NMU patch attached.
--
Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.blars.org/blars.html
With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature.
diff -ruN ../orig/sigcperl-0.2.0/debian/changelog
sigcperl-0.2.0/debian/changelog
---
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 297973 + fixed
Bug#297973: sigcperl: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): explicit qualification in
declaration of `std::string SigCPerl::get_string(SV*)'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
* Frank Lichtenheld:
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 11:53:52PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Frank Lichtenheld:
I mean, after closing fd _and_ unlinking the temporary file it is
completly gone and the race is open again, isn't it? Wouldn't be
the right fix to return the fd from the function
2005 m. rugsėjis 4 d., sekmadienis 02:44, Steve Langasek rašė:
This is not true; the package is both installable and usable. The C++
transition is nevertheless an RC bug on libdc0, because it is not
possible to rebuild this package (e.g., for a security fix) without
breaking the library ABI.
Package: cpio
Version: 2.6-4
Followup-For: Bug #326090
It's much worse than just that cpio -p does not copy dangling symlinks.
Try adding to your archive a symlink that's not dangling, but whose
target file is not in the archive. In this case, cpio dereferences the
link and includes the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 322524 grave
Bug#322524: wmfire: could'nt not install wmfire with libgtop2-5
Severity set to `grave'.
merge 316764 322524
Bug#316764: wmfire depends on unavailable package libgtop2-2
Bug#322524: wmfire: could'nt not install wmfire with
Subject: Uninstallable on sid; depends on unavailable packages
Package: lostirc
Version: 0.4.5-1
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
Some of the libraries that lostirc depends on were renamed as part of
the C++ ABI transition. The package is currently uninstallable on sid
and needs to be rebuilt.
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 316764 + pending
Bug#316764: wmfire depends on unavailable package libgtop2-2
Tags were: sid experimental
Bug#322524: wmfire: could'nt not install wmfire with libgtop2-5
Tags added: pending
tags 322524 + pending
Bug#322524: wmfire: could'nt not
Package: raidutils
Version: 0.0.4-6
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
raidutils failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc
pbuilder:
if sparc-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -O3 -DMESSAGES
-D_DPT_ACTIVE_ALIGNMENT -Dtrue=1
Package: ohphone
Version: 1:1.4.3+20050304-3
Severity: grave
The ohphone package is currently not installable in unstable due to
various library transitions:
# aptitude install ohphone
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading extended state information
Package: glibc
Version: 2.3.5-6
Severity: grave
The python2.3 package (as well as the 2.2 and 2.4 package) FTBFS on
hppa (see the buildd logs). The failures do not occur when downgrading
glibc to 2.3.2 from sarge, or using breezy's glibc. Not further
tracked down.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: t38modem
Version: 0.8.0+20050304-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
The t38modem package currently fails to build on m68k with the following
error:
[...]
g++ -D_REENTRANT -fno-exceptions -Wall -I/usr/share/pwlib//include -DPTRACING
-I/usr/include/openh323 -DHAS_OSS -Os -Wall
Package: yate-openh323
Version: 0.8.7+cvs20050604-1
Severity: grave
The yate-openh323 package is currently not installable in unstable due
to various library transitions:
# aptitude install yate-openh323
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading extended state
Package: openam
Version: 1.1.18+20050304-1
Severity: grave
The openam package is currently not installable in unstable due to
various library transitions:
# aptitude install openam
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing
Package: openmcu
Version: 2.1.0-1
Severity: grave
The openmcu package is currently not installable in unstable due to
various library transitions:
# aptitude install openmcu
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package
Package: pstngw
Version: 1.3.1-3
Severity: grave
The pstngw package is currently not installable in unstable due to
various library transitions:
# aptitude install pstngw
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package
Package: unison
Version: 2.13.16-1
Severity: serious
The recent upgrade to 2.13.16 broke unison in many ways simultaneously
and only the help of strace, my instinct, and definitely not the error
messages helped me get it running again. Maybe I have an installation
that the developers did not
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 325814 + unreproducible
Bug#325814: mergeant: FTBFS
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 05:02:14AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 08:16:48AM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
As far as packaging goes, this means you get the following packages:
libcurl3, providing libcurl3-openssl (linked against OpenSSL to avoid
breaking
sarge
Package: poppler
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
poppler 0.4.0-1 fails to build from source on Sid.
