On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 07:14:30AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > atomic_ops/sysdeps/gcc/s390.h:33:31: error: ordered_except_wr.h: No such
> > file or directory
> > atomic_ops/sysdeps/gcc/s390.h:34:43: error:
> > all_aligned_atomic_load_store.h: No such file or directory
Looks like some missing
Your message dated Wed, 05 Oct 2005 23:02:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#332348: fixed in synaptic 0.57.5.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 05 Oct 2005 23:02:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#332340: fixed in synaptic 0.57.5.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 322273 +pending
Bug#322273: [CAN-2005-2456]: XFRM array index buffer overflow
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tag 328389 +pending
Bug#328389: CAN-2005-2800: memory leak in scsi procfs leads to local DoS
There were no tags set.
Tags ad
tag 322273 +pending
tag 328389 +pending
tag 330353 +pending
thanks
These bugs are fixed for 2.6.8 in SVN and are pending release.
#322273: CAN-2005-2456: XFRM array index buffer overflow
#328389: CAN-2005-2800: memory leak in scsi procfs leads to local DoS
#330353: kernel-source-2.6.8: CAN-2005-30
Package: netapplet
Version: 1.0.0-1
Followup-For: Bug #316212
Ubuntu Breezy seems to have resolved this bug already; they have a
netapplet package which is built against libiw28.
The Ubuntu diff can be found at
http://people.ubuntu.com/~scott/patches/netapplet/netapplet_1.0.0-1ubuntu4.patch
Th
Your message dated Thu, 6 Oct 2005 11:20:21 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line #329888: [hppa] binutils breaks hppa kernel build, bad
operands of fic,m
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Package: cyphesis-cpp
Version: 0.5.0-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of cyphesis-cpp_0.5.0-2 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (>> 4.0.0), librea
Package: libatomic-ops
Version: 1.0-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of libatomic-ops_1.0-2 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 42
[...]
> Checking correctness of source dependencies...
> Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.5-6
> linux
This is caused by one of the test runned by the make process, it tries
to parse a 68Kb comment (), in s390 this causes a segmentation
fault, in other architectures it doesn't.
If anyone (maybe you) can help me figure out how to solve this I would
be very happy :). I'm not very experienced with prog
Your message dated Wed, 5 Oct 2005 18:22:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line can't reproduce after reboot
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 332199 unreproducable
Unknown tag/s: unreproducable.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-up
Your message dated Wed, 05 Oct 2005 17:32:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#286925: fixed in gtkhx 0.9.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 05 Oct 2005 17:32:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322750: fixed in ghemical 1.90-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 05 Oct 2005 17:47:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320873: fixed in exult 1.2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Wed, 05 Oct 2005 17:47:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#295052: fixed in exult 1.2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Package: hmake
Severity: serious
hmake depends on ghc6|ghc5|nhc98
on arm the only one of these packages that is available is nhc98, but
this is going to be removed (see #331704).
So hmake needs to drop the arm binary.
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Debian Release: tes
Package: xezmlm
Severity: serious
xezmlm depends on ezmlm which was recently removed from unstable.
While this is not in itself an RC bug, because xezmlm is in contrib,
you need to make provisions that xezmlm can propagate to testing in
the future.
I will temporarily remove xezmlm from testing so
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 02:50:46AM +0300, Radu Spineanu wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > In that case, could fprobe be turned into a dummy package that depends
> > on fprobe-ng, or are there incompatibilties that make an automatic
> > upgrade inappropriate?
> Would it be ok if when doing the tra
Steve Langasek wrote:
> In that case, could fprobe be turned into a dummy package that depends
> on fprobe-ng, or are there incompatibilties that make an automatic
> upgrade inappropriate?
>
Would it be ok if when doing the transition i would upload fprobe-ng as
fprobe and then ask ftpmasters to
Package: synaptic
Version: 0.57.5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13
Locale: LANG
Your message dated Wed, 05 Oct 2005 16:05:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326697: fixed in avalon-framework 4.2.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 05 Oct 2005 16:05:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301192: fixed in avalon-framework 4.2.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 323084 + fixed
Bug#323084: Shouldn't have C++-transitioned -- not exporting C++ symbols
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> severity 323301 normal
Bug#323301: tcng outdated
Severity set to `normal'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> severity 323301 grave
Bug#323301: tcng outdated
Severity set to `grave'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sy
You gotta listen friend
All Watches arrive in a Luxury gift box - The Perfect Gift!
