Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 303705 grave
Bug#303705: Incorrect libpng build-dependencies
Severity set to `grave'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
severity 335286 important
merge 335286 323133
thanks
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 09:59:30PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
reassign 335286 lilypond
thanks
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 08:49:17PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Compiling lilypond
penguin-command is now uninstallable except on i386. Accordingly
the severity of this bug has been raised to 'grave'. The package
will be removed from 'testing' if necessary to get the newest libpng into
etch.
On 8 Apr 2005, Karl Bartel wrote:
Thanks! I'll fix this in the next upload.
I guess
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 335286 important
Bug#335286: gcc: Internal error compiling lilypond on hppa,arm
Severity set to `important'.
merge 335286 323133
Bug#323133: [PR 21123, 4.0 regression, fixed in 4.1] ICE on arm m68k when
compiling arts (in cp_expr_size, at
Package: bandersnatch
Severity: serious
This contains the same sort of broken copyright file as shc and matanza.
It claims the package is copyright Craig Small; it's not, it's copyright
David Young (and possibly others; I don't know since I didn't look at all
the code). It says This package
Hi,
At Sat, 22 Oct 2005 16:42:03 +0200,
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Package: cupsys
Version: 1.1.99.b1.r4748-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on amd64 with the following
error:
Linking libcups.so.2...
/usr/bin/ld: array.o: relocation R_X86_64_PC32
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 328345 grave
Bug#328345: pgplot5: please rebuild against latest libpng
Severity set to `grave'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
clone 335291 -1
reassign -1 libcurl3-openssl-dev 7.15.0-3
retitle -1 curl-config --vernum is empty
thanks
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 12:44:13AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Package: mapserver
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Log at
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 335291 -1
Bug#335291: mapserver: FTBFS on hppa
Bug 335291 cloned as bug 335296.
reassign -1 libcurl3-openssl-dev 7.15.0-3
Bug#335296: mapserver: FTBFS on hppa
Bug reassigned from package `mapserver' to `libcurl3-openssl-dev'.
retitle -1
Hi,
I've NMU'd this as having Crypt::SSLeay broken makes me extremely
unproductive. The NMU diff is attached.
--
Joshua Kwan
diff -urN crypt-ssleay-0.51/debian/changelog
x/crypt-ssleay-0.51/debian/changelog
--- crypt-ssleay-0.51/debian/changelog 2005-10-22 23:58:03.0 -0700
+++
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
reassign 334938 libcrypt-ssleay-perl
Bug#334938: libssl0.9.8: libcrypt-ssleay-perl seg faults via https addresses
Bug reassigned from package `libssl0.9.8' to `libcrypt-ssleay-perl'.
Package: chrony
Version: 1.20-8
Followup-For: Bug #298709
Chrony just segfaults on amd64 with that patch.
Compiled with gcc 4.0.2 on testing.
gdb doestn't provide anything useful if I start it with the -d option
I tested it even with standard debian 2.6.8 kernel and gcc 3.4.5
(gdb) r -d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 334935 + fixed
Bug#334935: using Crypt:SSLeay coredumps perl
There were no tags set.
Bug#334938: libssl0.9.8: libcrypt-ssleay-perl seg faults via https addresses
Tags added: fixed
tag 334938 + fixed
Bug#334938: libssl0.9.8: libcrypt-ssleay-perl
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 00:11:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#304300: Should this bug be kept opened?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
editting
Hot Fortune 1000 Company On The Move, Watch It!
C0mpany: ESPRE Solutions, Inc.
Symb0L: EPRT . Pk
Current_Price: 1.O7
* Note: Massive Marketing Campaign Alert Starting Tuesday
At The Close Of The Market, Get In Early!
ESPRE Solutions, Inc. Receives TMC Labs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8
reassign 335286 g++-4.0
Bug#335286: gcc: Internal error compiling lilypond on hppa,arm
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-4.0' to `g++-4.0'.
forwarded 335287 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21123
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8
block 326224 with 335286
Bug#326224: kmldonkey_0.10-2(m68k/unstable/poseidon): fails to build from source
Was blocked by: 323133 323686
Blocking bugs added: 335286
merge 323133 335286
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8
forwarded 335286 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21123
Bug#335286: gcc: Internal error compiling lilypond on hppa,arm
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
posted mailed
Tommi Vainikainen wrote:
Hello members of debian-legal,
It isn't currently well known that Debian website's license is Open
Publication License, which has been judged to be non-free, and
therefore needs to be changed.