See the log attached.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 325814 + unreproducible
thanks
I can't reproduce the failure on a powerpc system. The log is here:
http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/mergeant_0.52-1_20050904-1025
Did you build in a clean and up-to-date chroot?
The only problem I found was this:
dh_shlibdeps -pmergeant
dpkg-shlibdeps:
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 11:42:25AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le samedi 03 septembre 2005 à 00:31 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
Yeah, right. binutils is unmaintained; the issue couldn't possibly be
that you've made poor design decisions in your packages by making them
dependent on
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 03:17:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#326585: fixed in openam 1.1.18+20050304-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 03:17:06 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#326584: fixed in ohphone 1:1.4.3+20050304-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 03:32:10 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#326586: fixed in openmcu 2.1.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
FWIW, I've started work on implementing the solution outlined in
http://curl.haxx.se/legal/distro-dilemma.html. However, my spare time is
very limited, so I can't promise anything about when (or even whether) I
can finish this.
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | GnuPG key:
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 03:32:11 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#326587: fixed in pstngw 1.3.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 310669 + patch
Bug#310669: krusader: [m68k, mipsel] FTBFS: autoconf: command not found
Tags were: sid
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#317863: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#318536: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#318536: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#321586: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#326048: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#326048: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:47:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#325681: fixed in ipy 0.42-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: alsa-utils
Version: 1.0.9a-3
Followup-For: Bug #325142
Just dropping a note here that the udev in unstable is .. in a nasty state.
Many udev bugs show this. I believe that currently installing the new
udev will break (along with large parts of the system) when booting into
2.6.8
Could this problem be related to the problems reported when running
liquidwar in valgrind? I saw several issues when running the binary
from the package, and the program refused to start. I decided to
rebuild with debug info and do a new test. This is the result:
reading past allocated memory
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.5
severity 319297 serious
Bug#319297: bigloo: missing build-dep on zip for jvm
Severity set to `serious'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Le dimanche 04 septembre 2005 à 03:04 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
If you're going to blame build failures on the toolchain, then policy
(and release policy) is quite relevant. There are in fact quite a few
toolchain options that *are* specified in policy: -O2, -O1, -O0, -g,
-Wl,-z,-defs,
Package: libqca1c2
Version: 1.0-7
Severity: serious
libqca1 has these files:
usr/lib/libqca.so.1
usr/lib/libqca.so.1.0
usr/lib/libqca.so.1.0.0
usr/share/doc/libqca1/changelog.Debian.gz
usr/share/doc/libqca1/copyright
and libqca1c2 has these:
usr/lib/libqca.so.1
usr/lib/libqca.so.1.0
Package: kde-i18n-de
Version: 4:3.4.2-3
Severity: serious
Unpacking replacement kde-i18n-de ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/kde-i18n-de_4%3a3.4.2-3_all.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/apps/khangman/de.txt', which is also in
package khangman
[EMAIL
Yes but its empty:
ls -l /usr/share/info/sed.info
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 2004-11-17 12:57 /usr/share/info/sed.info
Any idea where it came from?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 06:17:09 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#318285: fixed in xpvm 1.2.5-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: amarok
Version: 1.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi,
I really want to know how you are doing this package when I try to compile
amarok I see :
=== amaroK - ERROR ==
tag 318285 patch
thanks
Hi,
Here's the CAN-2005-2240 fix for woody and sarge (sid upload is already
in incoming).