Dreaming about a IWC watch
http://048.newsbyaoeomsen.com/
your account is terminated :
ps:nomore? http://048.newsbyaoeomsen.com/rm/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
Package: synaptic
Version: 0.57.5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 11:30:46PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> > Automatic build of gnunet-gtk_0.7.0-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69
> [...]
> > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> > Build-Depends: gnunet (>= 0.7.0-1),
Package: libmusicbrainz2-dev
Version: 2.0.2-11
Severity: grave
libmusicbrainz2-dev depends on libmusicbrainz2 (= 2.0.2-11), which
doesn't exist; you meant libmusicbrainz2c2.
This affects all architectures.
-Josh
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
AP
Package: libmusicbrainz2c2
Version: 2.0.2-11
Severity: grave
Unpacking libmusicbrainz2c2 (from .../libmusicbrainz2c2_2.0.2-11_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libmusicbrainz2c2_2.0.2-11_i386.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/libmusicbrainz.so.2.0.1', which
Your message dated Wed, 5 Oct 2005 23:36:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libndbclient problems
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Your message dated Wed, 5 Oct 2005 23:43:58 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319042: mysql-dfsg still FTBFS for me
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Package: gnunet-gtk
Version: 0.7.0-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of gnunet-gtk_0.7.0-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: gnunet (>= 0.7.0-1), debhelper (>= 4.1
Your message dated Wed, 05 Oct 2005 14:13:59 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327261: fixed in wine 0.0.20050830-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Wed, 05 Oct 2005 14:13:59 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321222: fixed in wine 0.0.20050830-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 330595 normal
Bug#330595: Miscompilation with -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -funroll-all-loops
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
severity 330595 normal
thanks
Camm Maguire writes:
> Package: gcc-4.0
> Version: 4.0.1-5
> Severity: serious
>
> The following preprocessed file is miscompiled when compiled as follows:
>
> + /usr/bin/gcc -o ATL_F77wrap_ctrsv.o -c -DL2SIZE=4194304
> -I/fix/t1/camm/debian/atlas/atlas3-3.6.0/incl
Package: pvpgn
Version: 1.7.7-1
Severity: serious
pvpgn contains bsd licensed code (zlib) but don't mention this in the
debian/copyright file.
Bastian
--
Killing is wrong.
-- Losira, "That Which Survives", stardate unknown
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: pvpgn
Version: 1.7.7-1
Severity: serious
pvpgn links against its own zlib. This is considered as don't do it by
the release team.
Bastian
--
You! What PLANET is this!
-- McCoy, "The City on the Edge of Forever", stardate 3134.0
signature.asc
Description: Digital sign
Your message dated Wed, 05 Oct 2005 14:02:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#330822: fixed in distcc 2.18.3-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 04:02:07PM +0200, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 02:53:37PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Hi,
> > this potential license problem is blocking (among others) the transition
> > of 1.0.7-1, which fixes several serious security problems.
Package: htp
Version: 1.15-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of htp_1.15-2 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69
[...]
> make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/htp-1.15/tests'
> .../src/htp -NODEPEND macro.htp macro.html
>
> htp 1.15 -
Package: cvm
Version: 0.76-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of cvm_0.76-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: bglibs-dev (>> 1.020-0), dietlibc-dev [alpha amd64 arm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 330938 + fixed
Bug#330938: FTBFS: ICE on m68k, arm and hppa
Tags were: pending patch sid
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 330937 + fixed
Bug#330937: FTBFS: ICE on m68k, arm and hppa
Tags were: pending patch sid
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Package spampd
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: spampd
> Tags 332259 +security
Bug#332259: spampd fails with 'Error in process_request': Modification of
read-only variable in Syslog.pm
There were no tags set.
Tags added: security
> Severity 332259 crit
Package: vdslib
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable (uninstallable binaries)
libvds-dev still depends on the old libfltk1.1c102 package; please
rebuild it with GCC 4.0 and a recent version of libfltk1.1-dev
(1.1.6-6) or newer for the current C++ ABI transition.