We know. ;-)
Currently web pages are Copyright ©
posted mailed
Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
Hi Francesco!
You wrote:
A less difficult solution is avoiding copyright assignements and simply
asking for a license change: each copyright holder should be tracked,
contacted and asked to agree with the relicensing.
I'm afraid that this will turn
Package: zvbi
Version: 0.2.17-3
Severity: grave
libzvbi0 declares a strict dependency on libzvbi-common (= ${Source-Version}).
This unfortunately breaks binNMUs; and as it happens, a binNMU was just done
of zvbi on sparc to correct for a wrong dependency picked up on a buildd.
Since dpkg-dev
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 02:02:10 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#335287: fixed in lilypond 2.6.3-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-10.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Output of apt:
Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-10.1) ...
Running fmtutil-sys. This may take some time. ...
Running updmap-sys. This may take some time. ...
updmap failed. Output has been stored in
Package: phpmyadmin
Tags: security
Severity: grave
This one seems to be different from the vulnerability mentioned in
Debian bug #333433.
From: Stefan Esser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Full-disclosure] Advisory 16/2005: phpMyAdmin Local File Inclusion
Vulnerability
To:
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 03:17:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#335103: fixed in apt 0.6.42.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Subject: k3b-i18n: k3b fails
Package: k3b-i18n
Version: 0.12.4a-2
Severity: serious
Justification: must
*** Please type your report below this line ***
The Package k3b is missed, but k3b-i18n is on the servers yet.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
Package: spamassassin
Version: 3.1.0a-1
Followup-For: Bug #335279
Hi, Duncan.
I'm also seeing the same problem reported by the original poster, but,
in my case, I had to install more packages to make the daemon start. If
I remember correctly, I had to install:
libnet-dns-perl
Hi,
Sebastien Helleu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Output of apt:
Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-10.1) ...
What does 'dpkg -l tetex-base' say?
Running updmap-sys. This may take some time. ...
[...]
!!! ERROR: The right location for map files has been
changed for this release and the map file
Package: apt
Version: 0.5.28.6
Severity: grave
File: /usr/bin/apt-get
Justification: renders package unusable
When trying to install the package libgtk2.0-dev, apt stops at this
errormessage:
# apt-get install libgtk2.0-dev Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some
Sebastien Helleu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for reporting. From which version did you upgrade?
I think from 3.0-10.
You can confirm by looking at /var/log/dpkg.log.
Interesting, current tetex has 'true' for the last two options. What is
the output of 'ls /etc/texmf/updmap.d/'? Did you
Sebastien Helleu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ ls -l /usr/share/texmf/dvips/
total 52
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2005-10-22 18:08 antp
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2005-10-22 18:08 antt
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2005-10-23 02:13 base
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2005-10-22 18:08 bluesky
Thank you for your report. I expect to soon upload a version with a
slightly different patch.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Elmwood, WI USA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
forwarded 334001 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=313454
thanks
Hi,
This is a python 2.3/2.4 issue, rebuilding python-vte with python 2.4
permits using python-vte with python 2.4. I'm discussing this with
pygtk's upsream for now.
Cheers,
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 13:45 +0200, Sebastien Helleu wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 12:12:51PM +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote:
Thanks for reporting. From which version did you upgrade?
I think from 3.0-10.
Where there any problems with version 3.0-10?
What is
the output of 'ls
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign #334001 pygtk 2.6.3-1
Bug#334001: Importing vte in python doesn't work
Bug#334668: ImportError while trying to import the vte module
Bug reassigned from package `python-vte' to `pygtk'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forwarded 334001 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=313454
Bug#334001: Importing vte in python doesn't work
Bug#334668: ImportError while trying to import the vte module
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 334898 grave
Bug#334898: tcl8.4: tclcurl FTBFS because tclsh SEGVs on hppa
Severity set to `grave'.
retitle 334898 tcl8.4: tclsh SEGVs on hppa
Bug#334898: tcl8.4: tclcurl FTBFS because tclsh SEGVs on hppa
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Stopping
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 14:41:20 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#335344: /usr/bin/apt-get: Unable to install libgtk2.0-dev,
dependencies issue
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Package: udev
Version: 0.056-3
Followup-For: Bug #328875
Perhaps I'm missing something, but I seem to be in an infinite loop.
I can't finish the udev upgrade without kernel = 2.6.12, but I can't
upgrade my kernel until the udev problem is fixed.
astra:/var/lib/dpkg/info# apt-get -f install
Kenshi Muto writes:
Hi,
At Sat, 22 Oct 2005 16:42:03 +0200,
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Package: cupsys
Version: 1.1.99.b1.r4748-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on amd64 with the following
error:
Linking libcups.so.2...