Cheers,
Matej
diff -u xpvm-1.2.5/src/xpvm.tcl xpvm-1.2.5/src/xpvm.tcl
--- xpvm-1.2.5/src/xpvm.tcl
+++ xpvm-1.2.5/src/xpvm.tcl
@@ -831,7 +831,7 @@
set tfck [ info exists
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 318285 patch
Bug#318285: CAN-2005-2240 symlink attack in xpvm.tcl
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:17:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#262671: fixed in oleo 1.99.16-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:17:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#322233: fixed in oleo 1.99.16-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:17:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#287854: fixed in oleo 1.99.16-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:17:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#300294: fixed in oleo 1.99.16-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:47:03 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#326580: fixed in raidutils 0.0.4-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag #325335 +patch
Bug#325335: Greylisting Config. Doc. ist incorrect
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
tag #325335 +patch
thanks
Hello,
As you have spamassassin 3.X, you need to follow the 3.X instructions,
that are around line 190 of README.greylisting.gz, and which tell to use
eval:greylisting and a priority instead of the reseval hack.
However, the file is indeed badly worded, and unclear.
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:02:10 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#325763: fixed in speedy-cgi-perl 2.22-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 03:44:13PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 11:33:51PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
fixed[0], waiting for my sponsor... this package solves *only* this bug,
I want to get 0.34-1 into 3.1r1 too.
It's been two weeks since then. Problems with the
Package: kazehakase
Version: 0.3.0-1
In fact, kaze segfaults not only after startup, but after all attempts to open
an url in a new tab (for example, with middle mouse button).
This is really annoying.
The patch fixes the problem for me. Thanks a lot!
I experienced the problem in 0.3.0 and
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:02:05 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#325639: fixed in gnome-session 2.10.0-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
notfound 326611 1.3.0-1
close 326611
thanks
* Christian Marillat [Sun, 04 Sep 2005 15:38:31 +0200]:
Package: amarok
Version: 1.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
The amarok 1.3.0-1 package does _not_ FTBFS, see below. I'm hence
closing this bug.
I really want to know how you
Hi,
Here is a patch that fixes the signedness errors and some other errors
encountered while fixing.
I couldn't test this patch myself because I don't have any ext2
filesystems anymore. So please test if it still works.
Regards,
Matthijs Mohlmann
#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
##
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 316960 normal
Bug#316960: evolution: Evo doesn't display messages after crash
Severity set to `normal'.
tags 316960 moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#316960: evolution: Evo doesn't display messages after crash
There were no tags set.
Tags added:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
notfound 326611 1.3.0-1
Bug#326611: amarok: Doesn't build from source
Bug marked as not found in version 1.3.0-1.
close 326611
Bug#326611: amarok: Doesn't build from source
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:35:54 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#322643: fixed in libvncserver 0.7.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:47:05 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#326090: fixed in cpio 2.6-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:47:05 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#323141: fixed in cpio 2.6-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 12:50:52 -0300
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Closing the bug since it wasn't really a bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Hi,
I have uploaded an NMU to fix this RC bug, as part of the BSP this
weekend. The diff follows.
BTW, there are also a number of lintian warnings which could use some
attention.
Regards,
Roger
diff -urN xdelta-1.1.3.original/debian/changelog xdelta-1.1.3/debian/changelog
---
Hi,
I have uploaded an NMU to fix this RC bug as part of the BSP this
weekend. The patch follows.
BTW, there are a number of lintian warnings that could use some
attention, as well as upgrading to a more recent debhelper version.
Regards,
Roger
diff -urN
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 325571 important
Bug#325571: Evolution crashes on startup
Severity set to `important'.
severity 321746 important
Bug#321746: evolution: Evolution crashes with new version of libgnomecanvas2-0
installed
Severity set to `important'.
merge
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:47:05 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#323141: fixed in cpio 2.6-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 4 Sep 2005 11:53:53 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#326037: Preconfiguring: No `START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY' and no
`This file documents'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:47:05 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#326090: fixed in cpio 2.6-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
notfound 326611 1.3.0-1
close 326611
This close command is deprecated and should not be used.
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control
[...]
+ do not require TagLib 1.4.0 since it's not in Debian yet (#323280).