AFAICT, this sh
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # These are the immediate blockers to installing cdebconf at all, which
> # also means it will soon be in a forced and broken state in testing.
> # This list may be incomplete.
> severity 332059 grave
Bug#332059: pango1.0 depends on debconf without | de
Package: lirc
Version: 0.7.1pre2-9
Followup-For: Bug #329897
It has been two weeks since this original bug report was sent...
(I would like to try lirc.) :)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Sh
Your message dated Wed, 5 Oct 2005 21:04:27 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line #323087: gs-esp - cups driver fails with ENOENT
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
The latest unstable upload of fwbuilder *is* 2.0.7-2. The latest
unstable upload of libfwbuilder is 2.0.7-5. I have verified that these
are available on the mirror for atleast half the supported arches.
Regards,
Jeremy
James Hughes wrote:
Pardon my ignorance, but where can I get the
Hi Bastian,
Do you still experience the failure with the current gs-esp in
unstable (8+8.15rc4.dfsg.1-2.1)?
I can't reproduce this with the CUPS test page. If it's still a
problem, please could you attach the print file and give some more
details about the driver in use and your print setup.
T
Pardon my ignorance, but where can I get these updated packages? They
don't seem to be available at packages.debian.org yet, and apt-getting
still leaves me at 2.0.7-2.
thanks,
James
--
James Hughes
Web application developer
Centre for Health Services and Policy Research
Vancouver, BC
Package: kmymoney2
Version: 0.8-6
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of kmymoney2_0.8-6 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69
[...]
> make[4]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'.
> make[4]: Nothing to be done for `install-data-am'.
> make
Your message dated Wed, 05 Oct 2005 10:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#332272: fixed in dmx4linux 2.5+dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Wed, 05 Oct 2005 10:32:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327991: fixed in kwirelessmonitor 0.5.91-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 05 Oct 2005 10:32:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327991: fixed in kwirelessmonitor 0.5.91-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: yacas
Version: 1.0.57-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: no longer builds from source
As you may have heard, Debian is undertaking an ongoing transition to
G++ 4. This affects yacas, particularly given that yacas-proteus
could really stand to be rebuilt against current fltk1.
Package: horde3
Version: 3.0.5-1
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Justification: root security hole
As part of the installation procedure in README.Debian, you are told to
configure horde3 via a web interface. This is done using an
Administrator account which requires no password. In the time t
Package: horde3
Version: 3.0.5-1
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Justification: root security hole
In the README.Debian, in section 6. it is recommended that the end
user executes:
chown root.www config/*
chmod 0440 config/*
becuase the "Some of Horde's configuration files c
Package: rscheme
Version: 0.7.3.4.b1-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of rscheme_0.7.3.4.b1-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0), libgmp3c2, lib
Package: mount
Version: 2.12p-4
File: /bin/umount
I run a server with / mounted ro. When maintenance is required on / then
I have to remount it rw, perform whatever operation is required and then
remount / ro. After installing the new util-linux and mount packages I
cannot do this. I get:
Package: omake
Version: 0.9.6.5-2-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of omake_0.9.6.5-2-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), autotools-dev, oca
Package: ocamlnet
Version: 1.1-4
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of ocamlnet_1.1-4 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69
[...]
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), ocaml-nox-3.08.3, libpcre-ocaml-dev (>=
> 5.10), libequeue-ocaml-dev, ocam
Package: vlc
Version: 0.8.4-svn20050823-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi,
vlc seems to fail to build from source, due to problems in
modules/gui/wxwidgets/open.cpp, trying to cast a wxWX2MBbuf (which
really aliases to a wxCharBuffer) into a "char *". (Example on line
1336; there are th
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Package: aime
Version: 0.60.3-7
Followup-For: Bug #292953
Hi!
