are safe: review your use of root-equivalent groups, file ownerships, and NFS configurations. For some more discussion please see http://bugs.debian.org/299007 . Cheers, Paul Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/ School of Mathematics and Statistics University of SydneyAustralia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: same bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 300938 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. merge 300938 300684 Bug#300684: siproxd_1:0.5.10-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: compile errors Bug#300938: siproxd: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): too few arguments to function 'osip_message_parse' Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged: Values for `severity' don't match: #300684 has `serious'; #300938 has `normal' tags 300684 + pending Bug#300684: siproxd_1:0.5.10-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: compile errors Tags were: sid Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300979: rebuild without libhowl0 dep
Package: neutrino Severity: grave Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free (on behalf on RM Steve Langasek) libhowl0 is moving to non-free and neutrino has a dependency on it because another library you build-depend on previously used it. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on multiple architectures, so please make a sourceful upload. Thanks. -- off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300598: marked as done (strace 4.5.9-1(unstable/alpha): FTBFS: O_LARGEFILE undeclared)
Your message dated Tue, 22 Mar 2005 18:48:12 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#300598: fixed in strace 4.5.11-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Mar 2005 17:53:01 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 20 09:53:00 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp06.web.de [217.72.192.224] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DD4bj-pH-00; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 09:52:59 -0800 Received: from [84.184.63.29] (helo=juist) by smtp06.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (WEB.DE 4.104 #268) id 1DD4bC-0003dn-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 18:52:26 +0100 Received: from falk by juist with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DD4bE-0006XJ-7a for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 18:52:28 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: strace 4.5.9-1(unstable/alpha): FTBFS: O_LARGEFILE undeclared X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 18:52:27 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: strace Version: 4.5.9-1 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source strace 4.5.9-1 doesn't build on ia64 and alpha: if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I. -Ilinux/alpha -I../linux/alpha -Ilinux -I../linux -Wall -g -O2 -MT file.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/file.Tpo -c -o file.o ../file.c; \ then mv -f .deps/file.Tpo .deps/file.Po; else rm -f .deps/file.Tpo; exit 1; fi ../file.c:248: error: `O_LARGEFILE' undeclared here (not in a function) ../file.c:248: error: initializer element is not constant ../file.c:248: error: (near initialization for `openmodes[15].val') ../file.c:248: error: initializer element is not constant ../file.c:248: error: (near initialization for `openmodes[15]') ../file.c:251: error: initializer element is not constant ../file.c:251: error: (near initialization for `openmodes[16]') ../file.c:254: error: initializer element is not constant ../file.c:254: error: (near initialization for `openmodes[17]') ../file.c:258: error: initializer element is not constant ../file.c:258: error: (near initialization for `openmodes[18]') ../file.c:261: error: initializer element is not constant ../file.c:261: error: (near initialization for `openmodes[19]') ../file.c:270: error: initializer element is not constant ../file.c:270: error: (near initialization for `openmodes[20]') ../file.c:302: error: initializer element is not constant ../file.c:302: error: (near initialization for `openmodes[21]') ../file.c: In function `printstatfs64': ../file.c:1559: warning: unsigned int format, different type arg (arg 4) ../file.c:1559: warning: unsigned int format, different type arg (arg 5) ../file.c:1563: warning: unsigned int format, different type arg (arg 2) ../file.c:1563: warning: unsigned int format, different type arg (arg 3) ../file.c:1563: warning: unsigned int format, different type arg (arg 4) ../file.c: In function `sys_getdents64': ../file.c:2140: warning: long long unsigned int format, __ino64_t arg (arg 3) ../file.c:2140: warning: long long unsigned int format, __off64_t arg (arg 4) make[2]: *** [file.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/strace-4.5.9/build' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/strace-4.5.9/build' make: *** [stamp-build] Error 2 debuild: fatal error at line 764: dpkg-buildpackage failed! Full logs: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=stracever=4.5.9-1arch=alphastamp=1110392032file=logas=raw http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=stracever=4.5.9-1arch=ia64stamp=276044file=logas=raw -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: alpha Kernel: Linux 2.6.8 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages strace depends on: ii libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 300598-close) by
Processed: pending
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 300951 + pending Bug#300951: hevea: Removed with latest version of ocaml Tags were: sid Tags added: pending -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 299602 is important
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 severity 299602 important Bug#299602: error from cron job after Sarge upgrade Severity set to `important'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300961: marked as done (rebuild without libhowl0 dep)