FYI,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package: libgal2.4-0
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
severity 318342 grave
Bug#318342: libgal2.4 causes evolution to crash when viewing message source
Severity set to `grave'.
severity 310612 grave
Bug#310612: libgnomecanvas2-0:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 297844 + fixed
Bug#297844: xdelta: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0):
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 325956 important
Bug#325956: depends on a FLAC library no longer available in unstable
Severity set to `important'.
severity 325643 important
Bug#325643: moc: uninstallable in sid (depends on libflac6 which is UNAVAILABLE)
Severity set to
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 09:02:12 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#287925: fixed in sodipodi 0.34-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 09:02:04 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#317613: fixed in bookmarkbridge 0.72-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
tag #324558 +patch
thanks
Hello,
The attached patch fixes this bug.
Please note that as we are during a BSP, a 0-day NMU policy is in place.
I will therefore upload a fixed package to DELAYED/0-day. I also attach
the NMU patch.
Regards,
--
Zorglub
Clément Stenac
--- Makefile.orig
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag #324558 +patch
Bug#324558: flite: FTBFS with current texi2html: Cannot find docs
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Has any progress been made with this bug?
After reviewing the patch patch/malloc.patch, it's clear this is
introducing KRisms which GCC 4.0 won't allow. These need replacing
with proper prototypes or, preferably, include a header containing the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 259912 + fixed
Bug#259912: wmsysmon: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: label at end of compound statement
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 09:32:04 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#258798: fixed in gnome-chess 0.3.3-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
* Christian Marillat [Sun, 04 Sep 2005 18:12:42 +0200]:
+ do not require TagLib 1.4.0 since it's not in Debian yet (#323280).
FYI, debian/patches/taglib-1.3.1-suffices.diff in the source package.
Of course upstream is stupid to make a depends on taglib 1.4 ?
Is this an irony?
Hi,
I have uploaded an NMU to fix this bug as part of the BSP this
weekend. This also fixes the usr/doc symlink creation. The diff
follows.
BTW, the standards-version is out of date, and there are bashisms in
the prerm which need removing.
Regards,
Roger
diff -urN
NMUed with the trivial (changelog-only) patch:
diff -Naur bonobo-1.0.22.bak/debian/changelog bonobo-1.0.22/debian/changelog
--- bonobo-1.0.22.bak/debian/changelog 2005-09-04 18:15:02.006989936 +0200
+++ bonobo-1.0.22/debian/changelog 2005-09-04 18:17:51.452230344 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 318974 + fixed
Bug#318974: libxbsql0: CXX 4.0 transition
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 12:52:43 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line m68k built with -O2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 308013 + fixed
Bug#308013: build against broken orbit
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 297738 + fixed
Bug#297738: uucpsend: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 09:50:25 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#323903: fixed in postgresql-plruby 0.4.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Christian Marillat [Sun, 04 Sep 2005 18:12:42 +0200]:
[...]
Of course upstream is stupid to make a depends on taglib 1.4 ?
Is this an irony? Anyway; if the required taglib is not in Debian, I
can't obviously use it. Unless it is determined that
Hello,
This bug can be closed. Since the upgrade to GTK 2.8.3, the bug has
gone.
Thanks.
--
eLShaman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 09:53:53 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#297973: fixed in sigcperl 0.2.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 324558 + fixed
Bug#324558: flite: FTBFS with current texi2html: Cannot find docs
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
I uploaded mostly Martin's patch with only some changelog adjustments:
(Sorry to Sven for ignoring his patch, but it was easier to edit
Martin's changelog entry to match what I wanted to have than his)
diff -u awstats-6.4/debian/changelog awstats-6.4/debian/changelog
---
Package: wipl
Version: 20020601-10
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'wipl' on unstable, I get the following error:
In file included from /usr/include/arpa/inet.h:23,
from common.h:5,
from wiplcSimple.cc:7:
/usr/include/netinet/in.h:50:1: warning: this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 247846 minor
Bug#247846: gnome-chess: Crashes after a few moves (assertion failed)
Severity set to `minor'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 322591 + fixed
Bug#322591: awstats: [CAN-2005-1527] arbitrary command injection
Tags were: patch security
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 19:28:04 +0200
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I uploaded mostly Martin's patch with only some changelog adjustments:
(Sorry to Sven for ignoring his patch, but it was easier to edit
Martin's changelog entry to match
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 10:47:09 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#322524: fixed in wmfire 1.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