The RC bug for aime is opened for quite a while now, and the abi
transition for c++ is also outstanding. I have prepared an NMU for the
package, it builds fine with the patch, if you leave off the chun
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have verified that the check_update.sh script in Debian is not
vulnerable to this. This was fixed up stream and we are running the
latest upstream version.
micah
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Hi,
> there has been a Gentoo advisory about insecure tem
Package: aqsis
Followup-For: Bug #324025
Please don't forget to upload a new revision with Andreas's fixes
applied. (Alternatively, may I NMU for this?)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: a
Package: muine
Version: 0.8.3-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When muine jumped the gun on gtk-sharp2 2.3.91, it did so only for
i386; on other architectures, the autobuilders naturally continued to
use 1.9.5. As such, could you please reupload the package, preferably
wi
Package: dmx4linux
Version: 2.5-1
Severity: serious
The code in tools/DMXDongle is non-free. It requires explicit written
permission for distribution. This code is not built, and so exists
only in the source package and not in the resulting binaries.
Thanks,
Shaun
Package: libflash
Version: 0.4.13-3
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
>From my build log:
Automatic build of libflash_0.4.13-3 on hertz by sbuild/kfreebsd-i386 1.170.5
...
Download complete and in download only mode
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Bu
Package: libflash
Version: 0.4.13-3
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of libflash_0.4.13-3 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), zlib1g-dev, libjpe
Package: lasso
Version: 0.6.3-3
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of lasso_0.6.3-3 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69
[...]
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), libxml2-dev, libxslt1-dev,
> libxmlsec1-dev, libxmlsec1-openssl, libglib2.0-
Luk Claes wrote:
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Please do, Luk. I am without a working Debian machine for some time now.
--
T
Package: ifstat
Version: 1.1-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
ifstat: Depends: libsnmp5 (>= 5.1) but it is not installable
E: Broken packages
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386 (i68
Package: gda2-freetds
Version: 1.2.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
gda2-freetds: Depends: libct1 but it is not installable
E: Broken packages
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386 (
Your message dated Wed, 05 Oct 2005 07:02:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#331382: fixed in syck 0.55-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 02:53:37PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Hi,
> this potential license problem is blocking (among others) the transition
> of 1.0.7-1, which fixes several serious security problems. As the problems
> some debian-legal people seem to have spotted haven't been noticed by n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Vers
Hi,
this potential license problem is blocking (among others) the transition
of 1.0.7-1, which fixes several serious security problems. As the problems
some debian-legal people seem to have spotted haven't been noticed by noone
else since the MPL is in use and triple-licensing is already being prep
Your message dated Wed, 05 Oct 2005 05:02:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#331608: fixed in libgtkimreg 0.1.3-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Wed, 05 Oct 2005 03:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#331610: fixed in mono-tools 1.1.9-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 05 Oct 2005 03:17:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320548: fixed in sdlperl 1.20.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> tags 327477 - unreproducible
Bug#327477: Breaks /dev/stdin, stdout, and stderr with UDEV.
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags removed: unreproducible
>
End of message, stopping processing
Your message dated Wed, 05 Oct 2005 02:47:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#303335: fixed in python-gnome 1.4.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Vers
Package: python2.3-soappy
Version: 0.11.3-1.3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
updating my sid today produces:
Unpacking python2.3-soappy (from .../python2.3-soappy_0.11.3-1.3_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/python2.3-soappy_0.11.3-1.3_a
I added "set -x" to /usr/bin/apt-move, output attached. Since the
error appears to happen in an awk script I attempted changing the awk
alternative from gawk to mawk, and the same error happend (different
temp file names and pids only).
Script started on Wed Oct 5 02:00:51 2005
]0;[EMAIL PROTECT
Package: yaboot-installer
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
During install with :
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/powerpc/current/debian-testing-powerpc-netinst.iso
It was the one from 3 october 2005
the yaboot install (complains about no Apple_Bootstrap p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> tags 325950 + pending
Bug#325950: depends on a FLAC library no longer available in unstable
Tags were: sid
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please cont
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> tags 321222 + pending
Bug#321222: libwine-jack: Needs rebuild against new jack
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
Howdy,
Sorry for the delayed response: I missed your previous email.
It appears that you're right: I should have used -1.0 instead of 1.0.
--
Matt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> This problem is actually caused by a problem with libfwbuilder
> 2.0.7-4 which is already corrected in 2.0.7-5 which was uploaded last
> night as part of the fix for Bug#331575.
Yepp, it works. Great. Thank you!
Regards, Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
94 matches
Mail list logo