Your message dated Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:54:25 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line nevermind has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2005 22:40:11 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 22 14:40:11 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.68] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DDs2k-0005aU-00; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:40:10 -0800 Received: from double-helix.org ([68.154.195.252]) by imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:39:40 -0500 Received: by anemone (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 239B5C6AD; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:39:22 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:39:22 -0500 From: Erinn Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: rebuild without libhowl0 dep Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-GPG-Key-Server: pgp.mit.edu User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: epiphany-browser Severity: grave Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free (on behalf on RM Steve Langasek) Please rebuild epiphany-browser without the libhowl0 dependency since it's moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on multiple architectures, so there should be a sourceful upload. Thanks. -- off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide --- Received: (at 300961-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Mar 2005 00:55:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 22 16:55:15 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.72] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DDu9T-0006tI-00; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 16:55:15 -0800 Received: from double-helix.org ([68.154.195.252]) by imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:54:44 -0500 Received: by anemone (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 90DADC6AD; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:54:25 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:54:25 -0500 From: Erinn Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: nevermind Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-GPG-Key-Server: pgp.mit.edu User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: It seems I was mistaken -- it only needs to be requeued on arm, not uploaded again. Sorry for the noise. -- off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300662: qalculate: New version depend on experimental version of library
hoi :) On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 11:31:51AM +1200, Carlos Z.F. Liu wrote: The new 0.7.2-2 version of qalculate depends on libatk1.0-0 (= 1.9.0). hmpf, I just noticed that, too. I only install a handfull of experimental packages and somehow atk must have sneeked in. I'll probably upload a new fixed version tomorrow. -- Martin Waitz signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#300422: Fwd: problems compiling
It looks like you're missing a build-depends for automake1.6 and libtool other than that, the patch works for me. thanks! -Tim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299709: Shall I upload libexif1 to unstable
On Tuesday 22 March 2005 22:53, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 08:46:17PM +, Mark Purcell wrote:
Now that libikexif1 has hit experimental shall I upload the release
version to unstable?
Both libkexif1 libkexif0 can co-exist in unstable together and
libkexif0 won't be removed until all reverse dependancies are taken care
of.
That's not true; libkexif0 and libkexif1 are both built from the libkexif
source package, so if you upload the experimental version of libkexif to
unstable, the old libkexif0 binaries will be removed.
Another reason to coordinate the libkexif upload with a showimg update.
I contacted Jean-Michel (DD of showimg, cc'ed) Monday last week via mail
already. This Monday I've prepare a deb (#300813). No response yet.
When Jean-Michel is ready we should (re)upload libkexif to sid together
with showimg, rebuild kipi-plguins and digikamimageplugins 0.7.2.
If you change the source package name, it will have to go through NEW
processing, AFAIK (and probably be rejected for a gratuitous name change).
When libkexif1{,-dev} is in sid (and later maybe even testing)
there's no need to have libkexif0{,-dev} binary pkgs.
$ apt-cache rdpends libkexi0
libkexif0
Reverse Depends:
digikam
showimg
libkexif0-dev
kipi-plugins
Given how few packages depend on this library, and given that one of them is
already broken, there's probably no reason to hold off on uploading the new
libkexif to unstable.
Short story:
This implies: broken digikam versus maybe will be broken showimg on arch !=
i386.
I was of course tempted but I resisted because I'm not involved in showimg
pkging.
Long version:
digikam 0.7.2, links against libkexif1 and conflicts with kipi-plugins and
digikamplugins in sid (linked against libkexif1). Therefore the 'need'
to upload libkexif1, and rebuild kipi-plugins and digikamplugins (that link
against libkexif1) in one go. [Everything already prepared in
http://www.mpe.mpg.de/~ach/debian/experimental (with dist = sid)]
But in this case showimg links against libkexif0 and would use kipi-plugins
that use libkexif1 :( This combination does not crash gwenview on i386
because the dynamicly loaded kipi-plugins use only the part of libkexif
that has not changed between libkexif 0 and 1. No idea show other archs
act with such a libkexif0/1 combination.
I hope Jean-Michel find soon time for a new showimg deb as e.g. prepared in
#300813
Achim
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
--
To me vi is Zen. To use vi is to practice zen. Every command is
a koan. Profound to the user, unintelligible to the uninitiated.
You discover truth everytime you use it.
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Cleaning
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 300765 serious Bug#300765: r-doc-html: Documents have nothing to do in /usr/lib Severity set to `serious'. reopen 300767 Bug#300767: r-doc-html: HTML documents in /usr/lib/R/doc/manual are loop symlinks Bug reopened, originator not changed. tag 300767 +unreproducible Bug#300767: r-doc-html: HTML documents in /usr/lib/R/doc/manual are loop symlinks There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible 300765 is a policy violation. No doubt about its severity. Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. 300767 is related to 300765. The way documents are symlinked because Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. they are not FHS-compliant mught have been the source of the bug. Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. Quickly, Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. Nowhere man Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. Too many unknown commands, stopping here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#300765: r-doc-html: Documents have nothing to do in /usr/lib
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 300765 wishlist Bug#300765: r-doc-html: Documents have nothing to do in /usr/lib Severity set to `wishlist'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