/usr/bin/ld:
found 334999 0.23-3
tag 334999 patch
thanks
Sorry, but you made a little mistake again. While your code in
debian/rules is mostly correct it misses the fact that
DEB_HOST_ARCH is no predefined variable, you have to set it yourself.
So please add something like
DEB_HOST_ARCH ?= $(shell
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
found 334999 0.23-3
Bug#334999: FTBFS on arm/hppa/m68k: please use g++-3.4
Bug marked as found in version 0.23-3.
tag 334999 patch
Bug#334999: FTBFS on arm/hppa/m68k: please use g++-3.4
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:12:07 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#334835: kdewebdev: ftbfs [sparc] error: expected
class-name before '{' token
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Package: libdjvulibre15
Severity: critical
While trying to install the PDF viewer Evince, which depends on
libdjvulibre15, I noticed that libdjvulibre15 is uninstallable
and hence breaks evince also. Here is the output of apt-get.
radio:/home/rkrishnan# apt-get install evince
Reading package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 21:41:03 -0600
Vagrant Cascadian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
attached should be a patch adding crude xserver-xorg support for
0.5.3cvs.20040906-16
Thanks alot!
- Jonas
- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
*
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8
severity 335298 normal
Bug#335298: zvbi: strict arch:any-arch:all dependencies break binNMUs
(uninstallable on sparc)
Severity set to `normal'.
End of message, stopping processing
Package: gfpoken
Version: 0.27-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of gfpoken_0.27-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69
[...]
install: cannot create directory `/home/buildd': Permission denied
ln: creating symbolic link
Package: anon-proxy
Version: 00.02.39-7
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi,
I tried to rebuild anon-proxy on i386, it fails.
Please find attached patch to fix that.
Regards
Petr
diff -ur anon-proxy-00.02.39/CACertificate.cpp anon-proxy.new/CACertificate.cpp
---
failed
Trying to reinstall removed packages:
Trying to uninstall newly installed packages:
Source-dependencies not satisfied; skipping printbill
**
Finished at 20051023-1054
Build needed 00:00:00, 0k disk space
Thanks! I'll fix this in the next upload.
I guess it is about time for that next upload.
Absolutely.
Hope you're OK, Karl.
I'm OK, but sometimes a grave bug is needed to bring my attention
back to my old games. I just uploaded a new version.
Thanks for the heads up and sorry that it
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 06:47:09 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#334935: fixed in crypt-ssleay 0.51-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 06:47:09 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#334935: fixed in crypt-ssleay 0.51-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 06:47:09 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#334938: fixed in crypt-ssleay 0.51-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 06:47:09 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#334938: fixed in crypt-ssleay 0.51-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:57:52 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#335317: k3b is missing, but k3b-i18n is already there
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Package: dovecot-imapd
Version: 1.0.alpha3-2.0.1
Followup-For: Bug #334180
If you need a working dovecot revert to version 1.0.alpha3-1 (26-Sep-2005)
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-common_1.0.alpha3-1_i386.deb
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 11:59:18PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
--- crypt-ssleay-0.51/SSLeay.xs 2003-05-27 23:55:02.0 -0700
+++ x/crypt-ssleay-0.51/SSLeay.xs 2005-10-22 23:57:45.0 -0700
@@ -105,6 +105,8 @@
static int bNotFirstTime;
char buf[1024];
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:02:09 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#303705: fixed in penguin-command 1.6.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:19:37 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#333780: fixed in libicq2000 0.3.2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:17:04 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#333856: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.32
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:17:04 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#334467: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.32
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
tag 332462 + pending
thanks
Moi!
I have now stuffed prestimel 1.0-3.1 as proposed earlier, into the
delayed queue on gluck with a delay of two days.
Regards,
Daniel.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 08:17:13 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#335285: fixed in kdebase 4:3.4.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
configure-stamp
# Add here commands to clean up after the build process.
#-/usr/bin/make clean
python setup.py clean
make: python: Command not found
make: *** [clean] Error 127
**
Build finished at 20051023-1345
FAILED [dpkg
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 332462 + pending
Bug#332462: FTBFS: libmagick++ transition
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 14:17 +0200, Florent Rougon wrote:
Good. Presumably, the problem was located (only) in /etc/texmf/updmap.d/
as suspected by Ralf.
Actually, I suspect that there is a similar situation in
/etc/texmf/texmf.d/, ie, some configuration files from teTeX 2 are still
used. This
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:17:04 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#300176: fixed in basket 0.5.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hello,
Thank you for reporting this bug. I had noticed that on several platforms the
source failed to build. However, this seems to be a problem with blender.
For details see bug #330920.
I had noticed that it tried (and failed) to create some config files in the
home directory, but that
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#220056: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#318233: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#324848: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#324970: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#324848: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#330012: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#321550: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#320883: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#327932: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:32:05 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#334034: fixed in kcheckgmail 0.5.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#327932: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:17:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#314157: fixed in debootstrap 0.3.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:17:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#314373: fixed in debootstrap 0.3.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:17:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#334506: fixed in debootstrap 0.3.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:17:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#334521: fixed in debootstrap 0.3.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
used. This could cause a wrong search path for mapfiles. What I am
wondering is why this problem didn't occur during the original 2.0.2 -
3.0 update. Also, why are dvips35.map and pdftex35.map still available
in /etx/texmf/dvips? I thought these files are
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:47:10 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#335284: fixed in lessdisks 0.5.3cvs.20040906-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Package: nvidia-kernel-source
Version: 1.0.7174-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Since I upgraded to 2.6.13, nothing seems to create /dev/nvidia* entries
for me, with the result that X dies on startup with the message failed
to initialize NVIDIA kernel module!.
The
Package: penguin-command
Version: 1.6.9-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi Karl,
it seems you forgot a build-depends on libsdl-image1.2-dev, the package has
failed to build on six arches so far.
Automatic build of penguin-command_1.6.9-1 on garkin by sbuild/m68k 69
** Using build
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 19:23:40 +0200 Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
[...]
Thanks for this analysis. I will go through it before preparing the
next upload.
You're welcome.
Some small comments:
I don't yet plan to remove the GFDL stuff, will do
that later in the release cycle... It's just too
Package: libgmp3-doc
Version: 4.1.4-6
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
According to the copyright file (and the texinfo file itself),
the GMP documentation is released under the GFDL license (v1.1
or later) and hence does not comply with the DFSG.
See
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David D. Smith) writes:
Package: w3-url-e21
Version: 2001.11.08-9
url claims to support SSL transfers but the support is broken since
the migration of the HTTP handler to emulating synchronous transfers
with asynchronous transfers (which I believe was around the time of
Thanks for letting me know. Seems that the file in the archive is not
the one I created. (was acedently changed at my sponsor).
To address this problem I've created version 3.0.6.1 at
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/efax-gtk/
Please test it. If it's OK, I'll arrange an upload.
Package: xfs-xtt
Version: 1:1.4.1.xf430-6
Severity: serious
During installation I noticed following message:
Setting up xfs-xtt (1.4.1.xf430-6) ...
chown: `xfntserv:xfntserv': invalid user
dpkg: error processing xfs-xtt (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 323884 serious
Bug#323884: xfs-xtt: /etc/init.d/xfs-xtt is incorrect
Severity set to `serious'.
severity 330340 serious
Bug#330340: A typo in the initscript file of xfs-xtt
Severity set to `serious'.
merge 330340 323884
Bug#323884: xfs-xtt:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
severity 328333 serious
Bug#328333: printbill: please rebuild against latest libpng
Severity set to `serious'.
merge 328333 335365
Bug#328333: printbill: please rebuild against latest
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 16:17:06 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#327610: fixed in libabz 0.6.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Subject: FTBFS with recent l-k-h; should not use l-k-h
Package: dcgui
Version: 0.80-2
Severity: serious
FTBFS with the following error:
In file included from /usr/include/asm/atomic.h:26,
from /usr/include/linux/sem.h:5,
from callbacks.c:33:
Subject: FTBFS with recent l-k-h; should not use l-k-h
Package: dctc
Version: 0.85.9-2
Severity: serious
In file included from /usr/include/asm/atomic.h:26,
from /usr/include/linux/sem.h:5,
from main.c:41:
/usr/include/asm/cpu-features.h:15:35: error:
Package: libsvncpp-dev,libapr0-dev
Severity: serious
that means, that pysvn's build-deps cannot be installed
anymore. Please coordinate, if these these packages should depend on
libdb4.2-dev or libdb4.3-dev.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Package: vncserver
Version: 3.3.7-7
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
vncserver lets me in without supplying the full password.
To reproduce this:
start vncserver: vncserver :1
whe prompted enter a password of eight or more characters
start xvncviewer and connect
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 16:50:14 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#334055: fixed in zope2.7 2.7.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
